## Description
1. What is this PR about (link the issue and add a short description)
## Steps for reproduction
1. click button
2. expect xyz
## Code Review
- [ ] hi @kof, I need you to do
- conceptual review (architecture, feature-correctness)
- detailed review (read every line)
- test it on preview
## Before requesting a review
- [ ] made a self-review
- [ ] added inline comments where things may be not obvious (the "why",
not "what")
## Before merging
- [ ] tested locally and on preview environment (preview dev login:
5de6)
- [ ] updated [test
cases](https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio-builder/blob/main/apps/builder/docs/test-cases.md)
document
- [ ] added tests
- [ ] if any new env variables are added, added them to `.env.example`
and the `builder/env-check.js` if mandatory
## Description
Debounce on hover makes me feel that everything is slow, you move mouse
but hover is not completed.
Compare with immediate hover, feels like UI is superfast
For example Figma has immediate hover
## Steps for reproduction
1. click button
2. expect xyz
## Code Review
- [ ] hi @kof, I need you to do
- conceptual review (architecture, feature-correctness)
- detailed review (read every line)
- test it on preview
## Before requesting a review
- [ ] made a self-review
- [ ] added inline comments where things may be not obvious (the "why",
not "what")
## Before merging
- [ ] tested locally and on preview environment (preview dev login:
5de6)
- [ ] updated [test
cases](https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio-builder/blob/main/apps/builder/docs/test-cases.md)
document
- [ ] added tests
- [ ] if any new env variables are added, added them to `.env.example`
and the `builder/env-check.js` if mandatory
## Description
On project change breakpoints can be updated later than canvas with is
calculated, so breakpoints from the previous project were used.
Here is the fix
## Steps for reproduction
1. click button
2. expect xyz
## Code Review
- [ ] hi @kof, I need you to do
- conceptual review (architecture, feature-correctness)
- detailed review (read every line)
- test it on preview
## Before requesting a review
- [ ] made a self-review
- [ ] added inline comments where things may be not obvious (the "why",
not "what")
## Before merging
- [ ] tested locally and on preview environment (preview dev login:
5de6)
- [ ] updated [test
cases](https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio-builder/blob/main/apps/builder/docs/test-cases.md)
document
- [ ] added tests
- [ ] if any new env variables are added, added them to `.env.example`
and the `builder/env-check.js` if mandatory
Part of #84
Should be deployed together with
https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio-saas/pull/148
## Description
1. Exposed `User.email` in the data we send to saas
2. Used Remix's form in the Form component
3. Refactoring in `form-handlers`
## Code Review
- [ ] hi @kof, I need you to do
- conceptual review (architecture, feature-correctness)
- [ ] hi @istarkov, I need you to do
- conceptual review (architecture, feature-correctness)
- detailed review (read every line)
## Before requesting a review
- [ ] made a self-review
- [ ] added inline comments where things may be not obvious (the "why",
not "what")
## Before merging
- [ ] tested locally and on preview environment (preview dev login:
5de6)
- [ ] updated [test
cases](https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio-builder/blob/main/apps/builder/docs/test-cases.md)
document
- [ ] added tests
- [ ] if any new env variables are added, added them to `.env.example`
and the `builder/env-check.js` if mandatory
## Description
Do not rerender Instance on drag
## Steps for reproduction
1. click button
2. expect xyz
## Code Review
- [ ] hi @kof, I need you to do
- conceptual review (architecture, feature-correctness)
- detailed review (read every line)
- test it on preview
## Before requesting a review
- [ ] made a self-review
- [ ] added inline comments where things may be not obvious (the "why",
not "what")
## Before merging
- [ ] tested locally and on preview environment (preview dev login:
5de6)
- [ ] updated [test
cases](https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio-builder/blob/main/apps/builder/docs/test-cases.md)
document
- [ ] added tests
- [ ] if any new env variables are added, added them to `.env.example`
and the `builder/env-check.js` if mandatory
## Description
We may need to rethink what we show when user hits report bug, e.g.
