Commit Graph
1869 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
ZverGuy b703a54cb4 fix(tenant): drop the tenant egress rule to the observability proxy
The rule was added for a tenant Grafana reading through the proxy, but
the tenant Grafana datasources still point straight at vlselect and
vmselect, and the console reaches the proxy from cozy-dashboard. The
rule therefore served no caller and only let every pod of every tenant
reach the proxy directly, outside the console route, where each
request with a fresh token costs a TokenReview.

It can come back together with a tenant client that needs it.

Assisted-by: LLM
Signed-off-by: ZverGuy <maximbel2003@gmail.com>
2026-11-10 00:45:06 +07:00
ZverGuy f7719cf6e2 feat(tenant): allow egress to the observability proxy
A tenant's Grafana reads the tenant's logs and metrics through the
observability proxy, and tenant egress is default-deny with one
allow-to-* policy per platform service. The rule is narrowed to the
proxy pods and their port, since the proxy's namespace holds nothing
else a tenant should reach.

Assisted-by: LLM
Signed-off-by: ZverGuy <maximbel2003@gmail.com>
2026-11-09 15:48:57 +07:00
myasnikovdaniil 4087218a02 docs: move the repo-only guides onto the website (#5034)
## What this PR does

Seven guides under `docs/` were operator facing and written alongside
the code, and left in the source tree where no user looks. They are on
the website now, so this deletes them here and repoints every reference.

```
docs/operations/backup-classes.md                  -> operations/services/backup-classes
docs/operations/resource-presets.md                -> guides/resource-management
docs/storage-immutability.md                       -> operations/storage-class-immutability
docs/operations/system-memory-limits.md            -> operations/configuration/system-memory-limits
docs/gateway-classes.md                            -> networking/gateway-classes
docs/observability/distributed-tracing.md          -> operations/services/monitoring/distributed-tracing
docs/operations/seaweedfs-capacity-for-backups.md  -> operations/services/object-storage/capacity-for-backups
```

`docs/release.md`, `docs/deprecating-applications.md` and the two
SeaweedFS runbooks in `docs/operations/` stay. A workflow, `AGENTS.md`,
a migration and a bats suite read them by path, which is the test from
#3777.

References point at `https://cozystack.io/docs/v1/...`. The site
rewrites that short prefix to the latest version in `layouts/404.html`,
so the links follow releases and pin none. Backup Classes, resource
management and `storageClass` immutability exist in the latest version
already. The other four pages are only in `next/` until 1.7.0 is
promoted, and their links start to resolve then. The generated mongodb
files come from `values.yaml` through `make generate` with
cozyvalues-gen v1.7.0, the version pinned in
`.github/workflows/pre-commit.yml`.

Tests: helm unit tests for mongodb (151), postgres (209), vm-disk (114)
and kubernetes-nodes (223), go tests for backupcontroller, presets and
the operator, rd-presets-check, the migration-50 bats suite.

### Downstream repositories

- [x] [cozystack/website](https://github.com/cozystack/website) -
follow-up: cozystack/website#763

Walked the rest of the trigger map against the diff. No provider
follow-up: the mongodb `values.schema.json` diff is one `description`
string, with no field added, removed or renamed, no enum, no default,
and no `kind`, `plural` or `release.prefix` change.
`packages/core/platform/values.yaml` changed in comments only and no
key, so the hand written platform-package table on the site is
unaffected.

Please merge after cozystack/website#763, the links in the code only
resolve once those pages deploy.

### Release note

```release-note
docs: seven guides move from the docs/ directory of this repository to cozystack.io (Backup Classes, resource presets, storageClass immutability, system component memory limits, GatewayClass selection, distributed tracing, SeaweedFS capacity for backups), and in-repo references point there.
```
2026-11-03 23:09:46 +05:00
IvanHunters 8d96c46994 fix(monitoring-agents): isolate merged log payload under log_processed
Fluent Bit's kubernetes filter runs with Merge_Log On but without
Merge_Log_Key, so a parsed JSON log line is merged into the record root.
An application log line can thereby forge the service fields that later
pipeline stages rely on for routing and tenant isolation
(kubernetes_namespace_name, kubernetes.labels, tenant, cluster,
log_source). Setting Merge_Log_Key log_processed nests the parsed
payload under a dedicated key so application content can no longer
override top-level service fields.

Applies to both the platform (system/monitoring-agents) and guest
(apps/kubernetes) Fluent Bit configurations.

Assisted-by: LLM
Signed-off-by: IvanHunters <xorokhotnikov@gmail.com>
2026-10-29 17:08:49 +03:00
Aleksei Sviridkin 3abdff5900 fix(kubernetes-nodes): refuse a partial resources spec on every pool (#4973)
The `resources.cpu`/`resources.memory` pair check in `nodegroup.yaml`
ran only when an `instanceType` was set, while the field description
(values.yaml, README, schema, the KubernetesNodes OpenAPI schema)
promised a render-time error for a partial spec on any pool. Without an
instancetype a cpu-only pool renders a VM with no memory, which KubeVirt
refuses when the Machine is created, and a memory-only pool silently
sizes the guest at KubeVirt's default of one vCPU.

- The check now runs on every kubevirt pool. The proxmox branch already
required both, so this is the kubevirt half of one rule, and the field
descriptions are true as written (no doc change). On a pool with no
`instanceType` the message ends in "or neither and set instanceType", so
it does not send the user straight into the next refusal.
- A kubevirt pool with neither an `instanceType` nor both resources
fails at render with a message naming both, the way `vm-instance` does.
No such pool could have passed admission (no memory), so this refusal
breaks nothing that runs today. This is the decision the issue asked
for; if the gate should stay narrower, this commit can be dropped on its
own.
- **Upgrade impact.** One shape that renders on main stops rendering:
`instanceType: ""` with only `resources.memory`. On main it gets
`domain.memory.guest` and no `domain.cpu`, so KubeVirt runs the worker
with one vCPU; with this PR it fails with the partial-spec message, and
the pool's HelmRelease sits in a failed upgrade until the values are
edited. To keep the current size such a pool needs `resources.cpu: "1"`.
Adding that line renames the machine template (for the test values,
`kubernetes-myk8s-md0-28d812` becomes `kubernetes-myk8s-md0-1ce103`, the
same name on main and on this branch), so the pool's workers are
replaced once. cpu-only with `instanceType: ""` is not in this class: it
renders a VM with no memory, which KubeVirt refuses, so it never ran.
- `cores:` printed an unquoted (float64) core count of one million or
more in exponent form (`1e+06`). It is printed as an integer now, with
the same bytes for every smaller whole number.

Tests: `tests/resources_partial_test.yaml` covers both halves with and
without an instancetype, the no-sizing case, both fields set, and the
float64 formatting. The existing unquoted-zero case in
`resources_cpu_test.yaml` now reads the field as unset on an
instancetype-sized pool (with a `kubernetesProvider` stub for the
lookup), and zero beside memory is pinned as a partial spec.

Byte stability, checked by snapshotting the `KubevirtMachineTemplate` on
main for nine spellings of `resources.cpu` and replaying the snapshots
on this branch: `"2"`, `2`, `2.0`, `"2.0"`, `"+2"`, `"1e1"`, `"010"`,
`999999` render identical bytes and template names. Only unquoted
`4294967295` changes, from `cores: 4.294967295e+09` to `cores:
4294967295`.

Verified with `helm unittest .` in `packages/apps/kubernetes-nodes` (38
suites, 233 tests, 12 snapshots), and on a trial merge with current main
(39 suites, 237 tests).

Closes #4546. The leading-zero inconsistency from the issue's comment is
addressed separately, together with #4554.

### Release note

```release-note
fix(kubernetes-nodes): a partial `resources` spec (only `cpu` or only `memory`) is now refused at render time on every kubevirt worker pool, not only on a pool with an `instanceType`, and a pool with neither an `instanceType` nor both resources is refused as well. Action required: a pool with `instanceType: ""` and only `resources.memory` rendered before (KubeVirt ran it with one vCPU) and now fails to upgrade; add `resources.cpu: "1"` to keep its current size. Adding that line renames the pool's machine template, so its workers are replaced once. Whole-number core counts of one million or more are now printed as integers instead of in exponent form.
```


<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
<!-- coderabbit-ai-generated:v1 -->

## Summary by CodeRabbit

* **Bug Fixes**
* KubeVirt worker pools now require either an instance type or both CPU
and memory values. Configurations with only one resource or no sizing
information are rejected.
* Whole-number CPU values render without exponent notation, including
values written with a decimal fraction.
* An unquoted zero CPU value is treated as unset when an instance type
is provided; without an instance type, pairing zero CPU with memory
fails validation.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
2026-10-29 11:22:48 +03:00
Aleksei Sviridkin 60d1f53e82 fix(kubernetes-nodes): plan autoscaler capacity on the cores the VM actually gets (#4974)
On the kubevirt substrate `resources.cpu` is written into
`domain.cpu.cores` as spelled and decoded as YAML, so `"010"` gives the
VM eight cores, while the cluster-autoscaler capacity annotation parsed
the same string as decimal ten
(`capacity.cluster-autoscaler.kubernetes.io/cpu: "9000m"` on a node that
offers 7000m). This is the inconsistency reported in #4554 and in the
comment on #4546.

- The YAML-decoded value the range check already computes is kept, and
on kubevirt the capacity annotation and the reserved-CPU check start
from it.
- The kubelet reservations are not touched. The worker machineconfig
(`_talosconfigtemplate.tpl`) sizes them from the raw string read as a
decimal, and the TalosConfigTemplate name is a hash of that config, so
reading the decoded value there would roll every leading-zero pool once.
Instead the annotation subtracts the reservations the machineconfig
really carries from the cores the VM really has: for `"010"` that is
8000m − 2 × 500m = `"7000m"`, the node's real allocatable, while `"8"`
keeps `"7200m"` (2 × 400m). Tests pin both sides: the annotation and the
bootstrap `configRef` name in `resources_cpu_test.yaml`, and
`systemReserved.cpu` / `kubeReserved.cpu` in the machineconfig in
`talos_worker_config_test.yaml`.
- No pool rolls. Checked by rendering `nodegroup.yaml` on main and on
this branch for nine spellings (`"2"`, `2`, `2.0`, `"2.0"`, `"+2"`,
`"1e1"`, `"010"`, `999999`, `4294967295`): the only difference is the
capacity annotation of the `"010"` case, so the
`KubevirtMachineTemplate` name and the TalosConfigTemplate `configRef`
stay as they are. The machineconfig template itself is not changed.
- Proxmox parses the quantity as decimal for the machine template and
for the reservations alike, so it never had the inconsistency and is
unchanged (pinned by a test).
- The `resources` description says the value is decoded as YAML, what
that means for a leading zero, and that the reservations still read it
as a decimal. README, schema, the RD and the Go type are regenerated
from it.

This closes #4554 without the migration and the render-time refusal it
proposes. A refusal at render breaks a stored pool on its next upgrade,
a pattern in the OpenAPI schema breaks every update of an existing CR,
and a platform-wide migration over every `KubernetesNodes` and parent
`nodeGroups` entry is a lot of blast radius for a spelling nobody has
reported in a live cluster. With this change the autoscaler plans for
the node the VM really is. What is left of a leading zero is the octal
reading itself and reservations sized from the decimal value, and both
are documented. The unquoted zero of the issue is already harmless: it
is falsy, counts as unset, and renders the same bytes as an absent
field. If a migration is still wanted, please reopen.

Verified with `helm unittest .` in `packages/apps/kubernetes-nodes` (38
suites, 233 tests, 12 snapshots; pointing the annotation back at the
decimal string turns the `"010"` case red with `9000m`), `make generate`
(no diff), and a trial merge with #4973 (clean, 243 tests green).

Closes #4554


<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->

<!-- coderabbit-ai-generated:v1 -->

## Summary by CodeRabbit

* **Bug Fixes**
* KubeVirt VM sizing and autoscaler capacity now reflect YAML-decoded
CPU values. For example, `"010"` represents eight VM cores, while
kubelet reservations interpret it as decimal ten. `"8"` and `"10"` yield
`7200m` and `9000m` of autoscaler capacity, respectively. Proxmox
continues to interpret `"010"` as ten cores, yielding `9000m` of
capacity.
* **Documentation**
* Clarified explicit worker CPU and memory sizing behavior, including
how leading-zero CPU values affect VM sizing, reservations, and capacity
calculations.

