mirror of
https://github.com/cozystack/cozystack.git
synced 2026-11-13 08:05:19 +09:00
f48a94de6d53d23801f4a27b016090e03ff24632
24
Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
d9689bd6e7 |
fix(gateway): stop describing Cilium 1.19.5 as the shipped release
With Cilium at 1.20.2 the tenant gateway comments, README and one status message still explained behaviour as that of "the pin" at 1.19.5. Several of those claims no longer hold: a Gateway with two routed passthrough ports now gets an Envoy listener per port, Cilium judges a route's kinds against the listener the route names, and the shipped operator accepts an HTTPS and a passthrough listener on one port when the passthrough hostname is strictly narrower. Behaviour that is unchanged is re-anchored on the 1.20.2 source, behaviour that is gone is stated as history, and the refusal of one hostname on two passthrough ports no longer blames a Cilium limitation the shipped release does not have. Assisted-by: LLM Signed-off-by: Aleksei Sviridkin <f@lex.la> |
||
|
|
ad3f15d4f3 |
feat(gateway)!: reserve a passthrough listener's name by the spec alone
The TenantGateway controller withheld the HTTPS-terminate listener for a name a passthrough listener answers only once a TLSRoute was attached there and resolved a backend, mirroring how Cilium builds its filter chains. That kept a served endpoint up on Cilium 1.19.5, but it tied every route's status to one implementation's translator and needed Service and ReferenceGrant watches to land the deferred decision. The shipped operator accepts a wildcard terminate listener beside a narrower passthrough listener on 443 and keeps conflicting every other overlap. A terminate listener for the passthrough name itself is not narrower, so on 443 the rule now protects the dataplane outright; on a native port Gateway API would serve the pair, and the rule holds as a policy that keeps a platform name with its passthrough listener. Reading it off the spec makes the outcome the same on every implementation. Under http01 an HTTPRoute claiming such a name gets no listener and no certificate whether or not a TLSRoute is attached. A route whose every hostname is reserved reads Accepted=False with NoMatchingListenerHostname; one that also claims a free hostname stays Accepted and is served there, as Gateway API accepts a route whose hostnames intersect at least one listener. dns01 and existingSecret are unchanged: their wildcard listener still covers such a name, and the passthrough listener answers it by its exact server name. The chart writes the passthrough services on the publishing tenant alone, so the names reserved by default are the ones the platform publishes there through its own TLSRoutes. The shape an upgrade changes is an HTTPRoute on such a name whose platform TLSRoute forwards nowhere, because it never attached (the package owning the service is not installed) or because none of its backends resolve: that route kept a terminate listener and now gets none. The backend resolution, its watches and the RBAC rules that served them go away. Assisted-by: LLM Signed-off-by: Aleksei Sviridkin <f@lex.la> |
||
|
|
bdca165f4c |
feat(gateway): report a GatewayClass that does not serve TLSRoute
A GatewayClass lists the features it serves in status.supportedFeatures, and TLS passthrough is TLSRoute. On a class that leaves it out the passthrough listeners are accepted and serve nothing, so the TenantGateway now reads Ready=False/GatewayClassUnsupported naming the class instead of Ready. A class that lists no features at all is not judged: implementations predating the field leave it empty. The class writes that list after it is accepted and may change it when its controller is upgraded, so a GatewayClass event requeues the TenantGateways on it. Assisted-by: LLM Signed-off-by: Aleksei Sviridkin <f@lex.la> |
||
|
|
d624049a3a |
feat(gateway): allow tlsPassthroughListeners under dns01 and existingSecret
The refusal existed because Cilium 1.19.5 served every Gateway port from one Envoy listener matched by SNI alone, so the "*.<apex>" terminate listener of the wildcard modes and a passthrough listener under the apex could reach each other's backend. The shipped Cilium 1.20.2 gives each port its own Envoy listener when SNI overlaps across ports, and Gateway API treats listeners on different ports as compatible, so the pair is served as declared. edge still refuses the field: it renders no TLS listener for an entry to bind to. Assisted-by: LLM Signed-off-by: Aleksei Sviridkin <f@lex.la> |
||
|
|
e62f510faf |
chore(deps): move the Kubernetes libraries to v0.37.1
The root module's k8s.io/* move from v0.35 to v0.37.1 and controller-runtime from v0.23 to v0.25.1, its release for Kubernetes 1.37. Two things held them back: the apimachinery fork, which had to be rebased onto every minor, and the watch handler that from k8s.io/apiserver v0.36 panicked on the initial-events-end bookmark the aggregated storages sent to plain watches. Both are gone. The rest of the upgrades are what these releases require: cel-go v0.29.2, the etcd client v3.7.0, kube-openapi, structured-merge-diff and the x/ modules. code-generator moves with the libraries. Regenerating the strategy CRDs that embed core types adds the Kubernetes 1.37 fields and follows one removal: the alpha PodSpec field workloadRef became schedulingGroup upstream. Once the new CRD is applied, the apiserver prunes workloadRef from every stored strategy it serves, and the object's next write erases it from etcd. It only ever took effect behind an alpha feature gate. The gateway README and the tenantgateway CRD tests cite the apiextensions-apiserver list-type ratchet at the pinned version; it is byte-identical in v0.37.1, so only the version they name changes. Assisted-by: LLM Signed-off-by: Aleksei Sviridkin <f@lex.la> |
||
|
|
7a0aab2bdc |
refactor: apply the Go 1.27 modernizers
Run go fix over every first-party module: interface{} becomes any,
hand-written loops become slices, maps, min/max and range-over-int,
errors.As becomes errors.AsType, pointer helpers become new(expr) and
are inlined at their call sites, and so on. Every rewrite keeps
behaviour.
