Commit Graph
190 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
Aleksei Sviridkin da28ea7ee8 ci(e2e): run nightly and release-tag e2e on the container lane
Nightly and the rc gate still booted the management nodes as QEMU
guests, the substrate the merge-gating lanes left behind. On it the
tenant Kubernetes suites have missed their node-join deadline on most
nights since 2026-10-02, each failure spends the whole deadline, and
the job reaches its timeout before the alphabetically later suites
run. Over the same days those suites passed on every PR run that
selected them, where the nodes are Talos containers and a tenant
worker sits one virtualization level shallower.

Both lanes now use the PR lanes' container substrate. Nightly's e2e no
longer waits for the nocloud disk, which it does not boot; the disk is
still built and published. A manual e2e-tag dispatch against a tag
that predates the container lane fails early and names the ref to
dispatch from instead.

DRBD, the replicated StorageClass and the Cozystack Talos node image
lose their last e2e coverage with this. The docs and comments that
pointed at nightly and the rc gate as that coverage now say so.

Assisted-by: LLM
Signed-off-by: Aleksei Sviridkin <f@lex.la>
2026-10-09 16:57:43 +03:00
Aleksei Sviridkin 387760b94e test(tests): run unit suites with Bats and retain POSIX coverage (#3849)
## What this PR does

This runs the unit suite with Bats and keeps a separate `dash` pass for
tests that source production shell helpers. Unit files are discovered
from the filesystem, and each loads the audited helper that restores
`set -u` in test bodies without changing subprocess shell options.

CI pins Bats 1.14.0, keeps JUnit reports, and runs Bats for docs-only
changes too. Code changes also run Helm, Go, controller and POSIX
compatibility tests.

Per-file Make targets and the `--keep-going` sub-make are removed
because one `bats -j` run goes through all files anyway, so a red file
doesn't stop the others, and `hack/bats-unit-keep-going.bats` checks
this with real bats. `-k` stays in the workflow because without it a red
Bats file keeps `test-controllers` from starting.

Local tests require bats-core 1.5 or newer. GNU parallel is optional,
and the complete local hook runs with `pre-commit run bats-unit-tests
--hook-stage manual --all-files`. Live-cluster suites keep their
existing runner.

### Validation

`make unit-tests test-controllers -j4 -k --output-sync=target
BATS_JOBS=4 BATS_POSIX_SHELL=dash` passed, including every discovered
Bats file and the POSIX pass. Mutation checks reject omitted files,
disabled or exported nounset, missing CI steps and missing or excessive
POSIX coverage.

### Downstream repositories

The developer guide update is tracked separately in
[cozystack/website](https://github.com/cozystack/website/issues/717).
CCP has no caller of the changed targets.

- [ ] No downstream repository is affected by this change
- [ ] [cozystack/website](https://github.com/cozystack/website) -
documentation follow-up:
[issue](https://github.com/cozystack/website/issues/717)
- [ ]
[cozystack/terraform-provider-cozystack](https://github.com/cozystack/terraform-provider-cozystack)
- follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/ansible-cozystack](https://github.com/cozystack/ansible-cozystack)
- follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/ccp](https://github.com/cozystack/ccp) - follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/talm](https://github.com/cozystack/talm) - follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/cozyhr](https://github.com/cozystack/cozyhr) -
follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/cozy-proxy](https://github.com/cozystack/cozy-proxy) -
follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/cozystack-telemetry-server](https://github.com/cozystack/cozystack-telemetry-server)
- follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/external-apps-example](https://github.com/cozystack/external-apps-example)
- follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/examples](https://github.com/cozystack/examples) -
follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/community](https://github.com/cozystack/community) -
follow-up:

### Release note

```release-note
NONE
```


<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit

* **Testing & Reliability**
* Bats unit tests run as a dedicated suite, with optional parallel
execution and JUnit reports.
* Pull request checks run Bats tests for documentation-only changes, and
unit and controller tests for code changes.
* POSIX-shell compatibility tests are included in the standard unit-test
run and continue after individual failures.
  * Test reports are uploaded even when checks fail.
* Added a manual local test hook for running Bats and POSIX
compatibility tests.
  * Shared strict setup is applied across Bats unit tests.
* **Documentation**
* Updated testing guidance with current commands, runner compatibility,
and CI coverage.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
2026-10-07 14:35:51 +03:00
Aleksei Sviridkin 3e078b79a9 ci(e2e): refuse a new fork image before the build starts (#4767)
## What this PR does

A fork PR that adds a first-party image cannot pass the fork e2e lane,
and today it finds that out only after the whole build. `e2e-fork.yaml`
pushes the fork's image archives only under names the base tree already
exports, so a new image is refused at the push with `image '<name>' is
not in the base-tree allowlist`. Nothing the contributor does on the PR
changes that.

This PR keeps the push allowlist as strict as it is and moves the
failure to the start of the run. On fork PRs, `plan` in
`pull-requests.yaml` now runs `hack/fork-new-images.sh`. The script
derives the image names of the PR tree and of its base parent with the
same `make -n` derivation the push step uses. If the PR tree exports a
name the base does not, it fails before any build, names the images and
says what has to happen: a maintainer lands the image on the base branch
first, or the change runs from a branch in this repository.

The check runs from the fork's own tree, so a fork can remove it. That
is fine, because it only saves an honest contributor a wasted build. The
push allowlist in `e2e-fork.yaml` is still the boundary. That workflow
cannot call the script, since it runs from the default branch over an
untrusted checkout. So `hack/fork-new-images.bats` pins the two
derivations to each other, and also covers the script's behaviour and
the fork-only gating of the step.

I replayed the script against the merge commit of #4291 and its base
parent. It fails with `cluster-api-provider-kubevirt`, the same name the
push step refused there. The workflow_run lane itself cannot be
exercised locally.

This does not lift the limitation itself: a fork still cannot get a
green run for a new image. Part of #4329.

### Screenshots

Not a UI change.

### Downstream repositories

- [x] No downstream repository is affected by this change
- [ ] [cozystack/website](https://github.com/cozystack/website) -
follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/terraform-provider-cozystack](https://github.com/cozystack/terraform-provider-cozystack)
- follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/ansible-cozystack](https://github.com/cozystack/ansible-cozystack)
- follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/ccp](https://github.com/cozystack/ccp) - follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/talm](https://github.com/cozystack/talm) - follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/cozyhr](https://github.com/cozystack/cozyhr) -
follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/cozy-proxy](https://github.com/cozystack/cozy-proxy) -
follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/cozystack-telemetry-server](https://github.com/cozystack/cozystack-telemetry-server)
- follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/external-apps-example](https://github.com/cozystack/external-apps-example)
- follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/examples](https://github.com/cozystack/examples) -
follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/community](https://github.com/cozystack/community) -
follow-up:

### Release note

```release-note
ci(e2e): a fork PR that adds a new first-party image now fails in the plan job, naming the image, instead of after the whole build at the image push.
```


<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->

## Summary by CodeRabbit

* **New Features**
* Fork pull requests that add image names not present in the base branch
are now rejected during planning, with the new names reported before
builds begin.
* **Documentation**
* Updated guidance describes the early check and clarifies how it
relates to the image allowlist used during publishing.
* **Tests**
* Added coverage for new, unchanged, reduced, and empty image sets,
along with checks that the pull request workflow applies the check only
to fork submissions.

<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
2026-10-07 11:14:23 +03:00
Myasnikov Daniil cc942fed68 test(tests): run unit suites with Bats and retain POSIX coverage
The shell translator rewrites test bodies and loses Bats reporting.
The unit lane needs complete TAP results and JUnit reports without
changing how live-cluster suites run.

Sourced production helpers still need a dash pass, and unit test bodies
need nounset without exporting shell options into subprocesses.

Assisted-by: LLM
Signed-off-by: Myasnikov Daniil <myasnikovdaniil2001@gmail.com>
2026-10-07 11:04:00 +03:00
Aleksei Sviridkin b1c84e9c06 feat(platform, tests): select E2E packages and declare controller dependencies (#4022)
## What this PR does

E2E installs the whole platform on a fresh cluster for every PR,
whatever the PR touches, so install time and flake surface go to
packages the selected suites never use. This PR makes the E2E install
take only what the selected suites need.

`hack/select-install.sh --disabled <suites>` generates
`bundles.disabledPackages` for fresh E2E installs using an ordinary
platform variant. It keeps suite owners, runtime requirements and the
install baseline, then follows their forward `PackageSource`
dependencies.

The baseline follows the unconditional waits in
`hack/e2e-install-cozystack.bats` and stays seeded directly even where
the graph reaches the same packages. It also keeps platform services
that no suite owns but the rest of the platform uses: `multus`,
`cozystack-scheduler`, `linstor-scheduler`, `flux-plunger`, `cozy-proxy`
and `ouroboros` (the Kubernetes suites assert its hairpin NAT). Backup
suites also keep `backupstrategy-controller` and its dependencies, and
the gateway suite keeps `kubeovn-webhook`.

The E2E job now selects the suites before it installs, and passes the
complement to the platform Package as `disabledPackages`. The `full-e2e`
label and an empty selection keep the full install, and the nightly and
tag lanes pass no list.

The platform sources also change: `mongodb-application` now depends on
`mongodb-operator`, and `seaweedfs-application` on
`objectstorage-controller`. These dependencies apply to regular platform
installs and upgrades too.

The new `mongodb-operator` edge also reaches reverse test selection: a
change under `packages/system/mongodb-operator` now selects the
`mongodb` suite instead of falling back to the full suite. Backup APIs
and the gateway webhook remain suite-specific install requirements, so
they add no edges.

The disable list governs fresh installs because existing Packages carry
`helm.sh/resource-policy: keep`. Optional packages still need
`bundles.enabledPackages`. Packages that no suite owns and the baseline
does not keep stay uninstalled on purpose, also when test selection
answers with every suite (monitoring exporters like `goldpinger` and
`kubeovn-plunger`, apps without a suite, provider-specific operators).
Nothing in the run looks at them, so installing them only adds a
readiness wait, and a change to such a package gets no install check
from this gate.

### Measured

One run per variant on a 32 vCPU / 128 GB VM, container lane, the CI
artifacts of this PR, `postgres` suite selected, 55 packages disabled:

- HelmReleases 111 to 77, pods 219 to 197
- pod requests 14.8 CPU / 37.7 GiB to 13.5 CPU / 35.7 GiB
- host memory peak during install 33.4 GB to 30.2 GB
- `install-cozystack` 26m33s in both runs
- `postgres` suite 25m50s to 25m17s, passes on the reduced install

Install time did not change. The removed packages are mostly operators
and apps without instances, and what the install waits on (SeaweedFS,
LINSTOR, CDI, the Cluster API providers, Keycloak) stays in the
baseline. With one run each, differences of a minute or two are noise.

The selection, the install closure and the workflow wiring are covered
by bats tests (`hack/select-install_test.bats`,
`hack/select-e2e_test.bats`, `hack/platform-packages_test.bats`) and by
a helm-unittest suite in the platform chart.

### Screenshots

Not a UI change.

### Downstream repositories

The new dependencies ship in the platform chart. No coordinated changes
are needed in downstream repositories.

- [x] No downstream repository is affected by this change
- [ ] [cozystack/website](https://github.com/cozystack/website) -
follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/terraform-provider-cozystack](https://github.com/cozystack/terraform-provider-cozystack)
- follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/ansible-cozystack](https://github.com/cozystack/ansible-cozystack)
- follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/ccp](https://github.com/cozystack/ccp) - follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/talm](https://github.com/cozystack/talm) - follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/cozyhr](https://github.com/cozystack/cozyhr) -
follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/cozy-proxy](https://github.com/cozystack/cozy-proxy) -
follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/cozystack-telemetry-server](https://github.com/cozystack/cozystack-telemetry-server)
- follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/external-apps-example](https://github.com/cozystack/external-apps-example)
- follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/examples](https://github.com/cozystack/examples) -
follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/community](https://github.com/cozystack/community) -
follow-up:

### Release note

```release-note
feat(platform, tests): E2E installs only the packages the selected suites need. MongoDB now depends on its operator, and SeaweedFS on the object storage controller.
```
2026-10-07 09:36:24 +03:00
Myasnikov Daniil 59555c895e fix(hack): retain controllers and APIs for selective installs
Tenant HelmReleases need a shard reconciler, and the root SeaweedFS
release creates COSI resources even when no backup suite is selected.
Without those controllers, a fresh reduced install cannot become ready.