ideally user would at least make a screenshot or create a video but for
now as a simple option is to lead them directly into github discussions
## Steps for reproduction
1. see new bug button on the left bottom
## Code Review
- [ ] hi @istarkov , I need you to do
- conceptual review (architecture, feature-correctness)
- detailed review (read every line)
- test it on preview
## Before requesting a review
- [ ] made a self-review
- [ ] added inline comments where things may be not obvious (the "why",
not "what")
## Before merging
- [ ] tested locally and on preview environment (preview dev login:
5de6)
- [ ] updated [test
cases](https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio-builder/blob/main/apps/builder/docs/test-cases.md)
document
- [ ] added tests
- [ ] if any new env variables are added, added them to `.env.example`
and the `builder/env-check.js` if mandatory
## Description
Npm update
## Steps for reproduction
1. click button
2. expect xyz
## Code Review
- [ ] hi @kof, I need you to do
- conceptual review (architecture, feature-correctness)
- detailed review (read every line)
- test it on preview
## Before requesting a review
- [ ] made a self-review
- [ ] added inline comments where things may be not obvious (the "why",
not "what")
## Before merging
- [ ] tested locally and on preview environment (preview dev login:
5de6)
- [ ] updated [test
cases](https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio-builder/blob/main/apps/builder/docs/test-cases.md)
document
- [ ] added tests
- [ ] if any new env variables are added, added them to `.env.example`
and the `builder/env-check.js` if mandatory
## Description
170ms -> 5ms reduction on validation
## Steps for reproduction
1. click button
2. expect xyz
## Code Review
- [ ] hi @kof, I need you to do
- conceptual review (architecture, feature-correctness)
- detailed review (read every line)
- test it on preview
## Before requesting a review
- [ ] made a self-review
- [ ] added inline comments where things may be not obvious (the "why",
not "what")
## Before merging
- [ ] tested locally and on preview environment (preview dev login:
5de6)
- [ ] updated [test
cases](https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio-builder/blob/main/apps/builder/docs/test-cases.md)
document
- [ ] added tests
- [ ] if any new env variables are added, added them to `.env.example`
and the `builder/env-check.js` if mandatory
We batching transactions though each transaction and each namespaace in
it loads build data, applies patches and writes to db. This makes
patches do a lot of connections to db within single request.
Here each patch request loads and updates build only once and apply
patches of all transactions to intermediary state.
## Description
<img width="499" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/5077042/236811571-0f98099d-907a-47d4-8733-59dba654d26f.png">
Now on connected outlines, it will not be the thin border like before.
(But the thin border has an issue that in some cases it can become a
solid line)
Imo this looks better vs thick 4px outlines at the webflow
## Steps for reproduction
1. click button
2. expect xyz
## Code Review
- [ ] hi @kof, I need you to do
- conceptual review (architecture, feature-correctness)
- detailed review (read every line)
- test it on preview
## Before requesting a review
- [ ] made a self-review
- [ ] added inline comments where things may be not obvious (the "why",
not "what")
## Before merging
- [ ] tested locally and on preview environment (preview dev login:
5de6)
- [ ] updated [test
cases](https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio-builder/blob/main/apps/builder/docs/test-cases.md)
document
- [ ] added tests
- [ ] if any new env variables are added, added them to `.env.example`
and the `builder/env-check.js` if mandatory
Co-authored-by: Oleg Isonen <oleg008@gmail.com>
## Description
Fix adding/deleting bg style in case of style source inheritance
https://discord.com/channels/955905230107738152/955907841070346300/1102929914182762617
## Steps for reproduction
1. click button
2. expect xyz
## Code Review
- [ ] hi @kof, I need you to do
- conceptual review (architecture, feature-correctness)
- detailed review (read every line)
- test it on preview
## Before requesting a review
- [ ] made a self-review
- [ ] added inline comments where things may be not obvious (the "why",
not "what")
## Before merging
- [ ] tested locally and on preview environment (preview dev login:
5de6)
- [ ] updated [test
cases](https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio-builder/blob/main/apps/builder/docs/test-cases.md)
document
- [ ] added tests
- [ ] if any new env variables are added, added them to `.env.example`
and the `builder/env-check.js` if mandatory
## Description
Image background layers are invisible during edit
fixes
https://discord.com/channels/955905230107738152/955907841070346300/1104430743049994331
## Steps for reproduction
1. click button
2. expect xyz
## Code Review
- [ ] hi @kof, I need you to do
- conceptual review (architecture, feature-correctness)
- detailed review (read every line)
- test it on preview
## Before requesting a review
- [ ] made a self-review
- [ ] added inline comments where things may be not obvious (the "why",
not "what")
## Before merging
- [ ] tested locally and on preview environment (preview dev login:
5de6)
- [ ] updated [test
cases](https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio-builder/blob/main/apps/builder/docs/test-cases.md)
document
- [ ] added tests
- [ ] if any new env variables are added, added them to `.env.example`
and the `builder/env-check.js` if mandatory
## Description
The current approach relies on batching behavior.
