This PR expands Webstudio MCP and CLI into a more complete agent
authoring interface. Agents can discover project capabilities, edit real
Webstudio content, use data/resources, verify visual output, and report
useful issues when workflows fail.
## MCP User Capabilities
- Create, update, duplicate, reorder, and delete pages.
- Create pages from templates and manage reusable page templates.
- Inspect project pages, instances, props, styles, assets, variables,
resources, and metadata.
- Insert Webstudio components and authored JSX fragments into pages.
- Edit text, props, styles, breakpoints, design tokens, and CSS
variables.
- Update page metadata, SEO fields, redirects, marketplace metadata, and
project settings.
- Create and use static data variables.
- Create and use dynamic resources fetched over HTTP.
- Use REST, GraphQL, and built-in system resources in authored pages.
- Bind data variables and resources to visible page content.
- Create resource-backed pages such as sitemap XML, structured SEO data,
and API-driven content sections.
- Preview current project state without requiring a publish step.
- Capture screenshots for visual verification.
- Verify responsive designs across desktop, tablet, and mobile
breakpoints.
- Use screenshot diff and OCR-style checks to inspect rendered output.
- Reset and refresh local MCP project state when needed.
- Discover available CLI/MCP commands from generated manuals.
- Use clearer examples for resources, data variables, JSX authoring,
previewing, and visual checks.
- Read marketplace product metadata without requiring a full project
snapshot.
- Get safer guidance when using low-level patch tools.
- Get a ready-to-copy Discord report template when MCP/CLI behavior is
confusing or broken.
## Summary
- Add CLI project import support from synced `.webstudio/data.json` into
another project via a destination share link.
- Move project bundle import/export contract into
`@webstudio-is/protocol`, including bundle versioning, staged upload
constants, schema validation, and fixture coverage.
- Upload project bundle data through staged TUS upload before calling
the import RPC to avoid request body limits.
- Upload referenced assets as binary files through the existing asset
upload route before importing asset rows.
- Add `--skip-assets` and `--ignore-version-check` import options.
- Add retry handling for transient missing imported asset files by
re-uploading only the reported missing assets.
- Share missing-asset import error formatting/parsing through protocol
to avoid duplicated string contracts.
- Preserve browser asset upload behavior while adding API upload
support.
- Normalize schema naming across the branch to lower-case names without
`Schema` suffix.
**Summary**
Migrates Builder bootstrap data loading from the legacy
`/rest/data/:projectId` endpoint to `build.loadData` tRPC, while keeping
the old REST route as a no-store compatibility shim.
Hardens authenticated Builder/dashboard responses by explicitly sending:
- `Cache-Control: private, no-store, max-age=0`
- `Pragma: no-cache`
- `Expires: 0`
- `Vary: Cookie`
**Details**
- Added `build.loadData` tRPC query for full Builder state.
- Switched Builder client bootstrap loading to tRPC.
- Added shared cache-control helpers for private no-store responses.
- Made tRPC responses private/no-store by default unless anonymous and
explicitly public-cacheable.
- Added no-store headers to
Builder/dashboard/auth/resource/asset-related responses.
- Updated redirect handling to preserve headers while enforcing
no-store.
- Prevented stale dashboard account data from flashing by applying
user-scoped loader data before paint and clearing stores on teardown.
- Added tests for cache headers, tRPC response metadata, and no-store
redirects.
**Validation**
- `pnpm --filter @webstudio-is/builder test --
app/services/cache-control.server.test.ts
app/services/trpc-response-meta.server.test.ts
app/services/no-store-redirect.test.ts app/routes/rest.assets.test.ts
app/shared/sync/project-queue.test.ts app/dashboard/dashboard.test.ts`
- `pnpm exec oxlint ...` on touched files
- `git diff --check`
`pnpm --filter @webstudio-is/builder typecheck` still fails on existing
unrelated Tailwind/css-engine errors.
## Problem
Commit cc20991b accidentally changed `itemToString` for `var` type
values to use `toValue(item)`, which produces `var(--variable,
fallback)` instead of the intended short `--variable` label.
This meant the CSS value input (when unfocused, and in the autocomplete
dropdown) showed the full `var(--variable, fallback)` string, which is
too long for small inputs and not how it previously displayed.