The Kubernetes suites create worker pools through KubernetesNodes, and
MongoDB renders an operator-owned CR. Selecting only the cluster API or
application chart drops resources those suites require.

Assisted-by: LLM
Signed-off-by: Myasnikov Daniil <myasnikovdaniil2001@gmail.com>
2026-10-07 06:01:52 +03:00
Myasnikov Daniil d3df698c43 docs(release): gate maintenance cuts on backport delivery
Listing labelled pull requests cannot establish whether their changes
landed on a maintenance branch.

Signed-off-by: Myasnikov Daniil <myasnikovdaniil2001@gmail.com>
Assisted-by: LLM
2026-10-07 05:19:16 +03:00
Aleksei Sviridkin 80eb2e5037 ci(e2e): refuse a new fork image before the build starts
The fork e2e lane pushes a fork's image archives only under names the
base tree already exports, which keeps a fork from minting repositories
under the CI registry. An image the PR itself adds is therefore refused,
but only at the push, after the whole build has run, and nothing the
contributor does on the PR can clear it.

Compare the image names of the PR tree and its base in the plan job of
fork runs, with the same make -n derivation the push allowlist uses,
and fail there naming the new images and what has to happen first. The
push allowlist is unchanged and remains the boundary: this check runs
from the fork's own tree, so it only saves an honest contributor the
wasted build.

Assisted-by: LLM
Signed-off-by: Aleksei Sviridkin <f@lex.la>
2026-10-06 16:28:51 +03:00
Aleksei Sviridkin 415430bcc7 fix(e2e): fail on a failed release of cilium and csi as on the parent, and report addon remediation (#3594)
## What this PR does

The history guard in the tenant Kubernetes e2e suite checked only the
parent `kubernetes-<test>` HelmRelease. A failed action on one of the
addon releases it installs left nothing the suite looked at, so a run
showed only the downstream symptom, usually the node-join deadline, and
never named the release behind it.

The guard now reads every addon release of the parent. It selects them
from the cluster by name prefix, so a release added to the chart later
is covered too. The rule:

- A `failed` or `uninstalled` Snapshot fails the run on any release
whose install strategy is `RetryOnFailure`. That is the parent (the
aggregated apiserver stamps it on every Application HelmRelease) and the
tenant `cilium` and `csi`.
- The same footprint on the other addons, which run the default strategy
with `retries: -1`, is printed as a note and the run stays green. For
the CRD addons that configuration is tracked in #3555.

A transient `cilium` or `csi` failure that later recovers on a retry
still turns the run red, by design, as long as its Snapshot still reads
`failed`. One recovery leaves no such Snapshot: when an install fails
and the very next attempt succeeds, Helm marks the failed install
`superseded`, because there is no deployed release to supersede, and the
history reads like an ordinary upgrade. The guard cannot see that case
from the statuses alone. The code and the docs now say so, a test pins
it, and detection is left to a follow-up.

An earlier revision of this PR tried to tell a teardown apart from a
retried failure and made only `uninstalled` fatal. That split does not
hold. In helm-controller v1.5.0, the version the platform installs, a
release with an active retry strategy never remediates.
`atomic_release.go` returns an upgrade for a failed release before it
reaches the remediation switch, and the two other paths that uninstall
(a changed release target, and deletion) both clear history afterwards.
So on these releases `uninstalled` never shows up, and `failed` is the
only signal. The parent keeps the rule it already had on main, and
`cilium` and `csi` now follow it too.

The failure paths get the same reading. The guard runs after the
assertions, while the deadlines a failed addon breaks end the script
earlier, so the same classification is also printed, without a verdict,
from the node-join collector and from the exit handler. That handler is
now armed at the tenant CR apply, so the management-cluster waits before
the tenant answers are covered too. Smaller changes that came with this:

- Every guard read is bounded, and a failed read is never folded into
"no history".
- The parent must read back a non-empty strategy. An empty value there
means the jsonpath stopped resolving, and without this check every
footprint would quietly turn into a note.
- The history read uses `HELMRELEASE_HISTORY_JSONPATH`, and the
upstream-type pin in `internal/fluxcontract` now accepts the bounded
wrapper the read goes through.

`docs/agents/e2e-testing.md` §6 and checklist item 8 describe the new
rule.

On related issues: this adds the `local` that #3774 reports missing in
`helmrelease_has_remediation_cycle`, but not the sweep over the other
`_lib/` helpers that the issue also asks for. For #3773 it rewrites the
guard comment the issue quotes. The waits without a backstop are not
touched.

Closes #3553.

### Screenshots

Not a UI change.

### Downstream repositories

I walked the trigger map against the diff. It touches
`hack/e2e-chainsaw/_lib/`, `hack/*.bats`, one Go test under
`internal/fluxcontract`, two spend-order comments in the kubernetes
suites, and `docs/agents/e2e-testing.md`. No package, schema, CRD, make
target or user-facing document changes.

- [x] No downstream repository is affected by this change
- [ ] [cozystack/website](https://github.com/cozystack/website) -
follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/terraform-provider-cozystack](https://github.com/cozystack/terraform-provider-cozystack)
- follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/ansible-cozystack](https://github.com/cozystack/ansible-cozystack)
- follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/ccp](https://github.com/cozystack/ccp) - follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/talm](https://github.com/cozystack/talm) - follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/cozyhr](https://github.com/cozystack/cozyhr) -
follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/cozy-proxy](https://github.com/cozystack/cozy-proxy) -
follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/cozystack-telemetry-server](https://github.com/cozystack/cozystack-telemetry-server)
- follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/external-apps-example](https://github.com/cozystack/external-apps-example)
- follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/examples](https://github.com/cozystack/examples) -
follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/community](https://github.com/cozystack/community) -
follow-up:

### Release note

```release-note
fix(e2e): the HelmRelease history guard now also covers the tenant addon releases. A failed or uninstalled Snapshot fails the run on the parent, cilium and csi, which retry in place; other addons get a note. The same classification is printed on the failure paths where the guard itself cannot run.
```
2026-10-05 17:12:38 +03:00
IvanHunters 40638429bd fix(release): collect refs stored as registry/image/tag/digest keys (#4697)
## What this PR does

The shared image-ref enumeration skipped refs stored the way upstream
ingress-nginx stores them: `registry`, `image`, `tag` and `digest` as
separate keys, with the repository in `image` and a digest that has no
`@`. Two refs in the tree use this layout, the ingress-nginx controller
and its default backend, both in
`packages/system/ingress-nginx/values.yaml`. Every tool that reads refs
through `hack/lib/image-refs.sh` missed both of them: the promote retag,
the nightly mirror, the multi-arch gate, the stitch step and the
promoted-packages verifier.

I added a sixth YAML shape that joins `<registry>/<image>@<digest>`. It
fires only on a complete `sha256:` digest, so upstream's unpinned
default (`digest: ""`) and image maps without a digest emit nothing. It
checks that `digest` is a string before `test()`, same as shape 3 does.
The library header and `docs/agents/image-refs.md` now say "the YAML
sub-shapes listed" instead of a number, so the next shape doesn't make
the count wrong again.

The real tree now gives 93 refs instead of 91, and the two new ones are
exactly the ingress-nginx pair. The retag and mirror output does not
change today, because both refs sit outside the owned registry and the
ownership filters drop them. Both digests are multi-arch indexes, so
`hack/verify-multiarch.sh --refs-file` with just those two passes and
the release gate stays green.

To show the consumers really pick the shape up, I ran both dry-runs on a
copy of the tree with the controller moved under the build registry, the
host being the whole `registry` value. In that copy the controller is
the only build-registry ref.

Before:

```text
$ REGISTRY=iad.ocir.io/idyksih5sir9/cozystack hack/promote-retag.sh 1.99.0 --dry-run
No cozystack-owned digest-pinned image refs found under iad.ocir.io/idyksih5sir9/cozystack/ — is this the rc's baked tree?
exit 1
$ hack/nightly-mirror.sh 1.99.0 <tree>/packages --dry-run
No cozystack-owned digest-pinned image refs found under iad.ocir.io/idyksih5sir9/cozystack/ in '<tree>/packages' — is this the baked main tree?
exit 1
```

After:

```text
$ REGISTRY=iad.ocir.io/idyksih5sir9/cozystack hack/promote-retag.sh 1.99.0 --dry-run
▸ iad.ocir.io/idyksih5sir9/cozystack/ingress-nginx-controller  sha256:a8ddcee59b63f6cbf93f4d3c9ffa1d1dda3c1d39497748d4484655356c68b3f6
DRY-RUN skopeo copy --multi-arch all docker://iad.ocir.io/idyksih5sir9/cozystack/ingress-nginx-controller@sha256:a8ddcee5… docker://iad.ocir.io/idyksih5sir9/cozystack/ingress-nginx-controller:1.99.0
exit 0
$ hack/nightly-mirror.sh 1.99.0 <tree>/packages --dry-run
▸ iad.ocir.io/idyksih5sir9/cozystack/ingress-nginx-controller  ->  ghcr.io/cozystack/cozystack/ingress-nginx-controller  sha256:a8ddcee5…
DRY-RUN skopeo copy --multi-arch all docker://iad.ocir.io/…/ingress-nginx-controller@sha256:a8ddcee5… docker://ghcr.io/cozystack/cozystack/ingress-nginx-controller:1.99.0
DRY-RUN skopeo copy --multi-arch all docker://iad.ocir.io/…/ingress-nginx-controller@sha256:a8ddcee5… docker://ghcr.io/cozystack/cozystack/ingress-nginx-controller:nightly
exit 0
```

The red test is a new case in `collect_refs_from_file understands every
YAML shape`. It has a fixture in the ingress-nginx layout, with a
non-string digest in front of it, and three near-misses that must emit
nothing: no digest, an empty digest, and a digest without `image`. On
main the positive case fails with `got: <nothing>`. Removing the rule,
the registry join, the full-digest check, or the type guard on `image`
or on `digest` turns that test red, and only that one. The bats suites
of all library consumers pass with both the old and the new library.

Two gaps remain in the tests and I left them out on purpose. No fixture
covers the new rule without a `registry` key, and none pins its type
guard on `registry`. Shapes 2 and 3 have the same unpinned `registry`
guard on main.

The overlay script has no such gap. `hack/overlay-main-images.sh` does
not use the library, and its line classifier already accepts `image:`,
`registry:`, `tag:` and `digest:` lines.

Closes #4518

### Screenshots

Not a UI change.

### Downstream repositories

I walked the trigger map against the diff. None of the changed files are
in it.

- [x] No downstream repository is affected by this change
- [ ] [cozystack/website](https://github.com/cozystack/website) -
follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/terraform-provider-cozystack](https://github.com/cozystack/terraform-provider-cozystack)
- follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/ansible-cozystack](https://github.com/cozystack/ansible-cozystack)
- follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/ccp](https://github.com/cozystack/ccp) - follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/talm](https://github.com/cozystack/talm) - follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/cozyhr](https://github.com/cozystack/cozyhr) -
follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/cozy-proxy](https://github.com/cozystack/cozy-proxy) -
follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/cozystack-telemetry-server](https://github.com/cozystack/cozystack-telemetry-server)
- follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/external-apps-example](https://github.com/cozystack/external-apps-example)
- follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/examples](https://github.com/cozystack/examples) -
follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/community](https://github.com/cozystack/community) -
follow-up:

### Release note

```release-note
fix(release): the image-ref enumeration used by promotion, the nightly mirror and the multi-arch gate now reads refs stored as separate registry/image/tag/digest keys, the layout of the ingress-nginx controller and default backend.
```


<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->

## Summary by CodeRabbit

* **New Features**
* Image references can now be read from configurations that store the
image name and SHA-256 digest separately, with an optional registry.
* **Bug Fixes**
* Incomplete or invalid image and digest values are ignored rather than
producing malformed references.
* **Documentation**
  * Documented the additional image storage format.

<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
2026-10-05 14:10:58 +03:00
IvanHunters 9196b9798e fix(e2e): bound the dataplane capture collector by wall clock (#4640)
## What this PR does

The e2e data-plane collector limited itself by counting pods and
LoadBalancers, but both of its callers stop it by the clock.
`hack/cozytest.sh` gives it 600s and the Chainsaw catch gives it 300s.
One affected pod could already run past the smaller limit, and the
LoadBalancer capture, which runs last, was the part that got lost. I
moved the collector to a wall-clock budget and fixed the other issues
filed against it.

