## Description
1. What is this PR about (link the issue and add a short description)
## Steps for reproduction
1. click button
2. expect xyz
## Code Review
- [ ] hi @kof, I need you to do
- conceptual review (architecture, feature-correctness)
- detailed review (read every line)
- test it on preview
## Before requesting a review
- [ ] made a self-review
- [ ] added inline comments where things may be not obvious (the "why",
not "what")
## Before merging
- [ ] tested locally and on preview environment (preview dev login:
5de6)
- [ ] updated [test
cases](https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio-builder/blob/main/apps/builder/docs/test-cases.md)
document
- [ ] added tests
- [ ] if any new env variables are added, added them to `.env.example`
and the `builder/env-check.js` if mandatory
## Description
1. What is this PR about (link the issue and add a short description)
## Steps for reproduction
1. click button
2. expect xyz
## Code Review
- [ ] hi @kof, I need you to do
- conceptual review (architecture, feature-correctness)
- detailed review (read every line)
- test it on preview
## Before requesting a review
- [ ] made a self-review
- [ ] added inline comments where things may be not obvious (the "why",
not "what")
## Before merging
- [ ] tested locally and on preview environment (preview dev login:
5de6)
- [ ] updated [test
cases](https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio-builder/blob/main/apps/builder/docs/test-cases.md)
document
- [ ] added tests
- [ ] if any new env variables are added, added them to `.env.example`
and the `builder/env-check.js` if mandatory
Ref https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio-builder/issues/1116
We moved all data to build and tree table no longer necessary.
- fixed writing instances on page creation (broke in my previous PRs)
- pages are no longer cloned on build cloning and preserve their ids
between builds
Ref https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio-builder/issues/1116
We want to have freedom in manipulation and reusability of tree parts so
gonna merge tree data of all pages into build.
Here migrated instances. Tree no longer have any data. Will cleanup in
the next PR.
Ref https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio-builder/issues/1116
Before we assumed the first instance in the list of instances is the
root. Though we are gonna introduce slots and for this have to combine
instances of all pages into single array. So there can be many roots in
one list.
So now we gonna specify root instance id on page. treeId will be removed
once instances are migrated to Build table.
We want to have freedom in manipulation and reusability of tree parts so
gonna merge tree data of all pages into build.
Here migrated props. Left one todo to cleanup tree data of deleted
pages. Though easier to solve this when pages management is moved to
client.
May require to change code in sass.
## Description
1. What is this PR about (link the issue and add a short description)
## Steps for reproduction
1. click button
2. expect xyz
## Code Review
- [ ] hi @kof, I need you to do
- conceptual review (architecture, feature-correctness)
- detailed review (read every line)
- test it on preview
## Before requesting a review
- [ ] made a self-review
- [ ] added inline comments where things may be not obvious (the "why",
not "what")
## Before merging
- [ ] tested locally and on preview environment (preview dev login:
5de6)
- [ ] updated [test
cases](https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio-builder/blob/main/apps/builder/docs/test-cases.md)
document
- [ ] added tests
- [ ] if any new env variables are added, added them to `.env.example`
and the `builder/env-check.js` if mandatory
## Description
Adding target and prefetch to initial properties of a Link component
along with the defaults
## Steps for reproduction
1. add a link
2. try target prop
3. try prefetch options
## Code Review
- [ ] hi @rpominov, I need you to do
- conceptual review (architecture, feature-correctness)
- detailed review (read every line)
- test it on preview
## Before requesting a review
- [ ] made a self-review
- [ ] added inline comments where things may be not obvious (the "why",
not "what")
## Before merging
- [ ] tested locally and on preview environment (preview dev login:
5de6)
- [ ] updated [test
cases](https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio-builder/blob/main/apps/builder/docs/test-cases.md)
document
- [ ] added tests
- [ ] if any new env variables are added, added them to `.env.example`
and the `builder/env-check.js` if mandatory
## Description
1. What is this PR about (link the issue and add a short description)
## Steps for reproduction
1. click button
2. expect xyz
## Code Review
- [ ] hi @kof, I need you to do
- conceptual review (architecture, feature-correctness)
- detailed review (read every line)
- test it on preview
## Before requesting a review
- [ ] made a self-review
- [ ] added inline comments where things may be not obvious (the "why",
not "what")
## Before merging
- [ ] tested locally and on preview environment (preview dev login:
5de6)
- [ ] updated [test
cases](https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio-builder/blob/main/apps/builder/docs/test-cases.md)
document
- [ ] added tests
- [ ] if any new env variables are added, added them to `.env.example`
and the `builder/env-check.js` if mandatory
---------
Co-authored-by: Bogdan Chadkin <trysound@yandex.ru>
## Description
Renaming WrapperComponent > WebstudioComponent
## Code Review
- [ ] hi @TrySound , I need you to do
