Similar to react-sdk/runtime added another entry point to sdk package
which includes all the stuff imported on published sites to reduce js
size.
./fixtures/webstudio-remix-netlify-functions/build/client: 392kB
(-176kB)
## Description
fixes
https://discord.com/channels/955905230107738152/1292985076702908500/1292985076702908500
tested deploy, builder, seems like all is fine
## Steps for reproduction
1. click button
2. expect xyz
## Code Review
- [ ] hi @kof, I need you to do
- conceptual review (architecture, feature-correctness)
- detailed review (read every line)
- test it on preview
## Before requesting a review
- [ ] made a self-review
- [ ] added inline comments where things may be not obvious (the "why",
not "what")
## Before merging
- [ ] tested locally and on preview environment (preview dev login:
5de6)
- [ ] updated [test
cases](https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio/blob/main/apps/builder/docs/test-cases.md)
document
- [ ] added tests
- [ ] if any new env variables are added, added them to `.env` file
## Description
closes#4181
1. What is this PR about (link the issue and add a short description)
## Steps for reproduction
1. click button
2. expect xyz
## Code Review
- [ ] hi @kof, I need you to do
- conceptual review (architecture, feature-correctness)
- detailed review (read every line)
- test it on preview
## Before requesting a review
- [ ] made a self-review
- [ ] added inline comments where things may be not obvious (the "why",
not "what")
## Before merging
- [ ] tested locally and on preview environment (preview dev login:
5de6)
- [ ] updated [test
cases](https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio/blob/main/apps/builder/docs/test-cases.md)
document
- [ ] added tests
- [ ] if any new env variables are added, added them to `.env` file
## Description
1. What is this PR about (link the issue and add a short description)
## Steps for reproduction
1. click button
2. expect xyz
## Code Review
- [ ] hi @kof, I need you to do
- conceptual review (architecture, feature-correctness)
- detailed review (read every line)
- test it on preview
## Before requesting a review
- [ ] made a self-review
- [ ] added inline comments where things may be not obvious (the "why",
not "what")
## Before merging
- [ ] tested locally and on preview environment (preview dev login:
5de6)
- [ ] updated [test
cases](https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio/blob/main/apps/builder/docs/test-cases.md)
document
- [ ] added tests
- [ ] if any new env variables are added, added them to `.env` file
## Description
closes#2644
- [x] - Merge this https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio/pull/4156
into this PR
- If the user has no custom domains:
- [x] Checkbox for Pro users is not shown.
- [x] Checkbox for Free users is shown but disabled (Tooltip enabled).
- If the user has custom domains:
- No Pro:
- [x] Checkboxes are shown disabled with Tooltips.
- Pro:
- Users can select any checkbox (no Tooltips).
- Current indexing logic:
- If a user has custom domain(s), upon publishing, the `*.wstd.io`
domain will receive the meta tag:
```html
<meta name="robots" content="noindex, nofollow">
```
- [x] - Fix example.com in tests (NEXT PR #4156)
- [ ] - saas cleanup should be changed (we need to preserve latest build
by domain now) (NEXT PR)
- [x] - Disable Publish Button if no checkboxes are selected
- "With the Pro, you’ll gain the ability to publish to each domain
independently!"
<img width="477" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/105577e5-318f-4146-a3eb-38c2117f6f79">
## Steps for reproduction
### Non Pro
- Login as a new non Pro User `pass:vaska@pupkin.ru`
- Create a new Project, Click Publish. Expect Disabled Checkbox with
Tolltip is visible. Publish is Enabled.
<img width="445" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/e48654af-1969-4f96-b048-a3fa72303b8f">
- Publish, check it published.
- Add custom domain, Publish, check both are published.
### Pro
- Login as a Pro User `pass`
- Open new Project. Expect No checkbox. One wstd domain.
<img width="351" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/c62f9ae5-669a-46ad-a2f2-32ba333068f9">
- Publish. Expect it published.
- Add domain. See checkboxes visible after domain activated.
- Publish. Expect both published.
- Uncheck checkboxes, see publish button disabled. See it has tooltip.
## Code Review
- [ ] hi @kof, I need you to do
- conceptual review (architecture, feature-correctness)
- detailed review (read every line)
- test it on preview
## Before requesting a review
- [ ] made a self-review
- [ ] added inline comments where things may be not obvious (the "why",
not "what")
## Before merging
- [ ] tested locally and on preview environment (preview dev login:
5de6)
- [ ] updated [test
cases](https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio/blob/main/apps/builder/docs/test-cases.md)
document
- [ ] added tests
- [ ] if any new env variables are added, added them to `.env` file
fixes#4105
## Description
This issue fixes picking the default vanilla template in the cli
init-flow. Right now, when a template is selected from the
`PROJECT_TEMPLATES` we are directly sending the value to `build`. But we
need to check for the `expanded` value of the template in order to pick
all the series of templates needed for the build.
## Steps for reproduction
- create a project in the editor.
- Now, create a share-link for the project and copy it.
- Run `webstudio` in your local terminal and then the cli prompts for
the URL, parse the url from the above step.