## Fix
- Restored `itemToString` to return `--${item.value}` for var types
(short label)
- Updated the `onFocus` handler to explicitly call `toValue(value)` for
var types, so the full `var(--variable, fallback)` is shown when the
user focuses the input to edit it
- Add minSeats/maxSeats to PlanFeatures schema
- listMembers returns DB-backed pending invites (no more client-side
state)
- countAllMembers includes pending invites (billed at invite time, Figma
model)
- Builder-level workspace-router calls payment worker on
addMember/removeMember
- Removed client-side invitedEmails state from manage-members-dialog
- getSeatSuspendedMessage now accepts optional workspace name
- notification-router simplified (accept no longer syncs seats)
## Description
1. What is this PR about (link the issue and add a short description)
## Steps for reproduction
1. click button
2. expect xyz
## Code Review
- [ ] hi @kof, I need you to do
- conceptual review (architecture, feature-correctness)
- detailed review (read every line)
- test it on preview
## Before requesting a review
- [ ] made a self-review
- [ ] added inline comments where things may be not obvious (the "why",
not "what")
## Before merging
- [ ] tested locally and on preview environment (preview dev login:
0000)
- [ ] updated [test
cases](https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio/blob/main/apps/builder/docs/test-cases.md)
document
- [ ] added tests
- [ ] if any new env variables are added, added them to `.env` file
- Add new story variants across ~100 files covering previously untested props
- Fix all story titles to use sentence case per UI label guidelines
- Consolidate duplicate card, thumbnail, and value-text stories into parent files
- Add interactive/controlled variants for checkbox, radio, switch, select, etc.
- Add style source, disabled, icon, placeholder, unit options variants to CssValueInput
- Add sub-menu, radio group, destructive, and disabled variants to dropdown/context menus
- Add dialog resize, maximize, actions, and non-draggable variants
- Add popover title, actions, and side placement variants
- Add tooltip side placements and content variant stories
- Skip loader/optimization for data: src in getImageAttributes
- Replace external picsum.photos URL with inline SVG data URI in social-preview story
- Remove unnecessary ThumbnailWrapper from thumbnail stories
Previously only purchases with a subscriptionId (recurring
subscriptions) were displayed. Lifetime deals were counted as paid (no
"Free" badge) but not shown in the dropdown. Now LTDs appear as
non-clickable labels while subscriptions remain clickable and navigate
to the billing portal.
## Description
1. What is this PR about (link the issue and add a short description)
## Steps for reproduction
1. click button
2. expect xyz
## Code Review
- [ ] hi @kof, I need you to do
- conceptual review (architecture, feature-correctness)
- detailed review (read every line)
- test it on preview
## Before requesting a review
- [ ] made a self-review
- [ ] added inline comments where things may be not obvious (the "why",
not "what")
## Before merging
- [ ] tested locally and on preview environment (preview dev login:
0000)
- [ ] updated [test
cases](https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio/blob/main/apps/builder/docs/test-cases.md)
document
- [ ] added tests
- [ ] if any new env variables are added, added them to `.env` file
Show a warning banner when a redirect path matches the current page
path, indicating the redirect will override access to the page.
Changes:
- Add PanelBanner component with warning variant to page settings
- Implement findMatchingRedirect utility to detect redirect conflicts
- Show contextual warning with link to Redirects settings section
- Add comprehensive tests for redirect conflict detection
Code quality:
- Replace 'return undefined' with 'return' per style guide
- Use 'return null' for React components returning nothing
- Changed safe mode detection from .has() to strict === 'true' check
- Made safemode a required boolean parameter in builderPath/builderUrl
- Added 'Open in safe mode' option to dashboard project menu
- Added safe mode indicator button with shield icon in topbar
- Safe mode now prevents all script execution in HTML embeds
- Added isSafeMode to React SDK context
- Added test coverage for safe mode in HTML embed component
## Description
1. What is this PR about (link the issue and add a short description)
## Steps for reproduction
1. click button
2. expect xyz
## Code Review
- [ ] hi @kof, I need you to do
- conceptual review (architecture, feature-correctness)
- detailed review (read every line)
- test it on preview
## Before requesting a review
- [ ] made a self-review
- [ ] added inline comments where things may be not obvious (the "why",
not "what")
## Before merging
- [ ] tested locally and on preview environment (preview dev login:
0000)
- [ ] updated [test
cases](https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio/blob/main/apps/builder/docs/test-cases.md)
document
- [ ] added tests
- [ ] if any new env variables are added, added them to `.env` file
Here's the list of available user plan flags with their defaults
- allowAdditionalPermissions: true,
- allowDynamicData: true,
- allowContentMode: true,
- allowStagingPublish: true,
- maxContactEmails: 5,
- maxDomainsAllowedPerUser: Number.MAX_SAFE_INTEGER,
- maxPublishesAllowedPerUser: Number.MAX_SAFE_INTEGER,
---------
Co-authored-by: Oleg Isonen <oleg008@gmail.com>
This PR replaces the limited "States" dropdown in the Style Panel with a
flexible input field that supports any CSS selector, pseudo-class, or
pseudo-element. This allows for advanced styling capabilities such as
`:has()`, `:focus-visible`, and complex combinators.