- Every kubectl call now goes through `dp_run`. It cuts the call's
timeout to what is left of `COZY_DATAPLANE_BUDGET` and starts nothing
once the budget is spent. The default is 270s, and `cozytest.sh` passes
570s. The pod section stops 90s early, so the LoadBalancer section
always gets time to start. A call the deadline cut says so, a call cut
by its own bound names that bound, and a refused call says it was not
started and names its section; exec blocks carry that line inside the
block. The node capture and the LoadBalancer probe used to blame an
unanswered lookup or a missing cni-server when the budget stopped a
call. Now they name the budget (#3671).
- A static test fails on any kubectl call that bypasses `dp_run` and
lists the lines. It matches by command position, so a call inside a
double-quoted `$(...)` is still checked (#3694).
- Per-pod and per-LoadBalancer capture files join namespace and name
with `_`, which neither can contain. A second run into the same
directory appends, with the run separator `capture-notes.txt` already
uses (#3679).
- `capture_node` and `capture_lb_node` no longer write their callers'
loop variables. A static test fails when a function assigns a name that
a `read -r` loop or another scope owns (#3675).
- The tests that shrank every timeout to one second now cut only the
read under test. A `timeout` shim decides by argv, so a slow machine
can't cut a read the test needs answered (#3685).
- `cilium-dbg bpf lb list` runs unfiltered in every affected node's
capture, not only for a failing LoadBalancer (#3689).

The call-site comment in `.chainsaw.yaml` and the collector paragraph in
`docs/agents/e2e-testing.md` now match the code. Every behaviour change
has a test in `hack/capture-dataplane.bats` that failed on the code
before it.

Two parts of the issues live elsewhere. The runner stopping a bats file
at its first failing test is #4620, and a conntrack read filtered by
service VIP is #4623.

From #4629 I fixed the items on lines this PR already changes: the node
capture now gets the run separator, a failed speaker log read writes a
note, the endpoint tcpdump says when it falls back to the geneve
interface, and the per-read timeout knobs are validated (a zero there
would otherwise look like a spent budget). The rest of #4629 stays open:
`ovn-lflows.txt` and `lb-speaker-logs.txt` are still replaced on each
run, and two comments still describe older behaviour.

- Closes #3694
- Closes #3671
- Closes #3679
- Closes #3675
- Closes #3685
- Closes #3689
- Refs #4629

### Screenshots

Not a UI change.

### Downstream repositories

- [x] No downstream repository is affected by this change
- [ ] [cozystack/website](https://github.com/cozystack/website) -
follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/terraform-provider-cozystack](https://github.com/cozystack/terraform-provider-cozystack)
- follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/ansible-cozystack](https://github.com/cozystack/ansible-cozystack)
- follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/ccp](https://github.com/cozystack/ccp) - follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/talm](https://github.com/cozystack/talm) - follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/cozyhr](https://github.com/cozystack/cozyhr) -
follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/cozy-proxy](https://github.com/cozystack/cozy-proxy) -
follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/cozystack-telemetry-server](https://github.com/cozystack/cozystack-telemetry-server)
- follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/external-apps-example](https://github.com/cozystack/external-apps-example)
- follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/examples](https://github.com/cozystack/examples) -
follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/community](https://github.com/cozystack/community) -
follow-up:

### Release note

```release-note
fix(e2e): bound the failure-path data-plane collector by a wall-clock budget, keep its per-pod and per-LoadBalancer captures from overwriting each other, and capture the cilium service map for ClusterIP failures.
```


<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit

* **Improvements**
* Data-plane diagnostics now follow a configurable time budget,
reserving time for LoadBalancer captures and stopping operations when
the budget is spent.
* Capture reports distinguish failed, successful, unknown, and
budget-limited checks. LoadBalancers with successful probes are skipped
for heavy capture.
* Repeated captures are preserved together, and limits help control
LoadBalancer diagnostic collection.
* Diagnostics include additional network details from relevant nodes
during probe replay.
* **Documentation**
* Updated guidance covers capture time limits and how unanswered
EndpointSlice reads are reported.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
2026-10-05 14:10:25 +03:00
IvanHunters 858ca4d0a3 test(e2e): cover monitoring OIDC modes with a Chainsaw suite (#4678)
## What this PR does

Monitoring OIDC gets live-cluster e2e coverage again. It had none since
the two pre-Chainsaw BATS suites were removed without a port. This adds
a Chainsaw suite in `hack/e2e-chainsaw/monitoring/` that ports what they
asserted, plus the in-place switch from an inline config to a
`secretRef` that nothing covered.

The suite takes one Monitoring release in `tenant-test` through three
modes in a row: System, CustomConfig with an inline config, and
CustomConfig with a `secretRef`. It creates that release itself and
never reads the tenant-root monitoring instance, so it keeps working if
#4023 or #4479 turns root monitoring off.

What each phase checks:

- System mode: cozystack-api admits `spec.oidc` and both HelmReleases go
Ready. The Grafana CR points `auth.generic_oauth` at the cozy realm, has
no `role_attribute_path`, and has `skip_org_role_sync` and
`oauth_allow_insecure_email_lookup` forced. The KeycloakClient is
confidential and references the generated Secret, which holds 32
alphanumeric characters. The audience scope is bound to this release's
clientId. There is no chart-owned `KeycloakRealmGroup`. The users-Job
carries the users and the mode, and `grafana-deployment` reads the
client secret from the Secret.
- Switch to inline: the Grafana CR takes the tenant's map, keeps the
forced keys and drops every System-only key. The users-Job reruns with
the new list. The KeycloakClient, the audience scope and the client
Secret are pruned, and the Deployment stops referencing that Secret.
- Switch to `secretRef`: the inline `auth.generic_oauth` block is gone
from the Grafana CR. The operator Secret is mounted at
`/etc/grafana/oidc` on both the CR and the Deployment. This checks the
mount only and does not prove Grafana loads the file, see #4679.
- After the install and after each switch, neither release may show a
remediation cycle. That means no `failed` or `uninstalled` snapshot, and
the latest revision must be exactly 1, then 2, then 3. The revision
check is there because helm-controller truncates history after the
previous deployed snapshot. An upgrade that failed, rolled back and then
passed on retry leaves no failed entry, only extra revisions.

I did not assert `GF_PATHS_CUSTOM_INI`. I could not find anything in
Grafana that reads it (#4679), and pinning it would make possibly dead
wiring part of the contract.

The coverage split with the render tests is this.
`packages/system/monitoring/tests/oidc_test.yaml` keeps the
fresh-install render of each mode, including the CustomConfig negatives
(no Keycloak objects, no client Secret). This suite covers what a render
cannot see: admission, the Deployment the Grafana operator builds, and
what a switch between modes prunes or leaves behind. The Keycloak
objects are checked as written, so creating the client in Keycloak is
not asserted. Removing it is, because the operator's finalizer holds the
KeycloakClient until the client is gone from Keycloak.

Before the first apply the suite also waits until the tenant's
`cozystack-values` carries `oidc-enabled: "true"`. The outer release
copies `_cluster` into the inner release once, so a Monitoring applied
right after the tenant is created can render from stale values and fail
the System-mode guard for the full 15m. That is what the first CI run on
this PR hit.

The Keycloak CRDs are required, not probed for. The e2e install always
enables platform OIDC, so a missing CRD is a broken install. The removed
suites skipped in that case, and their probe could not tell an absent
API group from a present one.

The selector picks the suite up by name from
`cozystack.monitoring-application` and `cozystack.monitoring`. A change
to `system/monitoring`, `extra/monitoring`, `monitoring-rd` or
`grafana-operator` now runs only this suite instead of the full run. The
tenant-root Grafana bring-up stays covered by the install BATS while it
exists. One selector unit test relied on `cozystack.monitoring` reaching
no suite, so it now renames that source in its copy of the graph.

The second commit keeps Keycloak changes on every suite that drives a
Keycloak client. Before this PR a change to `system/keycloak` or
`system/keycloak-operator` escalated to the full run. With the
monitoring suite it would select monitoring alone, because
`monitoring-application` is the only source that depends on
`keycloak-operator`, and `kubernetes-latest` with its OIDC lifecycle
would drop out. `src_to_suites()` now maps both to `kubernetes-latest
monitoring`. The mapping has to be explicit because
`kubernetes-application` has no `dependsOn` on `keycloak-operator`
(#4680). A `postgres-operator` change now also reaches
`kubernetes-latest`, through Keycloak's database. The selector comment
and the e2e doc no longer use `system/postgres-operator` as the example
of a path with a source that reaches no suite.

Cost: one monitoring stack bring-up, two in-place upgrades and teardown.
I expect 10 to 20 minutes on every full run. The selector change makes
the CI run on this PR a full run, so the suite's own timing is in the
chainsaw report. A red run can spend up to 16m on each of four waits,
since each one sits a minute above the 15m timeout of the release it
waits on.

The suite cannot run locally, so I checked it this way:

- `chainsaw lint test` at v0.2.15, the sandbox version, passes.
- I ran the suite's own steps against a local envtest apiserver.
Chainsaw applies the real manifests, and a stand-in for helm and the
operators renders the chart from the stored Monitoring spec. With the
chart intact all nine steps pass. Each of 30 single breakages of the
chart or of the simulated controllers turns the expected step red.
- `hack/select-e2e_test.bats` and `hack/select-install_test.bats` pass.
The new Keycloak selection case fails without the mapping and when
`kubernetes-latest` is dropped from it.

A browser login through Keycloak is out of scope, same as in the removed
suites.

Left for later:

- KeycloakClient and scope `status` after the operator creates them in
Keycloak is not checked.
- `hack/e2e-chainsaw/README.md` lists suites by hand. I added
`monitoring`, but `backup`, `kafka-metadata` and `kubernetes-proxmox`
were already missing.
- The `operator diff selects all dependent app suites` selector test
could also check `monitoring`.
- The comment on the Keycloak mapping says both suites wait for the
finalizer to remove the client. The monitoring suite does wait.
`kubernetes-latest` only reads once after its upgrade.
- The ready checks compare `observedGeneration` with
`metadata.generation` through `contains()`. Both are fields of the same
object, not a number literal, so the v0.2.15 literal gotcha should not
apply, but no live run has passed this suite yet.
- The inline fixture carries no `enabled: "true"`, so that phase checks
a disabled OAuth block. The asserts do not depend on it.

Closes #4051

Closes #3785

### Screenshots

Not a UI change.

### Downstream repositories

- [x] No downstream repository is affected by this change
- [ ] [cozystack/website](https://github.com/cozystack/website) -
follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/terraform-provider-cozystack](https://github.com/cozystack/terraform-provider-cozystack)
- follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/ansible-cozystack](https://github.com/cozystack/ansible-cozystack)
- follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/ccp](https://github.com/cozystack/ccp) - follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/talm](https://github.com/cozystack/talm) - follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/cozyhr](https://github.com/cozystack/cozyhr) -
follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/cozy-proxy](https://github.com/cozystack/cozy-proxy) -
follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/cozystack-telemetry-server](https://github.com/cozystack/cozystack-telemetry-server)
- follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/external-apps-example](https://github.com/cozystack/external-apps-example)
- follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/examples](https://github.com/cozystack/examples) -
follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/community](https://github.com/cozystack/community) -
follow-up:

### Release note

```release-note
NONE
```


<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->

## Summary by CodeRabbit

* **New Features**
* Added end-to-end coverage for Monitoring installations using system
OIDC, inline custom configuration, and Secret-based configuration. The
tests verify readiness, rendered resources, configuration cleanup, and
upgrade history.
* Updated test selection so Keycloak-related changes also run the
Monitoring suite.
* **Documentation**
* Added Monitoring to the documented Chainsaw suite list and clarified
how changed paths determine test coverage.

<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
2026-10-05 14:07:10 +03:00
IvanHunters 02fbe76418 fix(ci): close three blind spots in the e2e test selectors (#4658)
<!-- Thank you for making a contribution! Here are some tips for you:
- Use Conventional Commits for the PR title: `type(scope): description`
- Types: feat, fix, docs, style, refactor, perf, test, build, ci, chore
- Scopes are not an exhaustive list — pick the most specific scope for
the change and extend the list when a genuinely new area appears.
Examples:
- System components: dashboard, platform, operator, cilium, kube-ovn,
linstor, fluxcd, cluster-api
- Managed apps: postgres, mariadb, redis, kafka, clickhouse,
virtual-machine, kubernetes
- Development and maintenance: api, hack, tests, ci, docs, maintenance
- Breaking changes: append `!` after type/scope (`feat(api)!: ...`) or
add a `BREAKING CHANGE:` footer
- If it's a work in progress, consider creating this PR as a draft.
- Don't hesistate to ask for opinion and review in the community chats,
even if it's still a draft.
- Add the label `kind/backport` if it's a bugfix that needs to be
backported to a previous version.
-->

## What this PR does

The e2e selectors miss Chainsaw suites that have no `chainsaw-test.yaml`
or `.yml` directly in their directory. Chainsaw v0.2.15 also runs a
directory that holds only numbered step files such as `01-install.yaml`,
and its discovery walks every subdirectory of the path the runner hands
it. A suite in either layout ran only when nothing was selected. No
narrowed selection named it, the full-suite list left it out, and
`select-install.sh --validate` never asked for its mapping. Now
`hack/select-e2e.sh` and `hack/select-install.sh` list a top-level
directory as a suite when Chainsaw would load a test from it or from
anywhere below it. No suite in the current tree uses either layout, so
today's suite list stays the same.