Here is fast fix to not reset atom if global atom has not been changed
## Steps for reproduction
1. click button
2. expect xyz
## Code Review
- [ ] hi @kof, I need you to do
- conceptual review (architecture, feature-correctness)
- detailed review (read every line)
- test it on preview
## Before requesting a review
- [ ] made a self-review
- [ ] added inline comments where things may be not obvious (the "why",
not "what")
## Before merging
- [ ] tested locally and on preview environment (preview dev login:
5de6)
- [ ] updated [test
cases](https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio-builder/blob/main/apps/builder/docs/test-cases.md)
document
- [ ] added tests
- [ ] if any new env variables are added, added them to `.env.example`
and the `builder/env-check.js` if mandatory
Need to render placement indicator in portal to avoid shifting because
of position: relative on ancestors elements like ScrollView.
## Code Review
- [ ] hi @kof, I need you to do
- conceptual review (architecture, feature-correctness)
- detailed review (read every line)
- test it on preview
## Before requesting a review
- [ ] made a self-review
- [ ] added inline comments where things may be not obvious (the "why",
not "what")
## Before merging
- [ ] tested locally and on preview environment (preview dev login:
5de6)
- [ ] updated [test
cases](https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio-builder/blob/main/apps/builder/docs/test-cases.md)
document
- [ ] added tests
- [ ] if any new env variables are added, added them to `.env.example`
and the `builder/env-check.js` if mandatory
Fixed conditional rendering of tree preview.
## Code Review
- [ ] hi @kof, I need you to do
- conceptual review (architecture, feature-correctness)
- detailed review (read every line)
- test it on preview
## Before requesting a review
- [ ] made a self-review
- [ ] added inline comments where things may be not obvious (the "why",
not "what")
## Before merging
- [ ] tested locally and on preview environment (preview dev login:
5de6)
- [ ] updated [test
cases](https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio-builder/blob/main/apps/builder/docs/test-cases.md)
document
- [ ] added tests
- [ ] if any new env variables are added, added them to `.env.example`
and the `builder/env-check.js` if mandatory
Co-authored-by: Oleg Isonen <oleg008@gmail.com>
Outline was cut with overflow: scroll from scroll area. Here moved
paddings inside and added bottom padding.
## Code Review
- [ ] hi @kof, I need you to do
- conceptual review (architecture, feature-correctness)
- detailed review (read every line)
- test it on preview
## Before requesting a review
- [ ] made a self-review
- [ ] added inline comments where things may be not obvious (the "why",
not "what")
## Before merging
- [ ] tested locally and on preview environment (preview dev login:
5de6)
- [ ] updated [test
cases](https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio-builder/blob/main/apps/builder/docs/test-cases.md)
document
- [ ] added tests
- [ ] if any new env variables are added, added them to `.env.example`
and the `builder/env-check.js` if mandatory
## Description
Update NPM
## Steps for reproduction
1. click button
2. expect xyz
## Code Review
- [ ] hi @kof, I need you to do
- conceptual review (architecture, feature-correctness)
- detailed review (read every line)
- test it on preview
## Before requesting a review
- [ ] made a self-review
- [ ] added inline comments where things may be not obvious (the "why",
not "what")
## Before merging
- [ ] tested locally and on preview environment (preview dev login:
5de6)
- [ ] updated [test
cases](https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio-builder/blob/main/apps/builder/docs/test-cases.md)
document
- [ ] added tests
- [ ] if any new env variables are added, added them to `.env.example`
and the `builder/env-check.js` if mandatory
## Description
Fixes scrub control can set invalid unitless value
## Steps for reproduction
1. click button
2. expect xyz
## Code Review
- [ ] hi @kof, I need you to do
- conceptual review (architecture, feature-correctness)
- detailed review (read every line)
- test it on preview
## Before requesting a review
- [ ] made a self-review
- [ ] added inline comments where things may be not obvious (the "why",
not "what")
## Before merging
- [ ] tested locally and on preview environment (preview dev login:
5de6)
- [ ] updated [test
cases](https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio-builder/blob/main/apps/builder/docs/test-cases.md)
document
- [ ] added tests
- [ ] if any new env variables are added, added them to `.env.example`
and the `builder/env-check.js` if mandatory
## Description
Updated all icons in this list
https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio-builder/issues/1362
## Code Review
- [ ] hi @rpominov, I need you to do
- conceptual review (architecture, feature-correctness)
## Before requesting a review
- [ ] made a self-review
- [ ] added inline comments where things may be not obvious (the "why",
not "what")
## Before merging
- [ ] tested locally and on preview environment (preview dev login:
5de6)
- [ ] updated [test
cases](https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio-builder/blob/main/apps/builder/docs/test-cases.md)
document
- [ ] added tests
- [ ] if any new env variables are added, added them to `.env.example`
and the `builder/env-check.js` if mandatory
Here splitted asset upload into 2 phases
1. initial upload creates asset in db with uploading state and generates
unique name (POST /rest/assets endpoint)
2. use unique name to upload file, extract meta and mark asset as
uploaded (POST /rest/assets/$name endpoint)
This give us more straightforward data flow without creating temporary
asssets with fake id which are changed later.
