## Description
Npm release
## Steps for reproduction
1. click button
2. expect xyz
## Code Review
- [ ] hi @kof, I need you to do
- conceptual review (architecture, feature-correctness)
- detailed review (read every line)
- test it on preview
## Before requesting a review
- [ ] made a self-review
- [ ] added inline comments where things may be not obvious (the "why",
not "what")
## Before merging
- [ ] tested locally and on preview environment (preview dev login:
5de6)
- [ ] updated [test
cases](https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio/blob/main/apps/builder/docs/test-cases.md)
document
- [ ] added tests
- [ ] if any new env variables are added, added them to `.env.example`
and the `builder/env-check.js` if mandatory
## Description
When video is off-screen and needs to be autoplayed, you can now put it
to loading=lazy and it won't load until its in viewport.
https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio/assets/52824/3fa59ab8-1e19-44b4-969b-3eb99f12fccf
## Steps for reproduction
1. click button
2. expect xyz
## Code Review
- [ ] hi @TrySound , I need you to do
- conceptual review (architecture, feature-correctness)
- detailed review (read every line)
- test it on preview
## Before requesting a review
- [ ] made a self-review
- [ ] added inline comments where things may be not obvious (the "why",
not "what")
## Before merging
- [ ] tested locally and on preview environment (preview dev login:
5de6)
- [ ] updated [test
cases](https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio/blob/main/apps/builder/docs/test-cases.md)
document
- [ ] added tests
- [ ] if any new env variables are added, added them to `.env.example`
and the `builder/env-check.js` if mandatory
## Description
Logic was changed only in `prebuild.ts`. All other changes or README or
autogenerated
Integrate atomic CSS support into CLI
The Vercel fixtures project now explicitly sets atomicStyles to true.
Netlify explicitly sets atomicStyles to false.
The custom template doesn't have a default setting, so atomicCss=true is
used."
## Steps for reproduction
See fixtures.
## Code Review
- [ ] hi @kof, I need you to do
- conceptual review (architecture, feature-correctness)
- detailed review (read every line)
- test it on preview
## Before requesting a review
- [ ] made a self-review
- [ ] added inline comments where things may be not obvious (the "why",
not "what")
## Before merging
- [ ] tested locally and on preview environment (preview dev login:
5de6)
- [ ] updated [test
cases](https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio/blob/main/apps/builder/docs/test-cases.md)
document
- [ ] added tests
- [ ] if any new env variables are added, added them to `.env.example`
and the `builder/env-check.js` if mandatory
## Description
<img width="496" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio/assets/5077042/f49af094-b843-4fb0-b324-90ab0b4dabb1">
## Steps for reproduction
Open Project, See Project Settings
## Code Review
- [ ] hi @kof, I need you to do
- conceptual review (architecture, feature-correctness)
- detailed review (read every line)
- test it on preview
## Before requesting a review
- [ ] made a self-review
- [ ] added inline comments where things may be not obvious (the "why",
not "what")
## Before merging
- [ ] tested locally and on preview environment (preview dev login:
5de6)
- [ ] updated [test
cases](https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio/blob/main/apps/builder/docs/test-cases.md)
document
- [ ] added tests
- [ ] if any new env variables are added, added them to `.env.example`
and the `builder/env-check.js` if mandatory
## Description
- Decided to not have separate colors for link, it should just use
regular text colors.
