Commit Graph
17 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
Aleksei Sviridkin ad62a8d62b test(e2e): stop blocking merges on the tenant node-join deadline
The tenant node-join wait no longer discriminates. Nested
virtualisation on the shared runners degrades far enough that a guest
which registers in minutes on real hardware can miss any deadline this
test can afford, so a red on that one wait says as much about the
machine the run landed on as about the product, and it teaches a
reader to re-run the job.

The suite still fails on it. That is what keeps Chainsaw's catch
running: the previous-instance container logs, the host snapshot, the
data-plane capture and the event dump are all keyed on the test
failing, and the report stays honest. What changes is one layer up.
The wait writes a marker beside its diagnostics, and a new lane-side
gate reads that marker to decide whether the job blocks. It opens only
when every failed test in the run carries one, and blocks on anything
it cannot attribute: a report it could not read, a failed test the
report does not name, a failure with no marker.

Only the lanes that block a merge ask it. The two pull-request lanes
do; nightly and the tag lane run the same suites and stay hard. A soft
pass on the tag lane would ship a release candidate whose tenant
clusters brought up no worker nodes, and nightly is the only place an
e2e failure reaches anyone who did not open a pull request, since no
lane in this tree notifies anywhere.

A softened red finishes the job green, so the job's result stops
answering whether the suite passed, and both kinds of consumer are
handed the decision instead of inferring it. A step gated on the job
failing would silently stop running: the SSH breakpoint is that case,
and it still opens for a pull request marked for debugging. A job that
reports the result would silently start reporting a pass: the required
commit status now says the deadline was missed and that the merge is not
blocked on it, rather than that the suite passed.

The deadline goes to 29m. That is the test's own budget and nothing
more: its clock starts after the machinedeployment wait, the
LoadBalancer assignment and the healthz probe, while the chart's
autoscaler and health-check timers have been running since the Machine
was created, so no ordering against them is claimed. The chart's 20m
and 30m give a scale to pick against, and a budget over the first
leaves room for a remediation cycle without promising that one fits.

The operation ceiling both suites give the script rises with the
deadline, and the diagnostics phase budget rises inside it, because
the collectors gated ahead of the serial console cost more between
them than the old budget covered. Both budget guards read their terms
from the sources that set them. The e2e job cap rises with them, and
its guard holds what a guard can hold: the pair's operation and catch
ceilings, and one figure across every lane that runs the suite. It
also records that the suites' full summed ceilings have never fit any
cap in that file, so the margin above the bound is taken from a
measured run instead. The prose that restates the cap elsewhere moves
with it, and the sweep that holds the deadline's restatements now
reads the figure spelled in words as well as in minutes.

Assisted-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
Signed-off-by: Aleksei Sviridkin <f@lex.la>
2026-08-21 12:52:42 +03:00
Aleksei Sviridkin 86fb92abf5 docs(tests): correct five stale claims in the e2e capture tooling (#3662)
<!-- Thank you for making a contribution! Here are some tips for you:
- Use Conventional Commits for the PR title: `type(scope): description`
- Types: feat, fix, docs, style, refactor, perf, test, build, ci, chore
- Scopes are not an exhaustive list — pick the most specific scope for
the change and extend the list when a genuinely new area appears.
Examples:
- System components: dashboard, platform, operator, cilium, kube-ovn,
linstor, fluxcd, cluster-api
- Managed apps: postgres, mariadb, redis, kafka, clickhouse,
virtual-machine, kubernetes
- Development and maintenance: api, hack, tests, ci, docs, maintenance
- Breaking changes: append `!` after type/scope (`feat(api)!: ...`) or
add a `BREAKING CHANGE:` footer
- If it's a work in progress, consider creating this PR as a draft.
- Don't hesistate to ask for opinion and review in the community chats,
even if it's still a draft.
- Add the label `backport` if it's a bugfix that needs to be backported
to a previous version.
-->

## What this PR does

Five things in the e2e tooling said something the code no longer does,
or did not say it at all. All five are prose; no executable line
changes.

