## Description
1. What is this PR about (link the issue and add a short description)
## Steps for reproduction
1. click button
2. expect xyz
## Code Review
- [ ] hi @kof, I need you to do
- conceptual review (architecture, feature-correctness)
- detailed review (read every line)
- test it on preview
## Before requesting a review
- [ ] made a self-review
- [ ] added inline comments where things may be not obvious (the "why",
not "what")
## Before merging
- [ ] tested locally and on preview environment (preview dev login:
5de6)
- [ ] updated [test
cases](https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio-builder/blob/main/apps/builder/docs/test-cases.md)
document
- [ ] added tests
- [ ] if any new env variables are added, added them to `.env.example`
and the `builder/env-check.js` if mandatory
## Description
1. What is this PR about (link the issue and add a short description)
## Steps for reproduction
1. click button
2. expect xyz
## Code Review
- [ ] hi @kof, I need you to do
- conceptual review (architecture, feature-correctness)
- detailed review (read every line)
- test it on preview
## Before requesting a review
- [ ] made a self-review
- [ ] added inline comments where things may be not obvious (the "why",
not "what")
## Before merging
- [ ] tested locally and on preview environment (preview dev login:
5de6)
- [ ] updated [test
cases](https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio-builder/blob/main/apps/builder/docs/test-cases.md)
document
- [ ] added tests
- [ ] if any new env variables are added, added them to `.env.example`
and the `builder/env-check.js` if mandatory
## Description
1. What is this PR about (link the issue and add a short description)
## Steps for reproduction
1. click button
2. expect xyz
## Code Review
- [ ] hi @kof, I need you to do
- conceptual review (architecture, feature-correctness)
- detailed review (read every line)
- test it on preview
## Before requesting a review
- [ ] made a self-review
- [ ] added inline comments where things may be not obvious (the "why",
not "what")
## Before merging
- [ ] tested locally and on preview environment (preview dev login:
5de6)
- [ ] updated [test
cases](https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio-builder/blob/main/apps/builder/docs/test-cases.md)
document
- [ ] added tests
- [ ] if any new env variables are added, added them to `.env.example`
and the `builder/env-check.js` if mandatory
## Description
npm libs update
## Steps for reproduction
1. click button
2. expect xyz
## Code Review
- [ ] hi @kof, I need you to do
- conceptual review (architecture, feature-correctness)
- detailed review (read every line)
- test it on preview
## Before requesting a review
- [ ] made a self-review
- [ ] added inline comments where things may be not obvious (the "why",
not "what")
## Before merging
- [ ] tested locally and on preview environment (preview dev login:
5de6)
- [ ] updated [test
cases](https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio-builder/blob/main/apps/builder/docs/test-cases.md)
document
- [ ] added tests
- [ ] if any new env variables are added, added them to `.env.example`
and the `builder/env-check.js` if mandatory
## Description
EM seems to be challenging to use and people tend to use PX or REM
instead ... I changed those values that come with EM by default from
browsers to the values Webflow is using.
I am not sure why webflow is doing certain things: e.g. paragraphs have
marginTop 0, h1-3 have marginTop 20; marginBottom: 10, h4- have
marginTop 10 ; marginBottom 20
These seem to be inconsistent and weird choices.
---------
Co-authored-by: Bogdan Chadkin <trysound@yandex.ru>
Here added another expression utility to generate function body
generateExpressionsComputation.
InstanceRoot now requires computeExpressions(variables) prop which can
be generated build time.
## Description
1. What is this PR about (link the issue and add a short description)
## Steps for reproduction
1. click button
2. expect xyz
## Code Review
- [ ] hi @kof, I need you to do
- conceptual review (architecture, feature-correctness)
- detailed review (read every line)
- test it on preview
## Before requesting a review
- [ ] made a self-review
- [ ] added inline comments where things may be not obvious (the "why",
not "what")
## Before merging
- [ ] tested locally and on preview environment (preview dev login:
5de6)
- [ ] updated [test
cases](https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio-builder/blob/main/apps/builder/docs/test-cases.md)
document
- [ ] added tests
- [ ] if any new env variables are added, added them to `.env.example`
and the `builder/env-check.js` if mandatory
Ref https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio-builder/issues/1529
Here embed template will add scope to always be shown only within
instance. Before we have data sources UI the only use case is deleting
data sources along with instances.
