Files
cozystack/packages
Marian Koreniuk 18b83a72b3 feat(platform): make the Proxmox substrate installable from a bundle
Until now the two Cluster API packages behind the Proxmox substrate existed but
no bundle emitted them, so a Cozystack install shipped neither and the substrate
was reachable only by applying Package CRs by hand.

They join the iaas bundle as opt-in packages, where the KubeVirt infrastructure
provider is unconditional. The asymmetry is the point: capmox drives a
hypervisor outside this cluster and needs a Secret holding a Proxmox API token,
which capi-operator reads before it installs anything — with no Secret the
provider is never deployed at all. Enabling it by default would ask every
Cozystack install that has no Proxmox to supply hypervisor credentials.

Enabling capmox brings the in-cluster IPAM provider with it — capmox allocates
worker addresses from an InClusterIPPool and has no DHCP mode, so on its own it
never gets a ProxmoxCluster to Ready. IPAM stays independently enableable,
since assigning addresses is a generic Cluster API concern rather than a Proxmox
one.

Naming capmox in enabledPackages while disabling IPAM stops the render. The
cluster would catch that combination on its own: the capmox PackageSource
depends on the IPAM Package, so with that Package absent capmox goes
Ready=False with DependenciesNotReady and no HelmRelease is ever created. What
it would not do is say why. Failing the render names the two conflicting list
entries at the moment someone writes them, instead of leaving a condition to
decode later.

The negated containsDocument asserts in the wiring suite carry `any: true`.
Without it a negated containsDocument passes whether the document is in the
render or not, so the two properties the suite exists for — off by default,
and disabledPackages winning — could not fail.

Signed-off-by: Marian Koreniuk <moriarti@cp.if.ua>
Assisted-by: LLM
2026-09-25 16:25:00 +02:00
..