## Key Changes
### Flexible Selector Input
- Replaced the fixed "States" category list with a free-form input
field.
- Supports **any** valid CSS selector (e.g., `:hover`, `::before`,
`:has(:checked)`).
- Validation logic ensures only valid selectors are accepted (triggered
on `Enter` key).
## How to Test
1. Select an element and open the Style Panel.
2. Click on the Local style source or a Token.
3. In the input field (bottom of menu), type a selector like `:hover` or
`:first-child` and press Enter.
4. Verify the selector is added and selected.
---------
Co-authored-by: zehjotkah <111518041+zehjotkah@users.noreply.github.com>
## Description
- [x] new file types support
- [x] categories filter
- [x] sorting filter
- [x] asset resource for access from custom code
## Steps for reproduction
1. click button
3. expect xyz
## Code Review
- [ ] hi @kof, I need you to do
- conceptual review (architecture, feature-correctness)
- detailed review (read every line)
- test it on preview
## Before requesting a review
- [ ] made a self-review
- [ ] added inline comments where things may be not obvious (the "why",
not "what")
## Before merging
- [ ] tested locally and on preview environment (preview dev login:
0000)
- [ ] updated [test
cases](https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio/blob/main/apps/builder/docs/test-cases.md)
document
- [ ] added tests
- [ ] if any new env variables are added, added them to `.env` file
---------
Co-authored-by: zehjotkah <111518041+zehjotkah@users.noreply.github.com>
## Description
- user plan not correctly considered
- loading icon stuck
- added loadin indicator
## Steps for reproduction
1. click button
2. expect xyz
## Code Review
- [ ] hi @kof, I need you to do
- conceptual review (architecture, feature-correctness)
- detailed review (read every line)
- test it on preview
## Before requesting a review
- [ ] made a self-review
- [ ] added inline comments where things may be not obvious (the "why",
not "what")
## Before merging
- [ ] tested locally and on preview environment (preview dev login:
0000)
- [ ] updated [test
cases](https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio/blob/main/apps/builder/docs/test-cases.md)
document
- [ ] added tests
- [ ] if any new env variables are added, added them to `.env` file
## Description
1. What is this PR about (link the issue and add a short description)
## Steps for reproduction
1. click button
2. expect xyz
## Code Review
- [ ] hi @kof, I need you to do
- conceptual review (architecture, feature-correctness)
- detailed review (read every line)
- test it on preview
## Before requesting a review
- [ ] made a self-review
- [ ] added inline comments where things may be not obvious (the "why",
not "what")
## Before merging
- [ ] tested locally and on preview environment (preview dev login:
0000)
- [ ] updated [test
cases](https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio/blob/main/apps/builder/docs/test-cases.md)
document
- [ ] added tests
- [ ] if any new env variables are added, added them to `.env` file
doesn't have more value, already visible based on domain
## Description
1. What is this PR about (link the issue and add a short description)
## Steps for reproduction
1. click button
2. expect xyz
## Code Review
- [ ] hi @kof, I need you to do
- conceptual review (architecture, feature-correctness)
- detailed review (read every line)
- test it on preview
## Before requesting a review
- [ ] made a self-review
- [ ] added inline comments where things may be not obvious (the "why",
not "what")
## Before merging
- [ ] tested locally and on preview environment (preview dev login:
0000)
- [ ] updated [test
cases](https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio/blob/main/apps/builder/docs/test-cases.md)
document
- [ ] added tests
- [ ] if any new env variables are added, added them to `.env` file
## Description
1. What is this PR about (link the issue and add a short description)
## Steps for reproduction
1. click button
2. expect xyz
## Code Review
- [ ] hi @kof, I need you to do
- conceptual review (architecture, feature-correctness)
- detailed review (read every line)
- test it on preview
## Before requesting a review
- [ ] made a self-review
- [ ] added inline comments where things may be not obvious (the "why",
not "what")
## Before merging
- [ ] tested locally and on preview environment (preview dev login:
0000)
- [ ] updated [test
