Commit Graph
7672 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
Mattia Eleuteri 93faa7a862 fix(lineage, kubernetes): resolve CAPK node VMs to their cluster
The Cluster API KubeVirt provider creates a node's VirtualMachine
without an ownerReference and links it to its KubevirtMachine through
the capk.cluster.x-k8s.io/kubevirt-machine-{name,namespace} labels
only. The ownership walk therefore stopped at the VM, found no
ancestor, and the lineage webhook left every object below it unmanaged:
the virt-launcher pods of worker nodes never got
internal.cozystack.io/managed-by-cozystack, while still carrying the
application lineage labels copied from the machine template.

Anything that relies on the webhook having resolved those pods misses
them. The securitygroup-controller caches only managed pods, so a
SecurityGroup attached to a Kubernetes application labelled the
control-plane pods and never the nodes.

Follow the CAPK labels from the VM to its KubevirtMachine, whose
ownerReferences reach the CAPI Cluster and from there the cluster's
HelmRelease. Only a KubevirtMachine in the VM's own namespace is
followed: CAPK can target an external infrastructure cluster, and the
walk must never attribute an object across namespaces.

Signed-off-by: Mattia Eleuteri <mattia@hidora.io>
Assisted-by: LLM
2026-10-26 22:18:50 +01:00
myasnikovdaniil 7dc5c0b5e6 fix(marketplace): do not install a connected repository's components on connect (#5071)
## What this PR does

Connecting a marketplace repository materialized its `PackageSource`s
and then auto-created a tap-managed `Package` per source. The Package
reconciler installs a `HelmRelease` for every install-marked component
of the default variant, and Flux runs those under its `flux` service
account, which is bound to `cluster-admin` with no impersonation
(`--default-service-account` is not set, and neither `internal/operator`
nor `pkg/registry/apps` set `serviceAccountName` on the HelmRelease). A
publisher's install chart therefore ran as `cluster-admin` on connect,
with no operator step, contradicting the documented behaviour that
tapping installs nothing. The `privileged` flag is a prompt to the admin
and does not protect against a publisher acting in bad faith.

This removes the on-connect auto-registration (`ensureRegistration`).
Connecting now only materializes `PackageSource`s. Installing an app is
an explicit `cozypkg add`, which becomes the sole creator of a
`Package`; every other `Package` reference in the operator is a read or
a watch. Removing the call also fixes the second effect of the same
path: a `Package` the admin removed with `cozypkg del` is no longer
re-created on the next source revision.

A second commit reconciles the texts this behaviour change made wrong:
they promised that tapping registers a repository's apps in the catalog
and runs its charts. Reworded the `cozypkg tap`/`untap` help, the tap
success output (it now prints a `cozypkg add <name>` line per
materialized PackageSource), the `cozypkg init` scaffold README, the
packages-index trust model, and the dashboard Repositories banner and
per-repository empty state.

Accepted consequence: a connected repository's apps appear in the
catalog only after an admin runs `cozypkg add`, since the dashboard
catalog is computed from `ApplicationDefinition`s. Install from a
connected repository is CLI-only for now; the console connects and
disconnects repositories but does not create a `Package`. Populating the
catalog from `PackageSource` metadata without an install is the
long-term shape in #4359 and is out of scope here. The
privileged-confirmation gaps #4358 and #4359 stay open.

Upgrade note: a `Package` that Cozystack 1.7.0 auto-created on connect
stays after the upgrade, and the privileged-confirmation gate still
applies to it, so this is not a regression for existing installs. For a
newly connected repository no tap-labelled `Package` is created, so the
gate does not come into play on that path. An operator who does not want
a 1.7.0 auto-created package can remove it with `cozypkg del`.

Addresses #4978.

### Screenshots

Dashboard text-only change (Repositories banner and per-repository empty
state). No layout change.

### Downstream repositories

Walked the trigger map in `docs/agents/contributing.md` against the
diff. The diff is operator logic plus CLI/dashboard/doc text; it matches
no concrete trigger (no package, API, schema, tooling, annotation,
metric or commit-convention change). The dashboard console is vendored
in this repo (`packages/system/dashboard`), so its text change travels
in this PR. Leaving every box empty rather than ticking "No downstream
repository is affected".

### Release note

```release-note
fix(marketplace): connecting a marketplace repository no longer installs its components. A connected repository's apps are materialized as PackageSources but not installed until an explicit `cozypkg add`; install from a connected repository is CLI-only for now. Previously, connecting auto-created a Package whose install-marked components were deployed by Flux under its cluster-admin service account. A Package that Cozystack 1.7.0 auto-created on connect stays after upgrade and can be removed with `cozypkg del`.
```
2026-10-26 21:10:45 +05:00
myasnikovdaniil 7215b02d38 feat(keycloak): load additional CA files from Secret or ConfigMap keys (#5039)
## What this PR does

Closes #3823.

With the stock Cozystack chart, Keycloak cannot connect to an LDAPS
server, external identity provider or SMTP server signed by a private CA
because the chart cannot deliver a CA file to its truststore. Add
`truststores`, a list of existing Secret/ConfigMap references in the
release namespace, with one selected key per entry (`ca.crt` by
default).

```yaml
truststores:
  - configMapName: freeipa-ca
    key: ca.crt
  - secretName: partner-ca
    key: certificates.pem
```

Each key is mounted read-only in a separate `cozystack-<index>`
subdirectory of `/opt/keycloak/conf/truststores`. Keycloak discovers it
automatically; the chart adds no environment override, Kubernetes API
permission or arbitrary volume path. Existing image certificates, Java
default roots, themes and `extraEnv` keep their behavior. References are
mandatory: a missing object or selected key prevents the pod from
starting. Helm validates the reference shape and safe key paths, but
cannot inspect external certificate contents.

The trust decision belongs to platform administrators and applies to the
entire Keycloak server, across all realms. Write access to a referenced
object therefore permits changing that server's trust. If HTTPS client
authentication is set to `request` or `required` without a separate
`https-trust-store-file`, these CAs also verify incoming client
certificates; configure that file explicitly when incoming mTLS requires
a different trust boundary. Use public certificates only (PEM bundles or
unencrypted PKCS12 without private keys). This does not disable TLS
hostname verification. Updating an object's contents does not restart
Keycloak or reload its truststore: restart both pods after rotation, or
use a versioned object name to trigger a rollout.

Validation:

- All 113 Keycloak Helm tests pass, including 21 new cases for reference
wiring, read-only mounts, selected-key isolation, themes, PKCS12
filenames, defaults and invalid input.
- Boundary tests reject source names and keys of 254 characters and the
single-dot key, and accept a source name and key of exactly 253
characters. Removing any of the three guards makes its regression test
fail; changing either length comparison to reject 253 also fails the
boundary test.
- Empty-default render matches a clean upstream/main worktree after
normalizing the existing randomly generated bootstrap password. Four
mutations (wrong mount path, writable mount, wrong selected key and
removed validation) each turn the new suite red.
- Enabled and default manifests render successfully; enabled YAML parses
with yq. `git diff --check` passes.
- Runtime check with official Keycloak 26.6.3 in isolated Docker:
synthetic LDAPS succeeds with a CA loaded automatically through an
emulated Kubernetes AtomicWriter symlink layout (HTTP 204 from the LDAP
connection-test Admin API); no custom CA fails with PKIX, and a trusted
CA with a mismatched SAN fails hostname verification (both HTTP 400).
KC_TRUSTSTORE_PATHS was unset. This checks TLS establishment, not a
complete federation bind/failover or deployment to a Kubernetes cluster.
- `make generate` has no target in this system chart; no generated
schema/API files are involved. `make show` requires the unavailable
cozyhr CLI and a live release, so rendering uses `helm template`. `helm
lint` reports the same pre-existing undeclared cozy-lib dependency on
both this branch and clean main.


### Screenshots

Not applicable; no UI changes.

### Downstream repositories

The website guide currently says CA mounts are unavailable, so its
`next` documentation needs updating once this ships. Other downstream
trigger-map entries do not apply: this only adds an opt-in value to the
system Keycloak chart, with no app schema, platform configuration, CRD,
tooling, naming or node-contract changes.

- [ ] No downstream repository is affected by this change
- [x] [cozystack/website](https://github.com/cozystack/website) -
follow-up: https://github.com/cozystack/website/issues/765
- [ ]
[cozystack/terraform-provider-cozystack](https://github.com/cozystack/terraform-provider-cozystack)
- follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/ansible-cozystack](https://github.com/cozystack/ansible-cozystack)
- follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/ccp](https://github.com/cozystack/ccp) - follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/talm](https://github.com/cozystack/talm) - follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/cozyhr](https://github.com/cozystack/cozyhr) -
follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/cozy-proxy](https://github.com/cozystack/cozy-proxy) -
follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/cozystack-telemetry-server](https://github.com/cozystack/cozystack-telemetry-server)
- follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/external-apps-example](https://github.com/cozystack/external-apps-example)
- follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/examples](https://github.com/cozystack/examples) -
follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/community](https://github.com/cozystack/community) -
follow-up:

### Release note

```release-note
feat(keycloak): load additional CA files from existing Secret or ConfigMap keys through the new truststores value, enabling TLS to private LDAPS, identity-provider and SMTP endpoints.
```


<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
<!-- coderabbit-ai-generated:v1 -->

## Summary by CodeRabbit

- **New Features**
- Added support for configuring Keycloak truststores from existing
Secrets or ConfigMaps.
- Supports PEM bundles and unencrypted PKCS12 certificates, with
optional key selection and read-only mounts.
- Truststore certificates apply server-wide, including incoming
client-certificate validation when no separate HTTPS truststore is
configured.
- Invalid truststore configurations produce clear errors. Missing
objects or keys prevent startup; certificate rotations require pod
restarts unless the referenced object name changes.
- **Tests**
- Added coverage for default behavior, multiple truststore sources,
theme mounts, explicit paths, and invalid configurations.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
2026-10-26 19:57:18 +05:00
IvanHunters 2f39e304f0 fix(marketplace): reconcile tap texts with no-install-on-connect
Removing on-connect auto-registration made several user-facing and doc texts
wrong: they promised that tapping registers a repository's apps in the catalog
and runs its charts. Tapping now installs nothing, so the texts told operators to
wait for apps that never appear.