A file placed directly in `examples/backups/` (a shared `common.sh`, for
example) selected nothing, because it fell through to the inert
`examples/` rule. It now escalates to the full suite, same as
`examples/backups/_lib/`. `README.md` there stays inert through the
`*.md` rule.

The `test-chainsaw` comment in `packages/core/testing/Makefile` said
Chainsaw discovers every `chainsaw-test.yaml`, which was too narrow. I
fixed it, and the matching sentences in `docs/agents/e2e-testing.md`
too.

Every behaviour change has a bats test that fails against the scripts on
main.

Known gaps I left for a follow-up, none of them a wrong answer today:

- The `full_suite_list` helper in `hack/select-e2e_test.bats` repeats
the selector's `find`/`sed`, so a bug in that shared pattern would pass
every full-suite assertion. The step-file and nested tests compare
against literal lists, which covers the new layouts.
- The selectors are a little wider than Chainsaw: a broken
`chainsaw-test.y*ml` symlink, or one with no Test in it, still lists its
suite. That errs toward running more.
- A few test comments describe what used to happen rather than why the
rule exists.

Closes #4630

### Screenshots

<!-- REQUIRED for UI changes: attach screenshots or screen recordings
demonstrating
the visual impact of your changes. PRs with UI changes without
screenshots will not be merged. -->

### Downstream repositories

<!--
Cozystack is upstream for repositories that are NOT kept in sync with it
automatically, and nothing in CI compares the two sides, so a change
here can break them silently.

Which change forces what, and which file to touch, is the trigger map in
docs/agents/contributing.md under "Downstream Repositories". Walk it
before you tick anything.

IF YOU ARE AN AI AGENT OR AN LLM, THIS IS PART OF THE TASK, NOT A FORM
TO FILL IN:

1. Walk the trigger map against the actual diff of this PR, file by
file. Do not decide from the PR title or from your memory of what you
changed.
2. For every repository you tick, open the follow-up PR there and link
it on the same line. A ticked box with no link claims work that does not
exist, which is worse than an empty box. Search that repository for an
open PR or issue covering it first, and link that instead of filing a
duplicate.
3. When the follow-up is out of scope, or needs a decision that is not
yours to make, open an issue in that repository instead, link that, and
say so in the PR body. Do not push a speculative PR into another
repository just to fill a line here.
4. Do not tick "No downstream repository is affected" to make the
checklist go away. If you are unsure, leave every box empty and say so
in the PR body, so a human decides.
-->

- [x] No downstream repository is affected by this change
- [ ] [cozystack/website](https://github.com/cozystack/website) -
follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/terraform-provider-cozystack](https://github.com/cozystack/terraform-provider-cozystack)
- follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/ansible-cozystack](https://github.com/cozystack/ansible-cozystack)
- follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/ccp](https://github.com/cozystack/ccp) - follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/talm](https://github.com/cozystack/talm) - follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/cozyhr](https://github.com/cozystack/cozyhr) -
follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/cozy-proxy](https://github.com/cozystack/cozy-proxy) -
follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/cozystack-telemetry-server](https://github.com/cozystack/cozystack-telemetry-server)
- follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/external-apps-example](https://github.com/cozystack/external-apps-example)
- follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/examples](https://github.com/cozystack/examples) -
follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/community](https://github.com/cozystack/community) -
follow-up:

### Release note

<!--  Write a release note:
- Explain what has changed internally and for users.
- Start with the same `type(scope):` prefix as in the PR title
- Follow the guidelines at
https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/guide/release-notes.md.
-->

```release-note
fix(ci): the e2e test selectors now see Chainsaw suites made of numbered step files or nested below a suite directory, and run the full suite for an edit to a file placed directly in examples/backups/.
```


<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit

* **Bug Fixes**
* E2E suite discovery recognizes supported manifest and numbered-step
files at any depth and maps them to the top-level suite.
* Changes to files directly under `examples/backups/` trigger full-suite
selection.
* Suite selection reports an error if discovery fails or finds no
suites.
* **Documentation**
* Clarified supported suite layouts, disabled suite-file handling,
discovery and escalation rules, and per-path coverage guidance.
* **Tests**
* Added coverage for nested suites, numbered steps, unmapped suite
layouts, and backup-path selection.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
2026-10-05 14:06:18 +03:00
Aleksei Sviridkin b42805bb4f docs(e2e): describe the HelmRelease history guard for the addons
The conventions still described a guard on the parent release alone.
They now state which footprint fails a run and on which releases,
why a footprint on a RetryOnFailure release is fatal even after a
retry recovered it and which recovery leaves no footprint at all,
why the default-strategy addons only get a note, how the strategy
read is kept from failing soft, and why the failure paths carry the
same classification without a verdict.

Assisted-by: LLM
Signed-off-by: Aleksei Sviridkin <f@lex.la>
2026-10-03 06:59:32 +03:00
Aleksei Sviridkin 5137d98e71 test(bats): refuse a negated assertion across every suite
A negated assertion is the natural way to spell "this must not
appear", and an absence is what nothing else in a test covers, so the
errexit exemption lands where it is least likely to be noticed and
invisible in a green run. Switching runners does not lift it: the ERR
trap the bats binary reports through carries the same exemption, so
neither runner sees a negated assertion that has any statement below
it.

Add a suite that scans every hack/**/*.bats, subdirectories included,
and fails on a statement whose first token is `!` -- naming the file,
the line the statement opens on, and the form to use instead.

Statement boundaries are the POSIX separators, each measured against
the runner before being admitted: `;` `&` `&&` `||` `{` `(`, the `)`
closing a case pattern, and the words `then` `do` `else`. A keyword may
legally be preceded only by whitespace or by `;` -- every other
separator in front of one is a shell syntax error, checked with `sh -n`
rather than recalled -- so the scan admits exactly those two and that
part of the class is closed rather than patched a spelling at a time.
Both spellings are vacuous under the runner, so missing either is a
silent miss, the one direction this scan must not err in. For the same
reason the scan takes a `!` with no space before its subshell,
`!(cmd)`, which is vacuous on dash and bash alike, and reads through a
`time` or `time -p` prefix, which is vacuous under bats and under
cozytest where /bin/sh is bash. A scan that wants `!` and then
whitespace as the first token misses both. On a dash /bin/sh `time` is
not a keyword and `time ! cmd` fails, so there it is an over-count.
Five over-counts remain, all erring loud, each named in the header:
they are enumerated rather than removed, because a removed error
leaves no trace while a named one tells the next reader what they are
looking at.

Inverted conditions are untouched because errexit is not what decides
a condition. `[ ! -f x ]` is untouched for a different reason and
stays a normal failing assertion: the `!` there is an operator of
`test`, not negation of a command, so nothing exempts its status.

Each claim the suite makes is pinned against removing the thing it
claims, and the separator class is measured branch by branch rather than
only at its newest entries. The recursion is exercised through the audit
function on a fixture in a subdirectory rather than through a second
copy of its find expression, because a copy passes while the function
loses its recursion -- and an audit that returns empty reads as a clean
tree. The condition-strip carries fixtures that put the negation after
an `&&` inside the condition, where only the strip can save it. The
continuation fold is pinned by a fixture whose negation sits on the
continued line, so folded and unfolded name different lines. Both
keyword spellings, the `time` prefix and `!(cmd)` have fixtures of
their own. The subshell over-count carries a fixture for both of its
halves -- that the scan reports the shape, and that the shape really
does fail.

Both halves of the premise are pinned, not just the half about the
banned form. A test asserts the runner still passes a bare negated
assertion; a second asserts the prescribed `if cmd; then ...; false; fi`
does fail, under both runners, and fails AT the form rather than
somewhere before it. Every converted absence rests on that second
half, and its failure mode is asymmetric: were `false` in a `then`
body to stop propagating, the first test would still pass while every
conversion went silently green.

The rule joins the E2E conventions doc as its own section, and the
inline list in AGENTS.md that an agent may read instead of the doc --
it belongs beside the EXIT-trap ban for the same reason, both leaving
a green suite that checks nothing.

Assisted-by: LLM
Signed-off-by: Aleksei Sviridkin <f@lex.la>
2026-10-02 15:09:20 +03:00
Aleksei Sviridkin e5a1ca853f fix(ci): run every Keycloak client suite on a Keycloak change
With a monitoring suite in the tree, a change to system/keycloak or
system/keycloak-operator stopped escalating to the full run and
selected monitoring alone, because monitoring-application is the only
source that declares the keycloak-operator edge. That dropped
kubernetes-latest, whose OIDC lifecycle also creates a KeycloakClient
and waits on the operator's finalizer to remove it.

The mapping is explicit because kubernetes-application has no dependsOn
on keycloak-operator. A postgres-operator change now reaches
kubernetes-latest too, through Keycloak's database.

The selector comment and the e2e doc no longer name
system/postgres-operator as a path with a source that reaches no
suite, which stopped being true when monitoring got its suite.

Assisted-by: LLM
Signed-off-by: Aleksei Sviridkin <f@lex.la>
2026-10-02 15:03:15 +03:00
Aleksei Sviridkin a7ac37be65 test(e2e): let HR-Ready waits outlast the install timeout of the release they wait on (#4471)
## What this PR does

Stacked on #4468, which holds the raised backup waits to a start margin;
review that one first. This PR's own diff is the six commits on top of
it.

Most HR-Ready waits in the E2E suites gave up before the release they
were waiting on could fail its install. cozystack-api gives every
release it generates a 600s install timeout, and the Chainsaw asserts in
front of those releases sat at 5 or 6 minutes. When an install genuinely
failed, the suite reported a bare assert timeout against a release that
was still installing, and the reason the install failed, which the
release records when its own timeout fires, was never reached. Red runs
failed just as often as they should; they only said less.

I raised every HR-Ready wait above the install timeout of its own
release, by the 60s start margin #4468 introduces:

- Chainsaw asserts on releases cozystack-api generates go to 11m, across
bucket, clickhouse, etcd, external-dns, foundationdb, harbor, mongodb,
openbao, opensearch, postgres, qdrant, rabbitmq, redis, valkey and
vminstance.
- Asserts on nested `<name>-system` releases take their floor from the
template that renders them: 11m for external-dns, openbao and qdrant
(10m `spec.timeout`), 16m for `harbor-test-system` (15m). `harbor-test`
sat exactly on its 600s floor, which expires first because the assert's
clock starts before the install's; it goes to 11m too.
- The kuberture Package release takes its 10m from cozystack-operator
and goes to 11m.
- In the backup walkthroughs, the bucket waits go from 300s to 660s in
clickhouse, kafka, mariadb, mongodb, postgres, rabbitmq and redis, and
the two postgres waits go from 360s to 660s. The kafka bucket wait
passed no budget and silently took the helper's 300s default, which is
why earlier scans for literal budgets missed it. Each Chainsaw op that
runs a walkthrough grows by exactly what its waits gained (clickhouse
78m, kafka 46m, mariadb 48m, mongodb 42m, postgres 66m, rabbitmq 48m,
redis 36m), so a failure at any later wait keeps the headroom it had and
is still reported by the script instead of being cut off by the op.

Two waits stay as they are, on purpose:

- kafka: `kafka-rd` sets a 7h install timeout, which no budget inside
the 215-minute E2E job can clear. The kafka assert and the Kafka waits
in the kafka and kafka-metadata walkthroughs keep their numbers, and the
assert now says why in-line.
- `vm-instance-test`: `vm-instance-rd` disables the install wait, so its
release goes Ready as soon as helm has applied and there is no floor to
clear. Earlier lists of this problem included it by mistake.