cases](https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio/blob/main/apps/builder/docs/test-cases.md)
document
- [ ] added tests
- [ ] if any new env variables are added, added them to `.env` file
## Description
1. What is this PR about (link the issue and add a short description)
## Steps for reproduction
1. click button
2. expect xyz
## Code Review
- [ ] hi @kof, I need you to do
- conceptual review (architecture, feature-correctness)
- detailed review (read every line)
- test it on preview
## Before requesting a review
- [ ] made a self-review
- [ ] added inline comments where things may be not obvious (the "why",
not "what")
## Before merging
- [ ] tested locally and on preview environment (preview dev login:
0000)
- [ ] updated [test
cases](https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio/blob/main/apps/builder/docs/test-cases.md)
document
- [ ] added tests
- [ ] if any new env variables are added, added them to `.env` file
## Description
1. What is this PR about (link the issue and add a short description)
## Steps for reproduction
1. click button
2. expect xyz
## Code Review
- [ ] hi @kof, I need you to do
- conceptual review (architecture, feature-correctness)
- detailed review (read every line)
- test it on preview
## Before requesting a review
- [ ] made a self-review
- [ ] added inline comments where things may be not obvious (the "why",
not "what")
## Before merging
- [ ] tested locally and on preview environment (preview dev login:
0000)
- [ ] updated [test
cases](https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio/blob/main/apps/builder/docs/test-cases.md)
document
- [ ] added tests
- [ ] if any new env variables are added, added them to `.env` file
## Description
1. What is this PR about (link the issue and add a short description)
## Steps for reproduction
1. click button
2. expect xyz
## Code Review
- [ ] hi @kof, I need you to do
- conceptual review (architecture, feature-correctness)
- detailed review (read every line)
- test it on preview
## Before requesting a review
- [ ] made a self-review
- [ ] added inline comments where things may be not obvious (the "why",
not "what")
## Before merging
- [ ] tested locally and on preview environment (preview dev login:
0000)
- [ ] updated [test
cases](https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio/blob/main/apps/builder/docs/test-cases.md)
document
- [ ] added tests
- [ ] if any new env variables are added, added them to `.env` file
## Description
We should never use those menus without a portal, enforcing it by
default now:
- added portal to DropdownMenuContent
- removed usages of the portal in consumers
## Steps for reproduction
1. click button
2. expect xyz
## Code Review
- [ ] hi @kof, I need you to do
- conceptual review (architecture, feature-correctness)
- detailed review (read every line)
- test it on preview
## Before requesting a review
- [ ] made a self-review
- [ ] added inline comments where things may be not obvious (the "why",
not "what")
## Before merging
- [ ] tested locally and on preview environment (preview dev login:
0000)
- [ ] updated [test
cases](https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio/blob/main/apps/builder/docs/test-cases.md)
document
- [ ] added tests
- [ ] if any new env variables are added, added them to `.env` file
## Description
- [ ] Search the projects
- [ ] Use arrow keys directly from the search or by focusing the project
- [ ] Hit enter to open
- [ ] Empty state when nothing found
## Steps for reproduction
1. click button
2. expect xyz
## Code Review
- [ ] hi @kof, I need you to do
- conceptual review (architecture, feature-correctness)
- detailed review (read every line)
- test it on preview
## Before requesting a review
- [ ] made a self-review
- [ ] added inline comments where things may be not obvious (the "why",
not "what")
## Before merging
- [ ] tested locally and on preview environment (preview dev login:
0000)
- [ ] updated [test
cases](https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio/blob/main/apps/builder/docs/test-cases.md)
document
- [ ] added tests
- [ ] if any new env variables are added, added them to `.env` file
## Description
<img width="389" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/4e011ab6-5f39-4c38-84a5-96b4ad75934e"
/>
1. Added central place for all help links
1. Added same thing to the menu
1. Deemphasize github discussions, it works better with discord for
everything
## Steps for reproduction
1. click button
4. expect xyz