And also unlock splitting files into separate table to allow securely
copy paste assets between projects (still wip).
Fixed persistent fetcher to support sequential submits.
https://discord.com/channels/955905230107738152/1102879882960175164
## Description
1. What is this PR about (link the issue and add a short description)
## Steps for reproduction
1. click button
2. expect xyz
## Code Review
- [ ] hi @kof, I need you to do
- conceptual review (architecture, feature-correctness)
- detailed review (read every line)
- test it on preview
## Before requesting a review
- [ ] made a self-review
- [ ] added inline comments where things may be not obvious (the "why",
not "what")
## Before merging
- [ ] tested locally and on preview environment (preview dev login:
5de6)
- [ ] updated [test
cases](https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio-builder/blob/main/apps/builder/docs/test-cases.md)
document
- [ ] added tests
- [ ] if any new env variables are added, added them to `.env.example`
and the `builder/env-check.js` if mandatory
https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio-builder/issues/84#issuecomment-1522834976
## Description
1. Added new components:
- textarea
- radio-button and radio-button-field
- checkbox and checkbox-field
- success-message
- error-message
2. Added `states` like `:disabled`, `:valid`, etc. to `input`
3. Added `custom-components/form` that renders success-message and
error-message conditionally
4. Added `success` and `error` style states to `custom-components/form`
5. Style panel now shows "Select an instance on the canvas" if the
selected component is not rendered on canvas (e.g. error-message may not
be rendered)
Not in this PR:
- The mailer package
- Backend handler for forms (will be in a PR in SAAS)
- Logic in Form that actually submits to backend and shows success/error
messages
## Steps for reproduction
1. Add a "Form" to canvas
2. Add "Checkbox Field", "Radio Button Field", "Text Area" to the form
3. Try changing `initialState` property of the form
Added `allowedParentComponents: string[]` option to meta which prevents
dropping, inserting or pasting components into wrong parents. For
example ListItem now can be placed only inside of List component.
This will unlock better experience with compound radix components.
https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/52824/235469260-2a212e73-0815-4a4b-a02d-d98cf56c7a88.mp4
## Description
Closes https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio-builder/issues/1407
## Steps for reproduction
1. click edit breakpoints
2. test all possible inputs
## Code Review
- [ ] hi @rpominov , I need you to do
- conceptual review (architecture, feature-correctness)
- detailed review (read every line)
- test it on preview
- [ ] @TrySound please check if you have any concerns regarding removing
breakpoints and styles
## Before requesting a review
- [ ] made a self-review
- [ ] added inline comments where things may be not obvious (the "why",
not "what")
## Before merging
- [ ] tested locally and on preview environment (preview dev login:
5de6)
- [ ] updated [test
cases](https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio-builder/blob/main/apps/builder/docs/test-cases.md)
document
- [ ] added tests
- [ ] if any new env variables are added, added them to `.env.example`
and the `builder/env-check.js` if mandatory
## Description
1. Removed a sanity check that started to give false positives (wasn't
needed really in the first place)
2. Cmd+enter in textarea control now saves the value
3. Fixed layout of props panel in the case when there're no initial
props
Here I allows to return undefined in swapDropTarget. This enables us to
reset drop target when move cursor out of droppable elements.