Three rewrites stay out. embedlit flattens embedded-field literals
such as ObjectMeta, syntax only Go 1.27 accepts, which would break
backports to release branches still on Go 1.26. omitzero drops
omitempty from struct fields, and openapi-gen reads omitempty as
optional, so metadata, spec and status would turn required in the
published schemas. And errorsastype rewrote an errors.As whose
target, apierrors.APIStatus, does not implement error, which
errors.AsType rejects at compile time.
Assisted-by: LLM
Signed-off-by: Aleksei Sviridkin <f@lex.la>
|
||
|
|
626e1fe19d |
test(gateway): pin that a second reconcile leaves cert-manager objects alone
Idempotency was pinned only for the Gateway and the HTTP01 Issuer. A cert-manager type change that makes the rendered spec differ from the stored one would turn every reconcile into an update. Cover the DNS01 Issuer and wildcard Certificate and the per-listener HTTP01 ones. Assisted-by: LLM Signed-off-by: Aleksei Sviridkin <f@lex.la> |
||
|
|
9121456ba8 |
chore(cozystack-controller): name the Service and ReferenceGrant reads
Deciding whether a TLSRoute forwards anywhere reads the backend Service and the ReferenceGrant admitting a cross-namespace reference to it, and both are watched rather than fetched on demand. The read-everything rule at the foot of the ClusterRole covers them today, so nothing is broken. Naming them keeps the feature working the day that rule is narrowed, where an informer starting without a grant fails with Forbidden and takes the manager with it. The kubebuilder markers in the package generate nothing: controller-gen runs over ./api/... alone and writes no rbac artifact, so the shipped role is hand-written and only a test connects the two. Assisted-by: LLM Signed-off-by: Aleksei Sviridkin <f@lex.la> |
||
|
|
2bf9ae4a27 |
feat(gateway)!: serve passthrough hostnames and stop terminating them
Each tlsPassthroughListeners entry renders a mode=Passthrough listener on its own port, answering the entry's hostname by SNI and admitting TLSRoutes from the publishing tenant's namespace alone. It declares no allowedRoutes.kinds: at the pinned Cilium v1.19.5 a listener that spells its kinds out has them applied to every route on the Gateway rather than to itself, so naming TLSRoute here would reject every HTTPRoute on the Gateway. A hostname a passthrough listener answers no longer earns an HTTPS-terminate listener or a Gateway-issued certificate. That is the break, and it is keyed on service rather than on declaration: the same Cilium builds a passthrough filter chain per route out of the backends that survived resolution, so a listener no TLSRoute attaches to, and a route whose backendRefs resolve to nothing, both match no ClientHello and leave the terminate listener holding the name. Eligibility asks what v1.19.5 asks and no more, the reference allowed and the Service present, and fails closed on a read it cannot complete. Services and ReferenceGrants are watched, so a withdrawal deferred on a missing backend lands on the pass that sees it arrive, and the Service watch takes only the creates and deletes, existence being all that is read. Which hostname a route claims is answered the same way. spec.hostnames is optional on a TLSRoute, and ComputeHosts substitutes the hostname of each TLS listener the route's parentRefs select for a route that declares none, so such a route carries the SNI and takes the name over exactly as one that spells it out. A declared hostname broader than the listener's is that substitution from the other side: the route is served on the listener's name and not on the wildcard it wrote, so a claim covering a reserved name counts as a claim on it. The substitution reaches only the listeners that would admit the route. A native-port listener takes the publishing tenant's namespace alone, so Cilium never puts a route from elsewhere on it and never serves that route on its hostname; borrowing the name anyway refuses the route for a namespace, over a hostname its own object does not carry, in the same pass that sheds a terminate listener because that same route is serving a name it borrowed legitimately. A route that names the listener in its sectionName keeps the borrow, since there the refusal is the answer to what it asked for. A route the Gateway renders no listener for hears it from this controller instead of from Cilium alone: the hostname a passthrough listener took, the hostname nothing answers, the sectionName or port naming a listener that answers something else, the sectionName naming no rendered passthrough listener, and the native-port listener that admits the tenant alone, each with its own Gateway API reason and a message naming the hostnames that lost. An HTTPRoute pinning a rendered passthrough listener by sectionName is refused there too, since such a listener forwards a stream it never terminates and takes TLSRoute alone by protocol. Nothing else tells that route: the port-443 listeners name HTTPRoute in their kinds to keep every port-443 set uniform, which the Gateway reports back as InvalidRouteKinds rather than as a grant, and the pin reads a listener's kinds against every route on the Gateway, so it reports the route accepted. The field is confined to certMode http01, stated as the modes that can carry it so one added later is refused until someone rules on it. The wildcard modes cover the whole apex with one terminate listener the pinned Cilium cannot keep apart from a passthrough listener beneath it, and edge terminates TLS at the class provider and renders no TLS listener at all. An HTTPRoute claiming a wildcard is refused under http01 before the race and the overlap are read. The HTTP-01 