- Now, pick `Vanilla` as a template from the list of the templates.
- The project should build a vanilla template without any errors.
## Code Review
- [ ] hi @istarkov , I need you to do
- conceptual review (architecture, feature-correctness)
- detailed review (read every line)
- test it on preview
## Before requesting a review
- [x] made a self-review
- [x] added inline comments where things may be not obvious (the "why",
not "what")
## Before merging
- [x] tested locally and on preview environment (preview dev login:
5de6)
## Description
1. What is this PR about (link the issue and add a short description)
## Steps for reproduction
1. click button
2. expect xyz
## Code Review
- [ ] hi @kof, I need you to do
- conceptual review (architecture, feature-correctness)
- detailed review (read every line)
- test it on preview
## Before requesting a review
- [ ] made a self-review
- [ ] added inline comments where things may be not obvious (the "why",
not "what")
## Before merging
- [ ] tested locally and on preview environment (preview dev login:
5de6)
- [ ] updated [test
cases](https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio/blob/main/apps/builder/docs/test-cases.md)
document
- [ ] added tests
- [ ] if any new env variables are added, added them to `.env` file
## Description
closes #3754
## Steps for reproduction
1. click button
2. expect xyz
## Code Review
- [ ] hi @kof, I need you to do
- conceptual review (architecture, feature-correctness)
- detailed review (read every line)
- test it on preview
## Before requesting a review
- [ ] made a self-review
- [ ] added inline comments where things may be not obvious (the "why",
not "what")
## Before merging
- [ ] tested locally and on preview environment (preview dev login:
5de6)
- [ ] updated [test
cases](https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio/blob/main/apps/builder/docs/test-cases.md)
document
- [ ] added tests
- [ ] if any new env variables are added, added them to `.env` file
## Description
1. What is this PR about (link the issue and add a short description)
## Steps for reproduction
1. click button
2. expect xyz
## Code Review
- [ ] hi @kof, I need you to do
- conceptual review (architecture, feature-correctness)
- detailed review (read every line)
- test it on preview
## Before requesting a review
- [ ] made a self-review
- [ ] added inline comments where things may be not obvious (the "why",
not "what")
## Before merging
- [ ] tested locally and on preview environment (preview dev login:
5de6)
- [ ] updated [test
cases](https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio/blob/main/apps/builder/docs/test-cases.md)
document
- [ ] added tests
- [ ] if any new env variables are added, added them to `.env` file
## Description
closes#4048
## Steps for reproduction
see fixtures
We are still supporting `BUILDER_URL_DEPRECATED` (in a single fixture)
and all other fixtures uses modern link format
## Code Review
- [ ] hi @kof, I need you to do
- conceptual review (architecture, feature-correctness)
- detailed review (read every line)
- test it on preview
## Before requesting a review
- [ ] made a self-review
- [ ] added inline comments where things may be not obvious (the "why",
not "what")
## Before merging
- [ ] tested locally and on preview environment (preview dev login:
5de6)
- [ ] updated [test
cases](https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio/blob/main/apps/builder/docs/test-cases.md)
document
- [ ] added tests
- [ ] if any new env variables are added, added them to `.env` file
## Description
Unreveal remix, use fully default setup
## Steps for reproduction
1. click button
2. expect xyz
## Code Review
- [ ] hi @kof, I need you to do
- conceptual review (architecture, feature-correctness)
- detailed review (read every line)
- test it on preview
## Before requesting a review
- [ ] made a self-review
- [ ] added inline comments where things may be not obvious (the "why",
not "what")
## Before merging
- [ ] tested locally and on preview environment (preview dev login:
5de6)
- [ ] updated [test
cases](https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio/blob/main/apps/builder/docs/test-cases.md)
document
- [ ] added tests
- [ ] if any new env variables are added, added them to `.env` file
## Description
closes#3872
- [x] - Builder support
- [x] - Publish support
## Steps for reproduction
Example
https://add-json.staging.webstudio.is/builder/8160e16d-5ab4-4249-86de-0c98a64526a3https://test-json-ki9yj.wstd.work/
## Code Review
- [ ] hi @kof, I need you to do
- conceptual review (architecture, feature-correctness)
- detailed review (read every line)
- test it on preview
## Before requesting a review
- [ ] made a self-review
- [ ] added inline comments where things may be not obvious (the "why",
not "what")
## Before merging
- [ ] tested locally and on preview environment (preview dev login:
5de6)
- [ ] updated [test
cases](https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio/blob/main/apps/builder/docs/test-cases.md)
document
- [ ] added tests
- [ ] if any new env variables are added, added them to `.env` file
## Description
- [x] - Sync fixtures by buildId `pnpm cli sync --buildId blabla`
- [x] - Sync with current branch deployment
## Steps for reproduction
1. click button
2. expect xyz
## Code Review
- [ ] hi @kof, I need you to do
- conceptual review (architecture, feature-correctness)
- detailed review (read every line)
- test it on preview
## Before requesting a review
- [ ] made a self-review
- [ ] added inline comments where things may be not obvious (the "why",
not "what")
## Before merging
- [ ] tested locally and on preview environment (preview dev login:
5de6)
- [ ] updated [test
cases](https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio/blob/main/apps/builder/docs/test-cases.md)
document
- [ ] added tests
- [ ] if any new env variables are added, added them to `.env` file
Here split everything imported from react-sdk by published sites into
separate entry point react-sdk/runtime.
