## Description
1. What is this PR about (link the issue and add a short description)
## Steps for reproduction
1. click button
2. expect xyz
## Code Review
- [ ] hi @kof, I need you to do
- conceptual review (architecture, feature-correctness)
- detailed review (read every line)
- test it on preview
## Before requesting a review
- [ ] made a self-review
- [ ] added inline comments where things may be not obvious (the "why",
not "what")
## Before merging
- [ ] tested locally and on preview environment (preview dev login:
5de6)
- [ ] updated [test
cases](https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio/blob/main/apps/builder/docs/test-cases.md)
document
- [ ] added tests
- [ ] if any new env variables are added, added them to `.env.example`
and the `builder/env-check.js` if mandatory
## Description
1. What is this PR about (link the issue and add a short description)
## Steps for reproduction
1. click button
2. expect xyz
## Code Review
- [ ] hi @kof, I need you to do
- conceptual review (architecture, feature-correctness)
- detailed review (read every line)
- test it on preview
## Before requesting a review
- [ ] made a self-review
- [ ] added inline comments where things may be not obvious (the "why",
not "what")
## Before merging
- [ ] tested locally and on preview environment (preview dev login:
5de6)
- [ ] updated [test
cases](https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio/blob/main/apps/builder/docs/test-cases.md)
document
- [ ] added tests
- [ ] if any new env variables are added, added them to `.env.example`
and the `builder/env-check.js` if mandatory
## Description
We don't support inset/outset in the style panel which is the initial
for inputs/buttons
New defaults are:
- input, textarea, button - solid
- radio, checkbox - none (already was none, no change,but we didn't
reflect that in sp)
## Steps for reproduction
1. add those components to canvas
2. see that input, textarea, button - have solid border style in style
panel
3. see that radio, checkbox - show none
## Code Review
- [ ] hi @istarkov , I need you to do
- conceptual review (architecture, feature-correctness)
- detailed review (read every line)
- test it on preview
## Before requesting a review
- [ ] made a self-review
- [ ] added inline comments where things may be not obvious (the "why",
not "what")
## Before merging
- [ ] tested locally and on preview environment (preview dev login:
5de6)
- [ ] updated [test
cases](https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio/blob/main/apps/builder/docs/test-cases.md)
document
- [ ] added tests
- [ ] if any new env variables are added, added them to `.env.example`
and the `builder/env-check.js` if mandatory
Here refactored page meta with simpler type than full page data and
moved it into factory which is invoked lazily in loader.
This will let us support variables and resources in page settings later.
Ref https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio/issues/2791
Here renamed generatePageComponent to generateWebstudioComponent and
refactored to use it later for slots.
"Page Params" variable is now passed as parameter. Similar way we will
support parameters in design components.
## Description
1. What is this PR about (link the issue and add a short description)
## Steps for reproduction
1. click button
2. expect xyz
## Code Review
- [ ] hi @kof, I need you to do
- conceptual review (architecture, feature-correctness)
- detailed review (read every line)
- test it on preview
## Before requesting a review
- [ ] made a self-review
- [ ] added inline comments where things may be not obvious (the "why",
not "what")
## Before merging
- [ ] tested locally and on preview environment (preview dev login:
5de6)
- [ ] updated [test
cases](https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio/blob/main/apps/builder/docs/test-cases.md)
document
- [ ] added tests
- [ ] if any new env variables are added, added them to `.env.example`
and the `builder/env-check.js` if mandatory
Ref https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio/issues/2791
Here refactored actions generation and computing
to simplify rendering slots as components.
before
```ts
const onClick = () => {
variableName = 1
set$variableName(variableName)
}
...
<Box
data-ws-id="..."
data-ws-component="Box"
onClick={onClick}>
```
after
```ts
<Box
data-ws-id="..."
data-ws-component="Box"
onClick={() => {
variableName = 1
set$variableName(variableName)
}}>
```
Similar thing done in builder. Actions are generated and executed per
each prop when compute prop values instead of precomputing globally
along with variables.