<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
2026-10-29 11:22:40 +03:00
Aleksei Sviridkin 44848b9c9d fix(kubernetes): run Proxmox CCM v0.16.1 and pin the Proxmox images by digest (#4917)
## What this PR does

`v1.7.0-rc.1` and `release-1.7` ship the Proxmox
cloud-controller-manager as
`ghcr.io/sergelogvinov/proxmox-cloud-controller-manager:v0.15.0`, a bare
tag. That tag was re-pushed upstream on 2026-09-27: it used to name the
2026-08-06 build (`sha256:fbc553921145…`) and now names
`sha256:d81702998ae1…`, a binary whose gitVersion is `0.15.0` without
the leading `v`. component-base v0.37 parses that string in an `init()`
and panics:

```
panic: version string "0.15.0" doesn't match expected regular expression: "^v(\d+\.\d+\.\d+)"
```

The CCM Deployment crash-loops, no new Node loses
`node.cloudprovider.kubernetes.io/uninitialized`, and workloads on new
workers stay Pending. On a live Proxmox cluster this went unnoticed for
five days: the existing Nodes were already initialized, and the failure
only showed when the next new worker came up. Every fresh install pulls
the broken build, so as it stands v1.7.0 would be the first stable
release with the Proxmox substrate, shipping a CCM that cannot start.

Two commits, both cherry-pick onto `release-1.7` unchanged:

1. **`fix(kubernetes)`**: run v0.16.1, pinned as tag plus digest in
`images/proxmox-cloud-controller-manager.tag`. That is the same shape
the chart already uses for the KubeVirt cloud provider. v0.16 builds
with goreleaser and stamps the version with its `v`. The config the init
container writes still parses: the cluster entry moved to
go-proxmox-pool's `ClusterConfig` with the same `url`, `insecure`,
`token_id`, `token_secret` and `region` keys, and `features.provider:
capmox` still writes `proxmox://<SMBIOS UUID>`, the providerID capmox
puts on the Machine.
2. **`fix(kubernetes, proxmox-csi)`**: pin the CSI driver from the same
registry at its current v0.20.0, with no version change. The
management-side controller goes through
`images/proxmox-csi-controller.tag`. The tenant-side node plugin goes
through `repository` + `tag` in
`packages/system/proxmox-csi/values.yaml`, which also puts it in
`hack/lib/image-refs.sh` and so in front of the release multi-arch gate.
Pinning takes the version out of the vendored chart's hands, so
`hack/proxmox-csi-driver-pin_test.bats` now fails unless the chart's
`appVersion` and both pins name the same release.

All three digests are OCI indexes for `linux/amd64` and `linux/arm64`.
The sig-storage sidecars stay on tags, as they do for the KubeVirt CSI
driver: registry.k8s.io publishes through image promotion, which does
not move a tag.

### Testing

- `helm unittest`: `packages/apps/kubernetes` 31 suites / 346 tests,
`packages/apps/kubernetes-nodes` 37 / 223, all passing.
- bats: the new test, plus `image-pin-consistency`,
`promote-rewrite-tags_test`, `overlay-main-images_test`,
`nightly-mirror_test`, `promote-retag_test`, `stitch-multiarch_test`,
`bats-strict-setup`, `bats-runner-coverage`: 107/107. The new test was
checked to fail on a node tag at another version.
- `git cherry-pick -x` of both commits onto `release-1.7` (315b335cf)
applies cleanly, and the Proxmox unit suites and the new bats test pass
there.
- v0.16.1 compatibility was checked against its source, as described
above. It has also run on a live Proxmox cluster, including the
initialisation of a new worker; the results are in the comment below.

### Screenshots

Not a UI change.

### Downstream repositories

The diff touches no app `values.schema.json` or defaults, adds or
renames no package, and moves nothing under `hack/`.

- [x] No downstream repository is affected by this change
- [ ] [cozystack/website](https://github.com/cozystack/website) -
follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/terraform-provider-cozystack](https://github.com/cozystack/terraform-provider-cozystack)
- follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/ansible-cozystack](https://github.com/cozystack/ansible-cozystack)
- follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/ccp](https://github.com/cozystack/ccp) - follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/talm](https://github.com/cozystack/talm) - follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/cozyhr](https://github.com/cozystack/cozyhr) -
follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/cozy-proxy](https://github.com/cozystack/cozy-proxy) -
follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/cozystack-telemetry-server](https://github.com/cozystack/cozystack-telemetry-server)
- follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/external-apps-example](https://github.com/cozystack/external-apps-example)
- follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/examples](https://github.com/cozystack/examples) -
follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/community](https://github.com/cozystack/community) -
follow-up:

### Release note

```release-note
fix(kubernetes): the Proxmox cloud-controller-manager now runs v0.16.1, and the Proxmox CCM and CSI driver images are pinned by digest. The v0.15.0 tag referenced before was re-pushed upstream to a build that panics on start, which left every new Proxmox worker with the uninitialized taint.
```
2026-10-29 11:20:22 +03:00
Marian Koreniuk f7913329b2 fix(kubernetes-nodes): plan autoscaler capacity on the cores the VM actually gets
On the kubevirt substrate resources.cpu is written into domain.cpu.cores
as spelled and decoded as YAML, so "010" gives the VM eight cores, while
the cluster-autoscaler capacity annotation parsed the same string as
decimal ten. The autoscaler then planned 9000m on a node that offers
7000m.

Keep the YAML-decoded value the range check already computes and start
the capacity annotation and the reserved-CPU check from it on kubevirt.
The kubelet reservations stay as they are: the worker machineconfig
sizes them from the decimal string, and the TalosConfigTemplate name is
a hash of that config, so changing them would roll every leading-zero
pool once. The annotation therefore subtracts the reservations the
machineconfig really carries (2 x 500m for "010") from the cores the VM
really has, which is the node's real allocatable. Neither template name
changes for any spelling, so no pool rolls. Proxmox parses the quantity
as decimal on both sides and is unchanged. The field description says
the value is decoded as YAML and that the reservations still read it as
a decimal.

This closes #4554 without the migration and the render-time refusal it
proposes: a refusal breaks stored pools on their next upgrade, a schema
pattern breaks updates of existing CRs, and a platform-wide migration of
every KubernetesNodes and nodeGroups entry is a lot of blast radius for a
spelling nobody has reported in a live cluster.

Closes #4554

Signed-off-by: Marian Koreniuk <moriarti@cp.if.ua>
Assisted-by: LLM
2026-10-28 21:04:27 +01:00
Marian Koreniuk 780b068df0 fix(kubernetes, proxmox-csi): pin the Proxmox CSI driver images by digest
The CSI controller in the management cluster was referenced by the bare
tag ghcr.io/sergelogvinov/proxmox-csi-controller:v0.20.0, and the node
plugin in the tenant by the vendored chart's default, its appVersion as
a bare tag. That registry is the one whose proxmox-cloud-controller-
manager:v0.15.0 was re-pushed to a build that panics, so a tag there is
not a statement of what runs.

Both now carry the v0.20.0 digest: the controller through
images/proxmox-csi-controller.tag, like the cloud-controller-manager, and
the node plugin through repository and tag in the proxmox-csi values,
which also makes it visible to hack/lib/image-refs.sh and therefore to
the release multi-arch gate. Both digests are indexes for linux/amd64
and linux/arm64.

Pinning takes the version out of the vendored chart's hands: a chart
bump would bring a new appVersion while both pins kept naming the old
release, and the controller and the node plugin would drift apart from
the templates and from each other without anything noticing.
hack/proxmox-csi-driver-pin_test.bats fails unless the chart's
appVersion and both pins name the same release.

The sig-storage sidecars stay on tags, as they do for the KubeVirt CSI
driver: registry.k8s.io publishes them through image promotion, which
does not overwrite a tag.

Assisted-by: LLM
Signed-off-by: Marian Koreniuk <moriarti@cp.if.ua>
2026-10-28 18:38:35 +01:00
Marian Koreniuk 05a347e6f6 fix(kubernetes): run proxmox-cloud-controller-manager v0.16.1, pinned by digest
The Proxmox CCM was referenced by its bare v0.15.0 tag, and that tag no
longer names the image it named when the template was written. It was
re-pushed on 2026-09-27 (index sha256:d81702998ae1, replacing the
2026-08-06 build sha256:fbc553921145) to a binary whose gitVersion is
"0.15.0" without the leading v. component-base v0.37 parses that string
in the init() of its legacy metrics registry and panics:

  panic: version string "0.15.0" doesn't match expected regular
  expression: "^v(\d+\.\d+\.\d+)"

so the Deployment crash-loops, no Node ever loses the
node.cloudprovider.kubernetes.io/uninitialized taint, and workloads on a
new worker stay Pending. Any node that pulls the tag fresh gets it, which
is every fresh install.

v0.16 builds with goreleaser and stamps gitVersion as v{{.Version}}. The
configuration this template writes is read unchanged: the cluster entry
moved to go-proxmox-pool's ClusterConfig with the same url, insecure,
token_id, token_secret and region keys, and features.provider: capmox
still writes proxmox://<SMBIOS UUID>, the providerID capmox puts on the
Machine.

The reference now lives in images/proxmox-cloud-controller-manager.tag
as tag plus digest, the shape the chart already uses for the KubeVirt
cloud provider, so a moving tag can no longer change what runs.

Assisted-by: LLM
Signed-off-by: Marian Koreniuk <moriarti@cp.if.ua>
2026-10-28 18:38:35 +01:00
Marian Koreniuk 0e77e2b10f fix(kubernetes-nodes): name instanceType in the partial-spec refusal
On a pool with no instanceType, "set both resources.cpu and
resources.memory, or neither" sent the user straight into the next
refusal, since neither sizing source is refused as well. The message now
ends in "or neither and set instanceType" on such a pool; a pool sized by
an instancetype keeps the old wording.

The tests anchor both spellings, so the suffix cannot leak onto, or drop
off, either kind of pool.

Signed-off-by: Marian Koreniuk <moriarti@cp.if.ua>
Assisted-by: LLM
2026-10-28 17:06:39 +01:00
Aleksei Sviridkin ae9e7c4c64 test(kubernetes): pin RetryOnFailure on the Proxmox csi release (#4969)
The KubeVirt csi and cilium releases carry a helm-unittest pin on
`strategy.name: RetryOnFailure` for both actions, and the e2e
HelmRelease guard in `hack/e2e-chainsaw/_lib/run-kubernetes.sh` names
those two tests as load-bearing. `helmreleases/csi-proxmox.yaml` sets
the same strategy for the same reason and had no pin.

This adds
`packages/apps/kubernetes/tests/csi_proxmox_install_retry_test.yaml`, a
mirror of `csi_install_retry_test.yaml` rendered on the proxmox
substrate, and updates the guard comment that pointed at the gap. No
template change.

Verified with `helm unittest .` in `packages/apps/kubernetes` (32
suites, 349 tests).

Closes #4731


<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->

## Summary by CodeRabbit

* **Tests**
* Expanded automated coverage for Proxmox CSI installation and upgrade
retry behavior, including the retry interval and remediation retry
limits. The checks verify that retries continue according to the
configured settings during installation and upgrades. This update does
not change user-facing functionality.

<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
2026-10-28 18:30:06 +03:00
myasnikovdaniil 1ac83aebd9 fix(tenant): stop the gateway release waiting on TenantGateway listeners and certificates (#5086)
## What this PR does

After platform upgrade the tenant `gateway` HelmRelease fails with
`timeout waiting for: [TenantGateway/<namespace>/cozystack status:
'InProgress']`, retries every 30s without end (`RetryOnFailure`) while
holding a helm-controller worker, and parent tenant release that waits
on it fails too.

helm-controller waits on every object of the release with kstatus on
install and on every upgrade, and kstatus reads TenantGateway
`Ready=False/ListenersNotReady` as InProgress. TenantGateway stays there
while any listener certificate is pending, which depends on ACME or DNS
and on routes owned by other releases, so waiting longer doesn't help.
It passed before only because the wait runs inside a Helm action and the
install happened before those listeners showed up.

I added `healthCheckExprs` for `TenantGateway` with `current: "true"`
and pinned `waitStrategy: poller`, because expressions are evaluated
only under poller. Wait stays on. Flux returns InProgress while
`status.observedGeneration` lags `metadata.generation` before it reads
any expression, so release still waits until controller observed the new
TenantGateway spec, but not for listeners or certificates. tenant-root
renders same template and gets the change too. Gateway release that is
already stuck picks this up on its next attempt, after the current one
times out.

New helm-unittest suite
(`packages/apps/tenant/tests/gateway_wait_test.yaml`) pins the strategy
and the whole expression list, checks there is no `disableWait` on
install or upgrade, and that no gateway release is rendered when
`gateway` is unset.