Reword the `cozypkg tap`/`untap` help, the tap success output (now printing a
`cozypkg add <name>` line per materialized PackageSource), the `cozypkg init`
scaffold README, the packages-index trust model, the dashboard Repositories
banner and per-repository empty state, and the stale re-registration code
comments. No behaviour changes beyond the added `cozypkg add` hint in the tap
output.

Assisted-by: LLM
Signed-off-by: IvanHunters <xorokhotnikov@gmail.com>
2026-10-26 15:18:14 +03:00
Aleksei Sviridkin 749d401899 fix(kubernetes, opensearch, foundationdb)!: restrict managed application images (#5085)
## What this PR does

Image overrides let tenants run arbitrary containers in management
cluster, including helpers with access to Talos CA secrets and
Kubernetes API credentials. This PR removes those overrides and uses
images shipped by the platform.

Replaces [the original
PR](https://github.com/cozystack/cozystack/pull/4287) for 1.7. Andrei
Kvapil's commits keep his authorship.

- Kubernetes and KubernetesNodes helpers use the bundled image
references through `cozy-lib.image`. OpenSearch uses its version map.
Talos installer settings for tenant worker VMs stay available.
- FoundationDB uses `version: v7.3` or `v7.4`, mapped to `7.3.63` and
`7.4.1`. Migration 60 carries the old `cluster.version` over to its
release line, records releases needing attention and preserves the
legacy value while the old chart can still render it.
- The FoundationDB chart refuses a render when `cluster.version` and
`version` name different release lines. This also covers variants
without platform migrations.
- OpenSearch and FoundationDB get version-map update scripts. They
retain the current default while it remains supported.

Application types and schemas are still generated from the charts.

### Upgrade notes

Stored image overrides are accepted without new admission warnings and
ignored by the charts. On the first reconcile, OpenSearch nodes move to
the image for their selected version, and Kubernetes components whose
images changed restart. Check custom OpenSearch images before upgrading:
if one runs a newer version than the chart's map, switching back can
leave nodes unable to read their data. Air-gapped installations need
`docker.io` and `ghcr.io` mirrored on management-cluster nodes.

FoundationDB preserves the release line, not an arbitrary patch: 7.3.x
moves to 7.3.63 and 7.4.x to 7.4.1. Check these versions before
upgrading. A cluster on 7.1 needs an upgrade to 7.3 first. On variants
without migrations, set `version` to the line the cluster runs. To
change release lines later, remove the leftover `cluster.version` as
directed by the chart error.

Migration 60 records affected releases in the
`cozystack.io/migration-60-needs-attention` annotation on the
`cozystack-version` ConfigMap. Dry-run reports patch changes without
patching, annotating or advancing the migration stamp. Migration 56 no
longer carries the removed kubectl override into adopted node pools.

An explicit OpenSearch `version: null` now fails rendering instead of
falling back to `v2`.

### Validation

- `make unit-tests` passed, including migrations 56 and 60.
- Four-chart regression run: 750 tests passed.
- API Create/Update, admission, defaulting and existing warning
regression tests passed. `cmd/`, `internal/` and `pkg/` match main.
- Shell test lanes passed with `/bin/sh` as dash throughout the process
tree.
- `make generate manifests` passed with no generated drift, using
cozyvalues-gen v1.7.0.

E2E passed on e694b05b4.

### Screenshots

Not a UI change.

### Downstream repositories

- [ ] No downstream repository is affected by this change
- [ ] [cozystack/website](https://github.com/cozystack/website) -
existing generated parameter tables are refreshed by the release docs
job.
- [x]
[cozystack/terraform-provider-cozystack](https://github.com/cozystack/terraform-provider-cozystack)
- follow-up: [schema
updates](https://github.com/cozystack/terraform-provider-cozystack/issues/74).
- [ ]
[cozystack/ansible-cozystack](https://github.com/cozystack/ansible-cozystack)
- follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/ccp](https://github.com/cozystack/ccp) - follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/talm](https://github.com/cozystack/talm) - follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/cozyhr](https://github.com/cozystack/cozyhr) -
follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/cozy-proxy](https://github.com/cozystack/cozy-proxy) -
follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/cozystack-telemetry-server](https://github.com/cozystack/cozystack-telemetry-server)
- follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/external-apps-example](https://github.com/cozystack/external-apps-example)
- follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/examples](https://github.com/cozystack/examples) -
follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/community](https://github.com/cozystack/community) -
follow-up:

The provider follow-up removes the Kubernetes and KubernetesNodes image
blocks and adds FoundationDB version selection. No other downstream
follow-up is needed for these fields.

### Release note

```release-note
fix(kubernetes, opensearch, foundationdb)!: Remove tenant image overrides from Kubernetes, KubernetesNodes and OpenSearch. Existing overrides switch to platform images on reconciliation, which can roll OpenSearch nodes and restart Kubernetes components. Air-gapped installations must mirror the upstream registries on management-cluster nodes. FoundationDB replaces cluster.version with version (v7.3 or v7.4); migration 60 preserves the release line and records patch changes. Check running image versions before upgrading. Variants without migrations must set the FoundationDB version before upgrading, and the chart refuses mismatched legacy release lines. OpenSearch rejects an explicit version: null.
```


<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->

<!-- coderabbit-ai-generated:v1 -->

## Summary by CodeRabbit

* **New Features**
* FoundationDB now supports selecting version lines `v7.3` and `v7.4`,
with `v7.3` as the default.
* Added automatic migration of existing FoundationDB version settings,
with warnings for settings that need attention.

* **Changes**
* Removed per-application image overrides for Kubernetes, Kubernetes
Nodes, and OpenSearch. These charts now use their bundled images, which
can still be routed through the configured image registry.
* OpenSearch now reports an error when its version is missing or
unsupported.
* Existing FoundationDB settings with conflicting version lines are
reported for review.

<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
2026-10-26 13:00:10 +03:00
myasnikovdaniil 55aad6f914 fix(tcp-balancer): cap HAProxy fds and threads by the pod's own limits (#5005)
## What this PR does

On a v1.6.5 cluster a TCPBalancer created with the chart defaults
(`t1.nano`, limits 250m CPU and 128Mi memory, `haproxy:3.4.4`)
crash-looped. Both pods were OOMKilled with a memory limit of 134217728,
7 restarts each in about 15 minutes, and HAProxy logged `[NOTICE] (8) :
Automatically setting global.maxconn to 524126.` On another cluster the
same chart picked maxconn 524251 and the pods kept running.

`haproxy.cfg` has no `global` section, so HAProxy sizes itself from the
node. maxconn comes from the nofile limit capped at the built-in
`fd-hard-limit` of 1048576 (`DEFAULT_MAXFD`), and the thread count is
the number of CPUs the process may run on, whatever its CPU limit is.
Both are paid for at startup, before any traffic, and the thread part
grows with the node.

This PR adds a `global` section sized from the replica's own limits,
read through the same `cozy-lib.resources.defaultingSanitize` helper the
Deployment uses, so `resources` and `resourcesPreset` resolve the same
way. For `t1.nano` it renders

```
global
    fd-hard-limit 4096
    thread-hard-limit 1
```

`fd-hard-limit` is 32 per MiB of the memory limit and HAProxy derives
maxconn from it, 2035 for `t1.nano`, which is about 64 KiB per
connection. For comparison `haproxy -m 128` picks maxconn 3600 on 3.4.4,
about 35 KiB per connection, and the difference is left for the process
itself and for the kernel socket buffers the cgroup also charges. An
explicit `maxconn` would read simpler, but `strict-limits` is on by
default and HAProxy refuses to start when it cannot raise nofile to
about twice that value. With 1024 soft and 4096 hard nofile `maxconn
4096` exits with `Cannot raise FD limit to 8251`, while `fd-hard-limit
8192` starts with maxconn 2018. `thread-hard-limit` is the CPU limit
rounded up, at least 1. It caps the detected thread count and never
forces more threads than the node has.

Reproduced with Docker Desktop on arm64 (12 vCPU, kernel 6.12) and the
same image, running the rendered config the way the Deployment mounts
it. A larger node is stood in for by adding `nbthread 96` or `nbthread
128` to the `global` section. Memory is `memory.peak` of the container
cgroup.

```sh
cd packages/apps/tcp-balancer && mkdir -p /tmp/cfg
helm template tb . --show-only templates/configmap.yaml | yq '.data["haproxy.cfg"]' > /tmp/cfg/haproxy.cfg
docker run --rm --memory 128m --memory-swap 128m --ulimit nofile=1048576:1048576 -v /tmp/cfg:/usr/local/etc/haproxy:ro haproxy:3.4.4
```

| run | main | this PR |
| --- | --- | --- |
| idle, 12 threads | maxconn 524258, peak 89.6 MiB | maxconn 2035, 1
thread, peak 18.7 MiB |
| idle, `nbthread 96` | maxconn 524127, worker exited with code 137,
OOMKilled | 1 thread, peak 20.8 MiB |
| idle, `nbthread 128` | worker exited with code 137, OOMKilled | 1
thread, peak 22.9 MiB |
| 2035 clients echoing 16 KiB through a backend for 25 s, 12 threads |
worker exited with code 137 about a second after the clients started |
running, peak 83.7 MiB |

One case this PR does not cover is clients and servers that both stop
reading. They fill kernel socket buffers that the cgroup charges, and
with this PR the 128Mi container was still OOMKilled after 1225 such
connections, which maxconn does not bound.