## Description
Release 0.127.0
## Steps for reproduction
1. click button
2. expect xyz
## Code Review
- [ ] hi @kof, I need you to do
- conceptual review (architecture, feature-correctness)
- detailed review (read every line)
- test it on preview
## Before requesting a review
- [ ] made a self-review
- [ ] added inline comments where things may be not obvious (the "why",
not "what")
## Before merging
- [ ] tested locally and on preview environment (preview dev login:
5de6)
- [ ] updated [test
cases](https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio/blob/main/apps/builder/docs/test-cases.md)
document
- [ ] added tests
- [ ] if any new env variables are added, added them to `.env.example`
and the `builder/env-check.js` if mandatory
## Description
Npm 0.126.0 Release
## Steps for reproduction
1. click button
2. expect xyz
## Code Review
- [ ] hi @kof, I need you to do
- conceptual review (architecture, feature-correctness)
- detailed review (read every line)
- test it on preview
## Before requesting a review
- [ ] made a self-review
- [ ] added inline comments where things may be not obvious (the "why",
not "what")
## Before merging
- [ ] tested locally and on preview environment (preview dev login:
5de6)
- [ ] updated [test
cases](https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio/blob/main/apps/builder/docs/test-cases.md)
document
- [ ] added tests
- [ ] if any new env variables are added, added them to `.env.example`
and the `builder/env-check.js` if mandatory
Here added two new types
WebstudioFragment - reusable fragment of webstudio data which can be
generated (markdown, embed template), transferred (copied or stored in
marketplace) and inserted.
WebstudioData - all available normalized data to allow composing
multiple operations within single transaction like delete instance and
then insert into other part of the page.
Resources should not be part of component props.
Drilling resources to nested custom components
would be more complex so using context can
simplify this part and prepare for rendering
slots as separate components.
Ref https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio/issues/404
## Description
- can select a nested path for link pages
- can click in preview to get to the page
## Steps for reproduction
1. click button
2. expect xyz
## Code Review
- [ ] hi @TrySound , I need you to do
- conceptual review (architecture, feature-correctness)
- detailed review (read every line)
- test it on preview
## Before requesting a review
- [ ] made a self-review
- [ ] added inline comments where things may be not obvious (the "why",
not "what")
## Before merging
- [ ] tested locally and on preview environment (preview dev login:
5de6)
- [ ] updated [test
cases](https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio/blob/main/apps/builder/docs/test-cases.md)
document
- [ ] added tests
- [ ] if any new env variables are added, added them to `.env.example`
and the `builder/env-check.js` if mandatory
Ref https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio/issues/404
## Description
- generate remix app with nested routes
## Steps for reproduction
1. create nested routes
2. generate app using cli
## Code Review
- [ ] hi @istarkov , I need you to do
- conceptual review (architecture, feature-correctness)
- detailed review (read every line)
- test it on preview
## Before requesting a review
- [ ] made a self-review
- [ ] added inline comments where things may be not obvious (the "why",
not "what")
## Before merging
- [ ] tested locally and on preview environment (preview dev login:
5de6)
- [ ] updated [test
cases](https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio/blob/main/apps/builder/docs/test-cases.md)
document
- [ ] added tests
- [ ] if any new env variables are added, added them to `.env.example`
and the `builder/env-check.js` if mandatory
Ref https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio/issues/2532
- fixed collection icon color
- allow to specify expression in embed template children
- tweaked default collection template
- allow to specify variable aliases in embed template children
- renamed collectionItem variable to Collection Item
- moved collection component to "Data" category
- fix broken canvas when bind object to text content
- add better tooltips why cannot remove parameter and used variables
## Description
release 0.125.0
## Steps for reproduction
1. click button
2. expect xyz
## Code Review
- [ ] hi @kof, I need you to do
- conceptual review (architecture, feature-correctness)
- detailed review (read every line)
- test it on preview
## Before requesting a review
- [ ] made a self-review
- [ ] added inline comments where things may be not obvious (the "why",
not "what")
## Before merging
- [ ] tested locally and on preview environment (preview dev login:
5de6)
- [ ] updated [test
cases](https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio/blob/main/apps/builder/docs/test-cases.md)
document
- [ ] added tests
- [ ] if any new env variables are added, added them to `.env.example`
and the `builder/env-check.js` if mandatory
Ref https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio/issues/404
## Description
Implement ablity to organize pages in folders, not a complete
implementation, only:
- Implements data structure for folders
- Allows to create folders and select a parent folder from a folder
- Reparents orphaned pages/folders for the future collaboration mode
## Steps for reproduction
1. open pages
2. add folders
3. nest folders
4. delete folders
## Code Review
- [ ] hi @kof, I need you to do
- conceptual review (architecture, feature-correctness)
- detailed review (read every line)
- test it on preview
## Before requesting a review
- [ ] made a self-review
- [ ] added inline comments where things may be not obvious (the "why",
not "what")
## Before merging
- [ ] tested locally and on preview environment (preview dev login:
5de6)
- [ ] updated [test
cases](https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio/blob/main/apps/builder/docs/test-cases.md)
document
- [ ] added tests
- [ ] if any new env variables are added, added them to `.env.example`
and the `builder/env-check.js` if mandatory
## Description
Npm release
## Steps for reproduction
1. click button
2. expect xyz
## Code Review
- [ ] hi @kof, I need you to do
- conceptual review (architecture, feature-correctness)
- detailed review (read every line)
- test it on preview
## Before requesting a review
- [ ] made a self-review
- [ ] added inline comments where things may be not obvious (the "why",
not "what")
## Before merging
- [ ] tested locally and on preview environment (preview dev login:
5de6)
- [ ] updated [test
cases](https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio/blob/main/apps/builder/docs/test-cases.md)
document
- [ ] added tests
- [ ] if any new env variables are added, added them to `.env.example`
and the `builder/env-check.js` if mandatory
## Description
Realized that user can put in a quote that will break the rendering
We also need an actual validation in the UI for class name, because its
not just an arbitrary string.