`docs/agents/e2e-testing.md` section 8 described two of the three
on-failure capture legs. The missing one is
`hack/e2e-capture-dataplane.sh`, the only leg that reads forwarding
state off the node rather than object state, and the only one whose two
callers bound it differently, 600s from the BATS runner and 300s from
the Chainsaw catch. That split is what decides whether something added
to it fits, so a contributor who reads the document and not the script
sizes a change against the wrong budget. Its notes contract is described
with the carve-out the script declares itself: the two EndpointSlice
reads in the LoadBalancer path report nothing either way, so a `<none>`
backend line there is the one place a reader still cannot tell an
endpointless Service from a read that never answered.

The same section said the runner's captures serve "the BATS tests" in
two places. They serve the e2e ones. The runner keys on an `e2e-`
prefix, on the suite's own filename or on its parent directory, because
all three legs read cluster state and a unit runner has `kubectl` on
PATH with no cluster behind it. The legs are not gated alike either, so
the sentence says which fired where: two key on `kubectl`, and the
snapshot leg keys on `crust-gather` being installed, which on a unit
runner it usually is not.

Two numbers in the capture-gate rationale in `hack/cozytest.sh` no
longer described the code. The snapshot leg's cost was given as 360s,
the deadline passed to `timeout`; the leg is invoked as `timeout -k 30
360`, so the trap waits out 390s, which is what the comment forty lines
below and the op-budget arithmetic in `.chainsaw.yaml` already said. And
the data-plane leg was still described as having no bound on its first
pod list, and billed at the full 600s on that basis, after that read was
given a 28s ceiling.

Two files enumerated the BATS suites and both stopped one short. The
global catch in `hack/e2e-chainsaw/.chainsaw.yaml` said the runner it
names as its analog "only covers the BATS install/openapi tests", and
`hack/e2e-chainsaw/README.md` named the same two files. Both miss
`hack/e2e-prepare-cluster.bats`, which `packages/core/testing/Makefile`
drives through that runner, and which is the suite whose failures leave
the sandbox in the state hardest to reconstruct afterwards.
`docs/agents/e2e-testing.md` already listed all three, so the tree
disagreed with itself depending on which file you opened.

A comment in `hack/e2e-install-cozystack.bats` pointed at
`hack/e2e-apps/run-kubernetes.sh`, which does not exist; that directory
holds two monitoring suites and no runner. The readiness gate it means
is the `rollout status` wait in
`hack/e2e-chainsaw/_lib/talos-image-cache.sh`, along with both fallbacks
to the public factory.

relates to #3626 and #3642


### Screenshots

<!-- REQUIRED for UI changes: attach screenshots or screen recordings
demonstrating
the visual impact of your changes. PRs with UI changes without
screenshots will not be merged. -->

### Downstream repositories

<!--
Cozystack is upstream for repositories that are NOT kept in sync with it
automatically, and nothing in CI compares the two sides, so a change
here can break them silently.

Which change forces what, and which file to touch, is the trigger map in
docs/agents/contributing.md under "Downstream Repositories". Walk it
before you tick anything.

IF YOU ARE AN AI AGENT OR AN LLM, THIS IS PART OF THE TASK, NOT A FORM
TO FILL IN:

1. Walk the trigger map against the actual diff of this PR, file by
file. Do not decide from the PR title or from your memory of what you
changed.
2. For every repository you tick, open the follow-up PR there and link
it on the same line. A ticked box with no link claims work that does not
exist, which is worse than an empty box. Search that repository for an
open PR or issue covering it first, and link that instead of filing a
duplicate.
3. When the follow-up is out of scope, or needs a decision that is not
yours to make, open an issue in that repository instead, link that, and
say so in the PR body. Do not push a speculative PR into another
repository just to fill a line here.
4. Do not tick "No downstream repository is affected" to make the
checklist go away. If you are unsure, leave every box empty and say so
in the PR body, so a human decides.
-->