- conceptual review (architecture, feature-correctness)
- detailed review (read every line)
## Before requesting a review
- [ ] made a self-review
- [ ] added inline comments where things may be not obvious (the "why",
not "what")
## Before merging
- [ ] tested locally and on preview environment (preview dev login:
5de6)
- [ ] updated [test
cases](https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio-builder/blob/main/apps/builder/docs/test-cases.md)
document
- [ ] added tests
- [ ] if any new env variables are added, added them to `.env.example`
and the `builder/env-check.js` if mandatory
## Description
Closes#1013
1. Refactored `PropMeta` shape to be flat again instead of trying to be
the same as Storybook's `ArgType`
2. Changed `*.props.json` to `*.props.ts`. Fixes#1051
3. Prepared controls files structure, now just need to work on their UI
4. Refactored `usePropsLogic/PropsPanel` to the new logic where we
choose the prop before adding and then never change the name
5. A lot of cleanup / small fixes / better TS types
This PR basically completes architecture/logic and now only the work on
the controls UI is left. Although complicated controls like URL may
still require some work on the logic.
## Steps for reproduction
1. Open props panel
2. Interact with the props
## Description
Introduces Code component, no syntax highlighting just block and inline
code
## Steps for reproduction
1. add code component, try toggle inline prop
2. try from markdown
block
```js
alert(123)
alert(123)
alert(123)
```
inline
```
test test `alert(123)` test
```
## Code Review
- [ ] hi @kof, I need you to do
- conceptual review (architecture, feature-correctness)
- detailed review (read every line)
- test it on preview
## Before requesting a review
- [ ] made a self-review
- [ ] added inline comments where things may be not obvious (the "why",
not "what")
## Before merging
- [ ] tested locally and on preview environment (preview dev login:
5de6)
- [ ] updated [test
cases](https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio-builder/blob/main/apps/builder/docs/test-cases.md)
document
- [ ] added tests
- [ ] if any new env variables are added, added them to `.env.example`
and the `builder/env-check.js` if mandatory
## Description
## Steps for reproduction
1. Add separator
2. Paste `---` for markdown
## Code Review
- [ ] hi @TrySound , I need you to do
- conceptual review (architecture, feature-correctness)
- detailed review (read every line)
- test it on preview
## Before requesting a review
- [ ] made a self-review
- [ ] added inline comments where things may be not obvious (the "why",
not "what")
## Before merging
- [ ] tested locally and on preview environment (preview dev login:
5de6)
- [ ] updated [test
cases](https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio-builder/blob/main/apps/builder/docs/test-cases.md)
document
- [ ] added tests
- [ ] if any new env variables are added, added them to `.env.example`
and the `builder/env-check.js` if mandatory
## Description
This is adding a blockquote, preset styles taken from webflow
## Steps for reproduction
1. add a blockquote from add component
2. paste a blockquote as a markdown `> something`
3. add List
4. add List Item into List
5. paste list from markdown:
```
- one item
- another item
```
```
1. one item
1. another item
```
```
1. one item
2. another item
```
## Code Review
- [ ] hi @TrySound , I need you to do
- conceptual review (architecture, feature-correctness)
- detailed review (read every line)
- test it on preview
## Before requesting a review
- [ ] made a self-review
- [ ] added inline comments where things may be not obvious (the "why",
not "what")
## Before merging
- [ ] tested locally and on preview environment (preview dev login:
5de6)
- [ ] updated [test
cases](https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio-builder/blob/main/apps/builder/docs/test-cases.md)
document
- [ ] added tests
- [ ] if any new env variables are added, added them to `.env.example`
and the `builder/env-check.js` if mandatory
## Description
1. What is this PR about (link the issue and add a short description)
## Steps for reproduction
1. click button
2. expect xyz
## Code Review
- [ ] hi @kof, I need you to do
- conceptual review (architecture, feature-correctness)
- detailed review (read every line)
- test it on preview
## Before requesting a review
- [ ] made a self-review
- [ ] added inline comments where things may be not obvious (the "why",
not "what")
## Before merging
- [ ] tested locally and on preview environment (preview dev login:
5de6)
- [ ] updated [test
cases](https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio-builder/blob/main/apps/builder/docs/test-cases.md)
document
- [ ] added tests
- [ ] if any new env variables are added, added them to `.env.example`
and the `builder/env-check.js` if mandatory
Closes https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio-builder/issues/604
## Description
- User can now override helper definitions on canvas
- only boxes that would collapse without helper - receive helper
- helper is removed when any CSS property is changed on that instance
that would prevent collapsing, so that helper can be removed
- Helper doesn't show on the preview or publish
- Helper goes away if an instance inserted as a child
- There is no need to set padding-right or padding-bottom if you just
need a small div with a defined or layout-based size, as soon as div is
not collapsing, helper is not applied
More: padding will be only added on the side that would collapse
otherwise.