### Downstream repositories

- [x] No downstream repository is affected by this change
- [ ] [cozystack/website](https://github.com/cozystack/website) -
follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/terraform-provider-cozystack](https://github.com/cozystack/terraform-provider-cozystack)
- follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/ansible-cozystack](https://github.com/cozystack/ansible-cozystack)
- follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/ccp](https://github.com/cozystack/ccp) - follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/talm](https://github.com/cozystack/talm) - follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/cozyhr](https://github.com/cozystack/cozyhr) -
follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/cozy-proxy](https://github.com/cozystack/cozy-proxy) -
follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/cozystack-telemetry-server](https://github.com/cozystack/cozystack-telemetry-server)
- follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/external-apps-example](https://github.com/cozystack/external-apps-example)
- follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/examples](https://github.com/cozystack/examples) -
follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/community](https://github.com/cozystack/community) -
follow-up:

### Release note

```release-note
fix(tenant): the tenant gateway release no longer times out on upgrade while TenantGateway listener certificates are pending, it waits only until the controller has observed the current TenantGateway spec.
```


<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->

<!-- coderabbit-ai-generated:v1 -->

## Summary by CodeRabbit

* **Bug Fixes**
* Gateway releases now determine readiness from the gateway resource’s
current status, rather than waiting for its listeners and certificates
to become ready. Releases still wait for the latest resource update to
be observed.
* **Tests**
* Added checks for gateway release readiness behavior and for tenants
configured without a gateway.

<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
2026-10-27 11:47:15 +05:00
Aleksei Sviridkin 749d401899 fix(kubernetes, opensearch, foundationdb)!: restrict managed application images (#5085)
## What this PR does

Image overrides let tenants run arbitrary containers in management
cluster, including helpers with access to Talos CA secrets and
Kubernetes API credentials. This PR removes those overrides and uses
images shipped by the platform.

Replaces [the original
PR](https://github.com/cozystack/cozystack/pull/4287) for 1.7. Andrei
Kvapil's commits keep his authorship.

- Kubernetes and KubernetesNodes helpers use the bundled image
references through `cozy-lib.image`. OpenSearch uses its version map.
Talos installer settings for tenant worker VMs stay available.
- FoundationDB uses `version: v7.3` or `v7.4`, mapped to `7.3.63` and
`7.4.1`. Migration 60 carries the old `cluster.version` over to its
release line, records releases needing attention and preserves the
legacy value while the old chart can still render it.
- The FoundationDB chart refuses a render when `cluster.version` and
`version` name different release lines. This also covers variants
without platform migrations.
- OpenSearch and FoundationDB get version-map update scripts. They
retain the current default while it remains supported.

Application types and schemas are still generated from the charts.

### Upgrade notes

Stored image overrides are accepted without new admission warnings and
ignored by the charts. On the first reconcile, OpenSearch nodes move to
the image for their selected version, and Kubernetes components whose
images changed restart. Check custom OpenSearch images before upgrading:
if one runs a newer version than the chart's map, switching back can
leave nodes unable to read their data. Air-gapped installations need
`docker.io` and `ghcr.io` mirrored on management-cluster nodes.

FoundationDB preserves the release line, not an arbitrary patch: 7.3.x
moves to 7.3.63 and 7.4.x to 7.4.1. Check these versions before
upgrading. A cluster on 7.1 needs an upgrade to 7.3 first. On variants
without migrations, set `version` to the line the cluster runs. To
change release lines later, remove the leftover `cluster.version` as
directed by the chart error.

Migration 60 records affected releases in the
`cozystack.io/migration-60-needs-attention` annotation on the
`cozystack-version` ConfigMap. Dry-run reports patch changes without
patching, annotating or advancing the migration stamp. Migration 56 no
longer carries the removed kubectl override into adopted node pools.

An explicit OpenSearch `version: null` now fails rendering instead of
falling back to `v2`.

### Validation

- `make unit-tests` passed, including migrations 56 and 60.
- Four-chart regression run: 750 tests passed.
- API Create/Update, admission, defaulting and existing warning
regression tests passed. `cmd/`, `internal/` and `pkg/` match main.
- Shell test lanes passed with `/bin/sh` as dash throughout the process
tree.
- `make generate manifests` passed with no generated drift, using
cozyvalues-gen v1.7.0.

E2E passed on e694b05b4.

### Screenshots

Not a UI change.

### Downstream repositories

- [ ] No downstream repository is affected by this change
- [ ] [cozystack/website](https://github.com/cozystack/website) -
existing generated parameter tables are refreshed by the release docs
job.
- [x]
[cozystack/terraform-provider-cozystack](https://github.com/cozystack/terraform-provider-cozystack)
- follow-up: [schema
updates](https://github.com/cozystack/terraform-provider-cozystack/issues/74).
- [ ]
[cozystack/ansible-cozystack](https://github.com/cozystack/ansible-cozystack)
- follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/ccp](https://github.com/cozystack/ccp) - follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/talm](https://github.com/cozystack/talm) - follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/cozyhr](https://github.com/cozystack/cozyhr) -
follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/cozy-proxy](https://github.com/cozystack/cozy-proxy) -
follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/cozystack-telemetry-server](https://github.com/cozystack/cozystack-telemetry-server)
- follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/external-apps-example](https://github.com/cozystack/external-apps-example)
- follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/examples](https://github.com/cozystack/examples) -
follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/community](https://github.com/cozystack/community) -
follow-up:

The provider follow-up removes the Kubernetes and KubernetesNodes image
blocks and adds FoundationDB version selection. No other downstream
follow-up is needed for these fields.

### Release note

```release-note
fix(kubernetes, opensearch, foundationdb)!: Remove tenant image overrides from Kubernetes, KubernetesNodes and OpenSearch. Existing overrides switch to platform images on reconciliation, which can roll OpenSearch nodes and restart Kubernetes components. Air-gapped installations must mirror the upstream registries on management-cluster nodes. FoundationDB replaces cluster.version with version (v7.3 or v7.4); migration 60 preserves the release line and records patch changes. Check running image versions before upgrading. Variants without migrations must set the FoundationDB version before upgrading, and the chart refuses mismatched legacy release lines. OpenSearch rejects an explicit version: null.
```


<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->

<!-- coderabbit-ai-generated:v1 -->

## Summary by CodeRabbit

* **New Features**
* FoundationDB now supports selecting version lines `v7.3` and `v7.4`,
with `v7.3` as the default.
* Added automatic migration of existing FoundationDB version settings,
with warnings for settings that need attention.

* **Changes**
* Removed per-application image overrides for Kubernetes, Kubernetes
Nodes, and OpenSearch. These charts now use their bundled images, which
can still be routed through the configured image registry.
* OpenSearch now reports an error when its version is missing or
unsupported.
* Existing FoundationDB settings with conflicting version lines are
reported for review.

<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
2026-10-26 13:00:10 +03:00
myasnikovdaniil 55aad6f914 fix(tcp-balancer): cap HAProxy fds and threads by the pod's own limits (#5005)
## What this PR does

On a v1.6.5 cluster a TCPBalancer created with the chart defaults
(`t1.nano`, limits 250m CPU and 128Mi memory, `haproxy:3.4.4`)
crash-looped. Both pods were OOMKilled with a memory limit of 134217728,
7 restarts each in about 15 minutes, and HAProxy logged `[NOTICE] (8) :
Automatically setting global.maxconn to 524126.` On another cluster the
same chart picked maxconn 524251 and the pods kept running.

`haproxy.cfg` has no `global` section, so HAProxy sizes itself from the
node. maxconn comes from the nofile limit capped at the built-in
`fd-hard-limit` of 1048576 (`DEFAULT_MAXFD`), and the thread count is
the number of CPUs the process may run on, whatever its CPU limit is.
Both are paid for at startup, before any traffic, and the thread part
grows with the node.

This PR adds a `global` section sized from the replica's own limits,
read through the same `cozy-lib.resources.defaultingSanitize` helper the
Deployment uses, so `resources` and `resourcesPreset` resolve the same
way. For `t1.nano` it renders

```
global
    fd-hard-limit 4096
    thread-hard-limit 1
```

`fd-hard-limit` is 32 per MiB of the memory limit and HAProxy derives
maxconn from it, 2035 for `t1.nano`, which is about 64 KiB per
connection. For comparison `haproxy -m 128` picks maxconn 3600 on 3.4.4,
about 35 KiB per connection, and the difference is left for the process
itself and for the kernel socket buffers the cgroup also charges. An
explicit `maxconn` would read simpler, but `strict-limits` is on by
default and HAProxy refuses to start when it cannot raise nofile to
about twice that value. With 1024 soft and 4096 hard nofile `maxconn
4096` exits with `Cannot raise FD limit to 8251`, while `fd-hard-limit
8192` starts with maxconn 2018. `thread-hard-limit` is the CPU limit
rounded up, at least 1. It caps the detected thread count and never
forces more threads than the node has.

Reproduced with Docker Desktop on arm64 (12 vCPU, kernel 6.12) and the
same image, running the rendered config the way the Deployment mounts
it. A larger node is stood in for by adding `nbthread 96` or `nbthread
128` to the `global` section. Memory is `memory.peak` of the container
cgroup.

```sh
cd packages/apps/tcp-balancer && mkdir -p /tmp/cfg
helm template tb . --show-only templates/configmap.yaml | yq '.data["haproxy.cfg"]' > /tmp/cfg/haproxy.cfg
docker run --rm --memory 128m --memory-swap 128m --ulimit nofile=1048576:1048576 -v /tmp/cfg:/usr/local/etc/haproxy:ro haproxy:3.4.4
```

| run | main | this PR |
| --- | --- | --- |
| idle, 12 threads | maxconn 524258, peak 89.6 MiB | maxconn 2035, 1
thread, peak 18.7 MiB |
| idle, `nbthread 96` | maxconn 524127, worker exited with code 137,
OOMKilled | 1 thread, peak 20.8 MiB |
| idle, `nbthread 128` | worker exited with code 137, OOMKilled | 1
thread, peak 22.9 MiB |
| 2035 clients echoing 16 KiB through a backend for 25 s, 12 threads |
worker exited with code 137 about a second after the clients started |
running, peak 83.7 MiB |

One case this PR does not cover is clients and servers that both stop
reading. They fill kernel socket buffers that the cgroup charges, and
with this PR the 128Mi container was still OOMKilled after 1225 such
connections, which maxconn does not bound.

`helm unittest .` passes 13 of 13 with helm-unittest 1.1.2 as CI pins
it. Against the template on main the four new cases fail and the nine
existing ones pass, and each of six template mutations fails at least
one case. `haproxy -c` accepts the render for `t1.nano`, `t1.4xlarge`,
`m1.4xlarge`, a zero CPU limit, the whitelist, `kubernetesAndTalos` and
`tcp-with-proxy` inputs. A full `helm template` differs from main only
in the `global` section and the `checksum/config` annotation, so the
pods roll once on upgrade. I have not run the change on a live cluster.

The template is the same on release-1.6, and that backport is a separate
PR.

### Screenshots

Not a UI change.

### Downstream repositories

One chart template and its unittest suite in
`packages/apps/tcp-balancer`. No values key, schema, default, README or
package change, so no trigger map entry applies.

- [x] No downstream repository is affected by this change
- [ ] [cozystack/website](https://github.com/cozystack/website) -
follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/terraform-provider-cozystack](https://github.com/cozystack/terraform-provider-cozystack)
- follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/ansible-cozystack](https://github.com/cozystack/ansible-cozystack)
- follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/ccp](https://github.com/cozystack/ccp) - follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/talm](https://github.com/cozystack/talm) - follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/cozyhr](https://github.com/cozystack/cozyhr) -
follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/cozy-proxy](https://github.com/cozystack/cozy-proxy) -
follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/cozystack-telemetry-server](https://github.com/cozystack/cozystack-telemetry-server)
- follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/external-apps-example](https://github.com/cozystack/external-apps-example)
- follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/examples](https://github.com/cozystack/examples) -
follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/community](https://github.com/cozystack/community) -
follow-up:

### Release note

```release-note
fix(tcp-balancer): HAProxy now takes its fd and thread caps from the replica's memory and CPU limits instead of the node, so a t1.nano balancer is no longer OOMKilled on nodes with many CPUs. maxconn follows the memory limit at about 16 connections per MiB, 2035 on t1.nano, and the pods roll once on upgrade.
```


<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->

## Summary by CodeRabbit

- **New Features**
- TCP Balancer now automatically configures HAProxy file-descriptor and
thread limits based on the selected or explicitly defined resource
settings.
- CPU-based thread limits are rounded up and always maintain a minimum
of one thread.
- Memory-based file-descriptor limits scale automatically with the
configured memory capacity.

- **Tests**
- Added coverage for default, preset-based, explicit resource, rounding,
and minimum-limit scenarios.

<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
2026-10-23 23:53:39 +05:00
myasnikovdaniil 614847976f test(harbor): pin the resources of the nginx proxy and the portal (#5025)
## What this PR does

#4095 gave the Harbor nginx proxy the `t1.small` preset and moved the
portal from `t1.nano` to `t1.micro`, so neither falls back to the
LimitRange default of a tenant namespace, 250m CPU and 128Mi. It came
without a test. This adds a helm-unittest suite that pins both presets
in the nested HelmRelease and checks that they stay the same when the
other components are resized, so dropping them or tying them to another
component's values fails the suite.