- Added a Link component to the design system, modelled after MUI Link
component
## Steps for reproduction
1. click button
2. expect xyz
## Code Review
- [ ] hi @kof, I need you to do
- conceptual review (architecture, feature-correctness)
- detailed review (read every line)
- test it on preview
## Before requesting a review
- [ ] made a self-review
- [ ] added inline comments where things may be not obvious (the "why",
not "what")
## Before merging
- [ ] tested locally and on preview environment (preview dev login:
5de6)
- [ ] updated [test
cases](https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio/blob/main/apps/builder/docs/test-cases.md)
document
- [ ] added tests
- [ ] if any new env variables are added, added them to `.env.example`
and the `builder/env-check.js` if mandatory
---------
Co-authored-by: Taylor Nowotny <86495896+taylornowotny@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Bot (build-figma-tokens.yml) <bot@localhost>
Co-authored-by: Bogdan Chadkin <trysound@yandex.ru>
## Description
Implements the latest version of the dashboard card:
1. hover state of the link gets underline decoration (fixes
https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio/issues/2601)
2. added info icon with published date and created date (we don't have
edited date yet, not important enough I think)
https://www.figma.com/file/xCBegXEWxROLqA1Y31z2Xo/%F0%9F%93%96-Webstudio-Design-Docs?node-id=9598%3A11774&mode=dev
## Steps for reproduction
1. open dashboard
2. hover link to see decoration
3. hover info button to see tooltip with creation date and publish date
if project was published
## Code Review
- [ ] hi @TrySound , I need you to do
- conceptual review (architecture, feature-correctness)
- detailed review (read every line)
## Before requesting a review
- [ ] made a self-review
- [ ] added inline comments where things may be not obvious (the "why",
not "what")
## Before merging
- [ ] tested locally and on preview environment (preview dev login:
5de6)
- [ ] updated [test
cases](https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio/blob/main/apps/builder/docs/test-cases.md)
document
- [ ] added tests
- [ ] if any new env variables are added, added them to `.env.example`
and the `builder/env-check.js` if mandatory
## Description
New branch taken from the #2691 as we need branch names should be
smaller now. Please refer to the PR for any comments/discussions etc.
## Code Review
- [ ] hi @istarkov , I need you to do
detailed review (read every line)
- [ ] hi @taylornowotny, i need your help
- please check the tooltip contents for these three properties.
## Description
Realized that user can put in a quote that will break the rendering
We also need an actual validation in the UI for class name, because its
not just an arbitrary string.
## Code Review
- [ ] hi @TrySound , I need you to do
- conceptual review (architecture, feature-correctness)
- detailed review (read every line)
- test it on preview
## Before requesting a review
- [ ] made a self-review
- [ ] added inline comments where things may be not obvious (the "why",
not "what")
## Before merging
- [ ] tested locally and on preview environment (preview dev login:
5de6)
- [ ] updated [test
cases](https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio/blob/main/apps/builder/docs/test-cases.md)
document
- [ ] added tests
- [ ] if any new env variables are added, added them to `.env.example`
and the `builder/env-check.js` if mandatory
## Description
CSS engine has now a Style Sheet rendering with atomic classes which
will lead to a much smaller bundle size
## Steps for reproduction
1. click button
2. expect xyz
## Code Review
- [ ] hi @kof, I need you to do
- conceptual review (architecture, feature-correctness)
- detailed review (read every line)
- test it on preview
## Before requesting a review
- [ ] made a self-review
- [ ] added inline comments where things may be not obvious (the "why",
not "what")
## Before merging
- [ ] tested locally and on preview environment (preview dev login:
5de6)
- [ ] updated [test
cases](https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio/blob/main/apps/builder/docs/test-cases.md)
document
- [ ] added tests
- [ ] if any new env variables are added, added them to `.env.example`
and the `builder/env-check.js` if mandatory
## Description
Site is too narrow name for things that are pssible with webstudio
## Code Review
- [ ] hi @TrySound , I need you to do
- conceptual review (architecture, feature-correctness)
- detailed review (read every line)
- test it on preview
## Before requesting a review
- [ ] made a self-review
- [ ] added inline comments where things may be not obvious (the "why",
not "what")
## Before merging
- [ ] tested locally and on preview environment (preview dev login:
5de6)
- [ ] updated [test
cases](https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio/blob/main/apps/builder/docs/test-cases.md)
document
- [ ] added tests
- [ ] if any new env variables are added, added them to `.env.example`
and the `builder/env-check.js` if mandatory
Ref https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio/issues/2532
Here added resources fixture and fixed a few issues with it
- add optional chaining to collection?.map to safely skip iterating
missing data
- added any to resource responses to access remote data without type
errors
- always generate empty headers array
- skip empty body in generated resources
Refactored resources generator to use universal http resource which
cover most cases.
