## Description
1. What is this PR about (link the issue and add a short description)
## Steps for reproduction
1. click button
2. expect xyz
## Code Review
- [ ] hi @kof, I need you to do
- conceptual review (architecture, feature-correctness)
- detailed review (read every line)
- test it on preview
## Before requesting a review
- [ ] made a self-review
- [ ] added inline comments where things may be not obvious (the "why",
not "what")
## Before merging
- [ ] tested locally and on preview environment (preview dev login:
0000)
- [ ] updated [test
cases](https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio/blob/main/apps/builder/docs/test-cases.md)
document
- [ ] added tests
- [ ] if any new env variables are added, added them to `.env` file
## Description
1. What is this PR about (link the issue and add a short description)
## Steps for reproduction
1. click button
2. expect xyz
## Code Review
- [ ] hi @kof, I need you to do
- conceptual review (architecture, feature-correctness)
- detailed review (read every line)
- test it on preview
## Before requesting a review
- [ ] made a self-review
- [ ] added inline comments where things may be not obvious (the "why",
not "what")
## Before merging
- [ ] tested locally and on preview environment (preview dev login:
0000)
- [ ] updated [test
cases](https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio/blob/main/apps/builder/docs/test-cases.md)
document
- [ ] added tests
- [ ] if any new env variables are added, added them to `.env` file
## Description
- [x] new file types support
- [x] categories filter
- [x] sorting filter
- [x] asset resource for access from custom code
## Steps for reproduction
1. click button
3. expect xyz
## Code Review
- [ ] hi @kof, I need you to do
- conceptual review (architecture, feature-correctness)
- detailed review (read every line)
- test it on preview
## Before requesting a review
- [ ] made a self-review
- [ ] added inline comments where things may be not obvious (the "why",
not "what")
## Before merging
- [ ] tested locally and on preview environment (preview dev login:
0000)
- [ ] updated [test
cases](https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio/blob/main/apps/builder/docs/test-cases.md)
document
- [ ] added tests
- [ ] if any new env variables are added, added them to `.env` file
---------
Co-authored-by: zehjotkah <111518041+zehjotkah@users.noreply.github.com>
Ref https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio/issues/3632
This is big one. So I switched to html elements whole forms section in
components. Though here I introduced some deviation from specification
**Textarea**
Initial value is represented as text content
```html
<textarea>content</textarea>
````
Though it is trickier to manage text content as state and all frameworks
rely on value property of textarea dom interface.
**Select**
Similar story. There is no value attribute and state is represented by
selected boolean attribute on options
```html
<select>
<option value="value1" selected></option>
<option value="value2"></option>
</select>
```
We replace selected attribute on option with value attribute on selected
when paste.
So basically all form elements are using "value" and "checked"
attributes which can be easily mapped to html and all frameworks.
Added react-router + cloudflare template to migrate our cloud
publishing.
This template does not support image optimization and intended only for
internal usage.
Here got rid from auto namespacing meta.constraints and
meta.indexWithinAncestor to unlock using components from other sdk
packages.
Now package prefixes should be explicitly specified in meta though with
the help of proxy.
Though exports are still need to prefix automatically when install
package.
A non-zero exit code indicates that the process did not complete.
Alternatively, we could use a 130 exit code, which commonly refers to
Control+C termination.
## Description
https://animations.wstd.work/
Breakpoints Example
See on narrow screen animation is disabled.
<img width="699" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/f464fdf3-f57a-4cf7-91a1-beb355f8a5bd"
/>
## Steps for reproduction
1. click button
2. expect xyz
## Code Review
- [ ] hi @kof, I need you to do
- conceptual review (architecture, feature-correctness)
- detailed review (read every line)
- test it on preview
## Before requesting a review
- [ ] made a self-review
- [ ] added inline comments where things may be not obvious (the "why",
not "what")
## Before merging
- [ ] tested locally and on preview environment (preview dev login:
0000)
- [ ] updated [test
cases](https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio/blob/main/apps/builder/docs/test-cases.md)
document
- [ ] added tests
- [ ] if any new env variables are added, added them to `.env` file
Ref https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio/issues/4093
Here's refactoring to unlock resource UI in webhook form
Need to test in builder and on published site
1. Create webhook form in main and try to update it on this branch. So
legacy text prop should automatically migrate to resource.
2. New webhook form should create resource when type anything in action
prop
## Description
1. What is this PR about (link the issue and add a short description)
## Steps for reproduction
1. click button
2. expect xyz
## Code Review
- [ ] hi @kof, I need you to do
- conceptual review (architecture, feature-correctness)
- detailed review (read every line)
- test it on preview
## Before requesting a review
- [ ] made a self-review
- [ ] added inline comments where things may be not obvious (the "why",
not "what")
## Before merging
- [ ] tested locally and on preview environment (preview dev login:
0000)
- [ ] updated [test
cases](https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio/blob/main/apps/builder/docs/test-cases.md)
document
- [ ] added tests
- [ ] if any new env variables are added, added them to `.env` file
We don't really need anything from asset object on published sites
except the name to resolve the file.