`helm unittest .` passes 13 of 13 with helm-unittest 1.1.2 as CI pins
it. Against the template on main the four new cases fail and the nine
existing ones pass, and each of six template mutations fails at least
one case. `haproxy -c` accepts the render for `t1.nano`, `t1.4xlarge`,
`m1.4xlarge`, a zero CPU limit, the whitelist, `kubernetesAndTalos` and
`tcp-with-proxy` inputs. A full `helm template` differs from main only
in the `global` section and the `checksum/config` annotation, so the
pods roll once on upgrade. I have not run the change on a live cluster.

The template is the same on release-1.6, and that backport is a separate
PR.

### Screenshots

Not a UI change.

### Downstream repositories

One chart template and its unittest suite in
`packages/apps/tcp-balancer`. No values key, schema, default, README or
package change, so no trigger map entry applies.

- [x] No downstream repository is affected by this change
- [ ] [cozystack/website](https://github.com/cozystack/website) -
follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/terraform-provider-cozystack](https://github.com/cozystack/terraform-provider-cozystack)
- follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/ansible-cozystack](https://github.com/cozystack/ansible-cozystack)
- follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/ccp](https://github.com/cozystack/ccp) - follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/talm](https://github.com/cozystack/talm) - follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/cozyhr](https://github.com/cozystack/cozyhr) -
follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/cozy-proxy](https://github.com/cozystack/cozy-proxy) -
follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/cozystack-telemetry-server](https://github.com/cozystack/cozystack-telemetry-server)
- follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/external-apps-example](https://github.com/cozystack/external-apps-example)
- follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/examples](https://github.com/cozystack/examples) -
follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/community](https://github.com/cozystack/community) -
follow-up:

### Release note

```release-note
fix(tcp-balancer): HAProxy now takes its fd and thread caps from the replica's memory and CPU limits instead of the node, so a t1.nano balancer is no longer OOMKilled on nodes with many CPUs. maxconn follows the memory limit at about 16 connections per MiB, 2035 on t1.nano, and the pods roll once on upgrade.
```


<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->

## Summary by CodeRabbit

- **New Features**
- TCP Balancer now automatically configures HAProxy file-descriptor and
thread limits based on the selected or explicitly defined resource
settings.
- CPU-based thread limits are rounded up and always maintain a minimum
of one thread.
- Memory-based file-descriptor limits scale automatically with the
configured memory capacity.

- **Tests**
- Added coverage for default, preset-based, explicit resource, rounding,
and minimum-limit scenarios.

<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
2026-10-23 23:53:39 +05:00
myasnikovdaniil 432d02e20c fix(etcd): stop counting canceled watch streams as failed gRPC requests (#4985)
## What this PR does

The tenant etcd chart has its own copy of
`etcdHighNumberOfFailedGRPCRequests`, and both of its rules count every
`grpc_code` other than `OK` as a failure. `grpc_server_handled_total`
counts a Watch stream once, when it ends, and the streams of a
kube-apiserver that goes away end with `Canceled`. So whenever an API
server on a tenant etcd stops, the Watch method of every member reads as
100 percent failed and the critical rule fires on all of them.

Both rules now count only
`Unknown|FailedPrecondition|ResourceExhausted|Internal|Unavailable|DataLoss|DeadlineExceeded`,
the list the etcd mixin has used since etcd-io/etcd#13127 and the one
the platform copy in
`packages/system/monitoring-agents/alerts/etcd.yaml` already uses. The
grouping `BY (job, instance, grpc_service, grpc_method)`, the
thresholds, `for` and the annotations stay as they are, so the alerts
keep their labels.

Seen on a v1.6.5 cluster while a Kubernetes cluster on a tenant etcd was
created and deleted a few minutes later. vmalert had the critical alert
firing for `grpc_method="Watch"` on all three members with the value
100. At that point
`rate(grpc_server_handled_total{grpc_code!="OK"}[10m])` was 0.63 for
Watch with `Canceled`, and the only other non-OK codes were
`FailedPrecondition` on `RoleGet` and `UserGet` at 0.0017 each, which is
one call each. The same query an hour earlier returned nothing. The
platform copy runs in the same vmalert over the same series, and none of
the firing alerts came from it. Each alert also showed up seven times
there, once per tenant copy of these rules, because the root tenant's
vmalert loads the rules of every tenant namespace. This PR does not
change that.

`hack/etcd-grpc-alerts.bats` renders the chart's PrometheusRule with
`helm template` and replays it through `vmalert-tool` v1.136.0 pinned by
digest, the same image #4963 uses.
`hack/testdata/etcd-grpc-alerts/unittest.yaml` has three cases with
seven checks. Watch streams that end only with `Canceled` must not fire
at 6, 12 and 30 minutes. `Range` calls failing with `Unavailable` at 25
percent must fire the critical rule at 7 minutes and both rules at 12,
with the labels and the summary pinned. Both together must fire only for
`Range`. Against the rules on main the suite fails 4 of the 7 checks,
all of them on Watch alerts with the value 100. Dropping `Unavailable`
from the list, or grouping by `job` and `instance` only, fails 3 checks
each.

```console
$ bats hack/etcd-grpc-alerts.bats
1..1
ok 1 tenant etcd failed gRPC request alerts pass their vmalert-tool cases
```

The same run on the rules from main prints `not ok 1` and the four
failing checks. With Bats 1.14.0 at the commit CI pins, the suite passes
together with `bats-strict-setup`, `bats-no-negated-assert`,
`bats-no-exit-trap`, `bats-runner-coverage`, `bats-runner-contract`,
`alert-severity-contract` and `image-pin-consistency`, 81 of 81. Like
the migration suites it needs docker, and only the image pull touches
the network. Helm 3.17.3 and 4.2.4 render the same rules. I have not run
the new rules in vmalert on a live cluster.

The rules file is the same on release-1.6 and release-1.7. The commit
cherry-picks onto release-1.6 without conflicts, and that backport is a
separate PR with one more commit that drops the `load test_helper` line,
because release-1.6 runs `hack/*.bats` through `hack/cozytest.sh`.

### Screenshots

Not a UI change.

### Downstream repositories

A rule template in `packages/extra/etcd`, a Bats suite under `hack/` and
its test data. No values, schema, README, image or
`ApplicationDefinition` change, and the website does not mention these
rules, so no trigger map entry applies.

- [x] No downstream repository is affected by this change
- [ ] [cozystack/website](https://github.com/cozystack/website) -
follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/terraform-provider-cozystack](https://github.com/cozystack/terraform-provider-cozystack)
- follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/ansible-cozystack](https://github.com/cozystack/ansible-cozystack)
- follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/ccp](https://github.com/cozystack/ccp) - follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/talm](https://github.com/cozystack/talm) - follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/cozyhr](https://github.com/cozystack/cozyhr) -
follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/cozy-proxy](https://github.com/cozystack/cozy-proxy) -
follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/cozystack-telemetry-server](https://github.com/cozystack/cozystack-telemetry-server)
- follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/external-apps-example](https://github.com/cozystack/external-apps-example)
- follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/examples](https://github.com/cozystack/examples) -
follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/community](https://github.com/cozystack/community) -
follow-up:

### Release note

```release-note
fix(etcd): the tenant etcd alert etcdHighNumberOfFailedGRPCRequests now counts only the gRPC codes that the etcd mixin and the platform copy of the alert count, so the Canceled watch streams of a Kubernetes API server that stops no longer fire it on every etcd member.
```


<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->

## Summary by CodeRabbit

- **Bug Fixes**
- Refined etcd gRPC failure alerts to target specific failure status
codes, reducing alerts for non-failure responses while preserving
existing thresholds and timing.
- Added coverage for canceled watch streams, unavailable range requests,
and combined failure scenarios, including warning and critical alert
evaluations.

- **Tests**
- Added integration validation for rendering etcd alert rules and
running them through the alert-testing tool, including failure handling
when prerequisites are unavailable.

<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
2026-10-23 22:40:33 +05:00
myasnikovdaniil 614847976f test(harbor): pin the resources of the nginx proxy and the portal (#5025)
## What this PR does

#4095 gave the Harbor nginx proxy the `t1.small` preset and moved the
portal from `t1.nano` to `t1.micro`, so neither falls back to the
LimitRange default of a tenant namespace, 250m CPU and 128Mi. It came
without a test. This adds a helm-unittest suite that pins both presets
in the nested HelmRelease and checks that they stay the same when the
other components are resized, so dropping them or tying them to another
component's values fails the suite.

Both containers run nginx with `worker_processes auto`, which starts one
worker per CPU of the node whatever the container's CPU limit is. With
the proxy config the chart renders and `goharbor/nginx-photon:v2.15.1`,
96 workers idle at about 205 MiB, so on a node with many CPUs the proxy
is OOMKilled at 128Mi before it serves a request. That is what happened
on a v1.6.5 cluster, where both nginx pods of a default Harbor restarted
5 and 6 times within minutes, because `release-1.6` never got #4095. The
backport, with this suite and the measurements, is a separate PR.

`helm unittest .` in `packages/apps/harbor` passes 47 of 47 with
helm-unittest 1.1.2. With the #4095 hunk reverted the three new cases
fail and the 44 existing ones pass. Each of seven template mutations
fails at least one new case. They drop the nginx block, give nginx
`t1.micro` or the portal `t1.nano`, tie nginx to the core values or the
portal to the jobservice values, misspell the `resources` key under
nginx, and make core ignore its preset, which the resize case checks so
that it cannot pass on overrides that never reach the release.

### Screenshots

Not a UI change.

### Downstream repositories

One new helm-unittest suite in `packages/apps/harbor/tests`. No
template, values key, schema, default, README or package change, so no
trigger map entry applies.