Both containers run nginx with `worker_processes auto`, which starts one
worker per CPU of the node whatever the container's CPU limit is. With
the proxy config the chart renders and `goharbor/nginx-photon:v2.15.1`,
96 workers idle at about 205 MiB, so on a node with many CPUs the proxy
is OOMKilled at 128Mi before it serves a request. That is what happened
on a v1.6.5 cluster, where both nginx pods of a default Harbor restarted
5 and 6 times within minutes, because `release-1.6` never got #4095. The
backport, with this suite and the measurements, is a separate PR.

`helm unittest .` in `packages/apps/harbor` passes 47 of 47 with
helm-unittest 1.1.2. With the #4095 hunk reverted the three new cases
fail and the 44 existing ones pass. Each of seven template mutations
fails at least one new case. They drop the nginx block, give nginx
`t1.micro` or the portal `t1.nano`, tie nginx to the core values or the
portal to the jobservice values, misspell the `resources` key under
nginx, and make core ignore its preset, which the resize case checks so
that it cannot pass on overrides that never reach the release.

### Screenshots

Not a UI change.

### Downstream repositories

One new helm-unittest suite in `packages/apps/harbor/tests`. No
template, values key, schema, default, README or package change, so no
trigger map entry applies.

- [x] No downstream repository is affected by this change
- [ ] [cozystack/website](https://github.com/cozystack/website) -
follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/terraform-provider-cozystack](https://github.com/cozystack/terraform-provider-cozystack)
- follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/ansible-cozystack](https://github.com/cozystack/ansible-cozystack)
- follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/ccp](https://github.com/cozystack/ccp) - follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/talm](https://github.com/cozystack/talm) - follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/cozyhr](https://github.com/cozystack/cozyhr) -
follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/cozy-proxy](https://github.com/cozystack/cozy-proxy) -
follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/cozystack-telemetry-server](https://github.com/cozystack/cozystack-telemetry-server)
- follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/external-apps-example](https://github.com/cozystack/external-apps-example)
- follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/examples](https://github.com/cozystack/examples) -
follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/community](https://github.com/cozystack/community) -
follow-up:

### Release note

```release-note
NONE
```

<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
<!-- coderabbit-ai-generated:v1 -->

## Summary by CodeRabbit

* **Tests**
* Added Helm coverage verifying default resource settings for Harbor’s
nginx and portal components.
* Added coverage confirming nginx and portal memory allocations remain
consistent when related service resources are customized.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
2026-10-23 22:40:28 +05:00
Myasnikov Daniil 5265ee662c fix(tenant): stop the gateway release waiting on TenantGateway listeners and certificates
helm-controller waits on every object of a release with the kstatus
poller on install and on every upgrade. kstatus reads a TenantGateway at
Ready=False/ListenersNotReady as InProgress, and a TenantGateway sits
there whenever one listener certificate is pending, which depends on
ACME or DNS and, under HTTP-01, on routes that other releases own. After
a platform upgrade the gateway release therefore times out, retries
without end under RetryOnFailure, holds a helm-controller worker
meanwhile, and fails the tenant release that waits on it. It used to
pass because health is judged only inside a Helm action: the release
was installed while the TenantGateway had no status yet or was still
Ready, and the listeners whose certificates do not issue came later
with other releases' routes.

An always-true expression replaces kstatus for TenantGateway and keeps
the wait on. Flux checks status.observedGeneration against the
generation before it evaluates any expression, so the release still
waits until the controller has observed the new spec, but not for
listener or certificate health. The poller strategy is set explicitly
because expressions are only evaluated under it.

Assisted-by: LLM
Signed-off-by: Myasnikov Daniil <myasnikovdaniil2001@gmail.com>
2026-10-23 14:34:55 +00:00
Myasnikov Daniil 639ede20be fix(api): leave FoundationDB version checks in the chart
The chart still reads cluster.version to guard release-line changes,
so calling it ignored in an admission warning contradicts the render
error. Keep that decision in the chart, which can explain the version
mismatch, and limit removed-field warnings to inert values.

Assisted-by: LLM
Signed-off-by: Myasnikov Daniil <myasnikovdaniil2001@gmail.com>
2026-10-23 19:14:17 +05:00
Andrei Kvapil b43196e549 fix(kubernetes): pin the Proxmox cloud-config builders to the bundled image
The Proxmox substrate added two init containers that build the cloud
config from the hypervisor token Secret, and both still took their
image from images.waitForKubeconfig. With that key gone the render
failed on a nil map; with it set, a tenant chose the image that reads
the token. They now run the bundled busybox through cozy-lib.image, like
the wait-for-kubeconfig container next to them.

Assisted-by: LLM
Signed-off-by: Andrei Kvapil <kvapss@gmail.com>
2026-10-23 19:14:17 +05:00
Andrei Kvapil 9775628cc8 fix(foundationdb): refuse a render that would move the release line
Migration 60 carries cluster.version over to version, but platform
migrations run only on the variants that enable them. On any other the
new chart ignored cluster.version and rendered the v7.3 default, so a
7.4 cluster was downgraded and a 7.1 one moved onto a line nothing had
upgraded it to.

The render now fails when a stored cluster.version names another
release line than version selects, and says how to proceed, so the
release stays on the revision it runs until someone picks the line.
Where the migration ran the two agree and nothing changes.

Assisted-by: LLM
Signed-off-by: Andrei Kvapil <kvapss@gmail.com>
2026-10-23 19:14:16 +05:00
Andrei Kvapil 448b12657b fix(foundationdb): stop offering the 7.1 line
The FoundationDB operator no longer carries the 7.1 client, so it can
neither manage nor upgrade a 7.1 cluster. The version map offered v7.1
all the same; it now lists the lines the operator carries, 7.3 and 7.4,
which is also what hack/update-versions.sh reads from the operator
chart.

Assisted-by: LLM
Signed-off-by: Andrei Kvapil <kvapss@gmail.com>
2026-10-23 19:14:16 +05:00
Andrei Kvapil 1636349a63 fix(api): point the removed image overrides at node registry mirrors
The warning for a removed image override told an air-gapped install to
use the platform-wide registry, but nothing in the platform writes
_cluster.images-registry, so there is nothing to set. What serves these
images offline is what serves every other platform image: the registry
mirrors configured on the nodes, as the air-gapped install guide sets
up. The tests that hold the cozy-lib.image routing now say what they
check rather than promising a platform knob.

Assisted-by: LLM
Signed-off-by: Andrei Kvapil <kvapss@gmail.com>
2026-10-23 19:14:16 +05:00
Andrei Kvapil dfff5c2dac test(kubernetes): hold the routing of the busybox and unpin images
The busybox helper shared by four workloads and the pool's pre-delete
Job had no test holding their route through cozy-lib.image, so
reverting either line left both suites green.

Assisted-by: LLM
Signed-off-by: Andrei Kvapil <kvapss@gmail.com>
2026-10-23 19:14:16 +05:00
Andrei Kvapil a41015e309 fix(api): warn when a release still carries a field nothing reads
The apps API accepts and stores a values key the chart has stopped
reading, so a kubectl apply or a terraform apply carrying one succeeds
and changes nothing. The Phase 2 warning for the Kubernetes worker-pool
keys now covers the image overrides and the FoundationDB
cluster.version as well, one table per kind.

The version helpers name the value and the versions on offer when the
release values carry an explicit null, instead of failing on a template
type error that names neither.

Assisted-by: LLM
Signed-off-by: Andrei Kvapil <kvapss@gmail.com>
2026-10-23 19:14:15 +05:00
Andrei Kvapil a887125ee5 build(apps): keep the version default out of the tag refresh
Both generators wrote the newest line as the default, so a run made to
pick up a patch tag also moved every release that never set a version
onto another major line. The default now stays where it is while it is
still supported, and a line that leaves the supported set is reported
instead of quietly leaving the enum.

FoundationDB takes the patch from the operator chart rather than from
the newest tag in the registry: the operator only carries the client
library of that build, and the generator now reproduces the committed
map exactly.

Assisted-by: LLM
Signed-off-by: Andrei Kvapil <kvapss@gmail.com>
2026-10-23 19:14:15 +05:00
Andrei Kvapil d99a1b9f2f fix(kubernetes): route the helper images through cozy-lib.image
These images now go through cozy-lib.image like the harbor, kafka and
mariadb hook images, so they follow _cluster.images-registry wherever
that is set rather than any per-application value. An air-gapped
install serves them the way it serves every other platform image,
through the registry mirrors configured on its nodes.

The talos-csr-signer sidecar and the OIDC Jobs had no test holding
their image, which is where an override could come back unnoticed.

Assisted-by: LLM
Signed-off-by: Andrei Kvapil <kvapss@gmail.com>
2026-10-23 19:14:15 +05:00
Andrei Kvapil 46a9e12578 build(opensearch): generate the version map the way postgres does
hack/update-versions.sh listed the majors by hand and only rewrote
files/versions.yaml, so the Version enum and the default in values.yaml
drifted from the map on every refresh. It now takes the tested range
from the compatibility table of the pinned operator release, picks the
newest tag per major that has a matching Dashboards image, and rewrites
the enum and default along with the map, like postgres and mariadb.

The committed map keeps its current tags; the helper follows the
postgres idiom and no longer falls back to v2 on an empty version.

Assisted-by: LLM
Signed-off-by: Andrei Kvapil <kvapss@gmail.com>
2026-10-23 19:14:15 +05:00
Andrei Kvapil d62056ef03 fix(foundationdb)!: pick the version from a fixed list
cluster.version took any string and passed it to the operator as the
FoundationDB version, so a tenant chose the image tag rather than a
supported release line. The application now takes version (v7.4, v7.3,
v7.1) and maps it to a tag through files/versions.yaml, the same way
postgres and mariadb do.

The lines are the ones the pinned operator ships client libraries for,
which hack/update-versions.sh reads from the operator chart. The map
keeps v7.3 on 7.3.63, the previous default, so a cluster that never set
the version renders exactly as before.

Assisted-by: LLM
Signed-off-by: Andrei Kvapil <kvapss@gmail.com>
2026-10-23 19:14:15 +05:00
Andrei Kvapil 941b50c675 fix(kubernetes-nodes)!: drop the kubectl image override
images.kubectl picked the image of the talos-reconcile and pre-delete
unpin Jobs. Both run in the management cluster under service accounts
that read the pool's Talos and cluster CA secrets and patch its CAPI
objects, so a tenant-chosen image ran with access the apps API never
grants. The image now always comes from images/kubectl.tag.

Assisted-by: LLM
Signed-off-by: Andrei Kvapil <kvapss@gmail.com>
2026-10-23 19:14:14 +05:00
Andrei Kvapil af20694359 fix(kubernetes)!: drop the helper image overrides
images.waitForKubeconfig, images.kubectl and images.talosCsrSigner
ran whatever image a tenant named inside the management cluster: the
csr signer as a sidecar of the tenant control plane with the Talos CA
key mounted, the other two in pods holding service account tokens for
CAPI, KubeVirt and Cilium objects in the tenant namespace. A tenant
never gets that access through the apps API, and the platform should
not hand it over through an image field.

The images now always come from the bundled tag files. A release that
still carries the keys renders exactly as one without them.

Assisted-by: LLM
Signed-off-by: Andrei Kvapil <kvapss@gmail.com>
2026-10-23 19:14:14 +05:00
Andrei Kvapil 6f8a04c11a fix(opensearch)!: drop the custom image override
images.opensearch put any image a tenant named into the
OpenSearchCluster, so the platform ran that binary in its own cluster
and the version map stood behind nothing. The application offers a
choice of version; the image now always comes from that version.

A release that still carries the key renders as if it were absent: the
operator rolls the nodes onto the image of the selected version.

Assisted-by: LLM
Signed-off-by: Andrei Kvapil <kvapss@gmail.com>
2026-10-23 19:14:14 +05:00
myasnikovdaniil a26c441d78 fix(vm-disk): let CDI adopt the PVC a Velero restore recreates (#4955)
## What this PR does

After a Velero restore of a VMDisk or of a VMInstance (`RestoreJob` with
the Velero strategy), the disk's HelmRelease fails on its next upgrade
and stays failed:

```
Helm upgrade failed for release <ns>/vm-disk-<name> with chart vm-disk@...: failed to create resource:
admission webhook "datavolume-validate.cdi.kubevirt.io" denied the request: Destination PVC <ns>/vm-disk-<name> already exists
```

The VMInstance release that references the disk then fails in turn
(`Specified disk not exists in cluster`). Seen on a v1.6.5 cluster with
CDI v1.66.1, where each failed upgrade is retried and the release
history of one such disk had grown past 46,000 revisions.

### Cause

The restore controller deletes the disk's DataVolume
(`prepareForRestore`) and Velero restores the PVC under the same name,
with no owner. The restored release matches its chart and values, so
Flux does not upgrade it and the DataVolume is not recreated right away;
the next Helm upgrade (a platform update, an edit of the VMDisk) does
recreate it, and CDI's webhook refuses it.