- loadResource is imported from sdk
- accepts url (expression), method, headers (value is expression) and
body (expression)
- all variables and page params parameter are available for loader
expressions
Ref https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio/issues/2532
Here added generation of server modules with resource loaders. These
loaders are invoked in remix loader and result is passed to page
component.
Check fixtures and tests.
Ref https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio/issues/2532
Here added new schema type "Resources" to contain configuration of
requests to services. Their first use case is referencing from variable
to store loaded data.
For now added only client side generation. Later add support for server
code generation as part of remix loaders.
Ref https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio/issues/2532
Here remix route params are adapted to URLPattern format and passed to
generate page component as prop.
For this added 2 remix specific utilities
- convert subset of url pattern to remix route
- generate utility to adapt remix params to URLPattern params for
example for `/*` `params['*']` is replaced with `params[0]` and for
`/:slug*` `params['*']` is replaced with `params['slug']`
## Description
NPM Release 0.123.0
## Steps for reproduction
1. click button
2. expect xyz
## Code Review
- [ ] hi @kof, I need you to do
- conceptual review (architecture, feature-correctness)
- detailed review (read every line)
- test it on preview
## Before requesting a review
- [ ] made a self-review
- [ ] added inline comments where things may be not obvious (the "why",
not "what")
## Before merging
- [ ] tested locally and on preview environment (preview dev login:
5de6)
- [ ] updated [test
cases](https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio/blob/main/apps/builder/docs/test-cases.md)
document
- [ ] added tests
- [ ] if any new env variables are added, added them to `.env.example`
and the `builder/env-check.js` if mandatory
## Description
1. What is this PR about (link the issue and add a short description)
## Steps for reproduction
1. click button
2. expect xyz
## Code Review
- [ ] hi @kof, I need you to do
- conceptual review (architecture, feature-correctness)
- detailed review (read every line)
- test it on preview
## Before requesting a review
- [ ] made a self-review
- [ ] added inline comments where things may be not obvious (the "why",
not "what")
## Before merging
- [ ] tested locally and on preview environment (preview dev login:
5de6)
- [ ] updated [test
cases](https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio/blob/main/apps/builder/docs/test-cases.md)
document
- [ ] added tests
- [ ] if any new env variables are added, added them to `.env.example`
and the `builder/env-check.js` if mandatory
## Description
- Change "Pro" badge according to design
https://www.figma.com/file/xCBegXEWxROLqA1Y31z2Xo/%F0%9F%93%96-Webstudio-Design-Docs?node-id=8821%3A11999&mode=dev
- Add `Upgrade to Pro` menu item
See lostpixel changes too
ref #2661
## Steps for reproduction
1. click button
2. expect xyz
## Code Review
- [ ] hi @kof, I need you to do
- conceptual review (architecture, feature-correctness)
- detailed review (read every line)
- test it on preview
## Before requesting a review
- [ ] made a self-review
- [ ] added inline comments where things may be not obvious (the "why",
not "what")
## Before merging
- [ ] tested locally and on preview environment (preview dev login:
5de6)
- [ ] updated [test
cases](https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio/blob/main/apps/builder/docs/test-cases.md)
document
- [ ] added tests
- [ ] if any new env variables are added, added them to `.env.example`
and the `builder/env-check.js` if mandatory
Ref https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio/issues/2532
Here added dataSource.type = 'parameter' without initial value because
value is always provided by context. It let us fix a few issues with
variables without complicating logic.