- [x] No downstream repository is affected by this change
- [ ] [cozystack/website](https://github.com/cozystack/website) -
follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/terraform-provider-cozystack](https://github.com/cozystack/terraform-provider-cozystack)
- follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/ansible-cozystack](https://github.com/cozystack/ansible-cozystack)
- follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/ccp](https://github.com/cozystack/ccp) - follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/talm](https://github.com/cozystack/talm) - follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/cozyhr](https://github.com/cozystack/cozyhr) -
follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/cozy-proxy](https://github.com/cozystack/cozy-proxy) -
follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/cozystack-telemetry-server](https://github.com/cozystack/cozystack-telemetry-server)
- follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/external-apps-example](https://github.com/cozystack/external-apps-example)
- follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/examples](https://github.com/cozystack/examples) -
follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/community](https://github.com/cozystack/community) -
follow-up:

### Release note

```release-note
NONE
```

<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
<!-- coderabbit-ai-generated:v1 -->

## Summary by CodeRabbit

* **Tests**
* Added Helm coverage verifying default resource settings for Harbor’s
nginx and portal components.
* Added coverage confirming nginx and portal memory allocations remain
consistent when related service resources are customized.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
2026-10-23 22:40:28 +05:00
Myasnikov Daniil e694b05b4e refactor(api): keep application image policy in charts
The charts enforce image selection without extending the API server's
write path. Keep the existing admission behavior while the application
schemas expose the supported fields.

Assisted-by: LLM
Signed-off-by: Myasnikov Daniil <myasnikovdaniil2001@gmail.com>
2026-10-23 19:25:04 +05:00
Myasnikov Daniil 59932e5098 fix(platform): report FoundationDB patch drift in migration dry runs
The carry path skipped diagnostics in dry-run mode, so its summary could
report no releases needing attention even when the upgrade would lower a
FoundationDB patch version. Skip only the write and share the warning and
summary bookkeeping with a real run.

Assisted-by: LLM
Signed-off-by: Myasnikov Daniil <myasnikovdaniil2001@gmail.com>
2026-10-23 19:14:17 +05:00
Myasnikov Daniil 639ede20be fix(api): leave FoundationDB version checks in the chart
The chart still reads cluster.version to guard release-line changes,
so calling it ignored in an admission warning contradicts the render
error. Keep that decision in the chart, which can explain the version
mismatch, and limit removed-field warnings to inert values.

Assisted-by: LLM
Signed-off-by: Myasnikov Daniil <myasnikovdaniil2001@gmail.com>
2026-10-23 19:14:17 +05:00
Andrei Kvapil 465158f4a0 test(platform): load the strict-mode helper in the migration 60 suite
Every unit bats file loads test_helper so its tests run with nounset,
and hack/bats-strict-setup.bats fails the unit job on a file that
does not. The migration 60 suite passes under it unchanged.

Assisted-by: LLM
Signed-off-by: Andrei Kvapil <kvapss@gmail.com>
2026-10-23 19:14:17 +05:00
Andrei Kvapil b43196e549 fix(kubernetes): pin the Proxmox cloud-config builders to the bundled image
The Proxmox substrate added two init containers that build the cloud
config from the hypervisor token Secret, and both still took their
image from images.waitForKubeconfig. With that key gone the render
failed on a nil map; with it set, a tenant chose the image that reads
the token. They now run the bundled busybox through cozy-lib.image, like
the wait-for-kubeconfig container next to them.

Assisted-by: LLM
Signed-off-by: Andrei Kvapil <kvapss@gmail.com>
2026-10-23 19:14:17 +05:00
Andrei Kvapil 4cb505a512 fix(platform): record 7.1 FoundationDB clusters instead of carrying them
The operator no longer carries the 7.1 client, and the chart no longer
offers v7.1, so a 7.1 cluster has no line to be carried to. Migration
59 now records it, together with any release whose version already
names a line that is no longer offered; both have to be upgraded or
repointed before the chart will render them.

Assisted-by: LLM
Signed-off-by: Andrei Kvapil <kvapss@gmail.com>
2026-10-23 19:14:16 +05:00
Andrei Kvapil 9775628cc8 fix(foundationdb): refuse a render that would move the release line
Migration 60 carries cluster.version over to version, but platform
migrations run only on the variants that enable them. On any other the
new chart ignored cluster.version and rendered the v7.3 default, so a
7.4 cluster was downgraded and a 7.1 one moved onto a line nothing had
upgraded it to.

The render now fails when a stored cluster.version names another
release line than version selects, and says how to proceed, so the
release stays on the revision it runs until someone picks the line.
Where the migration ran the two agree and nothing changes.

Assisted-by: LLM
Signed-off-by: Andrei Kvapil <kvapss@gmail.com>
2026-10-23 19:14:16 +05:00
Andrei Kvapil 448b12657b fix(foundationdb): stop offering the 7.1 line
The FoundationDB operator no longer carries the 7.1 client, so it can
neither manage nor upgrade a 7.1 cluster. The version map offered v7.1
all the same; it now lists the lines the operator carries, 7.3 and 7.4,
which is also what hack/update-versions.sh reads from the operator
chart.

Assisted-by: LLM
Signed-off-by: Andrei Kvapil <kvapss@gmail.com>
2026-10-23 19:14:16 +05:00
Andrei Kvapil d5ebb62632 fix(platform): keep migration 60's record whole across a retry
A failed patch stops the migration before the stamp, and the retry
finds version already written on the releases it carried, so it never
reached the step that records a patch-level move. The move is now
worked out from the values alone, so a retried run records it too.

An OpenSearch release storing version: null rendered the old chart's
v2 default and is refused by the new one; it now goes on the record
before it turns up as a stuck release.

Assisted-by: LLM
Signed-off-by: Andrei Kvapil <kvapss@gmail.com>
2026-10-23 19:14:16 +05:00
Andrei Kvapil 1636349a63 fix(api): point the removed image overrides at node registry mirrors
The warning for a removed image override told an air-gapped install to
use the platform-wide registry, but nothing in the platform writes
_cluster.images-registry, so there is nothing to set. What serves these
images offline is what serves every other platform image: the registry
mirrors configured on the nodes, as the air-gapped install guide sets
up. The tests that hold the cozy-lib.image routing now say what they
check rather than promising a platform knob.

Assisted-by: LLM
Signed-off-by: Andrei Kvapil <kvapss@gmail.com>
2026-10-23 19:14:16 +05:00
Andrei Kvapil dfff5c2dac test(kubernetes): hold the routing of the busybox and unpin images
The busybox helper shared by four workloads and the pool's pre-delete
Job had no test holding their route through cozy-lib.image, so
reverting either line left both suites green.

Assisted-by: LLM
Signed-off-by: Andrei Kvapil <kvapss@gmail.com>
2026-10-23 19:14:16 +05:00
Andrei Kvapil 8c2e20539d fix(platform): record every release migration 60 moves
A FoundationDB release carried to its line still moves to the one tag
the chart ships for it, which can be a step below what it runs, and
that showed up only in the Job log. Kubernetes and KubernetesNodes
releases pointing the removed image overrides at a mirror were not
listed at all. Both now go into the needs-attention record next to the
OpenSearch ones.

The migrations image carries no charts, so the tag map is repeated in
the migration, and the bats suite fails when it drifts from the
chart's versions.yaml.

Assisted-by: LLM
Signed-off-by: Andrei Kvapil <kvapss@gmail.com>
2026-10-23 19:14:16 +05:00
Andrei Kvapil 044162583b fix(api): skip the removed-field warning on an empty default
The image overrides and the FoundationDB cluster.version were defaulted
to empty strings, the read path fills those defaults in, and a client
that writes back what it read stores them. The warning then fired on
releases that never set an image. For those keys only a value counts;
the Phase 2 worker-pool keys still warn on presence.

Assisted-by: LLM
Signed-off-by: Andrei Kvapil <kvapss@gmail.com>
2026-10-23 19:14:16 +05:00
Andrei Kvapil a41015e309 fix(api): warn when a release still carries a field nothing reads
The apps API accepts and stores a values key the chart has stopped
reading, so a kubectl apply or a terraform apply carrying one succeeds
and changes nothing. The Phase 2 warning for the Kubernetes worker-pool
keys now covers the image overrides and the FoundationDB
cluster.version as well, one table per kind.

The version helpers name the value and the versions on offer when the
release values carry an explicit null, instead of failing on a template
type error that names neither.

Assisted-by: LLM
Signed-off-by: Andrei Kvapil <kvapss@gmail.com>
2026-10-23 19:14:15 +05:00
Andrei Kvapil 033bec74fb fix(platform): keep one bad release from stopping migration 60
spec.values on a HelmRelease takes any shape, so a release holding a
scalar there, or a cluster.version the apiserver stored as a number,
crashed jq and stopped the carry-over for the whole management cluster:
every healthy FoundationDB release then went into the upgrade without
its version. Those releases are now reported and recorded like any
other value that cannot be carried over.

The same record covers OpenSearch releases that still set
images.opensearch. Nothing can be carried over for them, so what the
operator needs is the list.

Assisted-by: LLM
Signed-off-by: Andrei Kvapil <kvapss@gmail.com>
2026-10-23 19:14:15 +05:00
Andrei Kvapil a887125ee5 build(apps): keep the version default out of the tag refresh
Both generators wrote the newest line as the default, so a run made to
pick up a patch tag also moved every release that never set a version
onto another major line. The default now stays where it is while it is
still supported, and a line that leaves the supported set is reported
instead of quietly leaving the enum.

FoundationDB takes the patch from the operator chart rather than from
the newest tag in the registry: the operator only carries the client
library of that build, and the generator now reproduces the committed
map exactly.

Assisted-by: LLM
Signed-off-by: Andrei Kvapil <kvapss@gmail.com>
2026-10-23 19:14:15 +05:00
Andrei Kvapil d99a1b9f2f fix(kubernetes): route the helper images through cozy-lib.image
These images now go through cozy-lib.image like the harbor, kafka and
mariadb hook images, so they follow _cluster.images-registry wherever
that is set rather than any per-application value. An air-gapped
install serves them the way it serves every other platform image,
through the registry mirrors configured on its nodes.

The talos-csr-signer sidecar and the OIDC Jobs had no test holding
their image, which is where an override could come back unnoticed.