Here got rid from Asset objects for favicon, fonts and backgrounds. This
should reduce client bundle where a lot of assets are used.
User reported in discord.
Radix components like accordion does not open first item by default when
use with content block. The reason was in our default detection.
We used indexes within ancestor and when put item inside of content
block template it gets 0 but not rendered.
Here improved the logic to reset index when render inside of block
template.
<img width="837" alt="Screenshot 2025-03-01 at 21 14 09"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/788df39a-b7c5-466b-a80e-09cc40de9e3f"
/>
Here added support for generating global system variable with CLI. It's
not available yet in builder though.
Global system not presented in data but instead can be referenced with
`$ws$system` in expression instead of encoded id like
`$ws$dataSource$id`. Legacy page system variable will continue to work.
We want to migrate more templates to react-router
so here I split docker template into react-router and
react-router-docker. Image processing, dockerfile and node environment
are left as docker specifics.
Here added first react-router template which additionally adds docker
support. For now only adds Dockerfile + .dockerignore. Will add support
for image transforms separately.
Mostly duplicated defaults template
- replaced remix packages with react-router ones
- replaced `return redirect()` with `throw redirect()`
The template for now is self contained. Will split base react-router
template when will add more integrations.
We figured assets can be loaded from shared url without additional
manipulation. Here got rid of asset origin detection and dropped
excessive --preview flag. Now local, staging and prod will work
automatically.
In all cli templates asset base url and image base url are the same so
we can safely switch.
Removed image loader from prebuild.ts.
Dropped imageBaseUrl from sdk react context.
## Description
<img width="260" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/de289e25-1ffe-4af9-afdb-8ed3db70c1e8">
Tested with fixtures.
## Steps for reproduction
1. click button
2. expect xyz
## Code Review
- [ ] hi @kof, I need you to do
- conceptual review (architecture, feature-correctness)
- detailed review (read every line)
- test it on preview
## Before requesting a review
- [ ] made a self-review
- [ ] added inline comments where things may be not obvious (the "why",
not "what")
## Before merging
- [ ] tested locally and on preview environment (preview dev login:
0000)
- [ ] updated [test
cases](https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio/blob/main/apps/builder/docs/test-cases.md)
document
- [ ] added tests
- [ ] if any new env variables are added, added them to `.env` file
## Description
closes#4181
1. What is this PR about (link the issue and add a short description)
## Steps for reproduction
1. click button
2. expect xyz
## Code Review
- [ ] hi @kof, I need you to do
- conceptual review (architecture, feature-correctness)
- detailed review (read every line)
- test it on preview
## Before requesting a review
- [ ] made a self-review
- [ ] added inline comments where things may be not obvious (the "why",
not "what")
## Before merging
- [ ] tested locally and on preview environment (preview dev login:
5de6)
- [ ] updated [test
cases](https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio/blob/main/apps/builder/docs/test-cases.md)
document
- [ ] added tests
- [ ] if any new env variables are added, added them to `.env` file
## Description
closes#2644
- [x] - Merge this https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio/pull/4156
into this PR
- If the user has no custom domains:
- [x] Checkbox for Pro users is not shown.
- [x] Checkbox for Free users is shown but disabled (Tooltip enabled).
- If the user has custom domains:
- No Pro:
- [x] Checkboxes are shown disabled with Tooltips.
- Pro:
- Users can select any checkbox (no Tooltips).
- Current indexing logic:
- If a user has custom domain(s), upon publishing, the `*.wstd.io`
domain will receive the meta tag:
```html
<meta name="robots" content="noindex, nofollow">
```
- [x] - Fix example.com in tests (NEXT PR #4156)
- [ ] - saas cleanup should be changed (we need to preserve latest build
by domain now) (NEXT PR)
- [x] - Disable Publish Button if no checkboxes are selected
- "With the Pro, you’ll gain the ability to publish to each domain
independently!"
<img width="477" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/105577e5-318f-4146-a3eb-38c2117f6f79">
## Steps for reproduction
### Non Pro
- Login as a new non Pro User `pass:vaska@pupkin.ru`
- Create a new Project, Click Publish. Expect Disabled Checkbox with
Tolltip is visible. Publish is Enabled.
<img width="445" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/e48654af-1969-4f96-b048-a3fa72303b8f">
- Publish, check it published.
- Add custom domain, Publish, check both are published.
### Pro
- Login as a Pro User `pass`
- Open new Project. Expect No checkbox. One wstd domain.
