mirror of
https://github.com/cozystack/cozystack.git
synced 2026-11-09 22:13:18 +09:00
<!-- Thank you for making a contribution! Here are some tips for you: - Use Conventional Commits for the PR title: `type(scope): description` - Types: feat, fix, docs, style, refactor, perf, test, build, ci, chore - Scopes are not an exhaustive list — pick the most specific scope for the change and extend the list when a genuinely new area appears. Examples: - System components: dashboard, platform, operator, cilium, kube-ovn, linstor, fluxcd, cluster-api - Managed apps: postgres, mariadb, redis, kafka, clickhouse, virtual-machine, kubernetes - Development and maintenance: api, hack, tests, ci, docs, maintenance - Breaking changes: append `!` after type/scope (`feat(api)!: ...`) or add a `BREAKING CHANGE:` footer - If it's a work in progress, consider creating this PR as a draft. - Don't hesistate to ask for opinion and review in the community chats, even if it's still a draft. - Add the label `kind/backport` if it's a bugfix that needs to be backported to a previous version. --> ## What this PR does The chart pins `spec.sentinel.replicas: 3` whatever `replicas` says, so an instance created with `replicas: 1` runs one Redis pod and three Sentinel pods that have nothing to fail over to. This makes the Sentinel count follow the data pods: one Sentinel when `replicas` is 1, three otherwise. The operator cannot run zero Sentinels (freshworks `Validate()` resets `sentinel.replicas <= 0` to 3), and it needs at least one to locate the master. With one Sentinel its quorum is `replicas/2+1` = 1, so the single Sentinel works on its own. The operator also gives the Sentinel Deployment a PodDisruptionBudget with `minAvailable: 1` whenever Redis has two replicas or fewer (`ensurePodDisruptionBudget` in `operator/redisfailover/service/client.go`). On a single Sentinel that budget refuses every eviction and would block node drains, so the chart sets `sentinel.disablePodDisruptionBudget: true` in that case only. The Sentinel `WorkloadMonitor` now expects the rendered count instead of a fixed 3/2. The operator only stops ensuring that PDB once the flag is set; it never deletes the one it created while three Sentinels ran (`EnsureSentinelDeployment` in freshworks v3.3.5). An existing instance scaled to one replica would keep it, so `templates/hooks/sentinel-pdb.yaml` adds a post-upgrade hook that deletes `rfs-<release>`, with a Role scoped to that one name. It renders on upgrade only, since a fresh one-replica install never gets that PDB. From `replicas: 2` up nothing changes. Scaling an existing instance between 1 and 2 replicas scales the Sentinel Deployment between 1 and 3 accordingly. Not in scope: with `replicas: 1` the Redis data pod keeps its own operator PDB (`minAvailable: 1`), which already blocks drains of its node today; that is unchanged here. Tests: `tests/sentinel_replicas_test.yaml` covers 1, 2, 3 and the default, the PDB switch, and the `WorkloadMonitor`. Three of its cases fail on `main` without the template change. `tests/sentinel_pdb_hook_test.yaml` covers the hook. `helm unittest packages/apps/redis`: 79 passed. Open PR #4990 also edits `redisfailover.yaml` (Sentinel spreading); the two touch different keys. Backport: `release-1.7` ships the same freshworks operator and CRD, so `kind/backport` applies. `release-1.6` is not backportable as is: it still runs spotahome `v1.3.0-rc1`, whose vendored CRD (chart 3.3.0) does not declare `sentinel.disablePodDisruptionBudget`, and the operator's CRDs are installed with Flux's default `crds: Create` policy, so they are never updated on an existing cluster. The API server would prune the field and the single Sentinel would keep a `minAvailable: 1` PDB that blocks node drains. A 1.6 fix would need a CRD update path first. ### Screenshots <!-- REQUIRED for UI changes: attach screenshots or screen recordings demonstrating the visual impact of your changes. PRs with UI changes without screenshots will not be merged. --> ### Downstream repositories <!-- Cozystack is upstream for repositories that are NOT kept in sync with it automatically, and nothing in CI compares the two sides, so a change here can break them silently. Which change forces what, and which file to touch, is the trigger map in docs/agents/contributing.md under "Downstream Repositories". Walk it before you tick anything. IF YOU ARE AN AI AGENT OR AN LLM, THIS IS PART OF THE TASK, NOT A FORM TO FILL IN: 1. Walk the trigger map against the actual diff of this PR, file by file. Do not decide from the PR title or from your memory of what you changed. 2. For every repository you tick, open the follow-up PR there and link it on the same line. A ticked box with no link claims work that does not exist, which is worse than an empty box. Search that repository for an open PR or issue covering it first, and link that instead of filing a duplicate. 3. When the follow-up is out of scope, or needs a decision that is not yours to make, open an issue in that repository instead, link that, and say so in the PR body. Do not push a speculative PR into another repository just to fill a line here. 4. Do not tick "No downstream repository is affected" to make the checklist go away. If you are unsure, leave every box empty and say so in the PR body, so a human decides. --> - [x] No downstream repository is affected by this change (walked the map: the diff changes a template, a test, and the wording of two descriptions; no field, default, enum or name changes) - [ ] [cozystack/website](https://github.com/cozystack/website) - follow-up: - [ ] [cozystack/terraform-provider-cozystack](https://github.com/cozystack/terraform-provider-cozystack) - follow-up: - [ ] [cozystack/ansible-cozystack](https://github.com/cozystack/ansible-cozystack) - follow-up: - [ ] [cozystack/ccp](https://github.com/cozystack/ccp) - follow-up: - [ ] [cozystack/talm](https://github.com/cozystack/talm) - follow-up: - [ ] [cozystack/cozyhr](https://github.com/cozystack/cozyhr) - follow-up: - [ ] [cozystack/cozy-proxy](https://github.com/cozystack/cozy-proxy) - follow-up: - [ ] [cozystack/cozystack-telemetry-server](https://github.com/cozystack/cozystack-telemetry-server) - follow-up: - [ ] [cozystack/external-apps-example](https://github.com/cozystack/external-apps-example) - follow-up: - [ ] [cozystack/examples](https://github.com/cozystack/examples) - follow-up: - [ ] [cozystack/community](https://github.com/cozystack/community) - follow-up: ### Release note <!-- Write a release note: - Explain what has changed internally and for users. - Start with the same `type(scope):` prefix as in the PR title - Follow the guidelines at https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/guide/release-notes.md. --> ```release-note fix(redis): an instance with `replicas: 1` now runs one Sentinel instead of three, without a Sentinel PodDisruptionBudget; on upgrade, the PDB the operator created earlier is deleted. Instances with two replicas or more are unchanged. ``` <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> <!-- coderabbit-ai-generated:v1 --> ## Summary by CodeRabbit * **New Features** * Redis deployments configured with one replica now use one Sentinel; other replica settings continue to use three. * Workload monitoring now reflects the configured Sentinel count. When changing to one replica, upgrades remove the Sentinel PodDisruptionBudget. * **Documentation** * Updated Redis configuration guidance to explain how Sentinel count varies with the replica setting and clarify Sentinel resource defaults. <!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
How to test packages local
cd packages/core/installer
make image-cozystack REGISTRY=YOUR_CUSTOM_REGISTRY
make apply
kubectl delete po -l app=source-controller -n cozy-fluxcd