Assisted-by: LLM
Signed-off-by: Andrei Kvapil <kvapss@gmail.com>
2026-10-23 19:14:15 +05:00
Andrei Kvapil f3058d2353 fix(platform): guard the FoundationDB version carry-over on all values
Migration 60 tested only cluster.version before adding version, so a
version set on the release between the scan and the patch would have
been overwritten. The patch now tests the whole values object it read.

resourceVersion is not used for this: helm-controller keeps writing the
release status, and a mismatch there would abort the platform upgrade
for no change to the values.

Assisted-by: LLM
Signed-off-by: Andrei Kvapil <kvapss@gmail.com>
2026-10-23 19:14:15 +05:00
Andrei Kvapil 930051280b fix(platform): carry FoundationDB cluster.version over to version
The foundationdb chart no longer reads cluster.version, so a cluster
that set it to 7.1 or 7.4 would move to the v7.3 default on the first
reconcile after the upgrade: a full-bounce upgrade from 7.1, or a
downgrade from 7.4.

Migration 60 sets version to the release line of each cluster.version
it finds. It keeps cluster.version, because the old chart still renders
the release between the migration and the chart upgrade and would fall
back to its own default without it. A value outside the supported lines
is recorded on the cozystack-version ConfigMap and does not block the
upgrade.

Assisted-by: LLM
Signed-off-by: Andrei Kvapil <kvapss@gmail.com>
2026-10-23 19:14:15 +05:00
Andrei Kvapil 46a9e12578 build(opensearch): generate the version map the way postgres does
hack/update-versions.sh listed the majors by hand and only rewrote
files/versions.yaml, so the Version enum and the default in values.yaml
drifted from the map on every refresh. It now takes the tested range
from the compatibility table of the pinned operator release, picks the
newest tag per major that has a matching Dashboards image, and rewrites
the enum and default along with the map, like postgres and mariadb.

The committed map keeps its current tags; the helper follows the
postgres idiom and no longer falls back to v2 on an empty version.

Assisted-by: LLM
Signed-off-by: Andrei Kvapil <kvapss@gmail.com>
2026-10-23 19:14:15 +05:00
Andrei Kvapil d62056ef03 fix(foundationdb)!: pick the version from a fixed list
cluster.version took any string and passed it to the operator as the
FoundationDB version, so a tenant chose the image tag rather than a
supported release line. The application now takes version (v7.4, v7.3,
v7.1) and maps it to a tag through files/versions.yaml, the same way
postgres and mariadb do.

The lines are the ones the pinned operator ships client libraries for,
which hack/update-versions.sh reads from the operator chart. The map
keeps v7.3 on 7.3.63, the previous default, so a cluster that never set
the version renders exactly as before.

Assisted-by: LLM
Signed-off-by: Andrei Kvapil <kvapss@gmail.com>
2026-10-23 19:14:15 +05:00
Andrei Kvapil 873bd6712d fix(platform): stop carrying images.kubectl into adopted node pools
Migration 56 copied the parent cluster's kubectl image override into
each kubernetes-nodes release it creates. Neither chart reads an images
map any more, so the copy only planted an inert key in the pool values.

Migration 56 has not shipped in a stable release, so no cluster has run
the old mapping outside a pre-release.

Assisted-by: LLM
Signed-off-by: Andrei Kvapil <kvapss@gmail.com>
2026-10-23 19:14:14 +05:00
Andrei Kvapil 941b50c675 fix(kubernetes-nodes)!: drop the kubectl image override
images.kubectl picked the image of the talos-reconcile and pre-delete
unpin Jobs. Both run in the management cluster under service accounts
that read the pool's Talos and cluster CA secrets and patch its CAPI
objects, so a tenant-chosen image ran with access the apps API never
grants. The image now always comes from images/kubectl.tag.

Assisted-by: LLM
Signed-off-by: Andrei Kvapil <kvapss@gmail.com>
2026-10-23 19:14:14 +05:00
Andrei Kvapil af20694359 fix(kubernetes)!: drop the helper image overrides
images.waitForKubeconfig, images.kubectl and images.talosCsrSigner
ran whatever image a tenant named inside the management cluster: the
csr signer as a sidecar of the tenant control plane with the Talos CA
key mounted, the other two in pods holding service account tokens for
CAPI, KubeVirt and Cilium objects in the tenant namespace. A tenant
never gets that access through the apps API, and the platform should
not hand it over through an image field.

The images now always come from the bundled tag files. A release that
still carries the keys renders exactly as one without them.

Assisted-by: LLM
Signed-off-by: Andrei Kvapil <kvapss@gmail.com>
2026-10-23 19:14:14 +05:00
Andrei Kvapil 6f8a04c11a fix(opensearch)!: drop the custom image override
images.opensearch put any image a tenant named into the
OpenSearchCluster, so the platform ran that binary in its own cluster
and the version map stood behind nothing. The application offers a
choice of version; the image now always comes from that version.

A release that still carries the key renders as if it were absent: the
operator rolls the nodes onto the image of the selected version.

Assisted-by: LLM
Signed-off-by: Andrei Kvapil <kvapss@gmail.com>
2026-10-23 19:14:14 +05:00
myasnikovdaniil a26c441d78 fix(vm-disk): let CDI adopt the PVC a Velero restore recreates (#4955)
## What this PR does

After a Velero restore of a VMDisk or of a VMInstance (`RestoreJob` with
the Velero strategy), the disk's HelmRelease fails on its next upgrade
and stays failed:

```
Helm upgrade failed for release <ns>/vm-disk-<name> with chart vm-disk@...: failed to create resource:
admission webhook "datavolume-validate.cdi.kubevirt.io" denied the request: Destination PVC <ns>/vm-disk-<name> already exists
```

The VMInstance release that references the disk then fails in turn
(`Specified disk not exists in cluster`). Seen on a v1.6.5 cluster with
CDI v1.66.1, where each failed upgrade is retried and the release
history of one such disk had grown past 46,000 revisions.

### Cause

The restore controller deletes the disk's DataVolume
(`prepareForRestore`) and Velero restores the PVC under the same name,
with no owner. The restored release matches its chart and values, so
Flux does not upgrade it and the DataVolume is not recreated right away;
the next Helm upgrade (a platform update, an edit of the VMDisk) does
recreate it, and CDI's webhook refuses it.

In CDI v1.66.1 the webhook admits a DataVolume over an existing claim
only when `ClaimMayExistBeforeDataVolume` is true
(`pkg/controller/common/util.go`): either the PVC carries
`cdi.kubevirt.io/storage.populatedFor: <dv name>`, or
`AllowClaimAdoption` returns true, which reads
`cdi.kubevirt.io/allowClaimAdoption` **from the DataVolume** and
otherwise falls back to the `DataVolumeClaimAdoption` feature gate. The
Velero strategy's resource modifiers
(`createResourceModifiersConfigMap`) put `allowClaimAdoption=true` on
the restored **PVC**, where CDI never reads it, and the `CDI` CR in
`packages/system/kubevirt-cdi` enables neither the gate nor anything
equivalent. Migration 29 creates its PVCs with the same PVC-side
annotation.

### Fix

The vm-disk chart sets `cdi.kubevirt.io/allowClaimAdoption: "true"` on
the DataVolume it renders, on the creation path and on the
existing-DataVolume path alike, so the annotation does not flap between
upgrades.

- A fresh disk is unaffected: no PVC exists when the DataVolume is
admitted, and the PVC CDI then creates carries
`cdi.kubevirt.io/createdForDataVolume: <dv uid>`, for which
`AllowClaimAdoption` returns false, so CDI imports, clones or uploads as
before.
- An existing DataVolume already controls its PVC, so the annotation
changes nothing there; a Helm upgrade only adds it to the DataVolume's
metadata, which CDI allows (only the spec is immutable).
- After a restore, the webhook admits the recreated DataVolume and the
DataVolume controller adopts the claim: `pvcRequiresWork` is false, it
takes controller ownership of the PVC and the DataVolume goes
`Succeeded` without populating it again, so the restored data is kept.

Checked against a v1.6.5 cluster carrying the broken state, by rendering
the chart for an affected disk and running `kubectl create
--dry-run=server`: the DataVolume without the annotation is refused with
the error above, the same one with the annotation is admitted. On that
cluster two affected disks were later recovered through the
claim-adoption path (the same `AllowClaimAdoption` check): the PVC kept
its uid, became controlled by the new DataVolume, and the DataVolume
reached `Succeeded` with no import.

### Alternatives considered

- **Enable the `DataVolumeClaimAdoption` feature gate in the `CDI` CR.**
It works too, but for every DataVolume in the cluster (tenant Kubernetes
worker disks, golden images, KubeVirt `dataVolumeTemplates`), each of
which would then silently take over any unowned PVC of its name. The
per-DataVolume annotation keeps the behaviour to the one chart whose
DataVolumes are expected to meet a restored claim, and CDI has said it
means to retire the gate (kubevirt/containerized-data-importer#3480)
while the annotation is checked first and independently of it.
- **Stamp `cdi.kubevirt.io/storage.populatedFor` on the restored PVC**
from the resource modifiers. That would also pass the webhook, but only
for disks restored by the Velero strategy, not for claims created by
migration 29 or by hand, and it would need a controller image change
where a chart change suffices.

The PVC-side `allowClaimAdoption` rule in
`createResourceModifiersConfigMap` (and the one in migration 29) is
inert under CDI v1.66.1. This PR leaves the rule and its unit-test
assertions in place, and corrects the comments that credited it with the
adoption (the collector and `createResourceModifiersConfigMap` in
`velerostrategy_controller.go`, and step 5 of
`examples/backups/vmi/scenario-user-restore.md`): they now say CDI
adopts the restored PVC through the annotation the vm-disk chart sets on
the DataVolume. The backports carry only the template and the unittest
suite, so these comment and doc edits do not reach them.