challenge issues no wildcard certificate, so the terminate listener rendered for the claim could never carry the name, and the listener name built from the hostname's first label carried the asterisk, which the Gateway CRD admits in a hostname and refuses in a name, so the apiserver refused the whole Gateway write and every other listener on it froze where it stood. The renderer now writes that label as "wildcard", so every hostname the CRD admits yields a name it admits, and no name that was already admissible moves. That refusal is a statement about the terminate listener, so it is judged where that listener is decided rather than ahead of everything else. The port-80 listener carries no hostname and serves a wildcard claim as readily as any other, so a route that selects it, by pinning the port or by naming the listener, never needed the listener HTTP-01 cannot supply and is served rather than refused. Judged first, the refusal reached that route too and reported it unserved while Cilium was serving it in plaintext. A parentRef port on an HTTPRoute is read the way servableOn reads it for a TLSRoute. The terminate listener sits on 443, so a route pinning another port attaches to no listener the render would give it, and it used to earn a listener and an ACME certificate for a route that attached to nothing. Port 80 is the plain-HTTP listener, which admits the publishing tenant alone: a route from there pinning it is served plain and earns neither a listener nor a refusal. A route status write that fails is told apart by kind. A conflict or a route that vanished between the list and the write is a race between the two status writers this Gateway has: the reconcile requeues and retries the write without pinning Ready=False on the tenant, and the status pass runs after the http-to-https redirect, so such a race cannot withhold the one object that guard exists to provide. A write the apiserver will refuse on every pass still fails the reconcile, after every other route has been written, because the condition is the only object saying why a hostname is not served, and a pass that reported success over a lost write left the route reading Accepted=True until the resync. The retryable half is logged on the way out. Declining to pin Ready=False leaves the requeue as the only thing acting on it, and the requeue says nothing: the tenant goes on reading Ready, no event is recorded, and returning no error opts out of the backoff that would widen the interval, so a write failing on every pass retries at a fixed period indefinitely with nothing anywhere to show for it. A TLSRoute claiming a hostname broader than the listener's is pulled into the eligibility question for each name it covers, because the pinned Cilium serves it on the listener's own name. That is right only where the listener answering a name is named exactly that name. Under a wildcard entry the substitution hands such a route the wildcard, so its chain carries "*.db.<apex>" while the terminate chain carries the exact name beneath, and Envoy matches an exact server name ahead of a wildcard, so nothing collides; pulling the route in there withdrew a served endpoint and handed its name to the database behind the passthrough listener. The pull-in is now keyed on an exact listener match. Every condition this controller writes on an HTTPRoute, and the one it writes on a TLSRoute declaring no hostnames, is written under http01, and the whole-apex modes collect no claims, so a switch of certMode left those verdicts standing over listeners the new mode does not render. The whole-apex pass now drops this controller's entry from HTTPRoutes and from hostname-less TLSRoutes; the edge refusal stays confined to routes that declare hostnames, since a refusal written on a lent hostname would have no path back. Within http01 the same verdicts outlive their listeners for a second reason, and no mode change is needed to reach it. The status pass walks the routes that attached rather than the ones that claimed a hostname, and retracts its entry from the difference, because a claim set is not a route's own property once a hostname can be borrowed: a TLSRoute declaring none takes the hostname of every passthrough listener its parentRef selects, so removing that listener empties the claim set while the route stands unchanged, and an HTTPRoute reaches the same state by dropping its hostnames. Judged on claims alone such a route keeps whatever the last pass that did judge it left behind, describing a listener the Gateway no longer has. An HTTPRoute pinned by sectionName to a passthrough listener this Gateway does not render is refused with NoMatchingParent, the reading a TLSRoute in the same shape already got, instead of earning a terminate listener it could never attach to. A route served on the port-80 listener, by parentRef port or by naming it, earns no terminate listener and is refused nothing, but it publishes the name from its namespace all the same, so it stays in the hostname race. Every recount now ranks it with the field it recounts, because a recount that left it out crowned the namespace that had lost to it and dropped a loss the first count recorded: a third route refused in a third namespace, or a passthrough entry declared for the name, flipped the loser to Accepted=True. Selecting the port-80 listener by name is judged as selecting it by port: from a namespace the listener admits the route is served plain, from anywhere else the listener turns it away and the route reads NotAllowedByListeners, and a sectionName and a parentRef port that select different listeners select none and read NoMatchingParent, which is what Gateway API requires when both are given. Before this a route naming the listener from a refused namespace earned a terminate listener and a certificate it could never attach to. Assisted-by: LLM Signed-off-by: Aleksei Sviridkin <f@lex.la> |