- [x] No downstream repository is affected by this change
- [ ] [cozystack/website](https://github.com/cozystack/website) -
follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/terraform-provider-cozystack](https://github.com/cozystack/terraform-provider-cozystack)
- follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/ansible-cozystack](https://github.com/cozystack/ansible-cozystack)
- follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/ccp](https://github.com/cozystack/ccp) - follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/talm](https://github.com/cozystack/talm) - follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/cozyhr](https://github.com/cozystack/cozyhr) -
follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/cozy-proxy](https://github.com/cozystack/cozy-proxy) -
follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/cozystack-telemetry-server](https://github.com/cozystack/cozystack-telemetry-server)
- follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/external-apps-example](https://github.com/cozystack/external-apps-example)
- follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/examples](https://github.com/cozystack/examples) -
follow-up:

### Release note

<!--  Write a release note:
- Explain what has changed internally and for users.
- Start with the same `type(scope):` prefix as in the PR title
- Follow the guidelines at
https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/guide/release-notes.md.
-->

```release-note
NONE
```
2026-08-09 04:08:35 +03:00
Aleksei Sviridkin c6961541f3 fix(tests): report a data-plane capture cut short by its backstop
Both callers of the data-plane collector wrap it in a wall-clock backstop
and threw the result away with `|| true`, while the previous-instance
logs leg sitting beside each of them records the exit status and prints
"INCOMPLETE (exit N); kept what landed in ...". When a backstop killed
the collector, nothing said so, and a truncated dataplane/ directory read
exactly like a complete one that found little.

The collector itself now names every read of its own it could not finish,
which left these two call sites as the only remaining way for that leg to
die without a word. The Chainsaw one is the tighter of the pair -- 300s
against 600s, because it shares an op envelope with the snapshot leg --
so it is both likelier to fire and more expensive to leave silent. In
each place the status is read, never propagated: a diagnostic still
cannot change a test's outcome.

Assisted-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
Signed-off-by: Aleksei Sviridkin <f@lex.la>
2026-08-08 17:08:54 +03:00
Aleksei Sviridkin 2147e12d79 docs(hack): correct both budget claims in the capture-gate rationale
Two numbers in this comment block no longer described the code.

The snapshot leg's cost was given as 360s, the deadline passed to
timeout. The leg is invoked as `timeout -k 30 360`, so a hung
crust-gather is signalled at 360s and killed at 390s, and the trap
waits out the later one. The comment 40 lines below already said 390s,
as does the op-budget arithmetic in .chainsaw.yaml; the three now
agree, and the number names the grace it includes, because the
data-plane leg beside it is quoted at its bare deadline.

The data-plane leg was still described as having no bound on its first
pod list, and billed at the full 600s on that basis. Its reads carry
their own ceilings now, 28s for a list and 20s for a single read, so
the leg returns in tens of seconds and the paragraph's bottom line
overstated the bill it exists to justify.

Assisted-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
Signed-off-by: Aleksei Sviridkin <f@lex.la>
2026-08-08 11:21:47 +03:00
Aleksei Sviridkin db590b493c fix(hack): arm cozytest cluster captures for e2e suites only (#3645)
<!-- Thank you for making a contribution! Here are some tips for you:
- Use Conventional Commits for the PR title: `type(scope): description`
- Types: feat, fix, docs, style, refactor, perf, test, build, ci, chore
- Scopes are not an exhaustive list — pick the most specific scope for
the change and extend the list when a genuinely new area appears.
Examples:
- System components: dashboard, platform, operator, cilium, kube-ovn,
linstor, fluxcd, cluster-api
- Managed apps: postgres, mariadb, redis, kafka, clickhouse,
virtual-machine, kubernetes
- Development and maintenance: api, hack, tests, ci, docs, maintenance
- Breaking changes: append `!` after type/scope (`feat(api)!: ...`) or
add a `BREAKING CHANGE:` footer
- If it's a work in progress, consider creating this PR as a draft.
- Don't hesistate to ask for opinion and review in the community chats,
even if it's still a draft.
- Add the label `backport` if it's a bugfix that needs to be backported
to a previous version.
-->

## What this PR does

`hack/cozytest.sh` arms three cluster captures from its on-failure EXIT
trap, and gates each on a binary being installed rather than on there
being a cluster to read. A unit runner has kubectl and no cluster, so a
red unit test walked into those legs on its way out and paid for
snapshots of nothing.