- prevent deleting parameter variable (collection item) in variables
panel
- allow changing only name of parameter variable
- show only name in the list of variables
- fix removing expression from collection data
- hide item parameter from collection variable list
- prevent editing parameter value from props
- make collection unstylable
## Description
ref #2661
We use GENERATED columns in our database to simplify field extraction
from events. This avoids using JSON operators in our views. We store the
entire event data. In our SaaS, there's a script that runs once to
populate the eventData. We've also updated the n8n schemas in our SaaS
to automatically fill eventData. This setup makes it quicker to add new
events or update logic in n8n schemas.
## Steps for reproduction
## Code Review
- [ ] hi @kof, I need you to do
- conceptual review (architecture, feature-correctness)
- detailed review (read every line)
- test it on preview
## Before requesting a review
- [ ] made a self-review
- [ ] added inline comments where things may be not obvious (the "why",
not "what")
## Before merging
- [ ] tested locally and on preview environment (preview dev login:
5de6)
- [ ] updated [test
cases](https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio/blob/main/apps/builder/docs/test-cases.md)
document
- [ ] added tests
- [ ] if any new env variables are added, added them to `.env.example`
and the `builder/env-check.js` if mandatory
Ref https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio/issues/2532
Here added a "core" collection component to support iterating over json
arrays.
There is a lot of room for unification of all this logic though would
require building reactive tree abstraction.
Canvas automatically renders stub component for collection to make it
droppable. We can do the same for slot component.
Slot and Fragment eventually will go to "core" components too.
Added json/parameter prop types to embed template to support collection.
Fixed loosing focus while typing in json prop.
## Steps for reproduction
1. Drop collection component
2. play with it
Part of https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio/issues/2516
Here added new copy implementation. There are 2 differences
- it does not change existing instances and not change their children,
we will need this to copy pages
- it handles cross-project copy of portals (slots) properly, now each
portal content is inserted separately if the root does not exist and
skips otherwise
- much better covered with tests
## Steps for reproduction
1. try duplicating form and change form state prop
2. try duplicating form error message and change form state prop
## Description
fixes#2538 and #2615
Don't use `vercel` as default template while exporting from cli
## Code Review
- [ ] hi @istarkov , I need you to do
- detailed review (read every line)
## Before requesting a review
- [x] made a self-review
## Before merging
- [x] tested locally and on preview environment (preview dev login:
5de6)
- [x] updated [test
cases](https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio/blob/main/apps/builder/docs/test-cases.md)
document
## Description
1. What is this PR about (link the issue and add a short description)
## Steps for reproduction
1. click button
2. expect xyz
## Code Review
- [ ] hi @kof, I need you to do
- conceptual review (architecture, feature-correctness)
- detailed review (read every line)
- test it on preview
## Before requesting a review
- [ ] made a self-review
- [ ] added inline comments where things may be not obvious (the "why",
not "what")
## Before merging
- [ ] tested locally and on preview environment (preview dev login:
5de6)
- [ ] updated [test
cases](https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio/blob/main/apps/builder/docs/test-cases.md)
document
- [ ] added tests
- [ ] if any new env variables are added, added them to `.env.example`
and the `builder/env-check.js` if mandatory
## Description
Even we have this
https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio-builder/blob/9af97656af2e06a789f416bd93e1e1d0e756f063/packages/asset-uploader/src/utils/sanitize-s3-key.ts#L26
Additionally seems like best practice is to add backslashes for `"` and
`\` symbols, even this symbols are impossible having sanitize we are
using. (In case of sanitizer change everything can break)
## Steps for reproduction
1. click button
2. expect xyz
## Code Review
- [ ] hi @kof, I need you to do
- conceptual review (architecture, feature-correctness)
- detailed review (read every line)
- test it on preview
## Before requesting a review
- [ ] made a self-review
- [ ] added inline comments where things may be not obvious (the "why",
not "what")
## Before merging
- [ ] tested locally and on preview environment (preview dev login:
5de6)
- [ ] updated [test
cases](https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio/blob/main/apps/builder/docs/test-cases.md)
document
- [ ] added tests
- [ ] if any new env variables are added, added them to `.env.example`
and the `builder/env-check.js` if mandatory
## Description
SaaS has new n8n schema "Stripe Customer Subscription Deleted"
Other schemas updated accordingly
Now unsubscribe is handled by our system
## Steps for reproduction
1. click button
2. expect xyz
## Code Review
- [ ] hi @kof, I need you to do
- conceptual review (architecture, feature-correctness)
- detailed review (read every line)
- test it on preview
## Before requesting a review
- [ ] made a self-review
- [ ] added inline comments where things may be not obvious (the "why",
not "what")
## Before merging
- [ ] tested locally and on preview environment (preview dev login:
5de6)
- [ ] updated [test
cases](https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio/blob/main/apps/builder/docs/test-cases.md)
document
- [ ] added tests
- [ ] if any new env variables are added, added them to `.env.example`
and the `builder/env-check.js` if mandatory
## Description
Apply project owner's plan features to the projects shared via link
## Steps for reproduction
Need to be merged to test (see migrations)
After merge:
Create project shared link.