||
|
|
4b2507b7a1 |
docs(gateway): align gateway prose with the code
The comment on the shared CEL string said what the hostname requirement is but not what it is worth per kind. Two of the three schemas leave spec.hostnames optional at every version the vendored bundle serves, so for HTTPRoute and GRPCRoute this policy is the only rejection a hostname-less route meets; tlsroutes requires the field at v1 and v1alpha3 and not at v1alpha2, so there the policy closes the gap for as long as v1alpha2 is served. State that where the requirement is stated. The comment on the port-80 allowedRoutes filter credited the cert-manager namespace entry for letting ACME complete, which the paragraph above it retracts: the solver route lives in the tenant namespace, and that is what keeps ACME working. The same sentence claimed the filter keeps app routes off port 80, and the Layer 1 paragraph of the gateway README claimed it too. It does not. A tenant that owns its Gateway is its own gateway namespace, so its app routes are admitted by this very filter; what it excludes is cozy-* and inheriting children. Both copies now say that. Nothing said why naming the apex on the redirect costs no coverage, which is the question a reader has once the route stops matching every host. It holds because of the other half of this change: the port-80 listener admits routes only from the tenant namespace and cert-manager's, and the tightened route policy requires every route there to declare hostnames inside the apex. An inheriting child does not widen that set either, and the comment now says so at the point the hostnames are chosen: the gateway hostname policy compares every listener against the host label of the Gateway's own namespace, so a child apex outside it never gets its listener, the Gateway write carrying it being refused at admission whole, in reconcileGateway and before this route is rendered, while a child apex under this one passes that check and the wildcard already covers it. The empty-apex guard in renderHTTPRedirect, and the test pinning it, both read as though the guard is what spares an operator an unreadable schema error. It is, but the condition stated for it named the number of attached routes, which does not enter into it. In HTTP-01 the listener set is built from route hostnames alone, so reconcileGateway never reads the apex ahead of the guard however many routes attach. DNS-01 and existingSecret render an apex listener, and any tlsPassthroughServices entry builds <service>.<apex>, so in those the operator meets the equivalent error against the Gateway first. State that condition once, at the guard, and let the test defer to it rather than carry a second copy that can drift; the test stays green either way because the fake client does not validate against the CRD schema. The e2e suite explained omitting the TLSRoute empty-list probe by the v1 schema rejecting an empty list. Both halves of that are true and the conclusion does not follow: the probe runs at v1alpha2, which marks spec.hostnames neither required nor minItems, so an empty list reaches admission there exactly as an absent field does. What makes the omission safe is that all three policies render one byte-identical CEL string, so the HTTPRoute pair proves that term already. Assisted-by: LLM Signed-off-by: Aleksei Sviridkin <f@lex.la> |
||
|
|
b9ecb2e39f |
fix(tenantgateway): name the apex on the http-to-https redirect route
The controller-owned redirect route carried no spec.hostnames, relying on the port-80 listener to match every host. Name the tenant apex and its wildcard instead. A route in a tenant namespace has to declare hostnames inside its own apex to pass the route-hostname admission policy, and a route that names none has nothing to compare against that apex. Naming them also states the coverage the route wants rather than inheriting whatever its listener happens to carry. Both hostnames are required: a wildcard is a suffix match over any number of labels, so "*.<apex>" covers every subdomain at every depth but not the bare "<apex>". Coverage narrows in one direction worth stating: a request arriving on port 80 with a Host outside the tenant apex now falls through to a 404 instead of a 301. Skip this route when collecting hostname claims. Before it carried hostnames it contributed nothing to that set, and letting its hostnames through instead provisions listeners and certificates for them, which fails. The check matches on name and controller ownership, not on the labels the renderer stamps, since those are writable by anyone who can create a route. Deriving hostnames from spec.apex makes that field load-bearing for admission, so it gains MinLength=1 and a matching check in the renderer for clusters whose CRD is older than the binary. Assisted-by: LLM Signed-off-by: Aleksei Sviridkin <f@lex.la> |
||
|
|
773d8dabce |
fix(gateway): withdraw TLSRoute acceptance when the mode drops passthrough