What that costs turns on how kubectl fails, which is why the defect
survived: against an endpoint that refuses it is a second, and locally
that is what happens. Against one that hangs, which is what a runner
with a context pointing at a torn-down cluster has, I measured ~28s for
the previous-logs leg and the full 600s for the data-plane one. The 28s
is the leg self-bounding its own pod list, so it never reaches the 300s
ceiling above it; the 600s is real, because that leg's first pod list
carries no bound of its own. Ten minutes of dead waiting for a failure
that should have cost seconds.

Where crust-gather is installed too, the bill stops being empty and
starts being wrong. That leg needs no reachable cluster to fire, only an
ambient KUBECONFIG, and it will spend up to 360s snapshotting whatever
cluster the current context happens to name.

The gate now keys on the `e2e-` prefix, read from the suite's own name
or from the directory holding it. At the top level that is the split the
project already sorts on: the Makefile builds `BATS_UNIT_FILES` as
`$(filter-out hack/e2e-%.bats,$(wildcard hack/*.bats))`, so a top-level
`e2e-*` suite is exactly the one `make unit-tests` refuses to run and
`packages/core/testing/Makefile` runs against a live cluster. That
wildcard is not recursive, and `hack/e2e-apps/` holds live-cluster
suites whose own filenames carry no prefix, so the directory is checked
too. Matching the basename alone would take the captures away from
suites that need them, which is the opposite of the point. Every leg,
bound and message on the e2e path is unchanged.

It is deliberately not a reachability probe, though a probe would also
tell a cluster from a bare binary. A failing e2e run is frequently one
whose apiserver is degraded, and a probe answering "no" there would skip
the snapshot in precisely the case the snapshot exists for. A diagnostic
should not condition itself on the health of the thing it diagnoses.

The test drives the runner as a subprocess over fixtures that differ
only in where they sit, with stub kubectl and crust-gather on PATH so
neither direction is decided by a binary being absent. Each leg is
pinned by the artefact it leaves in the report tree rather than by the
one leg that echoes, so no single leg can be ungated without a test
going red; that was checked by ungating each in turn. The two armed
cases are the positive control for the disarmed one, whose assertion is
negative and would otherwise pass just as well against a harness that
ran nothing.

Relates to #3626.

### Screenshots

<!-- REQUIRED for UI changes: attach screenshots or screen recordings
demonstrating
the visual impact of your changes. PRs with UI changes without
screenshots will not be merged. -->

### Downstream repositories

<!--
Cozystack is upstream for repositories that are NOT kept in sync with it
automatically, and nothing in CI compares the two sides, so a change
here can break them silently.

Which change forces what, and which file to touch, is the trigger map in
docs/agents/contributing.md under "Downstream Repositories". Walk it
before you tick anything.

IF YOU ARE AN AI AGENT OR AN LLM, THIS IS PART OF THE TASK, NOT A FORM
TO FILL IN:

1. Walk the trigger map against the actual diff of this PR, file by
file. Do not decide from the PR title or from your memory of what you
changed.
2. For every repository you tick, open the follow-up PR there and link
it on the same line. A ticked box with no link claims work that does not
exist, which is worse than an empty box. Search that repository for an
open PR or issue covering it first, and link that instead of filing a
duplicate.
3. When the follow-up is out of scope, or needs a decision that is not
yours to make, open an issue in that repository instead, link that, and
say so in the PR body. Do not push a speculative PR into another
repository just to fill a line here.
4. Do not tick "No downstream repository is affected" to make the
checklist go away. If you are unsure, leave every box empty and say so
in the PR body, so a human decides.
-->