In CDI v1.66.1 the webhook admits a DataVolume over an existing claim
only when `ClaimMayExistBeforeDataVolume` is true
(`pkg/controller/common/util.go`): either the PVC carries
`cdi.kubevirt.io/storage.populatedFor: <dv name>`, or
`AllowClaimAdoption` returns true, which reads
`cdi.kubevirt.io/allowClaimAdoption` **from the DataVolume** and
otherwise falls back to the `DataVolumeClaimAdoption` feature gate. The
Velero strategy's resource modifiers
(`createResourceModifiersConfigMap`) put `allowClaimAdoption=true` on
the restored **PVC**, where CDI never reads it, and the `CDI` CR in
`packages/system/kubevirt-cdi` enables neither the gate nor anything
equivalent. Migration 29 creates its PVCs with the same PVC-side
annotation.

### Fix

The vm-disk chart sets `cdi.kubevirt.io/allowClaimAdoption: "true"` on
the DataVolume it renders, on the creation path and on the
existing-DataVolume path alike, so the annotation does not flap between
upgrades.

- A fresh disk is unaffected: no PVC exists when the DataVolume is
admitted, and the PVC CDI then creates carries
`cdi.kubevirt.io/createdForDataVolume: <dv uid>`, for which
`AllowClaimAdoption` returns false, so CDI imports, clones or uploads as
before.
- An existing DataVolume already controls its PVC, so the annotation
changes nothing there; a Helm upgrade only adds it to the DataVolume's
metadata, which CDI allows (only the spec is immutable).
- After a restore, the webhook admits the recreated DataVolume and the
DataVolume controller adopts the claim: `pvcRequiresWork` is false, it
takes controller ownership of the PVC and the DataVolume goes
`Succeeded` without populating it again, so the restored data is kept.

Checked against a v1.6.5 cluster carrying the broken state, by rendering
the chart for an affected disk and running `kubectl create
--dry-run=server`: the DataVolume without the annotation is refused with
the error above, the same one with the annotation is admitted. On that
cluster two affected disks were later recovered through the
claim-adoption path (the same `AllowClaimAdoption` check): the PVC kept
its uid, became controlled by the new DataVolume, and the DataVolume
reached `Succeeded` with no import.

### Alternatives considered

- **Enable the `DataVolumeClaimAdoption` feature gate in the `CDI` CR.**
It works too, but for every DataVolume in the cluster (tenant Kubernetes
worker disks, golden images, KubeVirt `dataVolumeTemplates`), each of
which would then silently take over any unowned PVC of its name. The
per-DataVolume annotation keeps the behaviour to the one chart whose
DataVolumes are expected to meet a restored claim, and CDI has said it
means to retire the gate (kubevirt/containerized-data-importer#3480)
while the annotation is checked first and independently of it.
- **Stamp `cdi.kubevirt.io/storage.populatedFor` on the restored PVC**
from the resource modifiers. That would also pass the webhook, but only
for disks restored by the Velero strategy, not for claims created by
migration 29 or by hand, and it would need a controller image change
where a chart change suffices.

The PVC-side `allowClaimAdoption` rule in
`createResourceModifiersConfigMap` (and the one in migration 29) is
inert under CDI v1.66.1. This PR leaves the rule and its unit-test
assertions in place, and corrects the comments that credited it with the
adoption (the collector and `createResourceModifiersConfigMap` in
`velerostrategy_controller.go`, and step 5 of
`examples/backups/vmi/scenario-user-restore.md`): they now say CDI
adopts the restored PVC through the annotation the vm-disk chart sets on
the DataVolume. The backports carry only the template and the unittest
suite, so these comment and doc edits do not reach them.

One behaviour change to be aware of: a PVC named `vm-disk-<name>` left
behind without an owner (a restored disk deleted before this fix, whose
PVC Velero restored without an owner) is now adopted by a new VMDisk of
the same name, with its old contents, instead of blocking that VMDisk
forever. That PVC lives in the same tenant namespace.

### Tests

- `packages/apps/vm-disk/tests/dv_claim_adoption_test.yaml`: the
post-restore state (a restored PVC, no DataVolume) renders the
DataVolume through the creation path with the annotation, and the
existing-DataVolume path keeps it. Both fail with the template change
reverted. `helm unittest packages/apps/vm-disk`: 116 passed.
- `examples/backups/vmdisk/05-restore-in-place.sh` (run by the
`vmdisk-2-backup-roundtrip` Chainsaw suite): after the restore, the
HelmRelease was already reported Ready because no upgrade ran, which is
why CI did not catch this. The script now forces a Helm upgrade
(`reconcile.fluxcd.io/forceAt` + `requestedAt`), then requires the
release Ready, the DataVolume `Succeeded`, and the PVC to keep its
restored uid and be controlled by the DataVolume.

### Backports

Opened by hand as #4956 (`release-1.6`) and #4957 (`release-1.7`) rather
than through the `kind/backport` labels: `examples/backups/vmdisk/` does
not exist on either branch, so the bot's cherry-pick would conflict.
They carry the template change and the helm unittest suite.

### Screenshots

Not a UI change.

### Downstream repositories

Walked the trigger map against the diff: a vm-disk template change (no
`values.yaml`, schema, `README.md` or `Chart.yaml` change), a new helm
unittest file, and a backup walkthrough script. No app, field, default,
CRD, platform value or tooling changes, and no documented workaround on
the website is made obsolete (the only mention of `allowClaimAdoption`
there is in the archived v0 docs, about a different manual procedure).

- [x] No downstream repository is affected by this change
- [ ] [cozystack/website](https://github.com/cozystack/website) -
follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/terraform-provider-cozystack](https://github.com/cozystack/terraform-provider-cozystack)
- follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/ansible-cozystack](https://github.com/cozystack/ansible-cozystack)
- follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/ccp](https://github.com/cozystack/ccp) - follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/talm](https://github.com/cozystack/talm) - follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/cozyhr](https://github.com/cozystack/cozyhr) -
follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/cozy-proxy](https://github.com/cozystack/cozy-proxy) -
follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/cozystack-telemetry-server](https://github.com/cozystack/cozystack-telemetry-server)
- follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/external-apps-example](https://github.com/cozystack/external-apps-example)
- follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/examples](https://github.com/cozystack/examples) -
follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/community](https://github.com/cozystack/community) -
follow-up:

### Release note

```release-note
fix(vm-disk): a VMDisk restored by Velero, alone or as part of a VMInstance, no longer fails its next upgrade with "Destination PVC ... already exists": the DataVolume now carries cdi.kubevirt.io/allowClaimAdoption, so CDI adopts the restored PVC and keeps its data.
```


<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
<!-- coderabbit-ai-generated:v1 -->

## Summary by CodeRabbit

* **Bug Fixes**
* Improved in-place VM disk restores so restored storage is correctly
adopted when the disk resource is recreated.
* The restore process now waits for the disk to become ready and reports
an error if it fails or the restored storage is not retained.
* Clarified the adoption behavior in restore documentation and ensured
recreated disks use the required adoption setting.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
2026-10-23 17:39:50 +05:00
Myasnikov Daniil b83cc087cc docs: move the repo-only guides onto the website
Seven guides in docs/ were written next to the code and left in the
source tree, where no operator looks. The website carries them now, so
a second copy here only lets the two drift again: the Backup Classes
page had already fallen behind its original.

docs/release.md, docs/deprecating-applications.md and the two SeaweedFS
runbooks in docs/operations stay. A migration, a bats suite, a workflow
or AGENTS.md reads each of them by path, which is the test for keeping
a document in this repository.

Assisted-by: LLM
Signed-off-by: Myasnikov Daniil <myasnikovdaniil2001@gmail.com>
2026-10-21 17:50:46 +05:00
Yan Bondarenko 1d8bea039b test(harbor): check that the resized components reach the release
The case that resizes the other components looked only at nginx and
the portal, so it would keep passing if those overrides stopped
reaching the nested release, and then it could not catch nginx or the
portal following another component's values. It now checks the core,
registry and jobservice limits it sets and leaves trivy alone, as
nothing in the case reads it. The portal case also checks its memory
request, as the nginx case does.

Assisted-by: LLM
Signed-off-by: Yan Bondarenko <202671653+yankawai@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-10-21 13:13:56 +03:00
Yan Bondarenko 7c0634586b test(harbor): pin the resources of the nginx proxy and the portal
Both containers run nginx with worker_processes auto, so their idle
memory follows the CPU count of the node, whatever their own CPU limit
is. In a tenant namespace a container without resources gets the
LimitRange default of 128Mi, which the proxy outgrows on a node with
many CPUs before it serves a request. The presets that keep both out
of that default have no test, so dropping them or tying them to
another component's values would go unnoticed.

Assisted-by: LLM
Signed-off-by: Yan Bondarenko <202671653+yankawai@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-10-21 12:56:07 +03:00
Yan Bondarenko 20545d00a5 fix(tcp-balancer): cap HAProxy fds and threads by the pod's own limits
Without a global section HAProxy 3.4 sizes itself from the node.
maxconn comes from the nofile limit, cut to the built-in fd-hard-limit
of 1048576, so about 524k, and the thread count is the number of CPUs
the process may run on, whatever the CPU limit says. With one thread
that alone idles at about 85 MiB, and every thread adds about 0.6 MiB,
so a t1.nano replica with its 128Mi limit runs on a small node and is
OOMKilled at startup on a node with many CPUs.

fd-hard-limit is now 32 per MiB of the memory limit, from which HAProxy
derives about 16 connections per MiB, 2035 for the t1.nano defaults.
That leaves 64 KiB per connection against the roughly 35 KiB HAProxy
budgets per connection itself when it is given a memory limit with -m,
and the rest covers the process and the kernel socket buffers charged
to the same cgroup. It caps the derived value instead of setting
maxconn, because an explicit maxconn above half the hard nofile limit
stops HAProxy at startup (strict-limits is on by default), while
fd-hard-limit still follows a lower system limit.

thread-hard-limit is the CPU limit rounded up, at least 1. It only caps
the detected thread count, so a node with fewer CPUs is not forced to
run more threads than it has.

Assisted-by: LLM
Signed-off-by: Yan Bondarenko <202671653+yankawai@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-10-20 21:48:51 +03:00
Marian Koreniuk 1211095693 fix(kubernetes-nodes): refuse a partial resources spec on every pool
The resources.cpu/resources.memory pair check ran only when an
instanceType was set, while the field description promised a render-time
error for a partial spec on any pool. Without an instancetype a cpu-only
pool renders a VM with no memory, which KubeVirt refuses when the Machine
is created, and a memory-only pool silently sizes the guest at one vCPU.

Run the check on every kubevirt pool; the proxmox branch already requires
both. A kubevirt pool with neither an instanceType nor both resources now
fails at render with a message naming both, the way vm-instance does; no
such pool ever passed admission, so nothing that runs is affected.

A float64 core count of one million or more printed in exponent form,
which the CRD's integer field cannot take. Print it as an integer; every
smaller whole number prints the same bytes, so no template name moves.

Closes #4546

Signed-off-by: Marian Koreniuk <moriarti@cp.if.ua>
Assisted-by: LLM
2026-10-19 23:29:09 +02:00
Marian Koreniuk 98d0402096 test(kubernetes): pin RetryOnFailure on the Proxmox csi release
The KubeVirt csi and cilium releases carry a helm-unittest pin on
strategy.name: RetryOnFailure for both actions, and the e2e HelmRelease
guard names those two tests as load-bearing. helmreleases/csi-proxmox.yaml
sets the same strategy for the same reason and had no pin. Add the mirror
test and update the guard comment that pointed at the gap.

No template change.

Closes #4731

Signed-off-by: Marian Koreniuk <moriarti@cp.if.ua>
Assisted-by: LLM
2026-10-19 23:08:02 +02:00
Mattia Eleuteri b4f6fb67db fix(vm-disk): let CDI adopt the PVC a Velero restore recreates
A Velero restore of a VMDisk or a VMInstance deletes the disk's
DataVolume and restores the PVC under its name, with no owner. The
restored release is in sync, so nothing recreates the DataVolume until
the next Helm upgrade, typically a platform update. That upgrade is
refused by CDI's admission webhook ("Destination PVC ... already
exists") and the release stays failed, followed by the VMInstance
release that looks the disk up.

CDI admits a DataVolume over an existing claim only when the
DataVolume carries cdi.kubevirt.io/allowClaimAdoption or the
DataVolumeClaimAdoption feature gate is on. The restore controller
puts the annotation on the restored PVC, where CDI never reads it, and
the CDI CR does not enable the gate. Setting it on the DataVolume
keeps the scope to vm-disk instead of every DataVolume in the cluster,
and does not depend on a gate CDI intends to remove. A claim CDI
created for this DataVolume carries its uid in createdForDataVolume
and is never treated as adoptable, so a fresh import is unaffected.