Edge terminates TLS at the class provider, so its Gateway carries plain HTTP listeners only and a route pinned to a passthrough section has nothing left to attach to. The api, vm-exportproxy and cdi-uploadproxy endpoints of publishing.exposedServices are the ones that pin one. Hostname claims are empty for every whole-apex mode, so the status pass ran over an empty ref set and left the Accepted=True written while the tenant ran HTTP-01 standing on a route the switch had just unpublished. Whoever went looking for the dead endpoint read that condition as proof the route was fine. The rule this settles on is that the controller owns a condition only where it judges. Edge judges every attached route by the absence of the listener it needs and writes Accepted=False with Gateway API's NoMatchingParent, the reason defined for a parentRef whose port or sectionName matches no listener. The other whole-apex modes render those listeners and serve them but collect no claims, so they hold no opinion: they drop the entry rather than leave a withdrawal standing on a listener that is serving, naming a class provider that no longer terminates anything. HTTP-01 collects claims and has already judged every route this pass could speak about. A route declaring no hostnames is judged by none of them, because claims are gathered inside a loop over spec.hostnames and TLSRoute v1alpha2 sets no minItems on that field. Withdrawing one would write a condition with no path back, since HTTP-01 renders the listener again and judges only the routes that produced claims, so both directions skip it. The tests read the controller name from the constant the controller stamps rather than restating it, so a helper cannot go looking for a name that is no longer written and report absence it never checked. The switch already deletes the redirect route, the Issuer and the wildcard Certificate it invalidates. The statuses it owns were the one thing left behind. Assisted-by: LLM Signed-off-by: Aleksei Sviridkin <f@lex.la> |
||
|
|
5976ddf02f |
fix(gateway): normalise the GatewayClass name and refuse a blank one
The class lists arrive over the values channel comma-joined, so every reader trims each entry as it splits them. The scalar those entries are compared against was not trimmed anywhere. A class name carrying a stray space therefore failed `has` against its own padded self, and the two readers of that scalar disagreed about the same class: the gateway chart put the tenant on an edge-terminated class, while the cluster-wide ACME issuers still pinned their solver to a listener an edge Gateway does not render. That stops every HTTP-01 certificate in the cluster from issuing, with nothing in any status naming the cause. Normalise once at the single writer so both readers see a clean value, and keep a defensive trim at each reader. The tenant's own choice does not travel that channel — it comes from tenant.spec.gatewayClass — so it is trimmed where the gateway chart reads it. Unset and whitespace-only are different events and no longer share an outcome. Unset means the choice was not made, and falling back to the bundled class stays its documented behaviour. Whitespace-only means a choice was made and is garbage, in the field that decides where TLS terminates: resolving it quietly would take a tenant the operator meant to put behind an edge terminator and publish it directly, with a real certificate on a real address. Both the platform default and the tenant's own choice now refuse it by name. The kind check beside that refusal is part of the same fix, not a tidy up. Through Helm's values path an unquoted numeric scalar arrives as a float64, and the whitespace check compares it against a string, so `className: 123` dies at that comparison — one line before the trim — with an error naming neither the key nor the file. Refusing whitespace without checking the kind first would therefore have made the numeric case worse than it was. `kindIs "string"` is the right test because it never has to name the type that actually arrived. The order of the guard's steps is part of the guard. The value is read before anything normalises it, so a default that fires on any falsy value cannot launder 0 or false into the empty string and resolve them to the bundled class ahead of the kind check. Unset is the one case that still falls back, and each of those four inputs is pinned, so a normalisation drifting back ahead of a check fails rather than quietly covering only the loudest bad input. Also correct a cleanup log line: the wildcard Certificate is deleted for every mode that is not DNS-01, so naming HTTP-01 in that message is wrong for existingSecret and for edge alike. And state the listener name invariant plainly: the cap is 253, not the 63 of a DNS label, and the longest name the builders produce is 84. Assisted-by: LLM Signed-off-by: Aleksei Sviridkin <3811295@gmail.com> |
||
|
|
7851969448 |
docs(gateway): document GatewayClass selection and edge TLS termination
An operator setting up a class whose provider terminates TLS upstream had no page answering their questions: which platform values bound the choice, what a tenant writes to make it, what a move between classes does to certificates and to the replicated wildcard Secret, and how the mechanism fails when a configured class name matches nothing installed. Add docs/gateway-classes.md covering that surface. Describe the mode and its consequences in the chart README alongside the other three, including the one constraint stated nowhere else: the publishing tenant cannot select a class whose TLS termination differs from the platform default, because the cluster-wide ACME issuers derive their solver pin from that default alone. State the blast radius where it actually applies. The endpoints an edge Gateway stops publishing exist only where those routes are rendered at all, and both pages say what the transition does to the route conditions the controller owns, so a reader is not left inferring it from the code. The security model names the selector each listener really carries. The port-80 listener selects on the built-in kubernetes.io/metadata.name label, which kube-apiserver writes and a namespace cannot forge; the HTTPS and TLS-passthrough listeners select on namespace.cozystack.io/gateway, written by the tenant chart and the controller, so that guarantee does not extend to them. What closes the exposure is that Namespace is cluster-scoped with no tenant verb on it, and that the route-hostname policies bound what a labelled namespace could publish. Assisted-by: LLM Signed-off-by: Aleksei Sviridkin <3811295@gmail.com> |