- [x] No downstream repository is affected by this change
- [ ] [cozystack/website](https://github.com/cozystack/website) -
follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/terraform-provider-cozystack](https://github.com/cozystack/terraform-provider-cozystack)
- follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/ansible-cozystack](https://github.com/cozystack/ansible-cozystack)
- follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/ccp](https://github.com/cozystack/ccp) - follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/talm](https://github.com/cozystack/talm) - follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/cozyhr](https://github.com/cozystack/cozyhr) -
follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/cozy-proxy](https://github.com/cozystack/cozy-proxy) -
follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/cozystack-telemetry-server](https://github.com/cozystack/cozystack-telemetry-server)
- follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/external-apps-example](https://github.com/cozystack/external-apps-example)
- follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/examples](https://github.com/cozystack/examples) -
follow-up:

### Release note

<!--  Write a release note:
- Explain what has changed internally and for users.
- Start with the same `type(scope):` prefix as in the PR title
- Follow the guidelines at
https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/guide/release-notes.md.
-->

```release-note
fix(hack): cozytest.sh no longer arms its cluster-capture hooks for unit BATS suites, so a failing unit test fails fast instead of waiting out capture timeouts against a cluster that is not there
```


<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->

## Summary by CodeRabbit

* **Bug Fixes**
* Cluster diagnostics are now collected only for end-to-end test suites.
* Unit tests no longer trigger unnecessary Kubernetes or cluster-capture
operations.
* End-to-end suites nested under application directories are correctly
recognized.
* Diagnostic capture remains subject to existing tool availability and
timeout checks.

* **Tests**
* Added coverage verifying diagnostic artifacts are collected for
end-to-end failures and omitted for unit-test failures.

<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
2026-08-08 10:46:53 +03:00
Aleksei Sviridkin 8d5ab4cfee fix(hack): arm cozytest cluster captures for e2e suites only
The runner's on-failure EXIT trap gates each cluster capture on a binary
being installed rather than on there being a cluster to read. A unit
runner has kubectl and no cluster, so a red unit test walked into those
legs on its way out.

What that cost depends on how kubectl fails. Against an endpoint that
refuses immediately it is a second; against one that hangs, measured
with a stub that never returns, it is ~28s for the previous-logs leg,
which self-bounds its pod list and so never reaches the 300s ceiling
above it, plus the full 600s for the data-plane leg, whose first pod
list carries no bound of its own. Ten minutes of dead waiting for a
failure that should cost seconds. Where crust-gather is installed too
the bill stops being empty and starts being wrong: that leg needs no
reachable cluster to be pointless, only an ambient KUBECONFIG, and it
will spend up to 360s snapshotting whatever cluster the current context
names.

Gate the three legs on the e2e- prefix instead, read from the suite's
own name or from the directory holding it. At the top level that prefix
is what the project already sorts on: the Makefile builds
BATS_UNIT_FILES as $(filter-out hack/e2e-%.bats,$(wildcard hack/*.bats)),
so a top-level e2e-* suite is exactly the one `make unit-tests` refuses
to run and packages/core/testing/Makefile runs against a live cluster.
That wildcard is not recursive, and hack/e2e-apps/ holds live-cluster
suites whose own filenames carry no prefix, so the directory is checked
too: matching the basename alone would take the captures away from
suites that need them, which is the opposite of this change. The e2e
path is otherwise unchanged, every leg, bound and message as it was.

Not a reachability probe, though that would also tell a cluster from a
bare binary. A failing e2e run is frequently one whose apiserver is
degraded, and a probe answering "no" there would skip the snapshot in
precisely the case the snapshot exists for.