The VMDisk backup round-trip now forces an upgrade after the restore,
which is what reaches the failure, and checks that the DataVolume
adopted the restored PVC instead of replacing it.

Signed-off-by: Mattia Eleuteri <mattia@hidora.io>
Assisted-by: LLM
2026-10-19 10:24:14 +02:00
Myasnikov Daniil f3486f4e3a docs: move the operator guides out of docs/ to where readers find them
Five guides in docs/ were written next to the feature code that needed
them and left in the source tree, where no operator looks. They are on
the website, so a second copy here only drifts: edits kept landing in
docs/ after the website copy was made.

docs/vm-external-vlan.md is split rather than moved. Its section on
staging the reference CNI plugins is a contract that
hack/cni-plugins-staging-contract.bats asserts against the multus
Dockerfile, the daemonset manifest and the platform values, so that half
is package documentation and goes to packages/system/multus/README.md,
which the suite now reads. The operator half goes to the website.

Assisted-by: LLM
Signed-off-by: Myasnikov Daniil <myasnikovdaniil2001@gmail.com>
2026-10-14 16:24:16 +05:00
Aleksei Sviridkin 3a463609e4 feat(bucket): add a ui flag to skip the s3manager web UI (#4881)
<!-- Thank you for making a contribution! Here are some tips for you:
- Use Conventional Commits for the PR title: `type(scope): description`
- Types: feat, fix, docs, style, refactor, perf, test, build, ci, chore
- Scopes are not an exhaustive list — pick the most specific scope for
the change and extend the list when a genuinely new area appears.
Examples:
- System components: dashboard, platform, operator, cilium, kube-ovn,
linstor, fluxcd, cluster-api
- Managed apps: postgres, mariadb, redis, kafka, clickhouse,
virtual-machine, kubernetes
- Development and maintenance: api, hack, tests, ci, docs, maintenance
- Breaking changes: append `!` after type/scope (`feat(api)!: ...`) or
add a `BREAKING CHANGE:` footer
- If it's a work in progress, consider creating this PR as a draft.
- Don't hesistate to ask for opinion and review in the community chats,
even if it's still a draft.
- Add the label `kind/backport` if it's a bugfix that needs to be
backported to a previous version.
-->

## What this PR does

Adds a `ui` flag to the Bucket application. Every bucket currently ships
an s3manager Deployment, its Service, and an Ingress or HTTPRoute on
`<bucket>.<tenant host>`. Tenants that only use the S3 API pay for a pod
per bucket and for one DNS name and TLS certificate per bucket, none of
which they need.

- `packages/apps/bucket`: new `ui` value (default `true`), passed
through to the `bucket-system` HelmRelease. The dashboard Role drops its
Ingress rule when the UI is off, since an empty `resourceNames` would
widen it to every Ingress in the namespace.
- `packages/system/bucket`: the Deployment, Service, Ingress and
HTTPRoute render only when `ui` is true. With the UI off, the chart no
longer requires the tenant apex, as the UI hostname was its only
consumer there.
- Regenerated `values.schema.json`, `README.md`, `types.go` and the
`bucket-rd` ApplicationDefinition.

The default keeps existing buckets unchanged. Setting `ui: false` on an
existing bucket makes Helm delete the UI objects on the next upgrade;
the cert-manager Certificate for the UI host is owned by the Ingress
through ingress-shim and goes with it.

Tested with `helm unittest` on both charts: new suites cover the default
render, `ui: false` behind an Ingress and behind a Gateway, the
empty-apex case, the value passthrough and the dashboard Role. The
system-chart suite fails against the previous templates.

### Screenshots

Not applicable: no dashboard change, only a new field in the Bucket form
generated from the schema.

### Downstream repositories

<!--
Cozystack is upstream for repositories that are NOT kept in sync with it
automatically, and nothing in CI compares the two sides, so a change
here can break them silently.

Which change forces what, and which file to touch, is the trigger map in
docs/agents/contributing.md under "Downstream Repositories". Walk it
before you tick anything.

IF YOU ARE AN AI AGENT OR AN LLM, THIS IS PART OF THE TASK, NOT A FORM
TO FILL IN:

1. Walk the trigger map against the actual diff of this PR, file by
file. Do not decide from the PR title or from your memory of what you
changed.
2. For every repository you tick, open the follow-up PR there and link
it on the same line. A ticked box with no link claims work that does not
exist, which is worse than an empty box. Search that repository for an
open PR or issue covering it first, and link that instead of filing a
duplicate.
3. When the follow-up is out of scope, or needs a decision that is not
yours to make, open an issue in that repository instead, link that, and
say so in the PR body. Do not push a speculative PR into another
repository just to fill a line here.
4. Do not tick "No downstream repository is affected" to make the
checklist go away. If you are unsure, leave every box empty and say so
in the PR body, so a human decides.
-->

Walked the trigger map against the diff. A new field in
`packages/apps/bucket/values.schema.json` reaches the Terraform provider
(schema, model, expand/flatten) and the website (the Bucket page is
hand-written). Both follow-ups are issues rather than PRs, since they
apply only once this PR is merged.

- [ ] No downstream repository is affected by this change
- [x] [cozystack/website](https://github.com/cozystack/website) -
follow-up: cozystack/website#750
- [x]
[cozystack/terraform-provider-cozystack](https://github.com/cozystack/terraform-provider-cozystack)
- follow-up: cozystack/terraform-provider-cozystack#71
- [ ]
[cozystack/ansible-cozystack](https://github.com/cozystack/ansible-cozystack)
- follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/ccp](https://github.com/cozystack/ccp) - follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/talm](https://github.com/cozystack/talm) - follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/cozyhr](https://github.com/cozystack/cozyhr) -
follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/cozy-proxy](https://github.com/cozystack/cozy-proxy) -
follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/cozystack-telemetry-server](https://github.com/cozystack/cozystack-telemetry-server)
- follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/external-apps-example](https://github.com/cozystack/external-apps-example)
- follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/examples](https://github.com/cozystack/examples) -
follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/community](https://github.com/cozystack/community) -
follow-up:

### Release note

<!--  Write a release note:
- Explain what has changed internally and for users.
- Start with the same `type(scope):` prefix as in the PR title
- Follow the guidelines at
https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/guide/release-notes.md.
-->

```release-note
feat(bucket): add a `ui` flag to the Bucket application. Set it to `false` to skip the s3manager web UI and its Service, Ingress or HTTPRoute, DNS name and TLS certificate. Defaults to `true`, so existing buckets are unchanged.
```



<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->

## Summary by CodeRabbit

* **New Features**
* Added a `ui` option for bucket deployments. It is enabled by default
and provides the S3 manager web UI at the tenant host.
* Set `ui` to `false` to run a bucket without its web UI or the
associated Service and Ingress or HTTPRoute.

<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
2026-10-12 17:49:41 +03:00
Aleksei Sviridkin d060c1dbb0 fix(kafka): pass the container limits to the Kafka JVMs (#4865)
## What this PR does

The Kafka JVMs we ship size themselves from host memory instead of their
container limits, and get OOMKilled. The Strimzi 0.45.1-rc1 images carry
JDK 17.0.15, which reads `/proc/cgroups` to decide whether it runs in a
container. Kernels 6.12 and newer built without `CONFIG_MEMCG_V1` no
longer list the memory controller there, so the JVM turns container
support off. The JDK fix is JDK-8347811, backported to 17.0.20 and
21.0.10.

In CI this shows up in two places. The cluster operator gets a 25 GiB
max heap inside its 512Mi limit. In 107 of the last 150 e2e reports the
kernel OOM-killed a Java process at about 500M, the limit the cluster
operator shares with the topic and user operators. Brokers and
controllers start with a 5 GiB heap inside a 1Gi limit, because Strimzi
asks the same JDK for the container memory and takes half of what it
reports.

This PR passes the limits to every Kafka JVM explicitly:

- the cluster operator gets `-XX:MaxRAM` and `-XX:ActiveProcessorCount`
from its own limits through the downward API;
- brokers, controllers, the topic and user operators and the drain-time
Cruise Control get `JAVA_TOOL_OPTIONS` with `-XX:MaxRAM` set to their
memory limit, plus `-XX:ActiveProcessorCount` where the chart sets a CPU
limit. The chart sets one only for brokers and controllers. A LimitRange
default on the entity operators or Cruise Control is invisible to the
chart, and Strimzi template env takes no `resourceFieldRef`, so those
JVMs still count host CPUs.

Every java in a container reads `JAVA_TOOL_OPTIONS`, including the heap
probe Strimzi runs before starting Kafka. So Strimzi's own heap rules
and Kafka's G1 defaults apply to the real memory limit, and the chart
does no heap arithmetic. `jvmOptions` with `-XX` would not work here:
Strimzi turns those into `KAFKA_JVM_PERFORMANCE_OPTS`, and Kafka skips
its G1 settings when that is set. Each JVM now prints a "Picked up
JAVA_TOOL_OPTIONS" line on start.

In a kind cluster on such a kernel the operator then runs Serial GC with
a heap of about 100 MiB, and peaks at 249Mi while creating a Kafka,
against 440Mi before. A broker with a 1Gi limit and one CPU gets the
same `-Xmx518982205` that Strimzi computes when the JDK sees the limit,
with G1 and one concurrent GC thread.

Existing Kafka clusters roll once on upgrade, Talos ones included,
because the pod environment changes. Their heap does not change on a
kernel where the JDK already sees the limit.

The chart has no values key for JVM options or heap, so there is no user
setting this could override.

The Kafka migration hook now applies with `--openapi-patch=false`. Its
container runs under a tenant LimitRange default of 128Mi, and a plain
`kubectl apply` of an existing pool downloads the cluster's whole
OpenAPI document, about 300Mi with the platform's CRDs, so every upgrade
in such a tenant failed on an OOM-killed hook. With the flag kubectl
builds the same merge patch from the last-applied annotation and peaks
at about 35Mi. A larger memory limit would count against the tenant
quota, and a server-side apply would stop removing fields that `kubectl
create` set on the `kafka` pool. Other Jobs without resources are
tracked in #4868.

The operator OOMKill is what triggered the e2e failure in #4855. The
other half is a Strimzi race. After a restart, the PodSet controller
drops the ADD event of a PodSet that has no pods yet and only picks it
up at the 5-minute resync. That one is upstream and is described in the
issue. The other JVMs we ship are tracked in #4864.

Talos nodes are not affected, the Talos kernel keeps
`CONFIG_MEMCG_V1=y`. Generic-variant clusters on newer distribution
kernels are. CI is affected even though it runs Talos, because there the
Talos nodes are containers on the runner's Ubuntu 6.17 kernel.

Closes #4855

### Screenshots

Not a UI change.

### Downstream repositories

- [x] No downstream repository is affected by this change
- [ ] [cozystack/website](https://github.com/cozystack/website) -
follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/terraform-provider-cozystack](https://github.com/cozystack/terraform-provider-cozystack)
- follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/ansible-cozystack](https://github.com/cozystack/ansible-cozystack)
- follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/ccp](https://github.com/cozystack/ccp) - follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/talm](https://github.com/cozystack/talm) - follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/cozyhr](https://github.com/cozystack/cozyhr) -
follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/cozy-proxy](https://github.com/cozystack/cozy-proxy) -
follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/cozystack-telemetry-server](https://github.com/cozystack/cozystack-telemetry-server)
- follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/external-apps-example](https://github.com/cozystack/external-apps-example)
- follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/examples](https://github.com/cozystack/examples) -
follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/community](https://github.com/cozystack/community) -
follow-up:

### Release note

```release-note
fix(kafka): the Strimzi cluster operator, Kafka brokers and controllers, the entity operators and the drain-time Cruise Control no longer size their JVM heap from host memory on kernels built without cgroup v1 memory support, which got them OOMKilled. The Kafka migration hook no longer runs out of memory on upgrade in a tenant with resource quotas. Existing Kafka clusters roll once on upgrade.
```


<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->

## Summary by CodeRabbit

- **New Features**
- Kafka components now size JVM memory and processor settings based on
their configured resource limits, including during migrations.
- The Kafka cluster operator now receives container resource limits for
JVM sizing.

- **Bug Fixes**
- Kafka migration operations avoid OpenAPI patch lookups that could use
excessive memory.

- **Tests**
- Added coverage for JVM sizing, resource limits, and migration
behavior.

<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
2026-10-12 17:25:04 +03:00
Aleksei Sviridkin fa9f09e3d8 fix(vm-disk)!: refuse a golden-image clone CDI would leave unbound (#4796)
## What this PR does

A VM disk created from a golden image into a StorageClass other than the
image's one can hang forever: its temporary clone PVC stays unbound, and
the user sees nothing. With the default `csi-clone` strategy, CDI checks
the source and target classes for a common provisioner, a matching
volume mode and room to expand. It never compares class names. So a
target class backed by the same provisioner gets no host-assisted
fallback, and the clone is left to the CSI driver. LINSTOR creates it
next to the source data, so on a target class that does not allow remote
volume access from every node (a node-local class, for example) the PVC
may never bind.