||
|
|
2ef0e8d3a1 |
feat(gateway): add an edge cert mode for upstream-terminated classes
Some GatewayClasses have their provider terminate TLS in front of the Gateway and reach it over plain HTTP. On such a class the platform issued origin certificates nobody serves, and where ACME could not complete, the Gateway's listeners never became ready. Add certMode=edge to TenantGateway. The controller renders the apex, its wildcard and every inheriting child apex as plain HTTP listeners carrying the same label-based allowedRoutes as the HTTPS listeners of the other modes, so application HTTPRoutes attach by hostname unchanged. It mints no Issuer and no Certificate, and removes the http-to-https redirect route, because the edge performs that redirect itself. TLSPassthroughServices are not rendered: an HTTP-only edge cannot carry a TLS listener, which leaves the endpoints relying on one unpublished through such a Gateway. The hostname-less port-80 listener is left out. It carries the ACME challenge and the redirect in the other modes and has neither here, so it would only be a catch-all admitting any hostname. Leaving it out also keeps a hostname-pinned listener at index 0, which is what Cilium's first-listener-wins namespace check reads before the fix in cilium/cilium#45693. Moving into the mode garbage-collects the Issuer and Certificate objects the controller owned. The TLS Secrets they issued stay behind: cert-manager runs with enableCertificateOwnerRef false, so a Certificate does not own the Secret it issued into. Every mode transition already behaves that way. Assisted-by: LLM Signed-off-by: Aleksei Sviridkin <3811295@gmail.com> |
||
|
|
fb740db0b0 |
docs(security): separate the fail-open Gateway-listener policy from the fail-closed route policies
The self-assessment summarised the whole hostname policy set as fail-closed, while its own table row states that the Gateway-listener policy passes a Gateway whose namespace carries no host label. Say which policies are which. The port-443 kinds comment in the reconciler test also tied the GRPCRoute admission rule to the port-80 listener; the rule matches the kind wherever it attaches, and the port-443 exclusion is a least-privilege choice, not the reason the rule exists. Assisted-by: LLM Signed-off-by: Aleksei Sviridkin <f@lex.la> |
||
|
|
af19aa933c |
docs(security): record GRPCRoute in the route hostname policy set
The port-443 kinds set still excludes GRPCRoute, TCPRoute and UDPRoute. cilium#45559 governs only that every port-443 listener carries the same set, not what is in it, so the contents are a least-privilege choice: nothing the platform ships needs gRPC, TCP or UDP routing on port 443. TCPRoute and UDPRoute additionally carry no hostname and no admission rule gates them. The gateway README described HTTPS and TLS-passthrough listeners as carrying different kinds. They carry the same one, which is what cilium#45559 requires. The threat model and the self-assessment enumerate which route kinds the hostname policies cover, and both listed two. Assisted-by: LLM Signed-off-by: Aleksei Sviridkin <f@lex.la> |
||
|
|
6acf34aef2 |
test(gateway): pin full port-443 kinds contract across all cert modes (cilium#45559)
Signed-off-by: shreyaabaranwal <shreyabaranwal229@gmail.com> |
||
|
|
786c098ac6 |
fix(gateway): pin identical allowedRoutes.kinds on port 443 listeners (cilium#45559)
Signed-off-by: shreyaabaranwal <shreyabaranwal229@gmail.com> |
||
|
|
4262658f0f |
feat(tenantgateway): add existingSecret cert mode for operator wildcard
Operators who already hold a wildcard TLS certificate (purchased, or issued by a corporate CA) had no way to make a tenant Gateway serve under it: the only cert modes were http01 (per-listener ACME) and dns01 (controller-minted wildcard via ACME). Add a third mode, existingSecret, that references a pre-existing TLS Secret in the TenantGateway's own namespace via spec.wildcardSecretRef. In this mode the controller mints no ACME Issuer and no Certificate; the wildcard, apex, and per-child-apex HTTPS listeners reference the supplied Secret directly. A missing wildcardSecretRef fails fast with Ready=False rather than producing a Gateway pointing at a nonexistent Secret. Switching into existingSecret from http01/dns01 reclaims the now-unused Issuer and Certificates so no ACME machinery is left behind. The non-cert listeners (http->https redirect, TLS passthrough) are unaffected and continue to render. Assisted-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com> Signed-off-by: Aleksei Sviridkin <f@lex.la> |
||
|
|
320172137e |
fix(tenantgateway): include inheriting child namespaces in hostname claim collection
The HTTP-01 inheritance flow deadlocked at the route-Accepted step:
the apps/tenant chart correctly labelled the child namespace with
`namespace.cozystack.io/gateway=<owner>`, the parent Gateway's
allowedRoutes selector matched by label, but `collectHostnameClaims`
filtered routes by the static set `{tgw.Namespace} ∪ Spec.AttachedNamespaces`
— so a child route in a namespace reached purely via the inheritance
label was silently dropped. No per-listener Certificate, no per-app
HTTPS listener, no hostname match → `Accepted=False,
Reason=NoMatchingListenerHostname` indefinitely.