The cost falls on red runs only: a suite whose release never goes Ready
now spends up to six more minutes before it reports, and in exchange the
report carries the release's own reason. Green runs are unchanged.
Suites run one after another in a single job capped at 215 minutes, so a
systemic failure that reddens many suites now reaches that cap sooner,
and a job cancelled at the cap loses its log and `cozyreport.tgz`. I
took that trade because a failed install that says why is worth more
than a red run that ends a few minutes earlier.

`docs/agents/e2e-testing.md` stopped being true in several places once
the waits were raised: it described most of the tree as under the floor,
mariadb as the only suite raised, the walkthrough bucket waits as under
it, and harbor's asserts as sitting on and under theirs. I rewrote those
sentences, and the one that pointed at "every wait above the band" of
5-6m, kept the start-margin wording from #4468, and added that a
walkthrough wait passing no budget takes the helper's default. The
comments in `hack/mariadb-first-boot-waits.bats` that quoted the old op
and bucket figures are restated; its existing checks and constants are
unchanged, because every op grew by exactly its bucket delta and each
remainder still sits at exactly its constant. I also added postgres to
the table that file holds the walkthroughs to, so its raised waits and
its op cannot drift back apart unnoticed, and a test that holds each
table suite's bucket wait to the bucket release's floor, read from the
api-server default with `bucket-rd` checked for an override; the op
check alone could not catch a bucket wait dropping back, since a lower
wait only widens the slack. redis stays out: its walkthrough waits on no
redis HelmRelease, only on the bucket and on the sentinel master, so the
table's floor check has nothing to read there.

How I checked it, since E2E cannot run locally:

- I re-ran the enumeration from the sizing section of
`docs/agents/e2e-testing.md` over every
`hack/e2e-chainsaw/*/chainsaw-test.yaml` and every `wait_hr_ready` call
under `examples/backups/`, literal or default, and held each against its
own release's floor. Every `Ready=True` assert and every `wait_hr_ready`
call a suite drives now clears its floor, except the kafka ones named
above. The opt-in etcd round-trip uses bare `kubectl wait hr` calls at
300s instead of that helper; they are listed in #4470. The `Ready=False`
assert on the rejected redis upgrade is not a readiness wait and is left
out.
- `make bats-unit-mariadb-first-boot-waits` passes, 31 of 31. For the
new postgres row, putting the op back to 50m fails only the postgres
slack test, and a postgres wait at 659s fails only the postgres floor
test. Setting any one table suite's bucket wait to 659s fails only the
bucket test, naming only that suite, and an install-timeout override on
`bucket-rd` fails it too. I ran the mutations under plain `bats` so a
fail-fast runner could not hide a second failure.
- `hack/select-e2e.sh` over this diff selects bucket, clickhouse, etcd,
external-dns, foundationdb, harbor, kafka, kuberture, mariadb, mongodb,
openbao, opensearch, postgres, qdrant, rabbitmq, redis, valkey and
vminstance.

Out of scope, and tracked in #4470: the tenant addon waits in
`hack/e2e-chainsaw/_lib/run-kubernetes.sh` (an edit there escalates the
whole E2E run), the redis and kafka-metadata `wait_hr_ready` helpers
that print no reason on timeout, and the opt-in etcd round-trip's bare
`kubectl wait` calls.

Known and left for later, none of them changed here:

- Only the mariadb Chainsaw asserts and the walkthroughs in the guard's
table are held by a test. The other raised asserts, and the redis and
kafka bucket waits, rest on literals with in-line reasons; #4470 covers
extending the guard.
- The Kafka waits in `examples/backups/kafka/04-create-kafka.sh`,
`07-restore-to-copy.sh` and `kafka-metadata/run-all.sh` stay at 300s
against the 7h floor without an in-line reason at the call site. The
doc's rule asks that of Chainsaw asserts only, and the kafka Chainsaw
assert carries it.

The postgres waits are the ones #3748 is about. Their budget now clears
the install-timeout floor and a test holds it there; what a CNPG first
boot costs on this platform is still unmeasured, so that issue stays
open.

Closes #3771

Closes #3753

### Screenshots

Not a UI change.

### Downstream repositories

I walked the trigger map in `docs/agents/contributing.md` against the
diff. It touches E2E suites, backup walkthrough scripts, a unit-lane
bats file and an agent doc, none of which any downstream repository
restates.

- [x] No downstream repository is affected by this change
- [ ] [cozystack/website](https://github.com/cozystack/website) -
follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/terraform-provider-cozystack](https://github.com/cozystack/terraform-provider-cozystack)
- follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/ansible-cozystack](https://github.com/cozystack/ansible-cozystack)
- follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/ccp](https://github.com/cozystack/ccp) - follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/talm](https://github.com/cozystack/talm) - follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/cozyhr](https://github.com/cozystack/cozyhr) -
follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/cozy-proxy](https://github.com/cozystack/cozy-proxy) -
follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/cozystack-telemetry-server](https://github.com/cozystack/cozystack-telemetry-server)
- follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/external-apps-example](https://github.com/cozystack/external-apps-example)
- follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/examples](https://github.com/cozystack/examples) -
follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/community](https://github.com/cozystack/community) -
follow-up:

### Release note

```release-note
fix(tests): HelmRelease readiness waits in the E2E suites and backup walkthroughs now outlast the install timeout of the release they wait on, so a failed install reports its own reason instead of a bare timeout.
```


<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->

## Summary by CodeRabbit

* **Tests**
* Extended readiness and backup round-trip test timeouts across multiple
services to accommodate slower startup and provisioning.
* Added checks to verify that bucket readiness waits meet configured
installation-timeout requirements.

* **Documentation**
* Updated testing guidance to clarify how readiness waits relate to
release-specific timeouts and overall test budgets.

<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
2026-10-02 12:15:58 +03:00
Aleksei Sviridkin 2d0c359f4c test(e2e): stop bringing up the monitoring instance nothing looks at (#4023)
## What this PR does

This PR turns off monitoring instance of root tenant in e2e install and
removes waits on it. Install patched root tenant with `monitoring: true`
and then waited up to 15m each on vmalert and vmalertmanager,
`vlclusters/generic`, shortterm and longterm vmclusters, `grafana-db`
CNPG cluster and grafana deployment, but nothing in the run looks at any
of it.

No chainsaw suite touches tenant-root monitoring objects. Only one that
mentions monitoring is `foundationdb`, it asserts `WorkloadMonitor`
whose CRD comes from `cozystack-controller` and exists without
monitoring stack. Monitoring OIDC wiring is covered by
`packages/system/monitoring/tests/oidc_test.yaml` since #4019 removed
orphaned BATS suites. Kubernetes suites run with
`monitoringAgents.enabled: false` and tracing is off by default
(`tracingStorages` is empty), so they don't depend on this instance
either.

Those waits were not free. Monitoring stack competes with rest of
install for node capacity, and removed block own comment said slow
victorialogs start can fail install on PR that never touched monitoring
- that's why it was moved to 15m budget.

### What stays

Monitoring package stays installed, because `tenant-application` has
`dependsOn cozystack.monitoring-application` and without the package
platform release is never resolved. Only tenant-root instance is off.

Container lane `logsStorages` override for victorialogs also stays. It
does nothing while monitoring is off, but keeps a run that turns
monitoring back on from creating immutable replicated PVC on lane that
has only `local`. Its comment, paragraph in `docs/agents/e2e-testing.md`
and comment on Install step env in `pull-requests.yaml` now say that
instead of calling root monitoring install-time workload.

### What is lost

`curl` through `root-ingress-controller` with `Host:
grafana.example.org`, it was the only check that root ingress actually
routes to backend. Grafana was the target just because it was installed.
Moving it to seaweedfs host needs expected response checked on live
stand first, so it's tracked in #4615.

### Savings

Not measured. The happy path never spent the 15m budgets, so what this
returns is real bring-up time of the stack plus tail risk, and only CI
runs can show how much it is.

### Screenshots

Not a UI change.

### Downstream repositories

- [x] No downstream repository is affected by this change
- [ ] [cozystack/website](https://github.com/cozystack/website) -
follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/terraform-provider-cozystack](https://github.com/cozystack/terraform-provider-cozystack)
- follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/ansible-cozystack](https://github.com/cozystack/ansible-cozystack)
- follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/ccp](https://github.com/cozystack/ccp) - follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/talm](https://github.com/cozystack/talm) - follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/cozyhr](https://github.com/cozystack/cozyhr) -
follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/cozy-proxy](https://github.com/cozystack/cozy-proxy) -
follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/cozystack-telemetry-server](https://github.com/cozystack/cozystack-telemetry-server)
- follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/external-apps-example](https://github.com/cozystack/external-apps-example)
- follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/examples](https://github.com/cozystack/examples) -
follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/community](https://github.com/cozystack/community) -
follow-up:

### Release note

```release-note
NONE
```
2026-10-02 09:58:52 +03:00
Aleksei Sviridkin 43bf2768c2 fix(release): collect refs stored as registry/image/tag/digest keys
The shared image-ref enumeration had no rule for the upstream
ingress-nginx values layout, where the repository sits in `image` and
the digest in its own `digest` key with no `@`. Both ingress-nginx
refs in the tree (the controller and the default backend) were
therefore invisible to the promote retag, the nightly mirror, the
multi-arch gate and the promoted-packages verifier.

The new rule requires a complete sha256 digest, so upstream's unpinned
default (`digest: ""`) and digest-less image maps emit nothing.

Assisted-by: LLM
Signed-off-by: Aleksei Sviridkin <f@lex.la>
2026-10-02 05:40:47 +03:00
Aleksei Sviridkin c4e6d169a0 fix(e2e): give the cozytest caller a dataplane budget that fits its backstop
The collector's default budget is sized under the 300s Chainsaw
backstop. The cozytest.sh caller allows 600s, and on the default it
would give up more than half of that window, so it passes a budget
matching its own backstop. The budget test reads each caller's
override and fails when a budget leaves more of its backstop unused
than the backstop's kill grace.

The Chainsaw call-site comment still described the fan-out caps as the
bound, and the e2e testing guide described an EndpointSlice exception
to the notes contract that the code does not have; both now describe
what the collector does.

Assisted-by: LLM
Signed-off-by: Aleksei Sviridkin <f@lex.la>
2026-10-02 03:29:13 +03:00
Aleksei Sviridkin e82e5baf65 fix(ci): discover Chainsaw tests nested below a suite directory
Chainsaw walks every subdirectory of the path it is handed, and the
runner hands it each top-level directory under hack/e2e-chainsaw/, so
a test in <dir>/<sub>/ runs as part of <dir>. Both selectors read only
one level down, so a directory whose tests all sit deeper was never
listed: no selection named it, the full-suite list left it out too,
and only a run with no selection at all executed it.

Both scripts now take the top-level directory of a test file found in
that directory or anywhere below it.

Assisted-by: LLM
Signed-off-by: Aleksei Sviridkin <f@lex.la>
2026-10-01 20:35:41 +03:00
Aleksei Sviridkin c1b99df98d fix(ci): escalate a file placed directly under examples/backups
A file beside the per-app backup directories rather than inside one
belongs to no single walkthrough, but it matched neither backup rule
and fell to examples/ in the inert list, so an edit to it selected
nothing and both lanes skipped Chainsaw. It is now treated as shared by
all of them and escalates the same way examples/backups/_lib/ does.
README.md there stays inert through the *.md rule.

Assisted-by: LLM
Signed-off-by: Aleksei Sviridkin <f@lex.la>
2026-10-01 20:03:05 +03:00
Aleksei Sviridkin 6913a04622 fix(ci): discover Chainsaw suites made only of numbered step files
With no chainsaw-test.* in a directory, Chainsaw v0.2.15 builds a Test
from files named like 01-install.yaml. Such a directory runs whenever
the whole tree is handed to chainsaw, but neither selector listed it,
so no escalation carried it and no edit to it could select it.

Both scripts now derive the suite list from the file names Chainsaw
itself accepts.

Assisted-by: LLM
Signed-off-by: Aleksei Sviridkin <f@lex.la>
2026-10-01 20:02:48 +03:00
Aleksei Sviridkin 67e42bbbc0 docs(agents): stop describing the HR-Ready waits as under their floor
The sizing guidance said most of the tree sat under the install-timeout
floor, that mariadb was the only suite raised, that the walkthrough
bucket waits were under it, and that harbor's asserts were on and under
theirs. None of that holds once the waits clear their floors, and a
reader would take the old band as the norm to copy. Name kafka as the
floor no budget can clear, keep harbor as the example of two floors in
one suite, and note that a walkthrough wait passing no budget takes its
helper's default, which a grep for the number misses. The list of
definitions that disable the install wait also missed vm-instance-rd,
which is why its assert has no floor to clear, and the section never
said where a Package release's floor comes from.