For example when I add a div, it is a block element, it grows
automatically full width but has 0 height, in this case spacing heloper
with padidng-top: 50px will apply, so that it doesn't collapse.
If user sets height: 100px or does anything that would give it a height
- we remove the helper padding right away, so user can actually see the
height they set
In other words we prevent elements from collapsing when they have 0
height or width by making them non-zero on canvas, but then we remove
those padding universally without shortlists as soon as element doesn't
collapse.
## Steps for reproduction
1. add a box
2. set padding-top
3. see it applies on canvas
1. add a box
2. set width
3. see the exact width on canvas, no helper padding
1. add a box
2. set height
3. see the exact height on canvas, no helper padding
## Code Review
- [ ] hi @TrySound , I need you to do
- conceptual review (architecture, feature-correctness)
- detailed review (read every line)
## Before requesting a review
- [ ] made a self-review
- [ ] added inline comments where things may be not obvious (the "why",
not "what")
## Before merging
- [ ] tested locally and on preview environment (preview dev login:
5de6)
- [ ] updated [test
cases](https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio-builder/blob/main/apps/builder/docs/test-cases.md)
document
- [ ] added tests
- [ ] if any new env variables are added, added them to `.env.example`
and the `builder/env-check.js` if mandatory
Before we had to preserve instance data to not break styles. Now styles
are decoupled and editor can interop whole instances type.
So we no longer need updates with instance-like shape. Text editor can
output instances directly preserving only ids.
As a result got rid from children updates in both react-sdk and project
packages.
## Description
1. What is this PR about (link the issue and add a short description)
## Steps for reproduction
1. click button
2. expect xyz
## Code Review
- [ ] hi @kof, I need you to do
- conceptual review (architecture, feature-correctness)
- detailed review (read every line)
- test it on preview
## Before requesting a review
- [ ] made a self-review
- [ ] added inline comments where things may be not obvious (the "why",
not "what")
## Before merging
- [ ] tested locally and on preview environment (preview dev login:
5de6)
- [ ] updated [test
cases](https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio-builder/blob/main/apps/builder/docs/test-cases.md)
document
- [ ] added tests
- [ ] if any new env variables are added, added them to `.env.example`
and the `builder/env-check.js` if mandatory
## Description
Partial fix for #1051
The full fix must include validating during props generation. Probably
we could generate ts files with all
typeinfo inside.
cc @rpominov
Also I excluded Zod exports, only types
https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio-builder/pull/1052/files#diff-5659b16effbbb5a7214ce728cf281efa2f2cac4332d31685b78ecb1b27ab0502
## Steps for reproduction
1. click button
2. expect xyz
## Code Review
- [ ] hi @kof, I need you to do
- conceptual review (architecture, feature-correctness)
- detailed review (read every line)
- test it on preview
## Before requesting a review
- [ ] made a self-review
- [ ] added inline comments where things may be not obvious (the "why",
not "what")
## Before merging
- [ ] tested locally and on preview environment (preview dev login:
5de6)
- [ ] updated [test
cases](https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio-builder/blob/main/apps/builder/docs/test-cases.md)
document
- [ ] added tests
- [ ] if any new env variables are added, added them to `.env.example`
and the `builder/env-check.js` if mandatory
## Description
1. What is this PR about (link the issue and add a short description)
## Steps for reproduction
1. click button
2. expect xyz
## Code Review
- [ ] hi @kof, I need you to do
- conceptual review (architecture, feature-correctness)
- detailed review (read every line)
- test it on preview
## Before requesting a review
- [ ] made a self-review
- [ ] added inline comments where things may be not obvious (the "why",
not "what")
## Before merging
- [ ] tested locally and on preview environment (preview dev login:
5de6)
- [ ] updated [test
cases](https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio-builder/blob/main/apps/builder/docs/test-cases.md)
document
- [ ] added tests
- [ ] if any new env variables are added, added them to `.env.example`
and the `builder/env-check.js` if mandatory
## Description
1. What is this PR about (link the issue and add a short description)
## Steps for reproduction
1. click button
2. expect xyz
## Code Review
- [ ] hi @kof, I need you to do
- conceptual review (architecture, feature-correctness)
- detailed review (read every line)
- test it on preview
## Before requesting a review
- [ ] made a self-review