## Code Review
- [ ] hi @TrySound , I need you to do
- conceptual review (architecture, feature-correctness)
- detailed review (read every line)
- test it on preview
## Before requesting a review
- [ ] made a self-review
- [ ] added inline comments where things may be not obvious (the "why",
not "what")
## Before merging
- [ ] tested locally and on preview environment (preview dev login:
5de6)
- [ ] updated [test
cases](https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio/blob/main/apps/builder/docs/test-cases.md)
document
- [ ] added tests
- [ ] if any new env variables are added, added them to `.env.example`
and the `builder/env-check.js` if mandatory
## Description
CSS engine has now a Style Sheet rendering with atomic classes which
will lead to a much smaller bundle size
## Steps for reproduction
1. click button
2. expect xyz
## Code Review
- [ ] hi @kof, I need you to do
- conceptual review (architecture, feature-correctness)
- detailed review (read every line)
- test it on preview
## Before requesting a review
- [ ] made a self-review
- [ ] added inline comments where things may be not obvious (the "why",
not "what")
## Before merging
- [ ] tested locally and on preview environment (preview dev login:
5de6)
- [ ] updated [test
cases](https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio/blob/main/apps/builder/docs/test-cases.md)
document
- [ ] added tests
- [ ] if any new env variables are added, added them to `.env.example`
and the `builder/env-check.js` if mandatory
## Description
Site is too narrow name for things that are pssible with webstudio
## Code Review
- [ ] hi @TrySound , I need you to do
- conceptual review (architecture, feature-correctness)
- detailed review (read every line)
- test it on preview
## Before requesting a review
- [ ] made a self-review
- [ ] added inline comments where things may be not obvious (the "why",
not "what")
## Before merging
- [ ] tested locally and on preview environment (preview dev login:
5de6)
- [ ] updated [test
cases](https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio/blob/main/apps/builder/docs/test-cases.md)
document
- [ ] added tests
- [ ] if any new env variables are added, added them to `.env.example`
and the `builder/env-check.js` if mandatory
Ref https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio/issues/2532
Here added resources fixture and fixed a few issues with it
- add optional chaining to collection?.map to safely skip iterating
missing data
- added any to resource responses to access remote data without type
errors
- always generate empty headers array
- skip empty body in generated resources
Refactored resources generator to use universal http resource which
cover most cases.
- loadResource is imported from sdk
- accepts url (expression), method, headers (value is expression) and
body (expression)
- all variables and page params parameter are available for loader
expressions
Ref https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio/issues/2532
Here added generation of server modules with resource loaders. These
loaders are invoked in remix loader and result is passed to page
component.
Check fixtures and tests.
Ref https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio/issues/2532
Here added new schema type "Resources" to contain configuration of
requests to services. Their first use case is referencing from variable
to store loaded data.
For now added only client side generation. Later add support for server
code generation as part of remix loaders.
Ref https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio/issues/2532
Here remix route params are adapted to URLPattern format and passed to
generate page component as prop.