The result in ssg fixture is the following
```diff
- 429788 chunk-CuG10VAj.js
+ 370366 chunk-D4NWbWis.js
```
## Description
### Todos
- [x] - Expand support: `ssg` and `ssg-(netlify|vercel)` differ by only
one file. This expansion allows a single external template to apply to
multiple internal uses (previously hardcoded in prebuild, see
`defaults`).
- [x] - Add & test ssg-vercel and ssg-netlify constants.mjs templates to
support image optimizations.
## Steps for reproduction
```bash
cd ./fixtures/ssg
pnpm cli build --template ssg-netlify --template internal --preview && pnpm prettier --write .
pnpm build
```
then drag drop on netlify and see the result
[example](https://66a9d3c5c6bb86681c6611e4--inspiring-liger-df7a81.netlify.app/)
```html
<img alt="" width="14" height="16" src="/.netlify/images?url=%2Fassets%2Ficonly_svg_converted-converted_zMaMiAAutUl8XrITgz7d1.svg&w=32&q=80" class="w-image c161qeci" sizes="100vw" srcset="/.netlify/images?url=%2Fassets%2Ficonly_svg_converted-converted_zMaMiAAutUl8XrITgz7d1.svg&w=16&q=80 16w, /.netlify/images?url=%2Fassets%2Ficonly_svg_converted-converted_zMaMiAAutUl8XrITgz7d1.svg&w=32&q=80 32w" decoding="async" loading="lazy">
```
```bash
cd ./fixtures/ssg
pnpm cli build --template ssg-vercel --template internal --preview && pnpm prettier --write .
pnpm build
```
Upload to https://github.com/webstudio-is/ssg-vercel-test/tree/main
See vercel deployment
[example](https://ssg-vercel-test-r0a778rpj-getwebstudio.vercel.app/)
```html
<img alt="" width="14" height="16" src="/_vercel/image?url=%2Fassets%2Ficonly_svg_converted-converted_zMaMiAAutUl8XrITgz7d1.svg&w=32&q=80" class="w-image c161qeci" sizes="100vw" srcset="/_vercel/image?url=%2Fassets%2Ficonly_svg_converted-converted_zMaMiAAutUl8XrITgz7d1.svg&w=16&q=80 16w, /_vercel/image?url=%2Fassets%2Ficonly_svg_converted-converted_zMaMiAAutUl8XrITgz7d1.svg&w=32&q=80 32w" decoding="async" loading="lazy">
```
## Code Review
- [ ] hi @kof, I need you to do
- conceptual review (architecture, feature-correctness)
- detailed review (read every line)
- test it on preview
## Before requesting a review
- [ ] made a self-review
- [ ] added inline comments where things may be not obvious (the "why",
not "what")
## Before merging
- [ ] tested locally and on preview environment (preview dev login:
5de6)
- [ ] updated [test
cases](https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio/blob/main/apps/builder/docs/test-cases.md)
document
- [ ] added tests
- [ ] if any new env variables are added, added them to `.env` file
We want to replace n8n handler as proprietary code with injected
handler. The idea is to return resource request from this handler which
can be executed same way as user defined resource.
## Description
Only support without any UI
Corresponding saas
https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio-saas/pull/312
## Steps for reproduction
1. click button
2. expect xyz
## Code Review
- [ ] hi @kof, I need you to do
- conceptual review (architecture, feature-correctness)
- detailed review (read every line)
- test it on preview
## Before requesting a review
- [ ] made a self-review
- [ ] added inline comments where things may be not obvious (the "why",
not "what")
## Before merging
- [ ] tested locally and on preview environment (preview dev login:
5de6)
- [ ] updated [test
cases](https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio/blob/main/apps/builder/docs/test-cases.md)
document
- [ ] added tests
- [ ] if any new env variables are added, added them to `.env` file
Closes https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio/issues/3789
Here stopped submitting webhook form with custom action to n8n and
requested directly from generated code. This has a few benefits
- self-hosted websites (vercel, netlify) no longer have to setup n8n to
support forms
- we can pay n8n for these executions no more
- user no longer have to unsubscribe from emails when setup custom
webhook
Ref https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio/issues/3789
Here changed a few things
- replace WebhookForm action prop with resource, which is sent with
hidden field instead of instance id
- prevented generating method and action in client side code
- generate "action" resource instead of form properties for server
action prop is replaced only inside cli to not require support in
builder yet, in the future this can be part of client migrations
Ref https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio/issues/3763
Here added new "ssg" template to cli.
Generated non-remix app. `vike build` generates
static site at `dist/client`.
```
cd fixtures/ssg
pnpm build
npx sirv-cli client/dist
```
Here made constants path easier to access from dynamic paths by
automatically replacing __CONSTANTS__ with actual relative path.
This is necessary for vike support which has folder based routes.
Bogdan Chadkin