Open in incognito.
## Code Review
- [ ] hi @kof, I need you to do
- conceptual review (architecture, feature-correctness)
- detailed review (read every line)
- test it on preview
## Before requesting a review
- [ ] made a self-review
- [ ] added inline comments where things may be not obvious (the "why",
not "what")
## Before merging
- [ ] tested locally and on preview environment (preview dev login:
5de6)
- [ ] updated [test
cases](https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio/blob/main/apps/builder/docs/test-cases.md)
document
- [ ] added tests
- [ ] if any new env variables are added, added them to `.env.example`
and the `builder/env-check.js` if mandatory
fixes#1966
The steps to reproduce are in the linked issue. The popover shouldn't
close when the name in the input field is empty.
@taylornowotny i would like you to check this one for the error state
please, the Input field didn't have a red outline for error as defined
in the figma file. I added it now, So, in order to check the effects of
this in other place. It would be great if you can check it once.

---------
Co-authored-by: Oleg Isonen <oleg008@gmail.com>
## Description
1. What is this PR about (link the issue and add a short description)
## Steps for reproduction
1. click button
2. expect xyz
## Code Review
- [ ] hi @kof, I need you to do
- conceptual review (architecture, feature-correctness)
- detailed review (read every line)
- test it on preview
## Before requesting a review
- [ ] made a self-review
- [ ] added inline comments where things may be not obvious (the "why",
not "what")
## Before merging
- [ ] tested locally and on preview environment (preview dev login:
5de6)
- [ ] updated [test
cases](https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio/blob/main/apps/builder/docs/test-cases.md)
document
- [ ] added tests
- [ ] if any new env variables are added, added them to `.env.example`
and the `builder/env-check.js` if mandatory
## Description
Add additional fields to transaction log, so we can create billing
portal for users to unsubscribe/change etc of subscriptions
Plus:
- [x] Allow unlimited domains to all "pro" users
- [x] Add subscriptions link to users with subscriptions (created by n8n
schema on click)
<img width="213" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio/assets/5077042/08d40835-3273-4ca9-a0e3-8a4f7614da93">
- [x] Allow admin link sharing
## Steps for reproduction
1. click button
2. expect xyz
## Code Review
- [ ] hi @kof, I need you to do
- conceptual review (architecture, feature-correctness)
- detailed review (read every line)
- test it on preview
## Before requesting a review
- [ ] made a self-review
- [ ] added inline comments where things may be not obvious (the "why",
not "what")
## Before merging
- [ ] tested locally and on preview environment (preview dev login:
5de6)
- [ ] updated [test
cases](https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio/blob/main/apps/builder/docs/test-cases.md)
document
- [ ] added tests
- [ ] if any new env variables are added, added them to `.env.example`
and the `builder/env-check.js` if mandatory
Ref https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio/issues/2532
Here refactored props values computing to reuse in both canvas and
settings panel and support future collections which need to provide
different values for same variables.