Also found jsep enable ternary by default and forbid for now caz there
is no generation implemented anyway.
Ref https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio-builder/issues/1529
Here introduced two types of data sources into "variable" and
"expression". First stores the value, the second only executable code.
Execute expressions now output results of all expressions so we could
access values globally with "computed" store
Embed template references now allow to define both variable reference
and expression.
Closes https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio-builder/issues/1845
## Description
See issue
## Code Review
- [ ] hi @TrySound , I need you to do
- conceptual review (architecture, feature-correctness)
- detailed review (read every line)
- test it on preview
## Before requesting a review
- [ ] made a self-review
- [ ] added inline comments where things may be not obvious (the "why",
not "what")
## Before merging
- [ ] tested locally and on preview environment (preview dev login:
5de6)
- [ ] updated [test
cases](https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio-builder/blob/main/apps/builder/docs/test-cases.md)
document
- [ ] added tests
- [ ] if any new env variables are added, added them to `.env.example`
and the `builder/env-check.js` if mandatory
Ref https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio-builder/issues/1529
Here added two utilities:
validateExpression to parse syntax and replace identifier. For parsing
used jsep package which is very limited subset of js.
executeExpression to execute the chain of expressions. The code is
unoptimized and will not cache results between calls. But still should
be fast enough because expressions are indented to be quite simple.
While turborepo does not work for us we can try to solve long checks
time with builtin caching. Eslint provides similar one to prettier we
already use.
```
pnpm -r lint
51.53s
pnpm eslint . --ext .ts,.tsx --max-warnings 0
18.10s
pnpm eslint . --ext .ts,.tsx --max-warnings 0 --cache (with cache)
1.82s
```
In this PR I removed all lint scripts in packages and added global one
in the to github workflow. It saves like 30s on my laptop because pnpm.
Already stored cache makes linting almost instant.
Also bumped all eslint dependencies.
Ref https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio-builder/issues/1529
Added data source values store which can be updated from both components
and props panel.
```js
const { setState } = useContext(ReactSdkContext)
const instanceId = getInstanceIdFromComponentProps(props)
setState(instanceId, propName, value)
```
Ref https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio-builder/issues/1529
- added data sources store
- added dataSource type to props
- insert data sources from template (prop.dataSourceReference allows to
bind several props to the same data source)
- convert to static prop on copying (simplification until requirements
are clear)
## Description
1. What is this PR about (link the issue and add a short description)
## Steps for reproduction
1. click button
2. expect xyz
## Code Review
- [ ] hi @kof, I need you to do
- conceptual review (architecture, feature-correctness)
- detailed review (read every line)
- test it on preview
## Before requesting a review
- [ ] made a self-review
- [ ] added inline comments where things may be not obvious (the "why",
not "what")
## Before merging
- [ ] tested locally and on preview environment (preview dev login:
5de6)
- [ ] updated [test
cases](https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio-builder/blob/main/apps/builder/docs/test-cases.md)
document
- [ ] added tests
- [ ] if any new env variables are added, added them to `.env.example`
and the `builder/env-check.js` if mandatory
We generate dts type for each package on publish.
It requires us to include only "src" to output same structure as in src
folder. Though we have configs and cli scripts outside of it which
should be typechecked, they cannot be ignored.
Ideally would be to have one-line commands in package.json. Though
typescript always has problems with build step. In this case the CLI
have everything to configure this except "include" and "exclude" flags.
So here to workaround that I added tsconfig.dts.json to distinct dts
generation and typechecking.