Assisted-by: LLM
Signed-off-by: Aleksei Sviridkin <f@lex.la>
2026-10-01 17:40:22 +03:00
Aleksei Sviridkin 94b328c6eb test(e2e): hold every raised backup wait to a start margin
The wait-budget guard accepted a wait one second over the install
timeout, although the wait's clock starts before the install's by the
Application reconcile, the chart fetch and the helm-controller queue. A
wait lowered from 660 to 601 passed every test and brought back the bare
assert timeout the budgets exist to avoid. A wait now has to clear its
floor by a named 60s margin. Nothing in the tree bounds those three
delays, so the value is policy: the headroom every current wait already
carries. The sizing guide in docs/agents/e2e-testing.md asked only for
"strictly above", which the guard now rejects; it points at the margin
instead of restating a number.

The mongodb, rabbitmq and clickhouse walkthrough waits were raised for
the same reason as mariadb's, and their Chainsaw ops grown with them,
but nothing held either. Each suite is now a row in one table and gets
its own floor and op tests, so a regression reds only its own suite.
Floors come from the api-server install-timeout default and, for
mariadb, the chart's startup probe; each suite's RD is checked for an
override instead of being assumed not to carry one. Each op keeps the
remainder it had before the raise over every HelmRelease wait it
reaches, the bucket one included, so raising a wait and its op together
keeps the remainder instead of widening the slack. The mongodb target
behind SKIP_RESTORE=1 is not reached and is left out until the op stops
passing it.

Assisted-by: LLM
Signed-off-by: Aleksei Sviridkin <f@lex.la>
2026-10-01 17:40:20 +03:00
Aleksei Sviridkin 312409ecd2 test(e2e): fail the suite whose pods outlive its cleanup (#4492)
## What this PR does

A Chainsaw suite could pass while the workloads it created kept running
after its own cleanup, and nothing noticed until a later suite failed.
On one E2E run the brokers of four Kafka releases from suites that had
passed and deleted their applications (#4488), plus a TenantControlPlane
sitting on its finalizer with two apiserver pods (#4489), pushed pod
memory requests to the node limit. Harbor then failed on `Insufficient
memory` two suites later, under the wrong name.

This makes the suite that leaked fail, and name what it left behind.

- Chainsaw v0.2.15 has no hook that runs after a test's cleanup: its
`Configuration` carries `error.catch`, which runs only on failure. So
`make test-chainsaw` now runs `hack/e2e-chainsaw-run.sh`, which invokes
`chainsaw test` once per suite directory and checks the cluster between
invocations with `hack/e2e-chainsaw/_lib/leak-guard.sh`.
- Attribution: a pod is charged to a suite when all three hold. It is
not terminal. Its UID was not in the pod list taken before the suite.
The root of its ownerReferences chain was created at or after the suite
started. A platform pod replaced mid-suite by a rollout, an eviction or
a crash traces back to an object the install created, so it is not
charged. A pre-existing pod adopted by a controller recreated mid-suite
is excluded by the UID baseline. A leak is charged once, to its own
suite.
- The suite start is read off an apiserver, from the `creationTimestamp`
of a server-side dry-run create, rather than off the sandbox. With
several control-plane nodes the reading and a root's timestamp can come
from different apiservers, so the rule assumes their clocks agree more
closely than the gap between the reading and the suite's first object;
no skew margin is added. Source for that behaviour: the generic registry
`Store.create` stamps it through `rest.FillObjectMetaSystemFields`, then
`DryRunnableStorage.Create` copies it back without persisting
(`staging/src/k8s.io/apiserver/pkg/registry/generic/registry/store.go`
and `dryrun.go` at Kubernetes v1.33.0).
- Budget: charged pods get 300s to disappear, the default
`timeouts.cleanup` in `.chainsaw.yaml`; a unit test keeps the two equal.
A suite that overrides its own cleanup timeout (kafka sets 8m) is
covered the same way, because the check runs only after `chainsaw test`
has returned, which is after every cleanup in the suite has finished
under its own timeout; the 300s start from there. The leaks this targets
sat about 110 minutes (Kafka brokers) and 30+ minutes (the
TenantControlPlane) past their suites. Every green suite logs
`leak-guard: suite=<dir> clear after Ns`, so the number can be checked
against later runs.
- Past the budget the run prints `LEAKED-PODS suite=<dir> budget=300s
count=N`, then one line per pod with its phase, deletion state, root and
`app.kubernetes.io/instance`. It raises a `leaked-pods` error annotation
and adds a failed `leak-guard` test case to `chainsaw-report.xml`. The
run continues through the remaining suites and exits non-zero at the
end, as the single invocation did on a red test.
- A suite that already failed on its own is checked once without the
wait. Its leftovers are reported as a `::warning` with `LEAKED-PODS
suite=<dir> checked-once=chainsaw-failed`, since some may still be
tearing down.
- Each pod gets one `kubectl wait` inside the remaining budget, and
nothing is retried. A timeout or a spent budget gives the verdict from
the last good pod list, also when the re-list after it fails, so a leak
fails the suite. A wait that fails only after running for its whole
`--timeout` counts as a timeout whatever it printed: kubectl maps an
expired context to "timed out waiting for the condition" only inside the
watch, so a deadline that passes during its initial lookup surfaces as
"context deadline exceeded" (`wait.go` and `delete.go` in kubectl
v1.33.0). A spent budget is caught before calling kubectl and never
passed as `--timeout=0`, which means "check once".
- Any other error on a wait or a re-list, before the budget is spent and
before any timeout, stops the waiting and is reported as `LEAKED-PODS
suite=<dir> count=N inconclusive="<error>"`. That is a warning, not a
leak failure, so an apiserver blip cannot become a leak red.
- A failed first reading after a suite, including a pod list that cannot
be parsed, leaves the suite unchecked. It fails with a `leak-guard`
annotation and a report case saying the cluster could not be read, not
that it leaked. Errors that are not leaks carry the annotation title
`leak-guard`, not `leaked-pods`.
- Known leaks are listed in `hack/e2e-chainsaw/_lib/leak-allowlist.txt`
as `<suite-dir> <issue-ref>`: `kubernetes-latest` and
`kubernetes-previous` against #4489 (both suites create a
TenantControlPlane through `_lib/run-kubernetes.sh`). `kafka` and
`kafka-metadata` were listed against #4488 until #4490 fixed it; those
entries are gone. An allowlisted suite prints its leak as a `::warning`
and does not fail. An entry that names a directory that is not a suite
stops the run before the first suite, so a rename cannot keep an
exemption alive. The PR fixing each issue deletes its lines.

Suite selection is unchanged. The runner runs the named directories when
there are any, and otherwise every directory directly under
`hack/e2e-chainsaw/`, each handed to Chainsaw's own discovery; it
refuses a tree with a test at its top level, where that split would stop
being exact. I verified this with Chainsaw v0.2.15's own
`discovery.DiscoverTests`, built from source at that tag. For the full
tree, for `kafka redis harbor` and for `kubernetes-latest`, the union of
the per-suite discoveries equals what a single `chainsaw test [suites]`
discovers: 57, 7 and 2 tests, identical lists. 57 matches the test count
in an earlier full run's report. A unit test pins that the runner passes
chainsaw the suites and flags it was given, in order. The order changes
too: suites used to run in Chainsaw's own order and now run one
directory at a time in alphabetical order, which moves the kubernetes
suites after the kafka ones. Before #4490 fixed #4488 this starved them
(see the E2E criterion below). With the fix merged the order has no
effect, and a future leak that lands before a memory-heavy suite is
named at the suite that leaked. One behaviour does change: a selected
name that is not a directory used to fail the single invocation before
any test ran; now only that suite fails and the others run.

`chainsaw-report.xml` keeps its path and shape: one `<testsuites>` root
with the summed counts, one `<testsuite>` per suite directory. Its
consumers are the `Collect chainsaw report` / `Upload chainsaw report`
steps in `pull-requests.yaml`, `e2e-fork.yaml`, `nightly.yaml` and
`e2e-tag.yaml`, which `docker cp` the file and upload it as an artifact.
Nothing in the repository parses it. The merge is unit-tested on two
per-suite reports in Chainsaw's real shape, one of them failed, and the
result is checked to parse as XML.

Tests: `hack/chainsaw-leak-guard_test.bats` (31 tests, in `make
unit-tests`; named without the `e2e-` prefix, which the unit lane
excludes) covers the attribution rule, the budget, the allowlist, the
merge and the runner, all against stub `kubectl` and `chainsaw`. Every
rule was mutation-checked: removing the guard call, having the Makefile
bypass the runner, inverting the allowlist match, flipping or tightening
the root-timestamp comparison, removing the UID baseline, removing the
terminal-phase filter, skipping the budget wait, changing the budget,
lowering or raising the depth cap, accepting a stale allowlist entry,
reading an unreadable pod list as empty, dropping the leak case from the
report, skipping directories in the selection, treating any failed owner
read as a missing owner, dropping the separate report for a suite that
already failed, dropping the not-run reason from the report, reading any
wait error as a timeout, removing the inconclusive branch, letting a
failed re-list after a timeout turn a leak inconclusive, ignoring a
failed re-list, reporting an unreadable cluster as a leak, reading an
unparsable pod list as clean, reporting a kubectl warning instead of the
error, passing the report name without its extension, wording a failed
re-list as a failed wait, dropping an allowlist's last line when it has
no newline, dropping the check that `--set-string` carries a value, and
reading a wait that ran its whole timeout but printed a context error as
inconclusive. Each one turns its named test red, and restoring turns it
green.

E2E criterion, registered before the run: in the `Run E2E tests` log of
this PR, every suite that ran prints `leak-guard: suite=<dir> clear
after`, a `LEAKED-PODS suite=<dir>` line carrying `allowlisted=`, or one
carrying `checked-once=` (a suite that failed on its own) or
`inconclusive=` (waiting stopped on a failed read), and no line matches
`LEAKED-PODS suite=.* budget=`. With #4490 merged, `kafka` and
`kafka-metadata` are no longer allowlisted and must print `leak-guard:
suite=kafka clear after` and `leak-guard: suite=kafka-metadata clear
after`, which is the live check that #4490 fixed #4488. The first run of
this PR (before #4490, run 36223896793) is the positive control: it
printed `LEAKED-PODS suite=kafka count=15` and `suite=kafka-metadata
count=8`, allowlisted, and every other suite cleared in 0-37s. That run
also went red on both kubernetes suites, because those 23 leaked brokers
left no memory for the second tenant worker VM (`0/3 nodes are
available: 3 Insufficient memory`), which the order change described
above made possible. The guard has not yet run against a real cluster,
so the first run of this PR should carry the `full-e2e` label; its
`clear after` lines are the first measured teardown times, and any
unexpected `LEAKED-PODS` line is either a real leak or a false positive
to understand before merge.