One behaviour change to be aware of: a PVC named `vm-disk-<name>` left
behind without an owner (a restored disk deleted before this fix, whose
PVC Velero restored without an owner) is now adopted by a new VMDisk of
the same name, with its old contents, instead of blocking that VMDisk
forever. That PVC lives in the same tenant namespace.

### Tests

- `packages/apps/vm-disk/tests/dv_claim_adoption_test.yaml`: the
post-restore state (a restored PVC, no DataVolume) renders the
DataVolume through the creation path with the annotation, and the
existing-DataVolume path keeps it. Both fail with the template change
reverted. `helm unittest packages/apps/vm-disk`: 116 passed.
- `examples/backups/vmdisk/05-restore-in-place.sh` (run by the
`vmdisk-2-backup-roundtrip` Chainsaw suite): after the restore, the
HelmRelease was already reported Ready because no upgrade ran, which is
why CI did not catch this. The script now forces a Helm upgrade
(`reconcile.fluxcd.io/forceAt` + `requestedAt`), then requires the
release Ready, the DataVolume `Succeeded`, and the PVC to keep its
restored uid and be controlled by the DataVolume.

### Backports

Opened by hand as #4956 (`release-1.6`) and #4957 (`release-1.7`) rather
than through the `kind/backport` labels: `examples/backups/vmdisk/` does
not exist on either branch, so the bot's cherry-pick would conflict.
They carry the template change and the helm unittest suite.

### Screenshots

Not a UI change.

### Downstream repositories

Walked the trigger map against the diff: a vm-disk template change (no
`values.yaml`, schema, `README.md` or `Chart.yaml` change), a new helm
unittest file, and a backup walkthrough script. No app, field, default,
CRD, platform value or tooling changes, and no documented workaround on
the website is made obsolete (the only mention of `allowClaimAdoption`
there is in the archived v0 docs, about a different manual procedure).

- [x] No downstream repository is affected by this change
- [ ] [cozystack/website](https://github.com/cozystack/website) -
follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/terraform-provider-cozystack](https://github.com/cozystack/terraform-provider-cozystack)
- follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/ansible-cozystack](https://github.com/cozystack/ansible-cozystack)
- follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/ccp](https://github.com/cozystack/ccp) - follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/talm](https://github.com/cozystack/talm) - follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/cozyhr](https://github.com/cozystack/cozyhr) -
follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/cozy-proxy](https://github.com/cozystack/cozy-proxy) -
follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/cozystack-telemetry-server](https://github.com/cozystack/cozystack-telemetry-server)
- follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/external-apps-example](https://github.com/cozystack/external-apps-example)
- follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/examples](https://github.com/cozystack/examples) -
follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/community](https://github.com/cozystack/community) -
follow-up:

### Release note

```release-note
fix(vm-disk): a VMDisk restored by Velero, alone or as part of a VMInstance, no longer fails its next upgrade with "Destination PVC ... already exists": the DataVolume now carries cdi.kubevirt.io/allowClaimAdoption, so CDI adopts the restored PVC and keeps its data.
```


<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
<!-- coderabbit-ai-generated:v1 -->

## Summary by CodeRabbit

* **Bug Fixes**
* Improved in-place VM disk restores so restored storage is correctly
adopted when the disk resource is recreated.
* The restore process now waits for the disk to become ready and reports
an error if it fails or the restored storage is not retained.
* Clarified the adoption behavior in restore documentation and ensured
recreated disks use the required adoption setting.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
2026-10-23 17:39:50 +05:00
Федор Батоногов d607b68a0f test(keycloak): pin truststore name and key constraints
Boundary cases must catch removal of the constraints and the error at
253 characters.

Assisted-by: LLM
Signed-off-by: Федор Батоногов <f.batonogov@yandex.ru>
2026-10-23 04:58:26 +03:00
IvanHunters 3fa534f3cf fix(marketplace): do not install a connected repository's components on connect
Connecting a marketplace repository materialized its PackageSources and then
auto-created a tap-managed Package per source. The Package reconciler installed
a HelmRelease for every install-marked component of the default variant, which
Flux runs under its cluster-admin service account with no impersonation. A
publisher's install chart therefore ran as cluster-admin on connect, with no
operator step, contradicting the documented behaviour that tapping installs
nothing.

Remove the on-connect auto-registration. Connecting now only materializes
PackageSources; installing an app is an explicit cozypkg add (or dashboard
action), which is the sole remaining creator of a Package. This also stops a
Package the admin removed with cozypkg del from being re-created on the next
source revision.

Catalog population from PackageSource metadata without an install is left to
the long-term design in #4359, and the privileged-confirmation gaps #4358 and
#4359 stay open.

Assisted-by: LLM
Signed-off-by: IvanHunters <xorokhotnikov@gmail.com>
2026-10-22 21:50:26 +03:00
Aleksei Sviridkin 215e582f03 fix(hack): keep the backup stack in the vminstance selective install (#5027)
## What this PR does

`vminstance` chainsaw suite has two velero round-trips
(`vmdisk-2-backup-roundtrip` and `vminstance-2-backup-roundtrip`), both
wait for `cozy-default` BSL that `backupstrategy-controller` package
renders together with platform Bucket. `hack/select-install.sh` keeps
this package only for database and broker suites
([#4022](https://github.com/cozystack/cozystack/pull/4022)), so PR with
selection of exactly `vminstance` gets platform without it: no Bucket,
no BucketClaim, no BSL, and both round-trips fail on BSL wait after
about 190 seconds, before any step of example scripts runs.

Seen on the [E2E run of
#4955](https://github.com/cozystack/cozystack/actions/runs/39225333408),
selected apps there are `vminstance` only and the backup packages are in
disabled list. Any edit of `examples/backups/vmi` or
`examples/backups/vmdisk` selects `vminstance` and nothing else, so PRs
that change those scripts can't run them.

Fix is one more entry in `suite_runtime_sources`, the table that already
keeps the stack for database suites. Install closure of `vminstance`
grows by `backup-controller`, `backupstrategy-controller`,
`bucket-application`, `velero`, `metrics-server` and
`monitoring-agents`. Bats test for backup suites now includes
`vminstance` and fails without the script change.

`hack/select-install_test.bats` and `hack/select-e2e_test.bats` pass
(110 tests), `hack/select-install.sh --validate` is clean. Own E2E run
of this PR doesn't cover the fix, because `hack/*.sh` escalates to full
suite and database suites install the backup stack anyway. Real check is
re-run of E2E for
[#4955](https://github.com/cozystack/cozystack/pull/4955) after merge,
it selects `vminstance` alone.

### Screenshots

Not a UI change.

### Downstream repositories

Walked the trigger map against the diff, it is one selector table entry
and its bats test, no file under `hack/` moved or renamed and no make
target changed.

- [x] No downstream repository is affected by this change
- [ ] [cozystack/website](https://github.com/cozystack/website) -
follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/terraform-provider-cozystack](https://github.com/cozystack/terraform-provider-cozystack)
- follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/ansible-cozystack](https://github.com/cozystack/ansible-cozystack)
- follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/ccp](https://github.com/cozystack/ccp) - follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/talm](https://github.com/cozystack/talm) - follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/cozyhr](https://github.com/cozystack/cozyhr) -
follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/cozy-proxy](https://github.com/cozystack/cozy-proxy) -
follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/cozystack-telemetry-server](https://github.com/cozystack/cozystack-telemetry-server)
- follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/external-apps-example](https://github.com/cozystack/external-apps-example)
- follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/examples](https://github.com/cozystack/examples) -
follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/community](https://github.com/cozystack/community) -
follow-up:

### Release note

```release-note
fix(hack): E2E install for `vminstance`-only selection keeps the backup stack, so VMInstance and VMDisk backup round-trips run instead of timing out on BSL wait.
```


<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->

<!-- coderabbit-ai-generated:v1 -->

## Summary by CodeRabbit

- **Bug Fixes**
- Virtual machine instances now correctly include the backup strategy
component required for backup-related functionality.
- Installation checks now consistently validate this requirement,
including when backup features are disabled. This improves setup
reliability and helps prevent incomplete or misconfigured virtual
machine deployments.

<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
2026-10-21 17:10:19 +03:00
Федор Батоногов 04a3f4be56 docs(keycloak): clarify incoming mTLS trust scope
The system truststore also verifies HTTPS client certificates unless a
separate HTTPS truststore is configured. Operators adding an LDAP CA
need to know that this can extend inbound TLS trust as well.

Assisted-by: LLM
Signed-off-by: Федор Батоногов <f.batonogov@yandex.ru>
2026-10-21 16:04:18 +03:00
Федор Батоногов 8bc8e429e6 feat(keycloak): trust additional CA files from existing objects
Private LDAPS, identity-provider and SMTP endpoints need their CA in the
Keycloak truststore. Environment variables alone cannot supply that file,
and manual StatefulSet patches are overwritten by Flux reconciliation.

Assisted-by: LLM
Signed-off-by: Федор Батоногов <f.batonogov@yandex.ru>
2026-10-21 15:50:35 +03:00
myasnikovdaniil d78897f842 fix(cluster-api): resync capi-operator every minute (#4939)
## What this PR does

After an upgrade restarts capi-operator, a Cluster API provider can keep
`Ready=False` for about 20 minutes while its controller is already
running, and `capi-providers-core` times out waiting for the
CoreProvider. The bundled operator v0.19.0 drops create events of
provider Deployments it finds running after a restart
(kubernetes-sigs/cluster-api-operator#1031), so it looks at them again
only when one changes or on informer resync, and the first resync after
a restart comes two sync periods later, about 20 minutes with the
default 10m.

This sets the operator `--sync-period` to 1m. On a test cluster a
provider left `Ready=False` across an operator restart recovered 2m02s
after the operator took its lease, the operator with the default period
had not recovered after more than 4 minutes. A resync is served from the
operator cache and writes nothing while providers are in sync: no
provider object was updated over five resyncs, about 15 log lines a
minute, 2m CPU and 26Mi memory.