The test drives the runner as a subprocess over generated fixtures that
differ only in where they sit, with stub kubectl and crust-gather on
PATH. Stubbing both matters: the runner calls crust-gather directly
rather than through a script that needs kubectl output first, so a
kubectl-only stub would leave that leg reaching for the real binary
against the ambient KUBECONFIG. Each leg is pinned by the artefact it
leaves in the report tree, not only by the one leg that echoes, so no
single leg can be ungated without a test going red; each was checked by
ungating it alone. All three directions are asserted, and the two armed
cases are the positive control for the disarmed one, whose assertion is
negative and would otherwise pass just as well if the harness ran
nothing; that case also pins that the fixture did fail.

Two shell traps are handled rather than left to be rediscovered. The awk
transform rewrites any line beginning `@test "` and any line that is
exactly `}`, and knows nothing of heredocs, so a fixture written as a
heredoc has its own `@test` line harvested into the outer suite as a
phantom test that fails first and ends the run before the real tests;
the fixtures are built with printf instead. And `set -e` ignores a
command whose status is inverted with `!`, so the negative assertion is
spelled as an `if`. Both were checked by building the broken variant,
not reasoned about.

Assisted-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
Signed-off-by: Aleksei Sviridkin <f@lex.la>
2026-08-08 03:43:29 +03:00
Aleksei Sviridkin 8a44b3e408 fix(e2e): skip crust-gather host-log collection rejected by PodSecurity
The diagnostic snapshot captured on a failed e2e run spawns a
privileged debug pod per node for its host-log leg. Baseline
PodSecurity rejects every such pod with a 403, and crust-gather's
retry loop keeps trying until it burns the entire --duration budget,
then exits 1 with a deadline error. The snapshot verdict therefore
printed FAILED on every failure capture even though the namespaced
object state had been collected, and the host-log leg itself gathered
nothing usable here.

Pass --disable-additional-logs at all three collect sites: the host
snapshot from the BATS runner, the host snapshot from the Chainsaw
error.catch, and the nested tenant snapshot. The object collection now
finishes cleanly, the happy path reports complete, and FAILED once
again means a genuine collection failure.

Assisted-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
Signed-off-by: Aleksei Sviridkin <f@lex.la>
2026-07-27 22:48:55 +03:00
Aleksei Sviridkin 76f7267ff2 test(e2e): describe --previous as the preceding instance, not the first
kubectl logs --previous returns the immediately preceding terminated
container instance, not the original first one — after multiple restarts
the first instance is already gone. Reword the helper, the BATS and
Chainsaw failure handlers, and the diagnostics doc to match the actual
--previous semantics.

Assisted-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
Signed-off-by: Aleksei Sviridkin <f@lex.la>
2026-07-21 18:57:01 +03:00
Aleksei Sviridkin 07c67a8913 test(e2e): capture previous container logs and stop killing the snapshot
Root-causing a crash-loop failure was blocked twice over by the
diagnostics collected on failure.

`kubectl logs` shows only the current container instance, so for a
crash-looping pod the suites' `podLogs` collector captured the Nth
restart -- a fresh replay of the same startup path -- while the
evidence that explained the failure sat in the first, interrupted
instance. Chainsaw's podLogs collector has no `previous` option, so
add e2e-capture-previous-logs.sh and drive it from the global catch
and from the BATS failure hook. It discovers containers with
restartCount > 0 at runtime (init containers included, where an
interrupted bootstrap lives), orders the app suites' namespace first,
and dumps each to the job log and the snapshot tree. Containers that
never restarted are skipped, so a healthy run emits one line rather
than a page of "previous terminated container not found".

Every way that capture can come up short is named rather than
inferred, because kubectl exits 1 for a garbage-collected container,
an RBAC denial and an unreachable node alike: the container cap, a
pod list that never returned (which is not the same as nothing having
restarted), a read that timed out versus one kubectl refused and the
reason it gave, and a previous instance that produced no output. A
partial capture is kept and marked truncated rather than deleted --
it is the only copy of a log already gone from the cluster.

The crust-gather snapshot was killed by the Chainsaw op containing it.
A script op is bounded by timeouts.exec (5m), and the catch's own
wall-clock wrappers summed to 960s, so the script was SIGKILLed
partway through -- taking out the process group mid-write and skipping
the data-plane capture entirely. Give each catch op an explicit
timeout above the budgets it contains, so an inner timeout fires
instead and leaves a partial, still-servable snapshot behind. The
data-plane leg drops from 600s to 300s at that call site so both legs
fit one envelope; the BATS hook keeps the wider budget, having no
containing op.