Follow-ups, known and out of scope here:

- The allowlist exempts a whole suite, so a new leak in an allowlisted
suite stays hidden until the issue's fix removes the line.
- Attribution is per suite directory, not per Chainsaw `Test`; the leak
lines carry the release instance, which usually names the test.
- Only pods are checked. A leaked PVC, LoadBalancer IP or bucket holds
no node memory and is not seen.
- The 300s budget rests on Chainsaw's cleanup timeout, not on a measured
pod-gone latency; the `clear after` lines are where that measurement
will come from.
- A platform object recreated mid-suite (for example a HelmRelease
uninstall/reinstall remediation, or a force-replace on an immutable
field) has a root newer than the suite start, and its pods would be
charged to whichever suite was running as a leak; the first CI runs are
where to look for this.
- The per-pod wait recomputes the remaining budget before each pod, and
no unit test pins that.
- `kubernetes-previous` is allowlisted for #4489 although the stuck
finalizer was seen only in `kubernetes-latest`; both suites create a
TenantControlPlane the same way, and the exemption hides any new leak
there until #4489 is fixed.
- Each clean suite now waits for its own pods to finish terminating
before the next starts, where the tail used to overlap the next suite.
The first full run's `clear after` lines say what that costs against the
E2E job's 215-minute cap.
- After a timeout followed by a failed re-list, the leak lines come from
the list taken before the wait, so a pod whose own wait had already
succeeded is still named and the count can be too high; the verdict is
unaffected.
- Likewise, when every wait succeeded and the re-list then fails, the
inconclusive report still lists the pods whose deletion was just
confirmed. In the boundary case where the budget runs out during the
last successful wait and the re-list then fails, the result is
inconclusive rather than a verdict from the last good list, because the
guard only treats the budget as spent when it finds it exhausted at a
check.
- A mistyped `COZY_LEAK_ALLOWLIST` path passes allowlist validation; it
fails closed, since no suite is then exempt.
- An allowlisted suite is not waited on, so `kubernetes-latest` and
`kubernetes-previous` will print `LEAKED-PODS ... allowlisted=` on most
runs even for pods still in normal teardown; waiting out the budget
first and applying the allowlist only to what remains would stop that
noise.
- A slow teardown in each of several suites can add up to 300s apiece,
against the E2E job's 215-minute cap. On the first full run of this PR
(run 36223896793) the `clear after` values of the suites that were
waited on summed to 210s; the last full run before this change took 158
of the 215 minutes.
- A pod whose owner's resource type is no longer served gets "the server
doesn't have a resource type" rather than NotFound, so its suite is
reported unchecked instead of leaked; it still fails.
- `kubectl wait --for=delete` waits for deletion, while the guard skips
pods in `Succeeded` or `Failed`; a pod that finishes but is never
deleted (a Job under a leaked root) spends the rest of the budget before
the suite shows `clear`. The verdict is right; only job time is lost.
- The unit tests do not pin the one-line empty report Chainsaw writes
for a directory with no tests (`_lib`), nor the branch that catches a
spent budget before calling `kubectl wait`; both are verified against
the Chainsaw and kubectl sources rather than by a test.
- The runner's per-suite report directory from `mktemp -d` is not
removed; the sandbox is discarded after the job.
- Each non-suite directory under `hack/e2e-chainsaw/` (today `_lib`)
costs one empty Chainsaw invocation, because the runner leaves the
decision of what is a test to Chainsaw.

### Screenshots

Not a UI change.

### Downstream repositories

- [x] No downstream repository is affected by this change
- [ ] [cozystack/website](https://github.com/cozystack/website) -
follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/terraform-provider-cozystack](https://github.com/cozystack/terraform-provider-cozystack)
- follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/ansible-cozystack](https://github.com/cozystack/ansible-cozystack)
- follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/ccp](https://github.com/cozystack/ccp) - follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/talm](https://github.com/cozystack/talm) - follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/cozyhr](https://github.com/cozystack/cozyhr) -
follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/cozy-proxy](https://github.com/cozystack/cozy-proxy) -
follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/cozystack-telemetry-server](https://github.com/cozystack/cozystack-telemetry-server)
- follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/external-apps-example](https://github.com/cozystack/external-apps-example)
- follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/examples](https://github.com/cozystack/examples) -
follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/community](https://github.com/cozystack/community) -
follow-up:

The diff adds files under `hack/`, changes the `test-chainsaw` target,
and rewords one comment and the failure line in the four E2E workflows.
The trigger map's `hack/` entry is for cozystack/ccp, whose skills
anchor on `hack/package.mk`, `hack/common-envs.mk` and `make generate`,
none of which change here. A GitHub code search for `chainsaw` across
the cozystack organisation finds hits only in this repository.

### Release note

```release-note
test(e2e): the E2E app suite now fails the suite whose pods outlive its own cleanup by more than 300s, naming each leftover pod and its owner; suites with a filed leak are listed in hack/e2e-chainsaw/_lib/leak-allowlist.txt and only warn.
```
2026-10-01 14:03:13 +03:00
Aleksei Sviridkin 08011cef09 fix(ci): escalate an edit to the shared backup walkthrough helpers
examples/backups/<app>/ selects that app's suite, and a directory whose
name is no suite selects nothing. A helpers directory shared by every
walkthrough, examples/backups/_lib/, falls into the second case: an
edit to it alone produces an empty selection, which both lanes read as
"skip Chainsaw", so a change reaching every backup round-trip would run
none.

It now escalates to the full suite like hack/e2e-chainsaw/_lib/. The
set of suites that run a walkthrough is spread across the suites' own
scripts, and a derived subset that misses one would fail open.

Assisted-by: LLM
Signed-off-by: Aleksei Sviridkin <f@lex.la>
2026-10-01 01:06:25 +03:00
Aleksei Sviridkin a6ec30d56f fix(ci): discover Chainsaw suites written as chainsaw-test.yml
Chainsaw loads chainsaw-test.yml when a directory has no
chainsaw-test.yaml, but select-e2e and select-install enumerated the
.yaml name only. A suite spelled that way ran whenever the whole
directory was handed to chainsaw, yet no escalation listed it and no
edit to it could select it, so it silently dropped out of every
narrowed run.

select-install also sent find's errors to /dev/null inside a pipeline
that reported sort's status, so a failed listing validated no suite at
all and passed. It is now captured and fails validation.

Assisted-by: LLM
Signed-off-by: Aleksei Sviridkin <f@lex.la>
2026-10-01 01:06:24 +03:00
Aleksei Sviridkin e070bc7d1d fix(ci): escalate a per-suite Chainsaw path that names no suite
A path under hack/e2e-chainsaw/<dir>/ put <dir> into the selection
without checking that it is a suite, leaving the final intersection to
drop it. Alone the path escalated through the empty-selection backstop,
but beside any path that contributed a suite the escalation vanished
and the run narrowed to that suite with nothing on stderr. Shared
material next to _lib/ or a suite nested deeper than discovery looks
then went untested in exactly the pull requests that also touch an app.

The directory name is now membership-tested where the path is
classified, as the hack/e2e-apps/ arm already does, so the decision is
a property of the path and names it.

Assisted-by: LLM
Signed-off-by: Aleksei Sviridkin <f@lex.la>
2026-10-01 01:06:13 +03:00
Aleksei Sviridkin 9ac67d76a2 test(tests): preserve Bats failure reports during fixture cleanup (#3848)
## What this PR does

Test-level `EXIT` cleanup overrides the Bats TAP handler, so a failed
assertion can disappear from test results. This moves cleanup in eight
unit files after their assertions. Failed tests keep scratch files for
inspection.

Prerequisite for [the Bats runner
change](https://github.com/cozystack/cozystack/pull/3849). Existing
subshell traps in the OpenAPI and CAPK tests remain supported.

Closes #3623

### Validation

`make unit-tests test-controllers -j4 --output-sync=target` passed. The
converted files passed under Bats 1.14.0 and `dash`. A deliberately
failed assertion produces `not ok` after this change, and the trap audit
rejects an added test-level handler.

### Downstream repositories

Test cleanup and its documentation only. No downstream consumer changes.

- [x] No downstream repository is affected by this change
- [ ] [cozystack/website](https://github.com/cozystack/website) -
follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/terraform-provider-cozystack](https://github.com/cozystack/terraform-provider-cozystack)
- follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/ansible-cozystack](https://github.com/cozystack/ansible-cozystack)
- follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/ccp](https://github.com/cozystack/ccp) - follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/talm](https://github.com/cozystack/talm) - follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/cozyhr](https://github.com/cozystack/cozyhr) -
follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/cozy-proxy](https://github.com/cozystack/cozy-proxy) -
follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/cozystack-telemetry-server](https://github.com/cozystack/cozystack-telemetry-server)
- follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/external-apps-example](https://github.com/cozystack/external-apps-example)
- follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/examples](https://github.com/cozystack/examples) -
follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/community](https://github.com/cozystack/community) -
follow-up:

### Release note

```release-note
NONE
```
2026-10-01 00:45:09 +03:00
Myasnikov Daniil 57bf10acae test(e2e): stop bringing up the monitoring instance nothing looks at
The install turned monitoring on in the root Tenant and then waited up
to 15m each on vmalert and vmalertmanager, vlclusters/generic, the
shortterm and longterm vmclusters, the grafana-db CNPG cluster and the
Grafana Deployment. No suite inspects any of it. The one Chainsaw suite
that mentions monitoring, foundationdb, asserts a WorkloadMonitor, whose
CRD ships with cozystack-controller and exists without the monitoring
stack. The OIDC wiring of the monitoring chart is covered by its
helm-unittest suite rather than by the e2e run.

Those waits were not idle. The stack competes with the rest of the
install for node capacity, and their own comment recorded that a slow
VictoriaLogs start could fail the install on a pull request that never
touched monitoring. The run was paying bring-up time and flake risk for
a component it never looked at.

The monitoring package stays installed: tenant-application declares
dependsOn cozystack.monitoring-application, so dropping the package
would leave the platform release unresolved. Only the tenant-root
instance is turned off.

The container lane's VictoriaLogs storage override stays. It does
nothing while monitoring is off, and it keeps a run that turns
monitoring back on from creating a replicated PVC on a lane that only
has local storage.

One check goes with the Grafana waits: the curl through
root-ingress-controller at grafana.example.org, the only assertion that
the root ingress routes to a backend. Grafana was its target because it
happened to be installed, and pointing it at a seaweedfs host needs the
expected response checked on a live stand first.

Assisted-by: LLM
Signed-off-by: Myasnikov Daniil <myasnikovdaniil2001@gmail.com>
2026-09-30 22:51:38 +05:00
Marian Koreniuk 7500a9fbae test(kubernetes): add the Proxmox e2e suite, parked disabled
Upstream CI has no hypervisor, so this suite cannot run there; it ships
`.disabled` and is run by a lane that owns a Proxmox stand.

Named for what the chart actually creates. The resource definition prefixes the
release, so a Kubernetes CR called k8s-e2e produces
ProxmoxCluster/kubernetes-k8s-e2e in the tenant's own namespace, and the admin
kubeconfig Secret is kubernetes-k8s-e2e-admin-kubeconfig.

Stand-specific values are variables rather than hardcoded. Every one of them is
a bare ${COZY_PVE_*} that run-proxmox.sh expands with envsubst, supplying the
defaults itself — GNU envsubst leaves a ${VAR:-default} in the text exactly as
it is, set or not, and that reaches the apiserver as a string where the schema
wants an integer — and refusing a fixture with a variable still in it. The
StorageClass and the PVC probe read the same COZY_PROXMOX_STORAGE, so the volume
lands where the probe looks. The runner reads the tenant kubeconfig's .conf key,
the address a runner outside the management cluster can reach.
The stand's resource pool comes in through COZY_PVE_POOL, empty by default.
hack/proxmox-e2e-fixture_test.bats pins the shape of the fixture and the render.

The PVC probe reads the storage again after the claim is deleted: a deleted
claim whose disk is still there is the leak the pre-delete hook's Step 1b
exists to prevent. keep_tenant is honoured by the suite's own teardown, not
only by the workflow's. The workflow carries no fallback for the stand's
variables: an unset one fails the job before a key is sent anywhere. The
schedule runs only where vars.PROXMOX_NIGHTLY is true: the job targets a
self-hosted runner with the `proxmox` label, and a scheduled run on a repository
without one would sit in the queue until GitHub cancels it.

The suite also asserts the half of the deployment that lives in the management
cluster — the CSI controller and the cloud-controller-manager — because that is
the property the pair is designed around and a tenant-only assertion would pass
with the token in the wrong place.

Signed-off-by: Marian Koreniuk <moriarti@cp.if.ua>
Assisted-by: LLM
2026-09-29 21:04:06 +02:00
Aleksei Sviridkin 51a2d859ac docs(release): describe what the release job builds and what blocks an rc
The amd64 release job builds the Talos installer and matchbox for both
arches, so the pages that said CI never builds both in one job, and
that build-amd64 builds amd64 only, were wrong. Every rc stitch also
skips matchbox and the e2e sandbox, and the nightly report lists
matchbox and the refs an in-tree rebuild stamps over; the page said
every such skip and line fails the next rc. Name the ones that do not.

Assisted-by: LLM
Signed-off-by: Aleksei Sviridkin <f@lex.la>
2026-09-29 12:36:56 +03:00
Aleksei Sviridkin 71144d4fd6 ci(release): pin the matchbox rebuild in the release job
tags.yaml only runs on tags, so no pull request exercises it. The
matchbox rebuild is the only thing that makes its ref an index, and
losing the step, moving it past the tree capture or letting it switch
the default builder would surface as a failed gate on the next rc. The
comments that called the talos images amd64 only now say they are
built for both arches in the amd64 job.

Assisted-by: LLM
Signed-off-by: Aleksei Sviridkin <f@lex.la>
2026-09-29 11:52:08 +03:00
Aleksei Sviridkin c740031453 Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/main' into ci/build-arm64-leg
Signed-off-by: Aleksei Sviridkin <f@lex.la>
2026-09-29 11:20:27 +03:00
Myasnikov Daniil 10727c0391 test(tests): preserve Bats failure reports during fixture cleanup
Test-level EXIT handlers replace the handler Bats uses for TAP output,
so a failed assertion can disappear from the reported test results.
Cleanup must preserve those failures before the unit runner changes.