The vm-disk chart now refuses such a disk at render time and tells the
user which StorageClass to set. The check follows CDI's own clone
planner. The effective strategy comes from the CDI override, or else
from the target StorageProfile. It has to be `csi-clone`, or `snapshot`
when CDI gets a VolumeSnapshotClass of the provisioner. Once the
snapshot path has such a class it runs the same checks as csi-clone, and
LINSTOR ships one. Both classes have to share a driver (the golden's is
read from its PV, as CDI does), the volume modes have to match, and the
target class has to allow expansion. On top of that the chart refuses
only a LINSTOR target whose `allowRemoteVolumeAccess`, read the way
linstor-csi reads it, is not true; without the parameter that means a
layer list with no DRBD or NVMe layer. A remote-accessible LINSTOR class
and other drivers render. When the provisioner or the volume mode
differs, CDI falls back to a host-assisted copy, which completes, so the
disk renders as before. A target class without expansion is left alone
too, see the follow-ups.

The class check compares nothing when a lookup it needs returns nothing:
under `helm template`, before the golden PVC exists, or without the CDI
resource. An empty `storageClass` is compared as the class CDI would
pick for a kubevirt DataVolume, which is the default virt class,
otherwise the Kubernetes default class. Existing disks are exempt,
because their DataVolume spec is immutable. A disk counts as existing
when its DataVolume or its PVC exists, since CDI can garbage-collect a
completed DataVolume. Under `snapshot`, a snapshot class that both
StorageProfiles name but that does not exist is refused too, for any
driver, because CDI then fails to plan the clone instead of falling
back.

This is a breaking change: a new disk in a LINSTOR class without remote
access from every node rendered before and is refused now, and so is one
whose StorageProfiles name a snapshot class that does not exist. The
first case can include a clone that would happen to work: on a class
with `Immediate` binding, which I have not verified, or when the node
the clone is placed on already holds a replica of the golden image. The
way out is the golden image's class or the `copy` clone strategy.

How this covers the three fix directions in the issue:

1. Omitting `cloneStrategyOverride` when it is empty already landed on
main in #4138: the template skips the field for an empty or null value,
the values schema accepts the empty string, and the chart tests pin
both. This PR does not touch it.
2. I kept `csi-clone` as the default on purpose. Same-class clones are
the common case, and `csi-clone` is the fast path for them. Changing the
default is a separate decision, tracked in #4850.
3. vm-disk refuses the mismatch where the clone can hang, as described
above. That is narrower than the issue proposed, which was to refuse
every mismatch: every case CDI falls back on completes, and a clone into
a remote-accessible LINSTOR class should complete too. The last part
comes from reading the CDI and linstor-csi sources, I have not run it on
a cluster.

Follow-ups this PR does not cover:

- When several classes claim the default, CDI picks the newest one. The
chart does not reproduce that tie-break and compares nothing in that
case.
- The chart does not compare sizes. A target class without volume
expansion is never refused for remote access, even when the disk is no
larger than the golden image and CDI would attempt the clone.
- Under `snapshot` on a cluster that does not serve the snapshot API,
StorageProfiles naming a snapshot class still make CDI fail, and the
chart does not look that class up.
- A disk cloned from another disk (`source.disk`) into another class of
the same provisioner can hang the same way, and nothing refuses it yet.
- Whether `csi-clone` should remain the platform default now that it can
be turned off: #4850.

Closes #2908

### Screenshots

Not a UI change.

### Downstream repositories

- [x] No downstream repository is affected by this change
- [ ] [cozystack/website](https://github.com/cozystack/website) -
follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/terraform-provider-cozystack](https://github.com/cozystack/terraform-provider-cozystack)
- follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/ansible-cozystack](https://github.com/cozystack/ansible-cozystack)
- follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/ccp](https://github.com/cozystack/ccp) - follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/talm](https://github.com/cozystack/talm) - follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/cozyhr](https://github.com/cozystack/cozyhr) -
follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/cozy-proxy](https://github.com/cozystack/cozy-proxy) -
follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/cozystack-telemetry-server](https://github.com/cozystack/cozystack-telemetry-server)
- follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/external-apps-example](https://github.com/cozystack/external-apps-example)
- follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/examples](https://github.com/cozystack/examples) -
follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/community](https://github.com/cozystack/community) -
follow-up:

No values, schema or ApplicationDefinition change. Re-check notes for
the next CDI and linstor-csi bumps sit next to the version pins in the
kubevirt-cdi-operator and linstor Makefiles. The new note in the vm-disk
README reaches the website through the regular reference-page
regeneration.

### Release note

```release-note
fix(vm-disk)!: a new disk from a golden image is now refused with a clear error when CDI would CSI-clone it into another LINSTOR StorageClass that does not allow remote volume access from every node. Before, such a disk could stay pending forever with no error. A clone that would have landed on a node already holding a replica of the golden image is refused as well; use the golden image's StorageClass or the copy clone strategy.
```

<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit

* **Bug Fixes**
* Prevented image-backed disks from being rendered when CDI’s selected
clone strategy cannot safely clone across differing storage classes,
including applicable LINSTOR remote-access and snapshot-class checks.
* Existing DataVolumes and same-namespace PVCs are not blocked by these
checks. Disk creation can proceed when required information is
unavailable or the selected strategy supports the operation.
* **Documentation**
* Clarified when image-backed disks may be refused and recommended using
the golden image’s storage class or the copy strategy as alternatives.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
2026-10-12 17:24:29 +03:00
Aleksei Sviridkin 953b965e66 fix(kubernetes): keep NFS publish from hanging on a dead server (#4791)
## What this PR does

When the kubevirt-csi node plugin publishes an NFS volume, it first
mounts the export root into an `nfs-init-*` temp dir to create `/data`
and move old files into it. That temp mount was hard. If the NFS server
stopped answering at that point, the publish call never returned.
kubelet gives up after 2m and retries, each retry blocked the same way,
and goroutines and temp dirs piled up until the server came back or the
plugin restarted.

The fix does three things:

1. The temp root is now mounted `soft` with `retry=0`. It only does
metadata work that a retried publish redoes, so an error there is
harmless, and a stuck call now ends on its own once the connection to
the server is declared dead. The mount the pod gets stays hard, because
a soft mount can report a failed write that the server did apply.
2. A publish to a target path that already has one running now returns
`Aborted` instead of starting another. This is what stops the pile-up:
at most one call per target path is stuck at a time.
3. Moving old files into `/data` now checks the destination with `lstat`
and fails the publish on any error other than a missing file. With the
soft mount, the check can fail with EIO on a file that `/data` already
holds, and a rename issued after the server comes back would replace
that file. `lstat` keeps a user's symlink in `/data` that loops or
dangles from failing every publish. Such a symlink counts as present and
is left alone, while before this change the rename replaced a dangling
one.

I kept the default retry timeouts on purpose, although the issue
suggested lowering `timeo` and `retrans`. The Linux client shares one
connection per server for all of that server's mounts on the node, and
the first mount sets the connection's TCP timeouts. Lowering them on the
temp mount would have changed the timeouts of the pods' hard mounts too.
Over NFSv4, a soft RPC fails only after the connection is declared dead,
so a stuck call takes minutes to end, longer than kubelet's 2m deadline.
The guard keeps kubelet's retries from adding new calls during that
time.

The guard works per target path, not per volume. Two pods on one node
that use the same RWX volume still publish in parallel, and each pod can
have at most one stuck call.

The unit tests pin the mount options on both mounts, the guard behaviour
including its release after a failed publish, and the destination check:
a failed check stops the move, and a symlink in `/data` stays in place.
They use the fake mounter. I did not test against a real NFS server that
went away.

Not covered here, and tracked in #4814:

- If the server's TCP connection stays up while the NFS service hangs, a
soft NFSv4 RPC does not time out. The guard still limits it to one stuck
call per target.
- `Mount` from mount-utils runs `mount` with no deadline. This predates
this change, and the guard bounds it the same way.
- If the target is already hard-mounted from the dead server, the check
of the target at the start of a publish blocks for good. The guard keeps
this to one call per target but does not end it. Unpublish is not
coordinated with a publish that is still running either. Both predate
this change.
- A follow-up comment on the issue reported two leftovers of the bounded
unmount: an orphaned `umount.nfs` after a timeout, and a possible `stat`
before `umount2`. Both may end sooner now that the temp mount is soft,
but I have not verified either.

Refs #4581

### Screenshots

Not a UI change.

### Downstream repositories

The change is limited to the kubevirt-csi node plugin's Go code. None of
the triggers in the contributing guide's map apply: no package added or
renamed, no platform values, variants, release assets,
ApplicationDefinition semantics or developer tooling touched.

- [x] No downstream repository is affected by this change
- [ ] [cozystack/website](https://github.com/cozystack/website) -
follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/terraform-provider-cozystack](https://github.com/cozystack/terraform-provider-cozystack)
- follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/ansible-cozystack](https://github.com/cozystack/ansible-cozystack)
- follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/ccp](https://github.com/cozystack/ccp) - follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/talm](https://github.com/cozystack/talm) - follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/cozyhr](https://github.com/cozystack/cozyhr) -
follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/cozy-proxy](https://github.com/cozystack/cozy-proxy) -
follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/cozystack-telemetry-server](https://github.com/cozystack/cozystack-telemetry-server)
- follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/external-apps-example](https://github.com/cozystack/external-apps-example)
- follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/examples](https://github.com/cozystack/examples) -
follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/community](https://github.com/cozystack/community) -
follow-up:

### Release note

```release-note
fix(kubernetes): an NFS volume publish in tenant Kubernetes clusters no longer hangs forever when the NFS server goes away during the publish, and kubelet retries no longer pile up while a publish is stuck. The plugin's temporary mount of the export root is now soft, and a second publish to the same target path is refused while the first is still running.
```


<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit

* **Bug Fixes**
* Concurrent NFS publish requests for the same target now return an
`Aborted` error. Different targets remain available, and a target can be
used again after a request finishes, including after a failed attempt.
* Migration now stops if checking a destination encounters an unexpected
error. Existing destinations, including symlinks, are left in place.
* Temporary-directory creation and mount errors now identify the
affected volume.
* **Updates**
* Temporary NFS root mounts now use soft behavior with retries disabled.
The final data mount remains hard.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
2026-10-12 17:23:47 +03:00
Mattia Eleuteri 0c62bee4da feat(bucket): add a ui flag to skip the s3manager web UI
Every bucket ships an s3manager Deployment with its Service and an
Ingress or HTTPRoute on <bucket>.<tenant host>. Tenants that only use
the S3 API pay for a pod per bucket and for one DNS name and TLS
certificate per bucket, none of which they need.

ui defaults to true, so existing buckets keep their UI. With ui set to
false the bucket no longer needs the tenant apex either, since the UI
hostname was its only consumer in the bucket-system chart.

Assisted-by: LLM
Signed-off-by: Mattia Eleuteri <mattia@hidora.io>
2026-10-12 13:09:23 +02:00
Aleksei Sviridkin 8deaa8e14c fix(vm-disk): name the importer error in the disk's WorkloadsReady message (#4815)
<!-- Thank you for making a contribution! Here are some tips for you:
- Use Conventional Commits for the PR title: `type(scope): description`
- Types: feat, fix, docs, style, refactor, perf, test, build, ci, chore
- Scopes are not an exhaustive list — pick the most specific scope for
the change and extend the list when a genuinely new area appears.
Examples:
- System components: dashboard, platform, operator, cilium, kube-ovn,
linstor, fluxcd, cluster-api
- Managed apps: postgres, mariadb, redis, kafka, clickhouse,
virtual-machine, kubernetes
- Development and maintenance: api, hack, tests, ci, docs, maintenance
- Breaking changes: append `!` after type/scope (`feat(api)!: ...`) or
add a `BREAKING CHANGE:` footer
- If it's a work in progress, consider creating this PR as a draft.
- Don't hesistate to ask for opinion and review in the community chats,
even if it's still a draft.
- Add the label `kind/backport` if it's a bugfix that needs to be
backported to a previous version.
-->

## What this PR does

A VMDisk whose HTTP source answers 404 or does not resolve never
finishes importing, and since #4380 its `WorkloadsReady` condition says
only `DataVolume vm-disk-x is ImportInProgress`. That reads the same as
a large download that is still running. CDI fails an import only on a
fatal error (a checksum mismatch) and restarts the importer pod
otherwise, so the phase never moves, and the reason the disk will not
finish was visible only in the importer logs.

