mirror of
https://github.com/ruvnet/ruflo.git
synced 2026-11-02 18:17:51 +09:00
rUv
3daca8f628
While researching a cross-ecosystem architecture question, found that witness-receipt-contract.md §9 and the ruflo-anchor-record-v1 schema both still say "PROPOSED-EXTENSION... nothing above is decided" — but the two consumers that placeholder was gating (ruvnet/rvm#35, ruvnet/autogenous#10) already merged real implementations against exactly this shape: - ruvnet/rvm#37 (merged): verify and anchor ruflo ADR-322C receipts into the witness chain - ruvnet/autogenous#13 (merged): export promotion evidence in the ruflo ADR-322C receipt shape - ruvnet/ruflo#3066, the PIR tracking issue that scoped this work, is itself closed with a status comment confirming the schema (PR #3067) is canonical on main and both conformance audits cleared No schema or behavior change — this is a documentation-accuracy fix. ADR-322D formally promotes the record from PROPOSED-EXTENSION to Accepted to match what's already shipped and consumed, and explicitly scopes it against a different, still-unwired "RVM" relationship (LatentMesh's own aspiration to have RVF/RVM gate its candidate cognition) so the two aren't conflated in future reads. Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01G3Fkc9qcZ2AkwGPce83yTa