## Description
closes#3872
- [x] - Builder support
- [x] - Publish support
## Steps for reproduction
Example
https://add-json.staging.webstudio.is/builder/8160e16d-5ab4-4249-86de-0c98a64526a3https://test-json-ki9yj.wstd.work/
## Code Review
- [ ] hi @kof, I need you to do
- conceptual review (architecture, feature-correctness)
- detailed review (read every line)
- test it on preview
## Before requesting a review
- [ ] made a self-review
- [ ] added inline comments where things may be not obvious (the "why",
not "what")
## Before merging
- [ ] tested locally and on preview environment (preview dev login:
5de6)
- [ ] updated [test
cases](https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio/blob/main/apps/builder/docs/test-cases.md)
document
- [ ] added tests
- [ ] if any new env variables are added, added them to `.env` file
## Description
- [x] - Sync fixtures by buildId `pnpm cli sync --buildId blabla`
- [x] - Sync with current branch deployment
## Steps for reproduction
1. click button
2. expect xyz
## Code Review
- [ ] hi @kof, I need you to do
- conceptual review (architecture, feature-correctness)
- detailed review (read every line)
- test it on preview
## Before requesting a review
- [ ] made a self-review
- [ ] added inline comments where things may be not obvious (the "why",
not "what")
## Before merging
- [ ] tested locally and on preview environment (preview dev login:
5de6)
- [ ] updated [test
cases](https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio/blob/main/apps/builder/docs/test-cases.md)
document
- [ ] added tests
- [ ] if any new env variables are added, added them to `.env` file
Here split everything imported from react-sdk by published sites into
separate entry point react-sdk/runtime.
The result in ssg fixture is the following
```diff
- 429788 chunk-CuG10VAj.js
+ 370366 chunk-D4NWbWis.js
```
## Description
1. What is this PR about (link the issue and add a short description)
## Steps for reproduction
1. click button
2. expect xyz
## Code Review
- [ ] hi @kof, I need you to do
- conceptual review (architecture, feature-correctness)
- detailed review (read every line)
- test it on preview
## Before requesting a review
- [ ] made a self-review
- [ ] added inline comments where things may be not obvious (the "why",
not "what")
## Before merging
- [ ] tested locally and on preview environment (preview dev login:
5de6)
- [ ] updated [test
cases](https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio/blob/main/apps/builder/docs/test-cases.md)
document
- [ ] added tests
- [ ] if any new env variables are added, added them to `.env` file
## Description
### Todos
- [x] - Expand support: `ssg` and `ssg-(netlify|vercel)` differ by only
one file. This expansion allows a single external template to apply to
multiple internal uses (previously hardcoded in prebuild, see
`defaults`).
- [x] - Add & test ssg-vercel and ssg-netlify constants.mjs templates to
support image optimizations.
## Steps for reproduction
```bash
cd ./fixtures/ssg
pnpm cli build --template ssg-netlify --template internal --preview && pnpm prettier --write .
pnpm build
```
then drag drop on netlify and see the result
[example](https://66a9d3c5c6bb86681c6611e4--inspiring-liger-df7a81.netlify.app/)
```html
<img alt="" width="14" height="16" src="/.netlify/images?url=%2Fassets%2Ficonly_svg_converted-converted_zMaMiAAutUl8XrITgz7d1.svg&w=32&q=80" class="w-image c161qeci" sizes="100vw" srcset="/.netlify/images?url=%2Fassets%2Ficonly_svg_converted-converted_zMaMiAAutUl8XrITgz7d1.svg&w=16&q=80 16w, /.netlify/images?url=%2Fassets%2Ficonly_svg_converted-converted_zMaMiAAutUl8XrITgz7d1.svg&w=32&q=80 32w" decoding="async" loading="lazy">
```
```bash
cd ./fixtures/ssg
pnpm cli build --template ssg-vercel --template internal --preview && pnpm prettier --write .