Assisted-by: LLM
Signed-off-by: Myasnikov Daniil <myasnikovdaniil2001@gmail.com>
2026-09-29 12:38:02 +05:00
Aleksei Sviridkin cb035f8eac docs(agents): stop calling the image-ref known gaps unfixed
Two of the gaps listed there are handled in the tree now, and each entry
already says whether it is. The heading sentence still claimed all of
them were open.

Assisted-by: LLM
Signed-off-by: Aleksei Sviridkin <f@lex.la>
2026-09-28 22:17:07 +03:00
Aleksei Sviridkin 79854b16fb Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/fix/build-list-orphan-images' into feat/arm64-image-builds
Signed-off-by: Aleksei Sviridkin <f@lex.la>
2026-09-28 19:49:54 +03:00
Aleksei Sviridkin 5924b3fd34 docs: describe how a pre-release is built and gated for arm64
Assisted-by: LLM
Signed-off-by: Aleksei Sviridkin <f@lex.la>
2026-09-28 01:32:37 +03:00
Aleksei Sviridkin 144d080342 feat(build): gate a release on every pinned image being multi-arch
A release pins one ref per image for clusters of either architecture.
A ref that resolves to a single-platform manifest, or to an index
missing amd64 or arm64, installs on one and fails to pull on the
other, and nothing before an arm64 install would notice.

hack/verify-multiarch.sh resolves every ref hack/lib/image-refs.sh
enumerates, third-party ones included since an arm64 node pulls them
too, and fails naming each ref that is not an index carrying both
linux/amd64 and linux/arm64. A ref that cannot be resolved fails as
well, rather than passing unchecked. A rate limit or a 5xx is the one
answer retried, a bounded number of times, and a ref still refused
fails as rate-limited rather than as single-arch. --report prints the
same list without failing, for a tree that is not being released.

Images that cannot be built for both architectures go in
hack/multiarch-allowlist by repository, each with a reason, so a bump
needs no edit; they are still listed, and an entry that matches no
single-arch ref is named as stale.

--refs-file checks a list of refs instead of a tree, a tag-only ref
resolved by its tag, with the same allowlist and output. It is for
images the tree does not pin by digest, such as the ones an e2e run's
nodes actually pulled.

Assisted-by: LLM
Signed-off-by: Aleksei Sviridkin <f@lex.la>
2026-09-28 01:32:36 +03:00
Aleksei Sviridkin 7753394bfe build: rebuild every package that has an image target
flux-plunger, keycloak-operator, kilo and migration-controller have
image targets but were missing from the root build list, which the
build matrix, the main build and release preparation all iterate. No
CI path rebuilt them, so their pins stayed on images pushed by hand
while Dockerfile, patch and base-image changes never shipped, and the
multi-arch pre-release build would find single-arch pins it cannot
replace. migration-controller shipped a bare :latest with no digest.

Add the four packages, and a test that derives the set from the
package Makefiles so a new image target cannot be left out again.

Assisted-by: LLM
Signed-off-by: Aleksei Sviridkin <f@lex.la>
2026-09-28 00:57:24 +03:00
Aleksei Sviridkin f02963a2c7 fix(keycloak-operator): keep the image host inside repository
The image target stamped only `tag`, leaving the committed
`registry: ghcr.io` in place, so a build against the CI registry would
render the public host with a digest that exists only in the build
registry. Stamping the build host into `registry` instead would split
the source registry across two keys, where the nightly mirror's
substring host rewrite cannot reach it and the published tree would
keep pointing at the private registry.

Set `registry: ""` and keep the whole host in `repository`, stamped
by the image target. The upstream chart joins the two keys, so the
rendered image string is unchanged, and the ref now has the same
shape as every other stamped reference the mirror and promotion
already handle.

Assisted-by: LLM
Signed-off-by: Aleksei Sviridkin <f@lex.la>
2026-09-28 00:57:24 +03:00
Aleksei Sviridkin 769d3b3897 fix(build): push the kamaji provider image under the build's IMAGE_TAG
The capi-providers-cpprovider Makefile assigned IMAGE_TAG itself, which
beats the value CI puts in the environment. Every PR, main and release
line build therefore pushed the same component-version tag and
overwrote each other's, and its second tag was built from an undefined
TAG variable and ended in a bare "-".

The image now goes through image-tags like every other package: the
build-unique IMAGE_TAG always, the component version only under
PUBLISH_VERSIONED=1. The stamped refs keep the component version as
their tag, so the promote, retag and mirror tooling see the same refs
as before.

Assisted-by: LLM
Signed-off-by: Aleksei Sviridkin <f@lex.la>
2026-09-27 07:57:31 +03:00
Aleksei Sviridkin 9a7094427e feat(build): stitch amd64 and arm64 builds into multi-arch indexes
The arm64 images are built on native arm64 runners, apart from the
amd64 build, so each build pushes a single-platform image. The stitch
joins every first-party image with its -arm64 twin into one index,
moves every tag this build pushed for it to that index, and repins
the tree on the index digest, so one ref serves both architectures.

Most refs in the tree name only the build's IMAGE_TAG, while under
PUBLISH_VERSIONED=1 the build also pushes the component version, so
the refs alone cannot say which tags to move. The image-tags macro
therefore appends every tag it pushes to PUSHED_TAGS_LOG when that is
set, and the stitch moves exactly those, plus IMAGE_TAG and the tag a
ref carries. It reads no other tag: another build's tag that sits on
the same amd64 bytes is not this build's to move, and scanning every
tag of every repository would cost thousands of registry reads per
release.

It reads refs through hack/lib/image-refs.sh like every other
consumer, rewrites only the files that enumeration names, and then
searches the whole tree outside charts/, gzip payloads included, for
any old digest it re-pointed. A ref whose digest is also pinned where
the rewrite cannot reach is skipped instead of half rewritten.

The kamaji control-plane provider's chart ships its ref only inside
files/components.gz, built from a plain copy with gzip -n, which no
text search sees. The stitch rewrites both copies, recompressing with
gzip -n so the result is what the package's image target would have
written, rather than leaving that image amd64 only.

An image with no arm64 twin (talos, the e2e sandbox), or a pair that
is not one amd64 and one arm64 image, is skipped and named. A
registry read answered with a rate limit or a 5xx is retried a
bounded number of times; any other registry error fails the run at
once rather than reading as a missing arm64 image.

On a rerun after a stitch that failed partway, the build tag can
already sit on an index of the pinned image and an arm64 image, not
necessarily this run's if the arm64 leg rebuilt it. The stitch repins
on that index instead of skipping the image, and copies it to any of
the build's other tags still left on the amd64 image. A tag moved to
anything else fails the run, since the tree then no longer matches
the registry.

MATRIX_ARCH=arm64 makes hack/build-matrix.sh leave out the e2e
sandbox, which pins linux/amd64: an arm64 leg building it would push
a second amd64 image under its -arm64 tag.

Assisted-by: LLM
Signed-off-by: Aleksei Sviridkin <f@lex.la>
2026-09-27 07:57:30 +03:00
Aleksei Sviridkin 6907c22302 docs(agents): describe the talos package as multi-arch
The build notes said the talos package pins linux/amd64, which no
longer holds and would steer an agent into re-adding the pin.

Assisted-by: LLM
Signed-off-by: Aleksei Sviridkin <f@lex.la>
2026-09-26 17:44:19 +03:00
Aleksei Sviridkin b6a30bd504 docs(e2e): describe the per-suite runner and the pod-leak guard
The agent guide, the suite README and a workflow comment said the E2E
step is a single chainsaw invocation; it is now one per suite, and a
suite whose pods outlive its cleanup fails. Say how a pod is charged
to a suite, what the budget is, and how the allowlist is kept honest.
The workflows' failure line now points at LEAKED-PODS as well, since a
run that failed only on a leak has no assertion diff to point at.

Assisted-by: LLM
Signed-off-by: Aleksei Sviridkin <f@lex.la>
2026-09-26 15:19:49 +03:00
Aleksei Sviridkin 084ac47237 feat(build): build published images for amd64 and arm64 by default
PLATFORM defaulted to empty, so buildx built for the host alone. On an
arm64 workstation `make image` published an arm64-only digest, which
amd64 nodes then fail to pull; the cilium pin shipped exactly that
until it was rebuilt by hand. A build now targets linux/amd64 and
linux/arm64 unless PLATFORM is set, and the digest a package stamps is
the index digest.

LOAD=1 keeps building for the host only. The classic docker image store
cannot load a multi-platform index, and loading is the documented local
workflow.

This changes local pushes: a `make image` on the default docker driver
without the containerd image store now fails with "Multi-platform build
is not supported for the docker driver", where it used to build for
the host. Such a build needs a docker-container builder (BUILDER), or
LOAD=1 or an explicit PLATFORM for a single architecture.

talos and testing pin linux/amd64 with `override`, placed before the
include because common-envs.mk expands BUILDX_ARGS immediately. The
Talos assets are amd64: matchbox bakes the kernel and initramfs into
its image, and the e2e sandbox boots the disk under qemu-system-x86_64.
An arm64 variant of either would still serve or boot amd64 files.

CI pins linux/amd64 on every image build. Nothing there sets up QEMU,
fork builds export a single-platform archive, and tags.yaml builds on
the default docker driver, so the default would break or emulate those
jobs. Native arm64 builds belong in a leg of their own.

Assisted-by: LLM
Signed-off-by: Aleksei Sviridkin <f@lex.la>
2026-09-26 15:14:12 +03:00
Aleksei Sviridkin 368d00b5d4 test(e2e): remove unused monitoring suites and audit BATS runners (#4019)
## What this PR does

I removed the two monitoring OIDC BATS suites that had no runner after
the Chainsaw migration, and brought the runner audit and wrapper OIDC
test from [#3778](https://github.com/cozystack/cozystack/pull/3778).

Also added checks for audience mapper and `OIDC_MODE=System`. The named
`KeycloakRealmGroup` test documents coverage the document-count and kind
assertions already provided.

Runner audit reports unused BATS suites, missing files in runner paths,
and unresolved Make variables (including `$(E2E_SUITE)`).

Live Monitoring API admission, Grafana operator reconciliation and mode
transitions are not tested here.

### Validation

- `make -j4 unit-tests SHELL=/usr/bin/dash` passed.
- Monitoring Helm tests: 53 system-chart tests and 10 wrapper-chart
tests passed.
- Runner audit: 12 cases passed under dash and Bats 1.14.0. The full
shell syntax and BATS sweep passed under dash too.
- Three chart mutations and seven runner mutations failed as expected.

### Downstream repositories

- [x] No downstream repository is affected by this change

### Release note

```release-note
NONE
```
2026-09-25 16:55:05 +04:00
Myasnikov Daniil c55ab268e2 test(monitoring): remove orphaned OIDC BATS suites
The two pre-Chainsaw monitoring OIDC suites have had no invocation site since the app suite migrated to Chainsaw. Remove them instead of carrying dead tests that force the selector to run every live suite.

Keep the existing selector and capture guards for the historical path shape, and update their comments now that the directory is empty. Retain a named chart assertion for the no-KeycloakRealmGroup ownership invariant; the existing count and kind assertions already enforce the same behavior.

Assisted-By: LLM
Signed-off-by: Myasnikov Daniil <myasnikovdaniil2001@gmail.com>
2026-09-24 16:28:00 +05:00
Timofei Larkin 180030be72 fix(api): refuse only what a name declaration actually breaks
Three cases refused creates of a kind, or were documented as refused,
without the declaration being at fault.

A schema that is not a JSON object was reported as an invalid
x-cozystack-name, although such a schema has no declaration to blame,
and the spec schema's own loader already reports it. It now declares
nothing, so creates keep working and a kind with a legacy cap keeps it.

Any unknown key inside a declaration took the kind offline, so a
generator adding a title or an example would do the same. Keywords that
constrain nothing, the JSON Schema annotations and x- extensions, are
now ignored. A constraint keyword the server does not implement is still
refused, because accepting it would drop it silently.

The docs said a declaration no name satisfies is refused. That holds
for lengths only: a pattern is checked to compile, not to match
anything. The docs now say so.

The parser moves to pkg/apis/apps/validation so the API review gate can
reuse it rather than keep a copy of its rules.

Assisted-by: LLM
Signed-off-by: Timofei Larkin <lllamnyp@gmail.com>
2026-09-24 09:35:10 +03:00