Caught by the new `child tenant's HTTPRoute attaches to parent's
Gateway via inheritance label` e2e bats — failed 3/3 retries on the
CI run for `afc7765e6`. The Go controller-level
TestReconcile_HTTP01CollectsHostnamesFromInheritingChildNamespaces
test pins the same contract at a faster feedback loop: an HTTPRoute
in a namespace labelled `namespace.cozystack.io/gateway=<owner>` but
NOT listed in Spec.AttachedNamespaces must still cause the
controller to render a per-listener HTTPS listener for its hostname.
The fix extends the `allowed` set in `collectHostnameClaims` to
also include namespaces matched by the gateway label selector, so the
hostname-claim collector and the Gateway's allowedRoutes selector
agree on which namespaces can attach. DNS-01 mode is unaffected — it
returns nil from `collectHostnameClaims` immediately and uses the
separate `collectInheritingChildApexes` path for SAN expansion.
Signed-off-by: Aleksei Sviridkin <f@lex.la>
|
||
|
|
99fe080def |
feat(tenantgateway): DNS-01 SAN expansion + listeners for child apexes
In DNS-01 mode, the parent's wildcard Certificate now covers every inheriting child tenant's apex (`<child-apex>` + `*.<child-apex>` as additional SANs) and the parent Gateway grows one wildcard HTTPS listener per child apex referencing the same Certificate. Without the expansion, a child route hostname like `harbor.alice.example.org` fails to match the parent's listeners — `*.example.org` is a single- label wildcard and `alice.example.org` is two labels deep — and the TLS handshake fails the SNI check because the parent cert never listed the child apex. The controller discovers inheriting children by listing namespaces labelled `namespace.cozystack.io/gateway = <tgw.Namespace>` (the existing inheritance contract from Stage 1/3) and reading their `namespace.cozystack.io/host` label, which apps/tenant chart writes to the child apex. Children with no host label are skipped (defensive); a child host equal to the parent apex is deduplicated (cert-manager rejects duplicate dnsNames). HTTP-01 mode is unchanged — its per-listener / per-cert flow already handles child hostnames without any wildcard. Listener naming: `https-child-<first-label>-<8-hex>`, where the hex suffix is sha256(child-apex)[:8] so two children whose first DNS label collides produce distinct listener names. Cap: Gateway API hard-caps spec.listeners at 64 entries. The parent uses 3 slots (http + https + https-apex) leaving ~61 wildcard children per parent. Operators whose subtree fans out beyond that must run the high-fanout branch on its own Gateway via tenant.spec.gateway=true. Tests (TDD red→green): * TestReconcile_DNS01WildcardCertCoversInheritingChildApexes pins the SAN list contains both `<child-apex>` and `*.<child-apex>`. * TestReconcile_DNS01WildcardCertDeduplicatesChildApexEqualToParent pins the dedupe path (child host == parent apex). * TestReconcile_HTTP01WildcardCertNeverRendered pins the inverse: HTTP-01 mode never renders a wildcard Certificate. * TestReconcile_DNS01GatewayHasListenerPerChildApex pins the listener-side expansion (one `*.<child-apex>` listener per inheriting tenant, all referencing the parent's wildcard cert). Signed-off-by: Aleksei Sviridkin <f@lex.la> |
||
|
|
30302eabe4 |
feat(tenantgateway): switch Gateway allowedRoutes to label selector
The Gateway's HTTPS / TLS-passthrough listeners now match attached namespaces by the namespace.cozystack.io/gateway label keyed on the TenantGateway's own namespace, instead of a static kubernetes.io/metadata.name In [list] whitelist. This restores inheritance parity with the legacy ingress flow: child tenants of a Gateway-owning ancestor publish through the ancestor's Gateway by default — without their own LB IP / Certificate, and without operator intervention to add each child by name to platform values. Two writers populate the label: * apps/tenant chart namespace.yaml — each tenant namespace gets a label pointing at the nearest ancestor that owns a Gateway (self if owning, inherited otherwise). The tenant Helm chart is the source of truth for tenant-tree labels; the controller never touches them (annotation-gated GC). * cozystack-controller (ensureNamespaceLabels) — patches the label onto every namespace in tgw.Spec.AttachedNamespaces, so cozy-* system namespaces (cert-manager, monitoring, harbor, …) reach the publishing Gateway alongside the tenant tree. Tracks its own writes via the cozystack.io/gateway-attached-by annotation; on a reconcile where an entry is removed from AttachedNamespaces, the label is garbage-collected (annotation present + namespace no longer expected → strip both label and annotation). Also adds the gateway-attach label to tenant-root itself via cozystack-basics/templates/tenant-root.yaml when _cluster.gateway-enabled is true, so the Gateway in tenant-root's own namespace passes its own selector for the controller-owned http→https redirect HTTPRoute. Tests (TDD, red→green): * TestReconcile_HTTPSListenerUsesGatewayLabelSelector pins the new MatchLabels shape on HTTPS listeners. * TestReconcile_LabelsAttachedNamespaces pins the patch path: every namespace in spec.AttachedNamespaces (plus tgw.Namespace) carries namespace.cozystack.io/gateway=<owner> after reconcile. * TestReconcile_LabelGCRemovesDroppedAttachedNamespaces pins the GC path: removing an entry between reconciles strips the label. * TestReconcile_LabelGCDoesNotStripHelmOwnedLabels pins the safety contract: labels lacking the controller annotation (Helm-owned tenant labels) are left alone. * tenant-root_test.yaml adds the positive case for the conditional label render under _cluster.gateway-enabled=true. The HTTP listener (port 80) keeps the narrower static-name selector — it allows only the tenant namespace plus cozy-cert-manager (for HTTP-01 ACME challenges) and must NOT accept routes from app namespaces or child tenants, since unattended routes on the HTTP listener serve plaintext and leak credentials. Signed-off-by: Aleksei Sviridkin <f@lex.la> |
||
|
|
d2e851f63b |
feat: Gateway API support via Cilium
Replace ingress-nginx as the default ingress layer for cozystack-native
services with Cilium Gateway API, materialised per-tenant via a new
TenantGateway CRD reconciled by cozystack-controller.