pnpm build
```
Upload to https://github.com/webstudio-is/ssg-vercel-test/tree/main
See vercel deployment
[example](https://ssg-vercel-test-r0a778rpj-getwebstudio.vercel.app/)
```html
<img alt="" width="14" height="16" src="/_vercel/image?url=%2Fassets%2Ficonly_svg_converted-converted_zMaMiAAutUl8XrITgz7d1.svg&w=32&q=80" class="w-image c161qeci" sizes="100vw" srcset="/_vercel/image?url=%2Fassets%2Ficonly_svg_converted-converted_zMaMiAAutUl8XrITgz7d1.svg&w=16&q=80 16w, /_vercel/image?url=%2Fassets%2Ficonly_svg_converted-converted_zMaMiAAutUl8XrITgz7d1.svg&w=32&q=80 32w" decoding="async" loading="lazy">
```
## Code Review
- [ ] hi @kof, I need you to do
- conceptual review (architecture, feature-correctness)
- detailed review (read every line)
- test it on preview
## Before requesting a review
- [ ] made a self-review
- [ ] added inline comments where things may be not obvious (the "why",
not "what")
## Before merging
- [ ] tested locally and on preview environment (preview dev login:
5de6)
- [ ] updated [test
cases](https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio/blob/main/apps/builder/docs/test-cases.md)
document
- [ ] added tests
- [ ] if any new env variables are added, added them to `.env` file
We want to replace n8n handler as proprietary code with injected
handler. The idea is to return resource request from this handler which
can be executed same way as user defined resource.
Closes https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio/issues/3789
Here stopped submitting webhook form with custom action to n8n and
requested directly from generated code. This has a few benefits
- self-hosted websites (vercel, netlify) no longer have to setup n8n to
support forms
- we can pay n8n for these executions no more
- user no longer have to unsubscribe from emails when setup custom
webhook
Ref https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio/issues/3789
Here changed a few things
- replace WebhookForm action prop with resource, which is sent with
hidden field instead of instance id
- prevented generating method and action in client side code
- generate "action" resource instead of form properties for server
action prop is replaced only inside cli to not require support in
builder yet, in the future this can be part of client migrations
Closes https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio/issues/3788
Here switched from attribute selector to classes when atomic styles are
disabled. This will let us get rid from data-ws-* attributes in
generated html.
Here made constants path easier to access from dynamic paths by
automatically replacing __CONSTANTS__ with actual relative path.
This is necessary for vike support which has folder based routes.
Here improved replacing placeholders in our templates. Before used some
relative path to stubs. Now use explicitly named placeholders like
`__CLIENT__`, `__SERVER__`, `__CSS__` and `__SITEMAP__`.
This will give more flexibility when support other frameworks, for
example vike.
Here improved our checks. No longet rely on "checks" script but run
"test" and "typescript" scripts from each package in monorepo.
Would also make each package less boilerplaty.
## Description
1. What is this PR about (link the issue and add a short description)
## Steps for reproduction
1. click button
2. expect xyz
## Code Review
- [ ] hi @kof, I need you to do
- conceptual review (architecture, feature-correctness)
- detailed review (read every line)
- test it on preview
## Before requesting a review
- [ ] made a self-review
- [ ] added inline comments where things may be not obvious (the "why",
not "what")
## Before merging
- [ ] tested locally and on preview environment (preview dev login:
5de6)
- [ ] updated [test
cases](https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio/blob/main/apps/builder/docs/test-cases.md)
document
- [ ] added tests
- [ ] if any new env variables are added, added them to `.env` file
These fields should have -webkit- prefix additionally to unprefixed
version to support more browsers.
- background-clip
- user-select
- text-size-adjust
## Description
Reload scripts in HTML Embed on dynamic pages
Closes#3581
## Steps for reproduction
Open
https://scripts-reload-saas-2-pgmkm.wstd.work/test/1
dynamic link clicks should cause `console.log` from IFrame
Anchor link should not.
## Code Review
- [ ] hi @kof, I need you to do
- conceptual review (architecture, feature-correctness)
- detailed review (read every line)
- test it on preview
## Before requesting a review
- [ ] made a self-review
- [ ] added inline comments where things may be not obvious (the "why",
not "what")
## Before merging
- [ ] tested locally and on preview environment (preview dev login:
5de6)
- [ ] updated [test
cases](https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio/blob/main/apps/builder/docs/test-cases.md)
document
- [ ] added tests
- [ ] if any new env variables are added, added them to `.env` file
## Description
Following code in Project Setting Custom Code
```
<script data-cf-beacon='{"token": "123"}'>
```
failed on build
## Steps for reproduction
1. click button
2. expect xyz
## Code Review
- [ ] hi @kof, I need you to do
- conceptual review (architecture, feature-correctness)
- detailed review (read every line)
- test it on preview
## Before requesting a review
- [ ] made a self-review
- [ ] added inline comments where things may be not obvious (the "why",
not "what")
## Before merging
- [ ] tested locally and on preview environment (preview dev login:
5de6)
- [ ] updated [test
cases](https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio/blob/main/apps/builder/docs/test-cases.md)
document
- [ ] added tests
- [ ] if any new env variables are added, added them to `.env` file
Here upgraded storybook with reresolved transitive dependencies. Removed
babel/types override, will eventually let us deduplicate a lot of
dependencies.
