In the v1 docs the kubernetes-distribution use-case path holds Build Your Own Platform: installing only the packages you need onto an existing cluster that already has networking and storage. The README entry still described the v0 page, Cozystack as a Kubernetes distribution for bare metal, so its label and description no longer matched the page it links to. Both now describe BYOP.
Assisted-by: LLM
Signed-off-by: Marian Koreniuk <moriarti@cp.if.ua>
The unversioned /docs/... paths on cozystack.io are aliases owned by the v0 docs, so the use-case, getting-started and troubleshooting links sent readers to the v0 documentation, a major version behind the current release. They now name the v1.6 pages, in line with the other versioned links in the repository.
Assisted-by: LLM
Signed-off-by: Marian Koreniuk <moriarti@cp.if.ua>
Both Slack channel links assume the reader is already in the workspace;
anonymously they just 403. Added the invite link beside each, so someone
arriving from the README can actually get in: cncf-slack.netlify.app for
CNCF Slack and slack.kubernetes.io for Kubernetes Slack. Both verified.
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
Signed-off-by: tym83 <6355522@gmail.com>
Final review nits: the project-documents table had an empty header row
that GitHub renders as a blank band, ROADMAP ended up linked twice once
the table landed, and one sentence in Contributions still read wrong.
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
Signed-off-by: tym83 <6355522@gmail.com>
Reverted the <picture> element. #gh-light-mode-only keys off GitHub's
account theme; prefers-color-scheme keys off the OS. They diverge for
anyone who pins a GitHub theme rather than syncing with the system, and
the combination 'OS dark, GitHub light' renders the white logo on white.
The fragment form is correct in all four combinations. Kept the width
attribute, which was the actual fix -- the logo stretched to 734px
because the SVG has no intrinsic width, not because of the fragment.
Also from review:
- /docs/roadmap/ on the website is a 404; linked ROADMAP.md instead.
- Added a project-documents table. The README linked one of the eight
policy files in the repository root; governance, code of conduct,
security policy and adopters are what a newcomer and a CNCF reviewer
both look for first.
- Added both Slack channels. The community section listed Telegram only,
while the CNCF-hosted #cozystack channel went unmentioned.
- Added the CLOMonitor badge, the standard CNCF project-health signal.
It currently reports A.
- semver.org was the one remaining plain-http link, which sat oddly next
to dropping a badge for the same reason.
- The commit-activity badge linked to the contributors graph.
- 'free platform' reads as price now that the Open Source badge is gone.
- 'CNCF Sandbox Level Project' is legacy phrasing.
- Fixed an ungrammatical sentence in Contributions.
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
Signed-off-by: tym83 <6355522@gmail.com>
The logo is an SVG with no intrinsic width, so GitHub rendered it at the
full width of the README column -- 734x246 on a desktop viewport, a wall
of logo before a single word of text. It also used the
#gh-light-mode-only / #gh-dark-mode-only fragment hack, which GitHub has
since superseded with <picture> and prefers-color-scheme.
Replaced with a <picture> element at a fixed 340px, which both bounds the
logo and drops the hack.
The badge block had eight entries of ragged widths. Two carried no
information: 'Open Source' says what the Apache-2.0 badge beside it
already says, and a hand-set 'Status: Active' is a claim rather than a
measurement -- the commit-activity badge next to it is the real thing,
and the static one was also served over plain http. Both removed.
The remaining six are ordered identity, then health, then support, and
the licence badge now points at the LICENSE file rather than at
opensource.org.
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
Signed-off-by: tym83 <6355522@gmail.com>
Adds the OpenSSF Scorecard badge next to the existing OpenSSF Best
Practices badge. The scorecard.yml workflow already publishes results
to the public securityscorecards.dev dataset, so the badge reflects the
project's live supply-chain security score.
Assisted-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
Signed-off-by: Timur Tukaev <timur.tukaev@aenix.io>
Add an issue-template chooser and a feature-request template, and document
in CONTRIBUTING and the README where each kind of contribution belongs:
- bugs and concrete features -> issues in this repo
- questions and early ideas -> GitHub Discussions
- cross-cutting / architectural changes -> design proposals in cozystack/community
Also reconciles the README, which routed feature requests to a Discussions
category while the issue tracker is actually used for kind/feature issues.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Signed-off-by: Myasnikov Daniil <myasnikovdaniil2001@gmail.com>
Marian Koreniuk