- [ ] added inline comments where things may be not obvious (the "why",
not "what")
## Before merging
- [ ] tested locally and on preview environment (preview dev login:
5de6)
- [ ] updated [test
cases](https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio-builder/blob/main/apps/builder/docs/test-cases.md)
document
- [ ] added tests
- [ ] if any new env variables are added, added them to `.env.example`
and the `builder/env-check.js` if mandatory
## Description
1. What is this PR about (link the issue and add a short description)
## Steps for reproduction
1. click button
2. expect xyz
## Code Review
- [ ] hi @kof, I need you to do
- conceptual review (architecture, feature-correctness)
- detailed review (read every line)
- test it on preview
## Before requesting a review
- [ ] made a self-review
- [ ] added inline comments where things may be not obvious (the "why",
not "what")
## Before merging
- [ ] tested locally and on preview environment (preview dev login:
5de6)
- [ ] updated [test
cases](https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio-builder/blob/main/apps/builder/docs/test-cases.md)
document
- [ ] added tests
- [ ] if any new env variables are added, added them to `.env.example`
and the `builder/env-check.js` if mandatory
## Description
1. What is this PR about (link the issue and add a short description)
## Steps for reproduction
1. click button
2. expect xyz
## Code Review
- [ ] hi @kof, I need you to do
- conceptual review (architecture, feature-correctness)
- detailed review (read every line)
- test it on preview
## Before requesting a review
- [ ] made a self-review
- [ ] added inline comments where things may be not obvious (the "why",
not "what")
## Before merging
- [ ] tested locally and on preview environment (preview dev login:
5de6)
- [ ] updated [test
cases](https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio-builder/blob/main/apps/builder/docs/test-cases.md)
document
- [ ] added tests
- [ ] if any new env variables are added, added them to `.env.example`
and the `builder/env-check.js` if mandatory
## Description
We are going to render CSS for all pages in production mode.
That allows us to switch on native remix links i.e. `export const links`
Also now for `published` pages we use same data as SaaS will.
That would allow for investigating SaaS issues faster.
[x] - Also now check does ssr css is needed at all at "edit" mode.
_Checked, as of now we don't render `style` tags serverside and that
cause FOUC in designer on page switch,
cc @TrySound probably in Canvas we can render styles serverside too that
would allow us to not use /s/css path for canvas inside designer_
closes#929
closes https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio-saas/issues/51closes#606
## Steps for reproduction
In local dev mode, create 2 pages in a project, and add cross-links on
both pages.
Do publish.
Go to the published page, see no fouc on link clicks.
## Code Review
- [ ] hi @kof, I need you to do
- conceptual review (architecture, feature-correctness)
- [ ] hi @TrySound , I need you to do
- detailed review (read every line)
- test it on preview
## Before requesting a review
- [ ] made a self-review
- [ ] added inline comments where things may be not obvious (the "why",
not "what")
## Before merging
- [ ] tested locally and on preview environment (preview dev login:
5de6)
- [ ] updated [test
cases](https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio-builder/blob/main/apps/builder/docs/test-cases.md)
document
- [ ] added tests
- [ ] if any new env variables are added, added them to `.env.example`
and the `builder/env-check.js` if mandatory
#992
1. Cleaned up control types
2. Control type is now chosen by component meta (including Image.src)
3. Added custom labels support
4. Some other changes mentioned in comments in diff
## Description
1. What is this PR about (link the issue and add a short description)
## Steps for reproduction
1. click button
2. expect xyz
## Code Review
- [ ] hi @kof, I need you to do
- conceptual review (architecture, feature-correctness)
- detailed review (read every line)
- test it on preview
## Before requesting a review
- [ ] made a self-review
- [ ] added inline comments where things may be not obvious (the "why",
not "what")
## Before merging
- [ ] tested locally and on preview environment (preview dev login:
5de6)
- [ ] updated [test
cases](https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio-designer/blob/main/apps/designer/docs/test-cases.md)
document
- [ ] added tests
- [ ] if any new env variables are added, added them to `.env.example`
and the `designer/env-check.js` if mandatory
## Description
1. What is this PR about (link the issue and add a short description)
## Steps for reproduction
1. click button
2. expect xyz
## Code Review
- [ ] hi @kof, I need you to do
- conceptual review (architecture, feature-correctness)
- detailed review (read every line)
- test it on preview
