mirror of
https://github.com/cozystack/cozystack.git
synced 2026-10-28 07:37:49 +09:00
648eb42cae3f12bd367102048fa89089fc40407a
3
Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
648eb42cae |
test(ci): make the image-ref guards see split-host and unparseable files
Both round-2 reviewers independently landed on the same two test-side
holes, and both are the guard being blind in exactly the way the bug it
guards was.
The completeness oracle derived its expected set from a grep for a
contiguous ghcr.io/cozystack/cozystack/...@sha256: string, so it could
not see any split-host shape: cilium, keycloak-operator, kubeovn, the OCI
artifact and seven shape-3 refs, 12 of 43 first-party refs in all. That
includes keycloak-operator, which the test's own rationale names as the
motivating profile. The fixture-discovery grep in the same file had
already been widened for this exact reason; the fix was never carried to
the oracle.
The oracle now applies the same shape knowledge to an independently
discovered file list, which is the axis that actually drifts -- what each
consumer disagreed about historically is which FILES it visits, not how a
ref is spelled inside one. To keep that sharing safe, shape coverage is
now pinned by its own test, so deleting a shape still fails something
even though both sides of the comparison would move together.
Sharing required splitting collect_refs_from_file out of
collect_image_refs. Behaviour is unchanged: same 67 refs collected before
and after, multus and the packages artifact both still present.
A YAML oracle cannot cover everything, though. A reviewer planted a
split-host ref in a Helm template, which yq cannot parse at all, and it
survived every test. A file-level marker check now backstops that: any
file carrying a first-party marker must be enumerated or explicitly
allowlisted. Two files are allowlisted today, each with its reason -- the
talos-csr-signer Dockerfile placeholder, and the documented capi gzip
gap. This also closes the secondary weakness that comparing on repo@digest
masks an unenumerated occurrence when the same image sits at an
enumerated path, which is live for that capi file.
Second hole: the postcondition's key-position branch had no coverage.
Replacing the whole pattern with the naive "${RC}@sha256:" -- the
narrowing rejected because cilium keeps tag: and digest: under separate
keys -- left all 22 tests green, so the branch that makes the split shape
visible was asserted by nothing. Added a cilium-shaped fixture at an
unenumerated path.
Both previously-surviving mutations are now caught. The oracle was also
pre-filtered by registry marker before parsing, cutting it from 32s to 5s.
Assisted-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
Assisted-By: GPT-5 <noreply@openai.com>
Signed-off-by: Myasnikov Daniil <myasnikovdaniil2001@gmail.com>
|
||
|
|
9bd8c17971 |
fix(ci): shape-filter the promote postcondition and close test gaps
Review of the previous commit found the postcondition itself could abort
a release. It grepped the bare "X.Y.Z-rc.N" substring across the tree, and
three live files carry such strings without being image refs:
kubevirt-csi-driver's go.sum pins github.com/golang/protobuf v1.4.0-rc.2
-- a version cozystack actually cut, so promoting v1.4.0 would have
failed on a Go checksum line -- metallb_test.yaml names v1.5.0-rc.2 in a
comment, and the console pnpm-lock.yaml carries rolldown@1.0.0-rc.15. The
remediation the error message gave would have made things worse: declaring
go.sum as a ref source would sed a checksum file.
Match the version only in image-reference position now: after an
image/repository/tag key with no intervening '#', or immediately before an
@sha256 digest. Narrowing it to "${RC}@sha256:" alone would have been
wrong -- cilium keeps `tag: v1.5.0` and `digest:` under separate keys, so
the version is not always adjacent to the digest. Verified against four
real rc versions that previously aborted.
The suite also only tested the fail-closed direction, which is why that
defect survived, and the collector had no completeness guard at all: a
first-party ref added at an unenumerated path on a `latest@` tag was
mirrored by nothing and passed all eighteen tests. Since the mirror's
failure mode is the worst of the three -- the published nightly points at
the private build registry -- that gap mattered most where coverage was
thinnest.
Added: a fail-open test using the three real rc versions above; a
collector completeness diff that discovers refs by content and fails on
any the enumeration misses; coverage for the OCI-artifact shape, whose
deletion previously left every suite green; and an unreadable-file test,
since a read error was being treated as "no match" and silently skipped.
The component-versioned test was vacuous -- its rc version shared no
substring with the kamaji tag it claimed to protect, so it passed by
construction. It now uses an rc version sharing kamaji's 0.19.0 prefix,
which a loosely-anchored implementation would corrupt.
Round-trip fixture discovery matched a combined 'ghcr.io/cozystack/
cozystack/' prefix, which skips keycloak-operator (host in a sibling
registry: key) and kubeovn (host in global.registry.address). It now
matches 'cozystack/cozystack' and stamps split `tag:` keys too.
Also documented two pre-existing gaps rather than half-fixing them: the
nightly host rewrite is a contiguous-substring replace and cannot reach a
split host, and a ref inside a gzip is invisible to every tool including
the postcondition, which skips binaries. Both are host-dimension defects;
the version dimension this change owns is unaffected, because the version
always lives in a tag key regardless of where the host sits.
Assisted-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
Assisted-By: GPT-5 <noreply@openai.com>
Signed-off-by: Myasnikov Daniil <myasnikovdaniil2001@gmail.com>
|
||
|
|
09323fff13 |
fix(ci): cover every image-ref storage shape in promote, retag and mirror
Promotion rewrote the rc version substring across the depth-2 package values.yaml plus packages/apps/kubernetes/images/*.tag alone, on the premise that the kubernetes app was the only one whose .tag files carry the cozystack version. Nine other .tag files do, and system/multus seds its ref straight into a vendored upstream manifest. v1.6.0 was therefore staged with 33 of 55 first-party refs still reading v1.6.0-rc.4. promote-retag.sh and nightly-mirror.sh had the same blind spot from the other direction: both scanned only the depth-2 values.yaml, so those images were never retagged to the stable version (30 refs selected before, 42 after) and never mirrored to the public registry for a nightly. A retag miss merely leaves an image short of a tag, since the digest still resolves inside one registry; a mirror miss is worse, because the host rewrite walks the same file list and a ref that is neither mirrored nor rewritten leaves the published tree pointing at the private build registry. The three call sites each carried their own idea of where a ref can live, which is how they drifted apart. Move that knowledge into hack/lib/image-refs.sh as the single enumeration -- image_ref_files() for the files, collect_image_refs() for the refs inside them -- and have all three source it, so a new storage location is declared once and reaches every consumer. The rewrite itself moves out of promote-rc.yaml into hack/promote-rewrite-tags.sh. Being workflow-inline is why this was only observable by cutting a release: there was nothing to unit test. It now also asserts its own postcondition, scanning wider than it rewrites and failing the promotion when any ref survives in a location the enumeration does not know about, rather than shipping it quietly. Component-versioned images (kamaji's v0.19.0-cozystack.N) and third-party pass-through images do not ride the cozystack version line and are deliberately left alone; a test pins that so a future fix here cannot over-reach. capi-providers-cpprovider is a documented known gap: its ref is also embedded in a gzipped copy that the chart actually ships, and rewriting only the readable copy would diverge the two. docs/agents/image-refs.md records the contract -- three tag classes, three storage shapes, the invariants, and which consumer does what. Assisted-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com> Signed-off-by: Myasnikov Daniil <myasnikovdaniil2001@gmail.com> |