Grouped whole logic and covered with tests.
## Testing
- check image src is working
- check link switch page in preview
## Description
1. What is this PR about (link the issue and add a short description)
## Steps for reproduction
1. click button
2. expect xyz
## Code Review
- [ ] hi @kof, I need you to do
- conceptual review (architecture, feature-correctness)
- detailed review (read every line)
- test it on preview
## Before requesting a review
- [ ] made a self-review
- [ ] added inline comments where things may be not obvious (the "why",
not "what")
## Before merging
- [ ] tested locally and on preview environment (preview dev login:
5de6)
- [ ] updated [test
cases](https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio/blob/main/apps/builder/docs/test-cases.md)
document
- [ ] added tests
- [ ] if any new env variables are added, added them to `.env.example`
and the `builder/env-check.js` if mandatory
## Description
- Prisma way of creating migrations comparing local db with schema model
is super error prone
- Adding 'preview' | 'production' or 'local' to n8n webhooks otherway no
way to host hooks together
## Steps for reproduction
1. click button
2. expect xyz
## Code Review
- [ ] hi @kof, I need you to do
- conceptual review (architecture, feature-correctness)
- detailed review (read every line)
- test it on preview
## Before requesting a review
- [ ] made a self-review
- [ ] added inline comments where things may be not obvious (the "why",
not "what")
## Before merging
- [ ] tested locally and on preview environment (preview dev login:
5de6)
- [ ] updated [test
cases](https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio/blob/main/apps/builder/docs/test-cases.md)
document
- [ ] added tests
- [ ] if any new env variables are added, added them to `.env.example`
and the `builder/env-check.js` if mandatory
## Description
Table "ClientRefernces" allows to hold 3rd party client references per
user and service.
Like client_reference_id in stripe
Following constraints
```
@@unique([userId, service])
@@unique([reference, service])
```
As `@@unique([userId, reference, service)` is not enough
Would need to change existing postgres node in n8n schema
https://webstudio.app.n8n.cloud/workflow/mdNfsFIIwnoMsz6N
onto
<img width="398" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio/assets/5077042/bf456ede-d211-4fd1-8f88-45038dd824c1">
```
INSERT INTO "ClientReferences"("userId", "service")
VALUES ($1, 'stripe')
ON CONFLICT ("userId", "service") DO UPDATE SET "userId"=$1
RETURNING *;
```
## Steps for reproduction
## Code Review
- [ ] hi @kof, I need you to do
- conceptual review (architecture, feature-correctness)
- detailed review (read every line)
- test it on preview
## Before requesting a review
- [ ] made a self-review
- [ ] added inline comments where things may be not obvious (the "why",
not "what")
## Before merging
- [ ] tested locally and on preview environment (preview dev login:
5de6)
- [ ] updated [test
cases](https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio/blob/main/apps/builder/docs/test-cases.md)
document
- [ ] added tests
- [ ] if any new env variables are added, added them to `.env.example`
and the `builder/env-check.js` if mandatory
New colors:
background.style-source.local
background.style-source.gradient.local
And some old colors adjusted.
---------
Co-authored-by: Bot (build-figma-tokens.yml) <bot@localhost>
Co-authored-by: Oleg Isonen <oleg008@gmail.com>
Here replaced scripts injection with special body override which already
includes those scripts.
This would simplify the logic with collections support.
Ref https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio/issues/2532
Here first part for collection support. Collections are generated as
```tsx
list.map((item, index) => <Fragment key={index}></Fragment>)
```
Added new "parameter" prop type to represent "item" which always refers
to variable. "parameter" reflects same semantics as js functions where
in function call it is argument `fn(1, 2, 3)` and in function definition
it is parameter `function fn(a, b, c) {}`.
Collection children are always wrapped with fragment to let having more
than one child and always pass key to avoid react warnings.