## Code Review
- [ ] hi @kof, I need you to do
- conceptual review (architecture, feature-correctness)
- detailed review (read every line)
- test it on preview
## Before requesting a review
- [ ] made a self-review
- [ ] added inline comments where things may be not obvious (the "why",
not "what")
## Before merging
- [ ] tested locally and on preview environment (preview dev login:
0000)
- [ ] updated [test
cases](https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio/blob/main/apps/builder/docs/test-cases.md)
document
- [ ] added tests
- [ ] if any new env variables are added, added them to `.env` file
## Description
The state for when user first signs up and has no projects
<img width="859" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/e4ec0bfc-68a9-4df4-8004-923c4b449ac4"
/>
## Steps for reproduction
1. click button
2. expect xyz
## Code Review
- [ ] hi @kof, I need you to do
- conceptual review (architecture, feature-correctness)
- detailed review (read every line)
- test it on preview
## Before requesting a review
- [ ] made a self-review
- [ ] added inline comments where things may be not obvious (the "why",
not "what")
## Before merging
- [ ] tested locally and on preview environment (preview dev login:
0000)
- [ ] updated [test
cases](https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio/blob/main/apps/builder/docs/test-cases.md)
document
- [ ] added tests
- [ ] if any new env variables are added, added them to `.env` file
Closes#4430
## Todo
- [ ] Better empty state in projects
- [ ] Opening some of those things like video tutorials or support hub
in an iframe directly in the dashboard
- [ ] Search
- [ ] published domain
## Steps for reproduction
1. click button
2. expect xyz
## Code Review
- [ ] hi @kof, I need you to do
- conceptual review (architecture, feature-correctness)
- detailed review (read every line)
- test it on preview
## Before requesting a review
- [ ] made a self-review
- [ ] added inline comments where things may be not obvious (the "why",
not "what")
## Before merging
- [ ] tested locally and on preview environment (preview dev login:
0000)
- [ ] updated [test
cases](https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio/blob/main/apps/builder/docs/test-cases.md)
document
- [ ] added tests
- [ ] if any new env variables are added, added them to `.env` file
## Description
- [x] left sidebar tab icons
## Steps for reproduction
1. click button
2. expect xyz
## Code Review
- [ ] hi @kof, I need you to do
- conceptual review (architecture, feature-correctness)
- detailed review (read every line)
- test it on preview
## Before requesting a review
- [ ] made a self-review
- [ ] added inline comments where things may be not obvious (the "why",
not "what")
## Before merging
- [ ] tested locally and on preview environment (preview dev login:
0000)
- [ ] updated [test
cases](https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio/blob/main/apps/builder/docs/test-cases.md)
document
- [ ] added tests
- [ ] if any new env variables are added, added them to `.env` file
Closes https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio/issues/4572
## Description
- All floating panels are now using a dialog and are draggable (bindings
and expressions not migrated yet, separate PR)
- Logic for positioning the panels is now in our control and easier to
manage, because we have lots of special cases
- Deleted FloatingPanelPopover, now everything uses either FloatingPanel
or Popover, difference is in positioning logic, FloatingPanel is using
Dialog
- Big center positioned dialogs like code for html embed allow having
another panel open at the same time, wile all other floating panels
close the other panel when clicked
- Most extended settings in style panel are now positioned above style
panel, not on the left
## Steps for reproduction
1. click button
3. expect xyz
## Code Review
- [ ] hi @kof, I need you to do
- conceptual review (architecture, feature-correctness)
- detailed review (read every line)
- test it on preview
## Before requesting a review
- [ ] made a self-review
- [ ] added inline comments where things may be not obvious (the "why",
not "what")
## Before merging
- [ ] tested locally and on preview environment (preview dev login:
0000)
- [ ] updated [test
cases](https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio/blob/main/apps/builder/docs/test-cases.md)
document
- [ ] added tests
- [ ] if any new env variables are added, added them to `.env` file
Oleg Isonen