CDI already keeps that reason on the DataVolume: the `Running` condition
goes `False` with the importer's termination message, and keeps it
through the back-off between restarts. The WorkloadMonitor now appends
it, so the condition reads `DataVolume vm-disk-x is ImportInProgress:
Unable to connect to http data source: expected status code 200, got
404. Status: 404 Not Found`. The console already shows the
`WorkloadsReady` message on the disk's overview page, so no UI change is
needed. The same text covers an unschedulable importer, a failed image
pull and a checksum failure, since CDI reports all of them through
`Running=False`.

Only `Running=False` is read: `Unknown` is not a failure, and `Bound`
repeats the same error behind PVC details. For a host-assisted clone CDI
joins the target and source pod messages as `<target> and <source>`,
which comes out as ` and ` when both pods are still being created, so
empty halves are dropped.

Behaviour to be aware of: while the importer pod is briefly running
between restarts, CDI flips `Running` to `True` and clears the message,
so the condition shows the bare phase for those seconds. This is not a
terminal state either: a disk with a broken source still stays
`ImportInProgress` and keeps retrying. Deciding when such an import
should count as failed is left for a separate change.

### Tests

A table test covers a 404, an unresolvable host, an unschedulable
importer, a fatal checksum error, a DataVolume without a phase and
joined clone messages with one or both halves empty, plus the cases that
must not add text: an importer that has not started, a running importer,
an `Unknown` condition, a populated disk and an error that only sits on
`Bound`. Each conjunct of the condition check and the append itself were
mutated and each mutant fails the test. A second test runs against a
DataVolume captured from a test cluster after its importer had restarted
about two thousand times on a 404, with only names and the URL changed,
so the parsing is pinned against what CDI actually writes rather than a
hand-built shape.

### Screenshots

No UI code changes: the console renders the `WorkloadsReady` message it
already receives. A message that carries a long source URL is not
wrapped on the overview card; that is a styling follow-up for the
console and is left out of this change.

### Downstream repositories

- [x] No downstream repository is affected by this change
- [ ] [cozystack/website](https://github.com/cozystack/website) -
follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/terraform-provider-cozystack](https://github.com/cozystack/terraform-provider-cozystack)
- follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/ansible-cozystack](https://github.com/cozystack/ansible-cozystack)
- follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/ccp](https://github.com/cozystack/ccp) - follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/talm](https://github.com/cozystack/talm) - follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/cozyhr](https://github.com/cozystack/cozyhr) -
follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/cozy-proxy](https://github.com/cozystack/cozy-proxy) -
follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/cozystack-telemetry-server](https://github.com/cozystack/cozystack-telemetry-server)
- follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/external-apps-example](https://github.com/cozystack/external-apps-example)
- follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/examples](https://github.com/cozystack/examples) -
follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/community](https://github.com/cozystack/community) -
follow-up:

The only non-Go change is a sentence in the
`packages/apps/vm-disk/README.md` notes; no values, schema, API kind or
default changes. The website reference page for vm-disk is regenerated
from that README by the release bot.

### Release note

```release-note
fix(vm-disk): the WorkloadsReady condition of a VM disk now includes the importer error reported by CDI, such as a 404 or an unresolvable host, so a disk whose source keeps failing shows why it is stuck instead of only ImportInProgress.
```


<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->

## Summary by CodeRabbit

* **Bug Fixes**
* Workload status messages now include available DataVolume import
failure details, such as HTTP errors or DNS resolution problems, making
the cause of an import issue clearer.
* **Documentation**
* Updated the workload readiness documentation to explain when
DataVolume phase and import error details appear in status messages.

<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
2026-10-12 12:29:50 +03:00
Yasar Rahman 8be7fb2e66 feat(redis): expose min-replicas-to-write and min-replicas-max-lag
Lets an operator bound the writes lost when an isolated Redis master is
failed over: the master refuses writes while fewer replicas than
configured are connected and recent. Both values are unset by default, so
the rendered Redis config is unchanged.

Redis treats 0 in either directive as disabling the check, so the
chart refuses minReplicasMaxLag 0 next to a replica requirement
instead of silently turning the protection off.

Negative values are refused by the schema (minimum 0), since Redis
rejects them at CONFIG SET and the operator would stop healing the
Sentinels of that instance. A requirement of replicas or more is
refused at render: a master with replicas pods has replicas-1
replicas, so it would refuse every write for good.

Assisted-by: LLM
Signed-off-by: Yasar Rahman <yasar.rehman@gmail.com>
2026-10-12 02:03:17 +05:00
Aleksei Sviridkin 33ca8b67bb feat(redis): run Sentinel on the same image as the Redis pods (#4831)
## What this PR does

The Redis application pins its Sentinels to `redis:6.2.6-alpine`
(`packages/apps/redis/templates/redisfailover.yaml`), while the data
pods run the version selected by `version` (`redis:8.4.0` for `v8`,
`redis:7.4.7` for `v7`). The pin was added in fde96dd7d so that the
freshworks-oss operator's new compiled-in default (`redis:7.2.4-alpine`)
could not move the Sentinels silently on upgrade, and its comment asks
for the bump to be made as a deliberate, separate change. This is that
change.

Redis 6.2 is end of life, and today every instance runs a Sentinel one
or two major versions behind the Redis it monitors. With this change
`spec.sentinel.image` is rendered from the same `files/versions.yaml`
entry as `spec.redis.image`, so a `v8` instance runs Redis and Sentinel
on `redis:8.4.0`, and a `v7` instance on `redis:7.4.7`. Nodes then pull
one engine image per instance instead of two.

The rollback concern behind the original pin was dump.rdb compatibility.
It does not apply to Sentinel: a Sentinel pod stores no RDB or AOF, only
a `sentinel.conf` on an `emptyDir` that the operator's
`sentinel-config-copy` init container rewrites from the operator
ConfigMap on every pod start. Rolling back the chart therefore starts
the older Sentinel image from a clean config. The image stays explicit
in the rendered RedisFailover, so an operator upgrade still cannot move
it.

Changes:

- `templates/redisfailover.yaml`: `spec.sentinel.image` uses
`redis.versionMap`, with the comment rewritten to say why it is pinned
and why a rollback is safe.
- `values.yaml` and `hack/update-versions.sh`: the `version` description
says that Redis and Sentinel run the same image (`update-versions.sh`
rewrites that line on `make update`, so it carries the same text).
`README.md`, `values.schema.json`, `api/apps/v1alpha1/redis/types.go`
and `packages/system/redis-rd/cozyrds/redis.yaml` are the `make
generate` output for that description.
- `tests/sentinel_image_test.yaml`: new helm-unittest suite; it asserts
that the Sentinel and Redis images share the major version for `v8` and
`v7`. The patterns pin the major version only, so a patch bump in
`files/versions.yaml` needs no test change.
- `hack/e2e-chainsaw/redis/chainsaw-test.yaml`: comment only. It
described the Sentinel container's `timeout` as busybox (exit 143); the
Sentinel now runs the Debian-based image with coreutils (exit 124). The
checks only read "non-zero", so behaviour is unchanged.

Upgrade behaviour: on the first reconcile after the upgrade, every Redis
instance rolls its Sentinel Deployment once (the operator does not set a
strategy, so the default `maxSurge: 1`, `maxUnavailable: 0` applies to 3
replicas). A new Sentinel pod starts from the initial config, the
operator points it at the current master (`NewSentinelMonitor`, which
also sets `auth-pass`), and only then does it pass the readiness probe
that lets the next old pod go. The data pods are not touched.

Not changed: Harbor's Redis
(`packages/system/harbor/templates/redis.yaml`) keeps both images on
`redis:6.2.6-alpine`. Its data pods are PVC-backed, so the rollback
concern still applies there and it needs its own decision.

Testing done:

- `make generate` in `packages/apps/redis`: regenerated files committed;
a second run leaves no diff.
- `make test` in `packages/apps/redis` (helm-unittest v1.1.2): 50
passed. With the template change reverted, the 2 new tests fail and the
other 48 pass.
- `helm template` with `version=v8` and `version=v7`:
`spec.sentinel.image` and `spec.redis.image` are both `redis:8.4.0` and
both `redis:7.4.7` respectively.
- `helm lint` reports the same two errors as on `main` (icon URL,
`cozy-lib` not declared as a dependency), so nothing new.
- I checked the operator's Sentinel command set (`SENTINEL
REMOVE/MONITOR/SET auth-pass/SET
down-after-milliseconds/RESET/CKQUORUM/MASTER`, `INFO sentinel`) against
a Redis 8.6.2 Sentinel locally. It behaves the same as on 6.2. I have
not run the e2e suite. On a Cozystack v1.6.4 cluster we run Redis 8.4.0
data pods with 6.2.6 Sentinels today, but not this exact chart.

Backwards compatibility: no API change. Existing instances roll their
Sentinels once, as described above. Rolling the chart back rolls the
Sentinels back to `redis:6.2.6-alpine` with a fresh config.

### Screenshots

Not a UI change.

### Downstream repositories

- [x] No downstream repository is affected by this change
- [ ] [cozystack/website](https://github.com/cozystack/website) -
follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/terraform-provider-cozystack](https://github.com/cozystack/terraform-provider-cozystack)
- follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/ansible-cozystack](https://github.com/cozystack/ansible-cozystack)
- follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/ccp](https://github.com/cozystack/ccp) - follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/talm](https://github.com/cozystack/talm) - follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/cozyhr](https://github.com/cozystack/cozyhr) -
follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/cozy-proxy](https://github.com/cozystack/cozy-proxy) -
follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/cozystack-telemetry-server](https://github.com/cozystack/cozystack-telemetry-server)
- follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/external-apps-example](https://github.com/cozystack/external-apps-example)
- follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/examples](https://github.com/cozystack/examples) -
follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/community](https://github.com/cozystack/community) -
follow-up:

Trigger map walked against the diff: the only user-visible text change
is the `version` description in `values.yaml`/`README.md`. `redis` is in
the website `Makefile` `APPS` list, so the release bot regenerates its
page. No field, enum, default or name changes, so
terraform-provider-cozystack is not affected.

### Release note

```release-note
feat(redis): Sentinel pods now run the same Redis image as the data pods (redis:8.4.0 for v8, redis:7.4.7 for v7) instead of the end-of-life redis:6.2.6-alpine. Existing instances roll their Sentinels once on upgrade; data pods are not restarted.
```


<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit

* **Bug Fixes**
* Redis Sentinel now uses the image selected by the Redis version
setting, keeping Sentinel and Redis pods on the same major-version
image.
* **Tests**
* Added checks confirming Sentinel and Redis images match with the
default version and when Redis 7 is selected.
* **Documentation**
* Clarified that Redis and Sentinel pods use the same image when
choosing a Redis version.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
2026-10-11 22:26:21 +03:00
Ray Low 904bc38fc3 fix(kubernetes): delete the Talos PKI and oidc-bootstrap Job on uninstall
cert-manager runs with enableCertificateOwnerRef: false, so the
<release>-talos-ca and <release>-talos-tls-cert Secrets carry no
ownerReference to their Certificates and outlive the release, keeping
the CA private key of a cluster that no longer exists. A new cluster
created under the same name then adopts that stale CA instead of
issuing its own trust root.

The <release>-oidc-bootstrap Job is a hook whose only delete policy is
before-hook-creation. Hooks are not part of the release manifest, so
uninstall never removes it.

The pre-delete hook deletes the two Certificates before their Secrets,
because deleting a Secret while its Certificate exists makes
cert-manager re-issue it. It runs after the TenantControlPlane is gone,
since the control plane's CSR signer mounts the CA. The Role grants
each delete by resourceName only.

Assisted-by: LLM
Signed-off-by: Ray Low <crossrt@gmail.com>
2026-10-11 22:40:47 +08:00
Aleksei Sviridkin 6ba440f7a3 fix(kafka): skip the OpenAPI patch lookup in the migration hook
The pre-install/pre-upgrade hook applies the node pools and the drain
KafkaRebalance with kubectl, and its container has no resources of its
own, so in a tenant with resource quotas it runs under the LimitRange
default of 128Mi. When it applies an object that already exists,
kubectl downloads the cluster's whole OpenAPI v2 document only to
decide that a custom resource takes a JSON merge patch: with the 374
CRDs of an e2e cluster that peaks at about 300Mi, so every upgrade of a
Kafka in such a tenant OOM-kills the hook and fails with "pre-upgrade
hooks failed".

--openapi-patch=false skips that lookup and builds the same three-way
merge patch from the last-applied annotation, peaking at about 35Mi on
the same cluster. A server-side apply would be as small but changes
what gets removed: the "kafka" pool is created with "kubectl create",
whose manager keeps co-owning every field it set, so a later
server-side apply leaves those fields in place when the chart drops
them. A larger memory limit would charge every upgrade against the
tenant quota instead.

Assisted-by: LLM
Signed-off-by: Aleksei Sviridkin <f@lex.la>
2026-10-11 12:49:19 +03:00