For this added 2 remix specific utilities
- convert subset of url pattern to remix route
- generate utility to adapt remix params to URLPattern params for
example for `/*` `params['*']` is replaced with `params[0]` and for
`/:slug*` `params['*']` is replaced with `params['slug']`
## Description
NPM Release 0.123.0
## Steps for reproduction
1. click button
2. expect xyz
## Code Review
- [ ] hi @kof, I need you to do
- conceptual review (architecture, feature-correctness)
- detailed review (read every line)
- test it on preview
## Before requesting a review
- [ ] made a self-review
- [ ] added inline comments where things may be not obvious (the "why",
not "what")
## Before merging
- [ ] tested locally and on preview environment (preview dev login:
5de6)
- [ ] updated [test
cases](https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio/blob/main/apps/builder/docs/test-cases.md)
document
- [ ] added tests
- [ ] if any new env variables are added, added them to `.env.example`
and the `builder/env-check.js` if mandatory
## Description
1. What is this PR about (link the issue and add a short description)
## Steps for reproduction
1. click button
2. expect xyz
## Code Review
- [ ] hi @kof, I need you to do
- conceptual review (architecture, feature-correctness)
- detailed review (read every line)
- test it on preview
## Before requesting a review
- [ ] made a self-review
- [ ] added inline comments where things may be not obvious (the "why",
not "what")
## Before merging
- [ ] tested locally and on preview environment (preview dev login:
5de6)
- [ ] updated [test
cases](https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio/blob/main/apps/builder/docs/test-cases.md)
document
- [ ] added tests
- [ ] if any new env variables are added, added them to `.env.example`
and the `builder/env-check.js` if mandatory
Ref https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio/issues/2532
Here added dataSource.type = 'parameter' without initial value because
value is always provided by context. It let us fix a few issues with
variables without complicating logic.
- prevent deleting parameter variable (collection item) in variables
panel
- allow changing only name of parameter variable
- show only name in the list of variables
- fix removing expression from collection data
- hide item parameter from collection variable list
- prevent editing parameter value from props
- make collection unstylable
Ref https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio/issues/2532
Here added a "core" collection component to support iterating over json
arrays.
There is a lot of room for unification of all this logic though would
require building reactive tree abstraction.
Canvas automatically renders stub component for collection to make it
droppable. We can do the same for slot component.
Slot and Fragment eventually will go to "core" components too.
Added json/parameter prop types to embed template to support collection.
Fixed loosing focus while typing in json prop.
## Steps for reproduction
1. Drop collection component
2. play with it
Part of https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio/issues/2516
Here added new copy implementation. There are 2 differences
- it does not change existing instances and not change their children,
we will need this to copy pages
- it handles cross-project copy of portals (slots) properly, now each
portal content is inserted separately if the root does not exist and
skips otherwise
- much better covered with tests
## Steps for reproduction
1. try duplicating form and change form state prop
2. try duplicating form error message and change form state prop
## Description
1. What is this PR about (link the issue and add a short description)
## Steps for reproduction
1. click button
2. expect xyz
## Code Review
- [ ] hi @kof, I need you to do
- conceptual review (architecture, feature-correctness)
- detailed review (read every line)
- test it on preview
## Before requesting a review
- [ ] made a self-review
- [ ] added inline comments where things may be not obvious (the "why",
not "what")
## Before merging
- [ ] tested locally and on preview environment (preview dev login:
5de6)
- [ ] updated [test
cases](https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio/blob/main/apps/builder/docs/test-cases.md)
document
- [ ] added tests
- [ ] if any new env variables are added, added them to `.env.example`
and the `builder/env-check.js` if mandatory
## Description
1. What is this PR about (link the issue and add a short description)
## Steps for reproduction
1. click button
2. expect xyz
## Code Review
- [ ] hi @kof, I need you to do
- conceptual review (architecture, feature-correctness)
- detailed review (read every line)
- test it on preview
## Before requesting a review
- [ ] made a self-review
- [ ] added inline comments where things may be not obvious (the "why",
not "what")
## Before merging
- [ ] tested locally and on preview environment (preview dev login:
5de6)
- [ ] updated [test
cases](https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio/blob/main/apps/builder/docs/test-cases.md)
document
- [ ] added tests
- [ ] if any new env variables are added, added them to `.env.example`
and the `builder/env-check.js` if mandatory
Ref https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio/issues/2532
Here refactored props values computing to reuse in both canvas and
settings panel and support future collections which need to provide
different values for same variables.
Grouped whole logic and covered with tests.
