mirror of
https://github.com/cozystack/cozystack.git
synced 2026-11-09 05:25:14 +09:00
## What this PR does The tenant backend Deployment in the kubernetes suites had one 300s budget to reach `condition=Available`, and two unrelated variable costs shared it. The first is scheduling. What the suite establishes before that point is two tenant nodes Ready, which is weaker than schedulable: a Ready node still carries `node.cilium.io/agent-not-ready` until the tenant cilium agent claims it, and a node the bringup has not finished with is `SchedulingDisabled`. In the run recorded in #3577 scheduling took 2m18s and 1m57s in the two suites, which left the image pull to finish inside what remained. It did not, and both suites reported the same `timed out waiting for the condition` for what were two different shortfalls. So this waits for a node that actually accepts a Pod before creating the workload, on its own budget and its own failure message. The gate encodes the scheduler's rule for a Pod that tolerates nothing (Ready, not unschedulable, no `NoSchedule` or `NoExecute` taint) over a `custom-columns` probe, prints the node table on both outcomes so a timeout names the taint that held it, and treats a failed probe as not-schedulable so an API blip cannot release it. On the happy path it adds no wall time: it spends the seconds the Pod would otherwise spend Pending, plus at most one 5s poll interval. On a failing run the two budgets stack, so a run that exhausts both now gives up at ~600s where it used to give up at 300s, inside the 40m Chainsaw script op the suites document as a ~25m bringup. The readiness wait keeps its 300s, now starting from a schedulable node, and dumps deployment, pod and event state when it runs out. The workload image is also pinned by digest. The tenant workers reach no Docker Hub mirror (`hack/e2e-talos-image-cache.yaml` serves the Talos worker OS disk image over HTTP and is not a registry mirror), so nginx is pulled from Docker Hub on every run either way. The digest does not take the pull off the critical path; it fixes what that pull returns instead of leaving a floating tag free to change size and content under a fixed deadline. Preloading the image would need infrastructure this tree does not have, and is not attempted here. Nothing will bump the pin: no renovate manager reads `hack/`, and the comment says so, because for a throwaway test workload the freeze is the point. What this does not claim: it removes two measured consumers from a fixed budget, both taken from the events of a single run. Whether that budget was the only thing making those suites red is not established from one run, so this is not offered as the fix for a red pipeline. `hack/run-kubernetes-schedulable_test.bats` covers the new logic: every branch of the predicate, the multi-node scan, the poll-again path, the deadline, and a probe that fails. Each test was verified by mutating the helper and checking that the intended test, and no other, went red. Note for whoever reviews alongside #3575: that branch mirrors `ghcr.io` for tenant worker pulls, not `docker.io`, so it does not change the Docker Hub pull described here. `git merge-tree` reports no conflict between the two, nor with #3548. Observed in #3577. ### Screenshots Not a UI change. ### Downstream repositories - [x] No downstream repository is affected by this change - [ ] [cozystack/website](https://github.com/cozystack/website) - follow-up: - [ ] [cozystack/terraform-provider-cozystack](https://github.com/cozystack/terraform-provider-cozystack) - follow-up: - [ ] [cozystack/ansible-cozystack](https://github.com/cozystack/ansible-cozystack) - follow-up: - [ ] [cozystack/ccp](https://github.com/cozystack/ccp) - follow-up: - [ ] [cozystack/talm](https://github.com/cozystack/talm) - follow-up: - [ ] [cozystack/cozyhr](https://github.com/cozystack/cozyhr) - follow-up: - [ ] [cozystack/cozy-proxy](https://github.com/cozystack/cozy-proxy) - follow-up: - [ ] [cozystack/cozystack-telemetry-server](https://github.com/cozystack/cozystack-telemetry-server) - follow-up: - [ ] [cozystack/external-apps-example](https://github.com/cozystack/external-apps-example) - follow-up: - [ ] [cozystack/examples](https://github.com/cozystack/examples) - follow-up: The trigger map was walked against the diff. The change is confined to `hack/e2e-chainsaw/_lib/run-kubernetes.sh` and one new `hack/*.bats` unit test. It moves and renames nothing under `hack/`, changes no make target, and does not touch `hack/e2e-prepare-cluster.bats`, any package, any CRD or any namespace name, so none of the listed repositories are reached. ### Release note ```release-note NONE ``` <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> ## Summary by CodeRabbit * **Bug Fixes** * Improved Kubernetes deployment readiness by waiting for a suitable, schedulable node before timing backend startup. * Added clearer diagnostics when nodes are unavailable or backend readiness fails. * Replaced the floating backend container image tag with a fixed, verified version. * **Tests** * Added coverage for node readiness, cordoning, taints, polling, timeouts, probe failures, and deployment sequencing. <!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->