mirror of
https://github.com/cozystack/cozystack.git
synced 2026-11-05 03:27:07 +09:00
Aleksei Sviridkin
5728eca401
Section 8 described two of the three on-failure capture legs and not the third, so the collector that reads forwarding state off the node was absent from the one document that tells a contributor what diagnostics exist. It is also the leg whose two callers disagree about its budget, 600s from the BATS runner and 300s from the Chainsaw catch, which is what decides whether something added to it fits. Its notes contract is described with the carve-out the script itself declares: the two EndpointSlice reads in the LoadBalancer path report nothing either way, so a <none> backend line there is the one place a reader still cannot tell an endpointless Service from a read that never answered. Stating the contract without it would have promised the distinction on the path this collector exists to diagnose. The prose also still said the runner's captures serve "the BATS tests". They serve the e2e ones: the runner keys on an e2e- prefix, on the suite's filename or on its parent directory, because all three legs read cluster state and a unit runner has kubectl on PATH with no cluster behind it. Said once where the captures are introduced, and the two phrases that over-claimed now name the e2e suites. The legs are not gated alike, so the sentence says which fired where: two key on kubectl, and the snapshot leg keys on crust-gather being installed, which on a unit runner it usually is not. Assisted-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com> Signed-off-by: Aleksei Sviridkin <f@lex.la>