## Testing
- check image src is working
- check link switch page in preview
## Description
1. What is this PR about (link the issue and add a short description)
## Steps for reproduction
1. click button
2. expect xyz
## Code Review
- [ ] hi @kof, I need you to do
- conceptual review (architecture, feature-correctness)
- detailed review (read every line)
- test it on preview
## Before requesting a review
- [ ] made a self-review
- [ ] added inline comments where things may be not obvious (the "why",
not "what")
## Before merging
- [ ] tested locally and on preview environment (preview dev login:
5de6)
- [ ] updated [test
cases](https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio/blob/main/apps/builder/docs/test-cases.md)
document
- [ ] added tests
- [ ] if any new env variables are added, added them to `.env.example`
and the `builder/env-check.js` if mandatory
Here replaced scripts injection with special body override which already
includes those scripts.
This would simplify the logic with collections support.
Ref https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio/issues/2532
Here first part for collection support. Collections are generated as
```tsx
list.map((item, index) => <Fragment key={index}></Fragment>)
```
Added new "parameter" prop type to represent "item" which always refers
to variable. "parameter" reflects same semantics as js functions where
in function call it is argument `fn(1, 2, 3)` and in function definition
it is parameter `function fn(a, b, c) {}`.
Collection children are always wrapped with fragment to let having more
than one child and always pass key to avoid react warnings.
Ref https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio/issues/2532
We need json control in settings panel to support editing current value
of variables for example for collection data.
Here tweaked props logic and fixed a few bugs related to switching prop
type based on variable type.
Testing:
- type something in body id
- add this expression to body id `{ id: 1 }`
- remove expression
- add variable with `{ id: 1 }`
- select variable
- remove expression
## Description
1. What is this PR about (link the issue and add a short description)
## Steps for reproduction
1. click button
2. expect xyz
## Code Review
- [ ] hi @kof, I need you to do
- conceptual review (architecture, feature-correctness)
- detailed review (read every line)
- test it on preview
## Before requesting a review
- [ ] made a self-review
- [ ] added inline comments where things may be not obvious (the "why",
not "what")
## Before merging
- [ ] tested locally and on preview environment (preview dev login:
5de6)
- [ ] updated [test
cases](https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio/blob/main/apps/builder/docs/test-cases.md)
document
- [ ] added tests
- [ ] if any new env variables are added, added them to `.env.example`
and the `builder/env-check.js` if mandatory
Ref https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio/issues/2532
Collections will introduce nested scope within same component and some
expressions at component scope will not be able to access collection
item. For example
```ts
const PageComponent = () => {
let [value, set$value] = useState('')
let show = value === 'error'
let arialabel = item + ' label'
return <Form>
<ErrorMessage data-ws-show={show}></ErrorMessage>
{list.map(item =>
<Button aria-label={arialabel}></Button>
)}
</Form>
}
```
So the easiest way to workaround it without complicated scope selecting
is just inline all expressions into props.
```ts
const PageComponent = () => {
let [value, set$value] = useState('')
return <Form>
<ErrorMessage data-ws-show={value === 'error'}></ErrorMessage>
{list.map(item =>
<Button aria-label={item + ' label'}></Button>
)}
</Form>
}
```
## Steps for reproduction
1. Create `Form`
2. Try to change `state` prop
## Description
1. What is this PR about (link the issue and add a short description)
## Steps for reproduction
1. click button
2. expect xyz
## Code Review
- [ ] hi @kof, I need you to do
- conceptual review (architecture, feature-correctness)
- detailed review (read every line)
- test it on preview
## Before requesting a review
- [ ] made a self-review
- [ ] added inline comments where things may be not obvious (the "why",
not "what")
## Before merging
- [ ] tested locally and on preview environment (preview dev login:
5de6)
- [ ] updated [test
cases](https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio/blob/main/apps/builder/docs/test-cases.md)
document
- [ ] added tests
- [ ] if any new env variables are added, added them to `.env.example`
and the `builder/env-check.js` if mandatory
## Description
1. What is this PR about (link the issue and add a short description)
## Steps for reproduction
1. click button
2. expect xyz
## Code Review
- [ ] hi @kof, I need you to do
- conceptual review (architecture, feature-correctness)
- detailed review (read every line)
- test it on preview
## Before requesting a review
- [ ] made a self-review
- [ ] added inline comments where things may be not obvious (the "why",
not "what")
## Before merging
- [ ] tested locally and on preview environment (preview dev login:
5de6)
- [ ] updated [test
cases](https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio/blob/main/apps/builder/docs/test-cases.md)
document
- [ ] added tests
- [ ] if any new env variables are added, added them to `.env.example`
and the `builder/env-check.js` if mandatory
Ivan Starkov