The vendored chart has no value for this flag, so a small package patch
(reapplied by `make update`) adds one, and a test holds the rendered
argument. The upstream fix is in cluster-api-operator v0.27.0, bumping
to it is a bigger change and is left for a later release.

Mitigates #4926.

### Downstream repositories

- [x] No downstream repository is affected by this change

### Release note

```release-note
fix(cluster-api): resync capi-operator every minute so a provider left not ready across an operator restart recovers in about two minutes instead of about twenty
```


<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->

## Summary by CodeRabbit

* **New Features**
* The Cluster API operator now refreshes its cached state every minute.
After an operator restart, provider readiness status can recover sooner
instead of remaining stale for a longer period.
* Providers that are already in sync are not written back to the API
during these cache refreshes.

<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
2026-10-21 15:48:14 +05:00
Mattia Eleuteri b5d7e43c49 docs(backups): say CDI adopts a restored PVC through the DataVolume
The restore controller and the user-restore example described the
allowClaimAdoption annotation its resource modifiers put on restored
PVCs as what lets CDI adopt them. CDI v1.66 reads that annotation only
on the DataVolume; on a PVC it reads nothing but createdForDataVolume.
Adoption rests on the vm-disk chart annotating the DataVolume Flux
recreates, and a reader trusting the PVC rule could rely on it for a
restore without such a DataVolume, or drop the DataVolume annotation as
redundant.

Assisted-by: LLM
Signed-off-by: Mattia Eleuteri <mattia@hidora.io>
2026-10-21 12:36:22 +02:00
Aleksei Sviridkin d24b92fe1d docs(agents): define where a new document belongs (#3777)
## What this PR does

`docs/` had collected component guides that belong on the website,
standalone oidc, gpu and vm networking documents written inside the
feature PRs that added the code and never routed anywhere a user looks.
Nothing said where documentation should go, and in particular nothing
mentioned that the website appends a whole package README onto a
published page, so a contributor with package scoped prose had no reason
to use that route.

This replaces the four line "Documentation is organized as follows" list
in `docs/agents/overview.md` with a destination table and the test that
separates `docs/` from the website: whether a non-documentation file has
to link to the document by path. It also says that a merged document
records current behaviour and its limitations, not the development
process around it, which is the "What is NOT in Phase N" and "this PR"
residue that motivated the whole thing.

One such residue dropped while here, `docs/operations/backup-classes.md`
described a pin as one "this PR removes".

Moving the documents themselves is a separate PR.

### Downstream repositories

- [x] No downstream repository is affected by this change

Walked the trigger map against the diff: this touches
`docs/agents/overview.md` and `docs/operations/backup-classes.md` only.
No package added, renamed or removed, no `values.yaml` or
`values.schema.json` field, no `packages/core/platform/values.yaml` key,
no bundle or variant, no release asset name, no `ApplicationDefinition`
semantics, no Talos pin, and no change to `cozyvalues-gen`, `cozypkg` or
a package Makefile.

### Release note

```release-note
NONE
```


<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit

- **Documentation**
- Added guidance for choosing where new documentation belongs, including
package READMEs, the website, repository docs, API design documents, and
community resources.
- Clarified package README publishing and sync conditions, when
repository documentation is warranted, and where to document feature
limitations and development-process notes.
- Clarified that documents referencing unmerged pull requests or
unreleased dependencies need a tracking issue.
- Updated the CloudNativePG upgrade note to explain that the CRD version
skew came from an image tag pin outrunning the vendored chart CRDs; the
pin has since been removed.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
2026-10-21 13:23:45 +03:00
Yan Bondarenko 1d8bea039b test(harbor): check that the resized components reach the release
The case that resizes the other components looked only at nginx and
the portal, so it would keep passing if those overrides stopped
reaching the nested release, and then it could not catch nginx or the
portal following another component's values. It now checks the core,
registry and jobservice limits it sets and leaves trivy alone, as
nothing in the case reads it. The portal case also checks its memory
request, as the nginx case does.

Assisted-by: LLM
Signed-off-by: Yan Bondarenko <202671653+yankawai@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-10-21 13:13:56 +03:00
Myasnikov Daniil 9a782f697a fix(hack): keep the backup stack in the vminstance selective install
The vminstance Chainsaw suite carries the VMInstance and VMDisk Velero
round-trips. Both build the cozy-default BackupStorageLocation and the
platform bucket from the backupstrategy-controller package, but the
selective install retained that package only for the database and
broker suites. A selection of vminstance alone therefore installed a
platform with no Bucket, no BucketClaim and no BSL, and both
round-trips timed out on the BSL wait before running a step of the
example scripts.

Every pull request whose selection is exactly vminstance hits this,
and that includes each edit to examples/backups/vmi and
examples/backups/vmdisk, which select that suite on purpose.

Assisted-by: LLM
Signed-off-by: Myasnikov Daniil <myasnikovdaniil2001@gmail.com>
2026-10-21 15:04:39 +05:00
Yan Bondarenko 7c0634586b test(harbor): pin the resources of the nginx proxy and the portal
Both containers run nginx with worker_processes auto, so their idle
memory follows the CPU count of the node, whatever their own CPU limit
is. In a tenant namespace a container without resources gets the
LimitRange default of 128Mi, which the proxy outgrows on a node with
many CPUs before it serves a request. The presets that keep both out
of that default have no test, so dropping them or tying them to
another component's values would go unnoticed.

Assisted-by: LLM
Signed-off-by: Yan Bondarenko <202671653+yankawai@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-10-21 12:56:07 +03:00
myasnikovdaniil 3cd261277e fix(backups): keep the backupstrategy-controller Helm release under the Secret size limit (#4941)
## What this PR does

Fixes a size regression from #4929. Helm stores each release revision in
one Secret and the apiserver refuses a Secret over 1 MiB. With all
default Strategy CRs rendered the `backupstrategy-controller` release
crosses that limit, so the forced upgrade that creates them fails with
`Secret "sh.helm.release.v1.backupstrategy-controller.vN" is invalid:
data: Too long: may not be more than 1048576 bytes`, the CRDs stay and
the default strategies never appear. The release was already within
about 1 KB of the limit before #4929, which added tests to the chart.

The strategy CRDs are 2.2 MB of YAML and Helm stores them twice per
revision, as chart files and in the rendered manifest. Almost all of it
is the upstream `PodTemplateSpec` schema inlined by the Altinity, Job
and FoundationDB strategies. Kafka, RabbitMQ and Redis already mark
their `Template corev1.PodTemplateSpec` as `Schemaless` and
`PreserveUnknownFields`, this PR does the same for
`AltinitySpec.Template`, `JobSpec.Template` and
`FoundationDBTemplate.BackupDeploymentPodTemplateSpec`. Go types are
unchanged and every description is kept. The CRDs go from 2.2 MB to 317
KB and the largest release revision from over the limit to about 250 KB,
24% of it. The size rationale now lives once in the package doc, the
field docs of the six schemaless templates share one short line.

What changes for users: the apiserver no longer validates these three
fields and `kubectl explain` no longer lists children under them
(`kubectl explain pod.spec` still documents them), same as for Kafka,
RabbitMQ and Redis today. Unknown keys are stored instead of pruned, the
typed decode in the drivers drops them either way. Labels and
annotations under `template.metadata` were rejected by the strict v1.6
schema and are now accepted and kept. A Go template in a non-string slot
never worked, it was rejected on apply, now the apiserver accepts it and
the typed decode in the controller is what rejects it, as for the other
three kinds (I did not run that case live).

The drivers read these fields through the non-strict client and
`internal/template` rewrites only string leaves, nothing under
`internal/backupcontroller` relies on pruning. Go tests for
`internal/backupcontroller`, `internal/template` and `api` pass.

`hack/strategy-crd-schemaless.bats` fails on any strategy CRD that
inlines a pod schema and prints the property path and the two markers to
add. `hack/helm-release-size.bats` estimates the stored release of every
chart under `packages/` the way Helm encodes it (release JSON, gzip,
base64) and fails above 90% of the limit, plus the worst case of this
chart. The estimate runs 1 to 2 percent above real Secrets. A chart has
to render offline to be measured with its manifest: the 36 charts that
do not are listed in `NO_OFFLINE_RENDER` and measured on files and
templates only, any other render failure fails the test, and so does a
listed chart that starts rendering.

Checked on a throwaway kind cluster: v1.6.4 upgrades to this branch and
the forced follow-up creates all default strategies, a fresh install
works, strategy objects created under the old schema stay valid, a Job
strategy with templated args and pod template labels is accepted.

### Downstream repositories

- [x] No downstream repository is affected by this change

### Release note

```release-note
fix(backups): the backupstrategy-controller release no longer fails with "Secret ... Too long" on the upgrade that creates the default backup strategies, the Altinity, Job and FoundationDB strategies store their pod templates schemaless like Kafka, RabbitMQ and Redis
```


<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->

## Summary by CodeRabbit

* **New Features**
* Backup strategy templates for Altinity, FoundationDB, Jobs, Kafka,
RabbitMQ, and Redis now preserve fields not defined in the API schema.
The API server no longer validates these templates against the pod
schema; validation occurs when the driver creates the workload. This
lets strategies include pod-template fields without requiring those
fields to be listed in the strategy schema.

<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
2026-10-21 14:27:15 +05:00
myasnikovdaniil c6fcb4e7c6 fix(ci): dispatch frozen-line builds with GITHUB_TOKEN (#4888)
## What this PR does

The first RC freeze hit HTTP 403 when dispatching `build-release.yaml`
because the CI app has no Actions write permission
([run](https://github.com/cozystack/cozystack/actions/runs/38229949424)).
I switched this dispatch to `GITHUB_TOKEN` with job-scoped `actions:
write`. Tag and branch pushes still use the app token.

Verified with `make unit-tests`, zizmor 1.26.1 and the commit trailer
check. The regression test fails on the old workflow and passes with the
fix, including warning and manual recovery on dispatch failure. Live
dispatch with `GITHUB_TOKEN` has not been tested.