## Before requesting a review
- [ ] made a self-review
- [ ] added inline comments where things may be not obvious (the "why",
not "what")
## Before merging
- [ ] tested locally and on preview environment (preview dev login:
5de6)
- [ ] updated [test
cases](https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio-designer/blob/main/apps/designer/docs/test-cases.md)
document
- [ ] added tests
- [ ] if any new env variables are added, added them to `.env.example`
and the `designer/env-check.js` if mandatory
## Description
1. What is this PR about (link the issue and add a short description)
## Steps for reproduction
1. click button
2. expect xyz
## Code Review
- [ ] hi @kof, I need you to do
- conceptual review (architecture, feature-correctness)
- detailed review (read every line)
- test it on preview
## Before requesting a review
- [ ] made a self-review
- [ ] added inline comments where things may be not obvious (the "why",
not "what")
## Before merging
- [ ] tested locally and on preview environment (preview dev login:
5de6)
- [ ] updated [test
cases](https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio-designer/blob/main/apps/designer/docs/test-cases.md)
document
- [ ] added tests
- [ ] if any new env variables are added, added them to `.env.example`
and the `designer/env-check.js` if mandatory
Before we checked looked for all asset ids in props, loaded assets and
replaced ids with resolved assets. This is all on server. We faced a few
problems with it.
- requires to maintain two versions of types: stored in db and resolved
for client
- easy to break project by writing to db wrong version
Here I provide to sdk both props and assets and resolve on client with
almost same amount of code.
Also replaced store setter with context, see
https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio-designer/issues/213
## Description
1. What is this PR about (link the issue and add a short description)
## Steps for reproduction
1. click button
2. expect xyz
## Code Review
- [ ] hi @kof, I need you to do
- conceptual review (architecture, feature-correctness)
- detailed review (read every line)
- test it on preview
## Before requesting a review
- [ ] made a self-review
- [ ] added inline comments where things may be not obvious (the "why",
not "what")
## Before merging
- [ ] tested locally and on preview environment (preview dev login:
5de6)
- [ ] updated [test
cases](https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio-designer/blob/main/apps/designer/docs/test-cases.md)
document
- [ ] added tests
- [ ] if any new env variables are added, added them to `.env.example`
and the `designer/env-check.js` if mandatory
## Description
1. What is this PR about (link the issue and add a short description)
## Steps for reproduction
1. click button
2. expect xyz
## Code Review
- [ ] hi @kof, I need you to do
- conceptual review (architecture, feature-correctness)
- detailed review (read every line)
- test it on preview
## Before requesting a review
- [ ] made a self-review
- [ ] added inline comments where things may be not obvious (the "why",
not "what")
## Before merging
- [ ] tested locally and on preview environment (preview dev login:
5de6)
- [ ] updated [test
cases](https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio-designer/blob/main/apps/designer/docs/test-cases.md)
document
- [ ] added tests
- [ ] if any new env variables are added, added them to `.env.example`
and the `designer/env-check.js` if mandatory
## Description
1. What is this PR about (link the issue and add a short description)
Update npm packages
## Steps for reproduction
1. click button
2. expect xyz
## Code Review
- [ ] hi @kof, I need you to do
- conceptual review (architecture, feature-correctness)
- detailed review (read every line)
- test it on preview
## Before requesting a review
- [ ] made a self-review
- [ ] added inline comments where things may be not obvious (the "why",
not "what")
## Before merging
- [ ] tested locally and on preview environment (preview dev login:
5de6)
- [ ] updated [test
cases](https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio-designer/blob/main/apps/designer/docs/test-cases.md)
document
- [ ] added tests
- [ ] if any new env variables are added, added them to `.env.example`
and the `designer/env-check.js` if mandatory
Ref https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio-designer/issues/696
While normalized array of props give us flexibility with atomic updates
we still cannot use it for collaboration because patches are applied
with index in this array which may leads to unexpected results when two
users collaboate on the same tree, for example both put new prop and
edit it before synchronization by the same index, we are getting
conflict.
To avoid such issues we can switch client representation to maps. Almost
all data have ids to use in map as keys. Map makes collaboration almost
conflict free.