Finally figured out how to leverage node conditions to run webstudio cli
in fixtures without rebuilding it on every change.
Import conditions is another thing which allows
to constrain not exposed modules but internal ones.
Now to run cli locally it should be have this env
which is basically same we do with vite.
Works for both import and export conditions.
```
NODE_OPTIONS='--conditions=webstudio --import=tsx' webstudio
```
## Description
Corresponding SAAS PR
https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio-saas/pull/298
(Must be renamed to "release.staging" on release to allow testing)
closes#3378
## Steps for reproduction
See fixtures now have working scripts.
Publish see saas supports script and language
https://rewrites.staging.webstudio.is/builder/f30da574-8022-433e-9a15-050792747b6f
.
## Code Review
- [ ] hi @kof, I need you to do
- conceptual review (architecture, feature-correctness)
- detailed review (read every line)
- test it on preview
## Before requesting a review
- [ ] made a self-review
- [ ] added inline comments where things may be not obvious (the "why",
not "what")
## Before merging
- [ ] tested locally and on preview environment (preview dev login:
5de6)
- [ ] updated [test
cases](https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio/blob/main/apps/builder/docs/test-cases.md)
document
- [ ] added tests
- [ ] if any new env variables are added, added them to `.env` file
Monorepo setup for storybook is very complicated, it has two major
problems
- it is very annoying to look for any link in commit status
- hard to upgrade comparing with single project setup
Here merged all storybooks into one in the root.
## Description
Add simple protection against non js and jsdom bots
Idea is to add hidden js generated field on submit, and check that
matchMedia is working.
## Steps for reproduction
Go here
https://saas-form-rdlrc.wstd.work/
then check via curl
```bash
curl 'https://saas-form-rdlrc.wstd.work/?index=&_data=routes%2F_index' \
-H 'content-type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded;charset=UTF-8' \
-H 'referer: https://saas-form-rdlrc.wstd.work/' \
--data-raw 'ws--form-id=2TIgyB2vQViDMitiYiGSK&name=wewe&email=wewe&ws--form-bot=18f72a6'
curl 'https://saas-form-rdlrc.wstd.work/?index=&_data=routes%2F_index' \
-H 'content-type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded;charset=UTF-8' \
-H 'referer: https://saas-form-rdlrc.wstd.work/' \
--data-raw 'ws--form-id=2TIgyB2vQViDMitiYiGSK&name=wewe&email=wewe'
curl 'https://saas-form-rdlrc.wstd.work/?index=&_data=routes%2F_index' \
-H 'content-type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded;charset=UTF-8' \
-H 'referer: https://saas-form-rdlrc.wstd.work/' \
--data-raw 'ws--form-id=2TIgyB2vQViDMitiYiGSK&name=wewe&email=wewe&ws--form-bot=jsdom'
```
## Code Review
- [ ] hi @kof, I need you to do
- conceptual review (architecture, feature-correctness)
- detailed review (read every line)
- test it on preview
## Before requesting a review
- [ ] made a self-review
- [ ] added inline comments where things may be not obvious (the "why",
not "what")
## Before merging
- [ ] tested locally and on preview environment (preview dev login:
5de6)
- [ ] updated [test
cases](https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio/blob/main/apps/builder/docs/test-cases.md)
document
- [ ] added tests
- [ ] if any new env variables are added, added them to `.env.example`
and the `builder/env-check.js` if mandatory
Turns out no-internal-imports did not forbid anything out of the box but
requires specifying specific folders to forbid. This does not scale well
and this rule mostly harms because requires either excluding each
package with submodules or suppressing it with comment.
Ivan Starkov
_LY_eDOEMEwtikKi5Pyld-.png?width=144&quality=100&format=auto&height=144&fit=pad){kind=link}