<img width="351" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/c62f9ae5-669a-46ad-a2f2-32ba333068f9">
- Publish. Expect it published.
- Add domain. See checkboxes visible after domain activated.
- Publish. Expect both published.
- Uncheck checkboxes, see publish button disabled. See it has tooltip.
## Code Review
- [ ] hi @kof, I need you to do
- conceptual review (architecture, feature-correctness)
- detailed review (read every line)
- test it on preview
## Before requesting a review
- [ ] made a self-review
- [ ] added inline comments where things may be not obvious (the "why",
not "what")
## Before merging
- [ ] tested locally and on preview environment (preview dev login:
5de6)
- [ ] updated [test
cases](https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio/blob/main/apps/builder/docs/test-cases.md)
document
- [ ] added tests
- [ ] if any new env variables are added, added them to `.env` file
fixes#4105
## Description
This issue fixes picking the default vanilla template in the cli
init-flow. Right now, when a template is selected from the
`PROJECT_TEMPLATES` we are directly sending the value to `build`. But we
need to check for the `expanded` value of the template in order to pick
all the series of templates needed for the build.
## Steps for reproduction
- create a project in the editor.
- Now, create a share-link for the project and copy it.
- Run `webstudio` in your local terminal and then the cli prompts for
the URL, parse the url from the above step.
- Now, pick `Vanilla` as a template from the list of the templates.
- The project should build a vanilla template without any errors.
## Code Review
- [ ] hi @istarkov , I need you to do
- conceptual review (architecture, feature-correctness)
- detailed review (read every line)
- test it on preview
## Before requesting a review
- [x] made a self-review
- [x] added inline comments where things may be not obvious (the "why",
not "what")
## Before merging
- [x] tested locally and on preview environment (preview dev login:
5de6)
## Description
1. What is this PR about (link the issue and add a short description)
## Steps for reproduction
1. click button
2. expect xyz
## Code Review
- [ ] hi @kof, I need you to do
- conceptual review (architecture, feature-correctness)
- detailed review (read every line)
- test it on preview
## Before requesting a review
- [ ] made a self-review
- [ ] added inline comments where things may be not obvious (the "why",
not "what")
## Before merging
- [ ] tested locally and on preview environment (preview dev login:
5de6)
- [ ] updated [test
cases](https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio/blob/main/apps/builder/docs/test-cases.md)
document
- [ ] added tests
- [ ] if any new env variables are added, added them to `.env` file
## Description
closes#4048
## Steps for reproduction
see fixtures
We are still supporting `BUILDER_URL_DEPRECATED` (in a single fixture)
and all other fixtures uses modern link format
## Code Review
- [ ] hi @kof, I need you to do
- conceptual review (architecture, feature-correctness)
- detailed review (read every line)
- test it on preview
## Before requesting a review
- [ ] made a self-review
- [ ] added inline comments where things may be not obvious (the "why",
not "what")
## Before merging
- [ ] tested locally and on preview environment (preview dev login:
5de6)
- [ ] updated [test
cases](https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio/blob/main/apps/builder/docs/test-cases.md)
document
- [ ] added tests
- [ ] if any new env variables are added, added them to `.env` file
## Description
closes#3872
- [x] - Builder support
- [x] - Publish support
## Steps for reproduction
Example
https://add-json.staging.webstudio.is/builder/8160e16d-5ab4-4249-86de-0c98a64526a3https://test-json-ki9yj.wstd.work/
## Code Review
- [ ] hi @kof, I need you to do
- conceptual review (architecture, feature-correctness)
- detailed review (read every line)
- test it on preview
## Before requesting a review
- [ ] made a self-review
- [ ] added inline comments where things may be not obvious (the "why",
not "what")
## Before merging
- [ ] tested locally and on preview environment (preview dev login:
5de6)
- [ ] updated [test
cases](https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio/blob/main/apps/builder/docs/test-cases.md)
document
- [ ] added tests
- [ ] if any new env variables are added, added them to `.env` file
## Description
- [x] - Sync fixtures by buildId `pnpm cli sync --buildId blabla`
- [x] - Sync with current branch deployment
## Steps for reproduction
1. click button
2. expect xyz
## Code Review
- [ ] hi @kof, I need you to do
- conceptual review (architecture, feature-correctness)
- detailed review (read every line)
- test it on preview
## Before requesting a review
- [ ] made a self-review
- [ ] added inline comments where things may be not obvious (the "why",
not "what")
## Before merging
- [ ] tested locally and on preview environment (preview dev login:
5de6)
- [ ] updated [test
cases](https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio/blob/main/apps/builder/docs/test-cases.md)
document
- [ ] added tests
- [ ] if any new env variables are added, added them to `.env` file
Oleg Isonen