Blocker for https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio-builder/pull/1634
## Description
closes#1781
Also makes body/html layout more modern fixing additional bugs
More details
https://twitter.com/ChallengesCss/status/1471128244720181258
## Steps for reproduction
1. click button
2. expect xyz
## Code Review
- [ ] hi @kof, I need you to do
- conceptual review (architecture, feature-correctness)
- detailed review (read every line)
- test it on preview
## Before requesting a review
- [ ] made a self-review
- [ ] added inline comments where things may be not obvious (the "why",
not "what")
## Before merging
- [ ] tested locally and on preview environment (preview dev login:
5de6)
- [ ] updated [test
cases](https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio-builder/blob/main/apps/builder/docs/test-cases.md)
document
- [ ] added tests
- [ ] if any new env variables are added, added them to `.env.example`
and the `builder/env-check.js` if mandatory
## Description
1. What is this PR about (link the issue and add a short description)
## Steps for reproduction
1. click button
2. expect xyz
## Code Review
- [ ] hi @kof, I need you to do
- conceptual review (architecture, feature-correctness)
- detailed review (read every line)
- test it on preview
## Before requesting a review
- [ ] made a self-review
- [ ] added inline comments where things may be not obvious (the "why",
not "what")
## Before merging
- [ ] tested locally and on preview environment (preview dev login:
5de6)
- [ ] updated [test
cases](https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio-builder/blob/main/apps/builder/docs/test-cases.md)
document
- [ ] added tests
- [ ] if any new env variables are added, added them to `.env.example`
and the `builder/env-check.js` if mandatory
## Description
Now we show in the builder the right color for visited and link itself
<img width="291" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio-builder/assets/5077042/1c691903-87c9-4837-8eae-dfd1b980ad0f">
Tooltip is wrong and not fixed in this PR
## Steps for reproduction
1. click button
2. expect xyz
## Code Review
- [ ] hi @kof, I need you to do
- conceptual review (architecture, feature-correctness)
- detailed review (read every line)
- test it on preview
## Before requesting a review
- [ ] made a self-review
- [ ] added inline comments where things may be not obvious (the "why",
not "what")
## Before merging
- [ ] tested locally and on preview environment (preview dev login:
5de6)
- [ ] updated [test
cases](https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio-builder/blob/main/apps/builder/docs/test-cases.md)
document
- [ ] added tests
- [ ] if any new env variables are added, added them to `.env.example`
and the `builder/env-check.js` if mandatory
## Description
1. What is this PR about (link the issue and add a short description)
## Steps for reproduction
1. click button
2. expect xyz
## Code Review
- [ ] hi @kof, I need you to do
- conceptual review (architecture, feature-correctness)
- detailed review (read every line)
- test it on preview
## Before requesting a review
- [ ] made a self-review
- [ ] added inline comments where things may be not obvious (the "why",
not "what")
## Before merging
- [ ] tested locally and on preview environment (preview dev login:
5de6)
- [ ] updated [test
cases](https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio-builder/blob/main/apps/builder/docs/test-cases.md)
document
- [ ] added tests
- [ ] if any new env variables are added, added them to `.env.example`
and the `builder/env-check.js` if mandatory
## Description
update npm
## Steps for reproduction
1. click button
2. expect xyz
## Code Review
- [ ] hi @kof, I need you to do
- conceptual review (architecture, feature-correctness)
- detailed review (read every line)
- test it on preview
## Before requesting a review
- [ ] made a self-review
- [ ] added inline comments where things may be not obvious (the "why",
not "what")
## Before merging
- [ ] tested locally and on preview environment (preview dev login:
5de6)
- [ ] updated [test
cases](https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio-builder/blob/main/apps/builder/docs/test-cases.md)
document
- [ ] added tests
- [ ] if any new env variables are added, added them to `.env.example`
and the `builder/env-check.js` if mandatory
Here I removed "rich-text" type from components. Instead "container" can
be edited when has only text or rich text children.
And any time user can drop into editablle container which will wrap all
text and rich text children into "Span" component.
Had to implement position adjustment to consider text children which do
not have representation in navigator tree and canvas dnd.
Span has temporary SpanContainer name to not conflict with existinig
Span for styled text in rich text. Will rename in other PR when remove
no longer necessary components.