For example before Body was always selected as drop target. Though this
behavior prevent us from restricting parents for cases like Tabs>Tab and
List>ListItem.
Also got rid from emulatePointerAlwaysInRootBounds which was used to
workaround that fallback to Body. So now no longer necessary too.
https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/5635476/235142653-48b95ebe-9714-44c4-90d9-b69b930f2379.mov
Part of https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio-builder/issues/1407
## Description
Implements design changes from
https://www.figma.com/file/xCBegXEWxROLqA1Y31z2Xo/%F0%9F%93%96-Webstudio-Design-Docs?node-id=3719-47947&t=IyN7o4sC7xAxaPNG-4
- new List and ListItem primitive components just for keyboard
accessibility
- deprecated List and ListItem we had before because they are only
useful in asset manager and we already learned how we want to treat
keyboard differently
## Code Review
- [ ] hi @rpominov, I need you to do
- conceptual review (architecture, feature-correctness)
- detailed review (read every line)
- test it on preview
## Before requesting a review
- [ ] made a self-review
- [ ] added inline comments where things may be not obvious (the "why",
not "what")
## Before merging
- [ ] tested locally and on preview environment (preview dev login:
5de6)
- [ ] updated [test
cases](https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio-builder/blob/main/apps/builder/docs/test-cases.md)
document
- [ ] added tests
- [ ] if any new env variables are added, added them to `.env.example`
and the `builder/env-check.js` if mandatory
## Description
Release 0.61.0
Npm packages update
## Steps for reproduction
1. click button
2. expect xyz
## Code Review
- [ ] hi @kof, I need you to do
- conceptual review (architecture, feature-correctness)
- detailed review (read every line)
- test it on preview
## Before requesting a review
- [ ] made a self-review
- [ ] added inline comments where things may be not obvious (the "why",
not "what")
## Before merging
- [ ] tested locally and on preview environment (preview dev login:
5de6)
- [ ] updated [test
cases](https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio-builder/blob/main/apps/builder/docs/test-cases.md)
document
- [ ] added tests
- [ ] if any new env variables are added, added them to `.env.example`
and the `builder/env-check.js` if mandatory
Now embed templates can define simplified version of our styles which is
useful for radix components and as AI output.
```
styles: [
{
property: 'backgroundColor',
value: { type: 'keyword', value: 'red' }
}
]
```
Ref https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio-builder/issues/1067
We need to move away from getComputedStyle for not local styles in style
panel.
Here added default html style from browser sources. Now we can render it
and properties initial styles instead of computed styles.
Also fixed in properties data generation currentcolor -> currentColor
and removed same from border presets.
Before preset styles used `{ tag: { property: value } }` format. Now we
are switching to `{ tag: [{ state,property,value }] }` to support
specifying states in preset styles.
Same format will be used for embed template styles.
Here switched only format. States in preset styles not supported in
builder yet.
## Description
Ref. #1411 (Not everything is fixed yet, only what is checked. Will fix
the rest in a separate PR.)
1. Updated Icons
2. Fixed geometry of the grid control
3. (!) Removed ability to set certain values as specified in the issue
and in Figma:
- `display: inline-flex`
- `flex-direction: normal, *-reverse`
- `justify-content: normal`
- `align-items: normal`
- `align-content: normal`
- `flex-wrap: normal, wrap-reverse`
4. Replaced dropdown with a toggle button for `direction` and `wrap`
5. Used toggle button for the gap link control
6. Fixed layout of controls
## Steps for reproduction
1. Choose `display: flex` on the Layout section in style panel
3. See the changes from the list above
Ref https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio-builder/pull/1516
Here added new utility "tree template" to describe children in component
meta and generate instances from it while inserting.
Added simple template to form component as example.
Ref
https://remix.run/docs/en/1.15.0/guides/constraints#server-code-pruning
Remix use NAME.server.ts extension to enforce omitting module from
client bundles. Though we heavily used `/server` in packages which had
no affect and blocked us in using a few node apis which were not
polifilled with empty modules while bundling for client.
Here I replaced `/server` with `/index.server` and removed all legacy
server entry points which are not longer necessary with new typescript
resolution.
Ivan Starkov
