Commit Graph
2 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
Juan DenisandClaude Opus 4.8 a55e50bc16 feat(extensions): Phase 5 — extract WordPress into serverkit-wordpress (backend)
The largest single move in the plan (#38). The entire WordPress backend leaves
core for the bundled, default-installed serverkit-wordpress extension (D4).

Moved (12 files → builtin-extensions/serverkit-wordpress/backend/, intra-extension
imports made relative, core imports stay absolute):
  api/wordpress.py, api/wordpress_sites.py, api/environment_pipeline.py,
  wordpress_service.py (2676 lines), git_wordpress_service, wordpress_env_service,
  wordpress_plugin_library_service, wp_analytics/reports/security/update/vulnerability.

Wiring:
- Blueprints keep /api/v1/wordpress, /wordpress/projects and the /wordpress/pipelines
  alias (D9) via new manifest `extra_blueprints` support (3 blueprints / 4 mounts).
- Flagship (D4): seeded active on every panel (fresh + upgrade), uninstallable,
  never deletes tracked builtin/pre-bundled files; the `wordpress` module toggle is
  retired (MODULES now empty) — the plugin status guard is the gate.
- Loadability: the dashed package app.plugins.serverkit-wordpress is registered
  in-place via spec_from_file_location (no copy) — uniform across prod/dev/test.
- The 11 WP test files re-pointed through app.services.wordpress_bridge; the 6 lazy
  core callers were re-pointed in the prior commit.
- _regenerate_frontend_manifest() is a no-op under testing so the flagship boot
  seed can't clobber the checked-in plugins-manifest.json.

Deviations (documented, matching the Email precedent):
- WordPress *models* stay core — status_page/environment_activity/promotion_job hold
  FKs into wordpress_sites, so relocation would be a breaking data migration.
- Event catalog + Fail2ban WP filter stay core as two-speed items (extension calls
  them via core APIs); inverting adds risk without blocking the move.
- Frontend UI stays core this session (it lives in a TabGroupLayout — the tab-grouped
  conversion Phase 1 deliberately deferred); the extension is backend-only, so there
  is no route duplication. Frontend contribution is the scoped follow-up.

Verified: clean collection across all 1223 tests; 199 passed / 2 skipped / 0 failed
across the WP + plugin/extension + module + backup + core-caller parity set, incl.
the new tests/test_wordpress_extraction.py proving the move.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-02 00:15:10 -04:00
Juan DenisandClaude Opus 4.8 92c435d436 refactor(unify): §7 — WordPress reachable through the generic /apps surface
Additive API consolidation (plan §7 Phases 3–4) that exposes a WordPress site
through its Application id, treating WordPressSite as the 1:1 extension table it
already is:
- GET  /apps/:id/wordpress            → {is_wordpress, site_id, env_type, ...}
- GET  /apps/:id/db-snapshots         → WP DB snapshots (was §8-deferred)
- POST /apps/:id/db-snapshots         → create
- DELETE /apps/:id/db-snapshots/:id   → delete
All grant-aware via the apps.py access seam (ResourceGrantService).

Deliberately NOT done (plan §7 Phase 1/2, with rationale): blanket-setting
app_type='wordpress' on WordPressSite-linked apps. Recon showed many WP sites are
app_type='docker', and 14+ docker-compose/nginx/scale/sleep code paths key on
app_type=='docker' — changing it would silently break start/stop/restart/logs/
status/domain config for containerized WP. The codebase already treats the
WordPressSite record (not app_type) as the source of truth (wordpress.py
_is_wp_app), which is the correct architecture; flipping app_type would regress
it. Frontend WordPress→Services merge likewise deferred (the /wordpress/:id route
is site-id-keyed).

Verified: 6 new surface tests + WP/resource-grant regression suites pass (23).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-24 14:46:14 -04:00