## Description
- I used object position instead of object fit by mistake
- Unrelated: ignore loader prop
## Steps for reproduction
1. add vimeo
2. select preview image
3. see it has object fit cover
## Code Review
- [ ] hi @TrySound , I need you to do
- conceptual review (architecture, feature-correctness)
- detailed review (read every line)
- test it on preview
## Before requesting a review
- [ ] made a self-review
- [ ] added inline comments where things may be not obvious (the "why",
not "what")
## Before merging
- [ ] tested locally and on preview environment (preview dev login:
5de6)
- [ ] updated [test
cases](https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio-builder/blob/main/apps/builder/docs/test-cases.md)
document
- [ ] added tests
- [ ] if any new env variables are added, added them to `.env.example`
and the `builder/env-check.js` if mandatory
## Description
Removes errors with vscode and tsconfig
## Steps for reproduction
1. click button
2. expect xyz
## Code Review
- [ ] hi @kof, I need you to do
- conceptual review (architecture, feature-correctness)
- detailed review (read every line)
- test it on preview
## Before requesting a review
- [ ] made a self-review
- [ ] added inline comments where things may be not obvious (the "why",
not "what")
## Before merging
- [ ] tested locally and on preview environment (preview dev login:
5de6)
- [ ] updated [test
cases](https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio-builder/blob/main/apps/builder/docs/test-cases.md)
document
- [ ] added tests
- [ ] if any new env variables are added, added them to `.env.example`
and the `builder/env-check.js` if mandatory
## Description
1. What is this PR about (link the issue and add a short description)
## Steps for reproduction
1. click button
2. expect xyz
## Code Review
- [ ] hi @kof, I need you to do
- conceptual review (architecture, feature-correctness)
- detailed review (read every line)
- test it on preview
## Before requesting a review
- [ ] made a self-review
- [ ] added inline comments where things may be not obvious (the "why",
not "what")
## Before merging
- [ ] tested locally and on preview environment (preview dev login:
5de6)
- [ ] updated [test
cases](https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio-builder/blob/main/apps/builder/docs/test-cases.md)
document
- [ ] added tests
- [ ] if any new env variables are added, added them to `.env.example`
and the `builder/env-check.js` if mandatory
Ref https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio-builder/issues/1688
## Description
Vimeo Component
## Steps for reproduction
1. Add vimeo
2. play with props
## Code Review
- [ ] hi @TrySound , I need you to do
- conceptual review (architecture, feature-correctness)
- detailed review (read every line)
- test it on preview
## Before requesting a review
- [ ] made a self-review
- [ ] added inline comments where things may be not obvious (the "why",
not "what")
## Before merging
- [ ] tested locally and on preview environment (preview dev login:
5de6)
- [ ] updated [test
cases](https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio-builder/blob/main/apps/builder/docs/test-cases.md)
document
- [ ] added tests
- [ ] if any new env variables are added, added them to `.env.example`
and the `builder/env-check.js` if mandatory
## Description
Npm update
## Steps for reproduction
1. click button
2. expect xyz
## Code Review
- [ ] hi @kof, I need you to do
- conceptual review (architecture, feature-correctness)
- detailed review (read every line)
- test it on preview
## Before requesting a review
- [ ] made a self-review
- [ ] added inline comments where things may be not obvious (the "why",
not "what")
## Before merging
- [ ] tested locally and on preview environment (preview dev login:
5de6)
- [ ] updated [test
cases](https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio-builder/blob/main/apps/builder/docs/test-cases.md)
document
- [ ] added tests
- [ ] if any new env variables are added, added them to `.env.example`
and the `builder/env-check.js` if mandatory
Saas is swithing to moduleResolution=bundler.
Here I replaced types top level field with exoprts condition in all our
packages. Thi should fix issues with new sdk components packages and
simplify using additional entry points.
## Description
Npm:
"version": "0.69.0"
## Steps for reproduction
1. click button
2. expect xyz
## Code Review
- [ ] hi @kof, I need you to do
- conceptual review (architecture, feature-correctness)
- detailed review (read every line)
- test it on preview
## Before requesting a review
- [ ] made a self-review
- [ ] added inline comments where things may be not obvious (the "why",
not "what")
## Before merging
- [ ] tested locally and on preview environment (preview dev login:
5de6)
- [ ] updated [test
cases](https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio-builder/blob/main/apps/builder/docs/test-cases.md)
document
- [ ] added tests
- [ ] if any new env variables are added, added them to `.env.example`
and the `builder/env-check.js` if mandatory
## Description
Closes https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio-builder/issues/1377
## Steps for reproduction
1. add Text
2. change tag prop to figcaption
## Code Review
- [ ] hi @TrySound , I need you to do
- conceptual review (architecture, feature-correctness)
- detailed review (read every line)
- test it on preview
## Before requesting a review
- [ ] made a self-review
- [ ] added inline comments where things may be not obvious (the "why",
not "what")
## Before merging
- [ ] tested locally and on preview environment (preview dev login:
5de6)
- [ ] updated [test
cases](https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio-builder/blob/main/apps/builder/docs/test-cases.md)
document
- [ ] added tests
- [ ] if any new env variables are added, added them to `.env.example`
and the `builder/env-check.js` if mandatory
Ref https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio-builder/issues/1129
Here added sdk-components-react-remix with all remix components moved
away from react-sdk.