Set crust-gather --duration explicitly as well. It is the collection
phase's own budget, it defaults to 60s, and on elapse it abandons the
collection and skips its finish step, leaving a truncated tree with no
indication anything is missing. The outer wall-clock has to exceed it
because the API discovery that runs first is not covered by that
budget at all -- with an unhealthy aggregated APIService, the state a
failed run is usually in, discovery alone can consume the whole
timeout before a single object is written. Send each collector's
output to a log beside its snapshot instead of /dev/null, with a
complete/truncated/failed verdict, so that question is answerable
from the artifact.

Assisted-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
Signed-off-by: Aleksei Sviridkin <f@lex.la>
2026-07-21 18:37:07 +03:00
Aleksei Sviridkin 079e4079d3 test(e2e): capture host->pod data-plane on failure
The E2E install intermittently fails on a CNI host->local-pod data-plane
transient: kubelet on a node reaches a local pod's readiness/startup probe
with "connection refused" for several minutes while overlay pod->pod
traffic works, then it self-heals. This is rooted in the cilium+kube-ovn
chaining config (forced enable-host-legacy-routing, CNI
InstallEndpointRoute:false), which delegates host->local-pod routing to
kube-ovn/ovn0. The crust-gather failure snapshot records Kubernetes object
state but not the node's L3 forwarding state, so the mechanism cannot be
root-caused after the fact.

On test failure, for each NotReady pod that is scheduled, has a podIP, and is
not terminal (Succeeded/Failed excluded), collect the host->pod data-plane
state from the pod's node into the crust-gather snapshot dir (so it ships in
the uploaded report):

- host netns via the kube-ovn cni-server (hostNetwork): ip route get <podIP>,
  ip neigh, ip rule, ip addr show ovn0, and the KERNEL conntrack entries for
  the podIP (conntrack -L, falling back to /proc/net/nf_conntrack). Under
  enable-host-legacy-routing the host->local-pod path traverses the kernel
  netfilter stack, not cilium BPF, so this is the authoritative conntrack
  table and route/rule state for the transient;
- cilium-agent on the node: endpoint list, bpf CT entries for the podIP, a
  bounded monitor --type drop, and hubble dropped verdicts when present
  (complementary: confirms the path is not handled in BPF);
- OVS/OVN on the node: ovs-ofctl dump-flows br-int, the OVN Port_Binding /
  Logical_Switch_Port for the pod, and a bounded ovn-sbctl lflow-list.

Diagnostic-only: it runs after the existing crust-gather collect and only on
an already-failed test, never mutates the cluster, and cannot change the
pass/fail outcome. Every live capture is time-boxed, every command is
|| true, the whole run has a wall-clock backstop, node-global captures are
deduped per node, and the pod count is capped. It no-ops cleanly when no
pods are affected or when a tool/pod is absent.

Assisted-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
Signed-off-by: Aleksei Sviridkin <f@lex.la>
2026-06-25 02:17:59 +03:00
Myasnikov DaniilandClaude Opus 4.8 5653c30799 fix(e2e): bound per-test crust-gather snapshots with a timeout
The per-test failure snapshots (host in cozytest.sh, tenant in run-kubernetes.sh)
ran `crust-gather collect` unbounded. On a contended/degraded cluster the collect
can hang indefinitely — observed wedging the E2E install step for ~2h35m after a
test failure until the job-level cancel, with no output after the capture line.
`|| true` only catches a bad exit code, never a hang.

Wrap both invocations in `timeout -k 30 300`: a 5-minute cap (hard SIGKILL 30s
later if the collect ignores SIGTERM) bounds the hang; a partial snapshot still
beats a multi-hour wedge, and timeout's exit 124 is already swallowed by `|| true`.