## Description
1. What is this PR about (link the issue and add a short description)
I want to update saas based on #928
## Steps for reproduction
1. click button
2. expect xyz
## Code Review
- [ ] hi @kof, I need you to do
- conceptual review (architecture, feature-correctness)
- detailed review (read every line)
- test it on preview
## Before requesting a review
- [ ] made a self-review
- [ ] added inline comments where things may be not obvious (the "why",
not "what")
## Before merging
- [ ] tested locally and on preview environment (preview dev login:
5de6)
- [ ] updated [test
cases](https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio-designer/blob/main/apps/designer/docs/test-cases.md)
document
- [ ] added tests
- [ ] if any new env variables are added, added them to `.env.example`
and the `designer/env-check.js` if mandatory
Ref https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio-designer/issues/744
We are trying to co-locate data and simplify cloning/copying. Here I
migrated Breakpoints.values into Build.breakpoints.
This makes Build responsible to all data scoped to project build similar
to tree scope.
We get projectId defined for free and no need additional sql
maintenance.
## Description
1. What is this PR about (link the issue and add a short description)
## Steps for reproduction
1. click button
2. expect xyz
## Code Review
- [ ] hi @kof, I need you to do
- conceptual review (architecture, feature-correctness)
- detailed review (read every line)
- test it on preview
## Before requesting a review
- [ ] made a self-review
- [ ] added inline comments where things may be not obvious (the "why",
not "what")
## Before merging
- [ ] tested locally and on preview environment (preview dev login:
5de6)
- [ ] updated [test
cases](https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio-designer/blob/main/apps/designer/docs/test-cases.md)
document
- [ ] added tests
- [ ] if any new env variables are added, added them to `.env.example`
and the `designer/env-check.js` if mandatory
## Description
1. What is this PR about (link the issue and add a short description)
Seems like this killed my dev expierence
https://github.com/remix-run/remix/issues/3123
Fixed in 1.12 gonna try, as otherwise I have 100% cpu load, and need to
stop `pnpm dev` before any changes
## Steps for reproduction
1. click button
2. expect xyz
## Code Review
- [ ] hi @kof, I need you to do
- conceptual review (architecture, feature-correctness)
- detailed review (read every line)
- test it on preview
## Before requesting a review
- [ ] made a self-review
- [ ] added inline comments where things may be not obvious (the "why",
not "what")
## Before merging
- [ ] tested locally and on preview environment (preview dev login:
5de6)
- [ ] updated [test
cases](https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio-designer/blob/main/apps/designer/docs/test-cases.md)
document
- [ ] added tests
- [ ] if any new env variables are added, added them to `.env.example`
and the `designer/env-check.js` if mandatory
## Description
```bash
pnpm up -r -L '@remix-run/*'
pnpm up -r -L 'react-router-dom'
```
`react-router-dom` removed.
## Steps for reproduction
1. click button
2. expect xyz
## Code Review
- [ ] hi @kof, I need you to do
- conceptual review (architecture, feature-correctness)
- detailed review (read every line)
- test it on preview
## Before requesting a review
- [ ] made a self-review
- [ ] added inline comments where things may be not obvious (the "why",
not "what")
## Before merging
- [ ] tested locally and on preview environment (preview dev login:
5de6)
- [ ] updated [test
cases](https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio-designer/blob/main/apps/designer/docs/test-cases.md)
document
- [ ] added tests
- [ ] if any new env variables are added, added them to `.env.example`
and the `designer/env-check.js` if mandatory
## Description
1. With all the new ideas and directions we don't need that initial
implementation
## Code Review
- [ ] hi @TrySound , I need you to do
- conceptual review (architecture, feature-correctness)
- detailed review (read every line)
- test it on preview
## Before requesting a review
- [ ] made a self-review
- [ ] added inline comments where things may be not obvious (the "why",
not "what")
## Before merging
- [ ] tested locally and on preview environment (preview dev login:
5de6)
- [ ] updated [test
cases](https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio-designer/blob/main/apps/designer/docs/test-cases.md)
document
- [ ] added tests
- [ ] if any new env variables are added, added them to `.env.example`
and the `designer/env-check.js` if mandatory
Ref https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio-designer/issues/696
We use store to render props in sdk components. Though it's easier to
maintain actual store in designer and provide necessary data to sdk.
Here I added utilities to inject computed store on module level. Now we
can get rid of legacy store and rewrite rest api to use normalized
props.
Andras Bacsai