Exposed 3 entry points
- @webstudio-is/sdk-components-react-remix
- @webstudio-is/sdk-components-react-remix/metas
- @webstudio-is/sdk-components-react-remix/props
## Description
We want to be able to specify the order in which components are shown in
the panel.
Right now the order property is not set where needed, because I am
waiting for feedback from @taylornowotny
## Steps for reproduction
1. Open add components panel
2. See components are in the right order
## Code Review
- [ ] hi @TrySound , I need you to do
- conceptual review (architecture, feature-correctness)
- [ ] hi @taylornowotny , I need you to do
- give some thought to both components that need to be first which we
set specific order to (the rest will go as is)
- recheck the categories, I feel like our split into categories is not
intentional
## Before requesting a review
- [ ] made a self-review
- [ ] added inline comments where things may be not obvious (the "why",
not "what")
## Before merging
- [ ] tested locally and on preview environment (preview dev login:
5de6)
- [ ] updated [test
cases](https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio-builder/blob/main/apps/builder/docs/test-cases.md)
document
- [ ] added tests
- [ ] if any new env variables are added, added them to `.env.example`
and the `builder/env-check.js` if mandatory
Ref https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio-builder/issues/1545
All complex use cases already switched to get meta from arguments and
from atom.
Here migrated the last cases and dropped legacy meta register in
react-sdk package. Now we ready to split components into separate
packages.
Cleanup after refactoring. Now we can get rid of Asset.location because
asset location is defined by environment. And remove fields moved to
File table.
Here added two component restrictions to meta.
requiredAncestors prevent inserting components outside of required ones
here restricted ListItem to always be inside of List.
invalidAncestors prevent inserting components inside of invalid ones
here prevented nested buttons
Ref https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio-builder/issues/1129
Here refactored registered components away from global state in
react-sdk package in favour of components map.
The map can be easily computed in runtime or generated for worker.
Default and custom (remix) components registering is unified now and
both libraries can be split into separate packages.
Temporary added "@webstudio/react-sdk/components" entry point to get a
record of components.
Ref https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio-builder/issues/1569
Here we change template in meta to include current component instead of
implicitly creating it.
This way we can provide insert composition of components instead of
single one for example input+label. Or even wrap current component like
label>input.
Another usecase is ability to set local styles and props for current
component.
Note: review with hidden whitespaces
## Description
How it looks. (Not everything aligned or have features like in design)
https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio-builder/assets/5077042/349c7fae-afd8-478d-9eba-701b002f0fd4
Most API methods return `{ success: true } | {success: false, error:
string}` because in the future they need to be moved into server
workflows, and do not exist or return anything.
## Steps for reproduction
Run locally, at localhost I've created a fake domain creation API, to be
able to test UI.
## Code Review
- [ ] hi @kof, I need you to do
- conceptual review (architecture, feature-correctness)
- detailed review (read every line)
- test it on preview
## Before requesting a review
- [ ] made a self-review
- [ ] added inline comments where things may be not obvious (the "why",
not "what")
## Before merging
- [ ] tested locally and on preview environment (preview dev login:
5de6)
- [ ] updated [test
cases](https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio-builder/blob/main/apps/builder/docs/test-cases.md)
document
- [ ] added tests
- [ ] if any new env variables are added, added them to `.env.example`
and the `builder/env-check.js` if mandatory
## Description
npm update
## Steps for reproduction
1. click button
2. expect xyz
## Code Review
- [ ] hi @kof, I need you to do
- conceptual review (architecture, feature-correctness)
- detailed review (read every line)
- test it on preview
## Before requesting a review
- [ ] made a self-review
- [ ] added inline comments where things may be not obvious (the "why",
not "what")
## Before merging
- [ ] tested locally and on preview environment (preview dev login:
5de6)
- [ ] updated [test
cases](https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio-builder/blob/main/apps/builder/docs/test-cases.md)
document
- [ ] added tests
- [ ] if any new env variables are added, added them to `.env.example`
and the `builder/env-check.js` if mandatory
Ivan Starkov