Assisted-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Signed-off-by: Myasnikov Daniil <myasnikovdaniil2001@gmail.com>
2026-06-20 20:48:51 +05:00
Myasnikov Daniil 51496832e7 fix(e2e): capture tenant cluster snapshot from an in-subshell trap
crust-gather can only reach a tenant Kamaji cluster through the test's
localhost port-forward (it connects directly to the kubeconfig server URL —
there is no apiserver-proxy mode — and the in-cluster URL is unreachable from
the runner). cozytest.sh's generic EXIT trap runs in the parent shell AFTER
the failing test subshell has exited and its port-forward is reaped, so a
collect there hits a dead socket and crust-gather bails before writing
anything (every tenant snapshot so far came back empty).

Capture the tenant from an EXIT trap registered INSIDE run_kubernetes_test
instead: it fires during THAT subshell's exit, while the supervised
port-forward is still alive. Verified end-to-end against the real
hack/cozytest.sh under dash (CI's /bin/sh) in an ubuntu:22.04 container —
the in-subshell trap fires on failure with the PF alive, the tenant snapshot
lands in the same snapshots/<test>/ dir as the host snapshot, the generic
cozy_cleanup still runs, and there is no pipeline deadlock.

Drop the now-dead tenant loop from cozytest.sh's generic trap (it could only
ever see a reaped PF); it keeps the host snapshot.

Signed-off-by: Myasnikov Daniil <myasnikovdaniil2001@gmail.com>
2026-06-19 22:30:41 +05:00
Myasnikov DaniilandClaude Opus 4.8 50e5f94132 test(e2e): per-test crust-gather snapshots + cleanup-on-exit via cozytest.sh
cozytest.sh runs each .bats as one invocation, exits on the first failing @test, and never invokes bats setup/teardown. Add a single EXIT-trap hook: on failure, snapshot the host AND every nested tenant cluster (tenantkubeconfig-*) with crust-gather into per-app dirs BEFORE cleanup — so each failure is independently inspectable (crust-gather serve) instead of one end-of-suite host-only dump; then ALWAYS run the file's cozy_cleanup() if defined.

run-kubernetes.sh gains cozy_cleanup() (delete tenant clusters, wait for PVCs to free): a failed kubernetes test otherwise leaves tens of GiB of worker-VM PVCs in tenant-test, exhausting the shared tenant-quota and cascade-failing every storage-heavy app after it. The kubernetes .bats now source run-kubernetes.sh at file scope so the parent-shell trap can reach the hook.

Ship pinned crust-gather 0.15.2 in the e2e-sandbox image; fold per-test snapshots into cozyreport.tgz.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Signed-off-by: Myasnikov Daniil <myasnikovdaniil2001@gmail.com>
2026-06-18 18:07:52 +05:00
Aleksei Sviridkin 18961de36b [tests] Add pre-cleanup, fix port-forward race, fix temp leak
- Add pre-cleanup of stale resources to all app E2E tests so
  retries start fresh instead of patching stuck state
- Wait for port-forward to be ready before using it in
  kubernetes tests (fixes race condition)
- Reduce version check sleep from 5s to 1s for faster retries
- Clean up temp directory on test failure in cozytest.sh

Assisted-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
Signed-off-by: Aleksei Sviridkin <f@lex.la>
2026-03-23 17:25:01 +03:00
Myasnikov Daniil 3bf43312aa (ci) Removed cozytest output trimming in non-tty run
Signed-off-by: Myasnikov Daniil <myasnikovdaniil2001@gmail.com>
2026-02-27 12:43:00 +05:00
Andrei Kvapil 168a24ffdf [tests] Add more space for e2e tests
Signed-off-by: Andrei Kvapil <kvapss@gmail.com>
2025-08-11 13:04:00 +03:00
Andrei Kvapil 2bf4032d5b [tests] Introduce cozytest - a new testing framework
Signed-off-by: Andrei Kvapil <kvapss@gmail.com>
2025-05-25 09:29:58 +02:00