The extra/gateway chart renders one gateway.cozystack.io/v1alpha1
TenantGateway per tenant; the controller owns the resulting Gateway,
per-tenant Issuer, Certificate(s), and the http->https redirect
HTTPRoute. This avoids the helm-vs-controller race on
Gateway.spec.listeners when route-driven listeners are added.
publishing.certificates.solver selects HTTP-01 (default; per-app HTTPS
listener + per-app Certificate) or DNS-01 (opt-in; single wildcard
Certificate per apex; providers: cloudflare, route53, digitalocean,
rfc2136). HTTP-01 keeps zero-config per-app onboarding; DNS-01 saves
Let's Encrypt budget on apex-shared clusters.
Security model -- seven independent layers, all admission-time gates
fail-closed:
1. Listener allowedRoutes namespace whitelist via the
kube-apiserver-written kubernetes.io/metadata.name label;
plain-HTTP listener is strictly narrower than HTTPS, and HTTPS /
passthrough listeners restrict allowedRoutes.kinds to
HTTPRoute / TLSRoute respectively.
2. cozystack-gateway-hostname-policy VAP on Gateway.
3. cozystack-gateway-attached-namespaces-policy VAP on Package --
blocks tenant-* in gateway.attachedNamespaces.
4. cozystack-tenant-host-policy VAP on Tenant -- blocks spec.host
writes from non-trusted callers.
5. cozystack-namespace-host-label-policy VAP on Namespace -- blocks
writes to namespace.cozystack.io/host from non-trusted callers.
6. Render-time fail in cozystack-basics for tenant-* in
gateway.attachedNamespaces.
7. cozystack-route-hostname-policy VAP on HTTPRoute / TLSRoute,
scoped to tenant-* namespaces.
Within-apex cross-namespace hostname conflict is resolved at reconcile
time by a HostnameConflict condition (cozy-* namespace wins).
Five reconcile paths refuse to rewrite pre-existing objects with the
controller-derived name but no OwnerReference back to the
TenantGateway: Gateway, redirect HTTPRoute, per-tenant Issuer, wildcard
Certificate, per-listener Certificate.
Derived-apex tenants (tenants whose host is a subdomain of a parent
tenant's) auto-enable Gateway when the platform-level gateway.enabled
is on.
Bonus fix: pkg/registry/apps/application/rest.go was ignoring the
createValidation and deleteValidation callbacks that genericapiserver
hands to every storage method, silently bypassing admission for Create
and Delete on every apps.cozystack.io resource (Tenant, MariaDB,
Postgres, Kubernetes, ...). Aligned with the existing updateValidation
pattern.
Always-on changes: cilium.envoy.enabled + cilium.gatewayAPI.enabled
flip to true (extra cilium-envoy DaemonSet, ~100 MB RAM/node idle),
and the cozystack-api admission-chain fix. Everything else is gated
behind gateway.enabled=false and tenant.spec.gateway=false; existing
clusters see no behavioural change until an operator opts in.
Tests: 60+ Go cases in internal/controller/tenantgateway/, admission-
chain regression tests in pkg/registry/apps/application/, helm-unittest
across 7 charts (extra/gateway, core/platform, apps/tenant,
system/cozystack-basics, system/cert-manager-issuers,
system/cozystack-api, system/dashboard), and 14 e2e bats scenarios in
hack/e2e-apps/gateway.bats. New make test-controllers target wired
into pull-requests.yaml.
Deps: sigs.k8s.io/gateway-api v1.4.1, cert-manager v1.17.4.
Assisted-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
Signed-off-by: Aleksei Sviridkin <f@lex.la>
|