### Downstream repositories

- [x] No downstream repository is affected by this change
- [ ] [cozystack/website](https://github.com/cozystack/website) -
follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/terraform-provider-cozystack](https://github.com/cozystack/terraform-provider-cozystack)
- follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/ansible-cozystack](https://github.com/cozystack/ansible-cozystack)
- follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/ccp](https://github.com/cozystack/ccp) - follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/talm](https://github.com/cozystack/talm) - follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/cozyhr](https://github.com/cozystack/cozyhr) -
follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/cozy-proxy](https://github.com/cozystack/cozy-proxy) -
follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/cozystack-telemetry-server](https://github.com/cozystack/cozystack-telemetry-server)
- follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/external-apps-example](https://github.com/cozystack/external-apps-example)
- follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/examples](https://github.com/cozystack/examples) -
follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/community](https://github.com/cozystack/community) -
follow-up:

### Release note

```release-note
fix(ci): use GITHUB_TOKEN to start the initial packages build when freezing a release line
```


<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->

## Summary by CodeRabbit

* **Chores**
* Updated release automation to use appropriate permissions and
authentication for CI triggers.
* Improved warnings and recovery guidance when automated package builds
cannot be started.

* **Tests**
* Added automated checks covering release dispatch permissions, branch
targeting, successful execution, and non-blocking failure handling.

<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
2026-10-21 14:17:15 +05:00
myasnikovdaniil 2e4783600b docs(release): point changelog check B at the Talos installer profile (#4959)
## What this PR does

Check B loops over three values files and the first one,
`packages/core/talos/values.yaml`, is an empty file, so nothing is ever
printed for Talos. Talos version is `version` in
`packages/core/talos/images/talos/profiles/installer.yaml` (package
Makefile reads it as `TALOS_VERSION`), this PR points the loop there.

I ran old and new loop on real tags. On `v1.5.4..v1.6.0` the Talos bump
from `v1.13.0` to `v1.13.6` was not shown before and is shown now, on
`v1.6.1..v1.6.2` and `v1.6.4..v1.6.5` output is the same.

Found it while reviewing #4952, which fixes the Dockerfile pathspec
right below the loop. The two PRs merge cleanly in any order. I left
`head -40` alone, it also hides the new `talos.version` block of
`packages/apps/kubernetes/values.yaml` on `v1.5.4..v1.6.0`, but that is
a separate decision.

### Screenshots

N/A: documentation-only change, no UI impact.

### Downstream repositories

- [x] No downstream repository is affected by this change
- [ ] [cozystack/website](https://github.com/cozystack/website) -
follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/terraform-provider-cozystack](https://github.com/cozystack/terraform-provider-cozystack)
- follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/ansible-cozystack](https://github.com/cozystack/ansible-cozystack)
- follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/ccp](https://github.com/cozystack/ccp) - follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/talm](https://github.com/cozystack/talm) - follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/cozyhr](https://github.com/cozystack/cozyhr) -
follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/cozy-proxy](https://github.com/cozystack/cozy-proxy) -
follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/cozystack-telemetry-server](https://github.com/cozystack/cozystack-telemetry-server)
- follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/external-apps-example](https://github.com/cozystack/external-apps-example)
- follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/examples](https://github.com/cozystack/examples) -
follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/community](https://github.com/cozystack/community) -
follow-up:

### Release note

```release-note
docs(release): point changelog check B at the Talos installer profile, a Talos version bump was not shown by it before
```


<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->

## Summary by CodeRabbit

* **Chores**
* Updated changelog verification to check the installer configuration;
checks for installer and Kubernetes values remain unchanged.

<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
2026-10-21 13:56:47 +05:00
myasnikovdaniil a6cb84673e docs(release): check changelog claims against the code (#4936)
## What this PR does

Changelog generator sees only `docs/agents/changelog.md`, two inline
prompts and `AGENTS.md`. Failure modes and pre-publish checks live in
`docs/release.md`, which it never reads. The prompt has detailed rules
for authors and PR numbers and none for checking a claim against the
code. I reviewed the generated v1.7.0 draft against the code and found
22 statements wrong or missing, while all authors and PR references were
right. Several were in breaking changes: a talm fix credited to a talm
release that doesn't contain it, worker pools said to be adopted without
churn while Talos workers are rolled once because of the hash-named
TalosConfigTemplate (#3523), migrations said to run on a variant that
has them disabled.

Three changes:

- `docs/agents/changelog.md`: new section 8b about verifying claims
against the code. Identifiers, migration behaviour and variant scope
come from the tree at the upper-bound tag, required actions come from
release notes and newly added upgrade sections, not only from `!`
commits. Section 9 now asks to run the `docs/release.md` checks and
`hack/validate-changelog.sh` on the written file before exit.
- `.github/workflows/changelog-generate.yaml`: refresh `docs/release.md`
and `hack/validate-changelog.sh` from the dispatch ref, next to the
existing `changelog.md` refresh. Job checks out the rc tag detached, so
without this generator runs older copies from that tag. Permissions,
tokens and tool flags are unchanged.
- `hack/validate-changelog.sh`: reject an entry cut off with an ellipsis
right before its attribution, and any link to `cozystack.io/docs/next/`
(live site answers 404). Reason names the offending lines in one line,
because workflows quote it into a single annotation.

How I checked it:

- Old validator accepts the original v1.7.0 draft, new one rejects it on
three truncated entries (lines 335, 393, 518) and, after those are
repaired, on the `/docs/next/` link (line 25). All 29 shipped changelogs
from v1.3.0 to v1.6.4 still pass.
- New contract test plants each defect into a shipped changelog, checks
the reason names the line, and checks that near misses real changelogs
carry still pass (`content/en/docs/next/` in prose, ellipsis inside a
sentence, three dots of a compare link). It goes red on the old
validator and on widened patterns.
- Overlay test pins both new copies and the cone-mode sparse checkout
that brings `docs/release.md` in. It goes red if either copy is removed,
cone mode is turned off or `docs/agents` is dropped from sparse paths.
- I ran every command the new prompt rules prescribe on
v1.6.0..v1.7.0-rc.1, each one finds an error the draft shipped.
- `make bats-unit-tests bats-posix-compat-tests` pass (2424 and 1120),
zizmor and actionlint are clean on the workflow.

Not included: a script that gives the generator component versions and
migration headers, and a networked check for references, authors, link
liveness and companion-release containment. Both are separate changes.
Things I noticed and left alone:

- validator summary in the Phase 2 section of `docs/release.md` doesn't
list the two new rejections
- `docs/agents/changelog.md` runs
`docs/changelogs/hack/check-optional-repos.sh`, but the script lives at
`hack/check-optional-repos.sh` and still resolves repo root from the old
location
- a changelog the validator rejects is still not uploaded as an
artifact, so rejection costs a regeneration or a hand-commit, that is
why section 9 has the generator run the validator first
- current v1.7.0 draft still has the three truncated entries, a
promotion that picks it up will discard it and generate a new one unless
the entries are rewritten
- three unrelated bats tests (in `check-gpu-recording-rules.bats` and
`promote-rewrite-tags_test.bats`) fail under en_US.UTF-8 collation on
main too, they pass under C.UTF-8 that runners use, I ran the suite that
way

### Screenshots

Not applicable, there is no UI change.

### Downstream repositories

- [x] No downstream repository is affected by this change
- [ ] [cozystack/website](https://github.com/cozystack/website) -
follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/terraform-provider-cozystack](https://github.com/cozystack/terraform-provider-cozystack)
- follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/ansible-cozystack](https://github.com/cozystack/ansible-cozystack)
- follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/ccp](https://github.com/cozystack/ccp) - follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/talm](https://github.com/cozystack/talm) - follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/cozyhr](https://github.com/cozystack/cozyhr) -
follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/cozy-proxy](https://github.com/cozystack/cozy-proxy) -
follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/cozystack-telemetry-server](https://github.com/cozystack/cozystack-telemetry-server)
- follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/external-apps-example](https://github.com/cozystack/external-apps-example)
- follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/examples](https://github.com/cozystack/examples) -
follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/community](https://github.com/cozystack/community) -
follow-up:

I walked the trigger map in `docs/agents/contributing.md` against each
changed file:

- `docs/agents/changelog.md` is the changelog prompt, not the commit
convention or the PR template that ccp and community restate. Its list
of release-window repositories is unchanged.
- `.github/workflows/changelog-generate.yaml` is not `tags.yaml`, the
release-prep workflow ccp relies on.
- `hack/validate-changelog.sh` is changed in place, not moved or
renamed, and it is not `hack/package.mk` or `hack/update-crd.sh`.
- `hack/release-changelog-contract.bats` is a test.

No package, values key, CRD, release asset, make target or node
prerequisite changes. Code search across the organization finds no
reference to any of these files outside this repository.

### Release note

```release-note
docs(release): check changelog claims against the code. The changelog generator now verifies operator-facing statements against the code and runs the release checks on its own output, and the changelog validator rejects entries cut off with an ellipsis and links to cozystack.io/docs/next/.
```


<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->

## Summary by CodeRabbit

* **Documentation**
* Release guidance now emphasizes verifying operator-facing claims
against the release version and carrying required actions into upgrade
instructions.
* Documentation links in changelogs should point to versioned
documentation.

* **Chores**
* Changelog validation now flags truncated entries and links to
unversioned “next” documentation.
* Release guidance and validation checks are refreshed automatically
during changelog generation.

<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
2026-10-21 13:56:15 +05:00
myasnikovdaniil f69958b15d docs: move the operator guides out of docs/ to where readers find them (#3780)
## What this PR does

Five documents under `docs/` were operator facing guides written
alongside the feature PRs that added the code, and left in the source
tree where no user looks. They are on the website now, so this deletes
them here and repoints every reference.

```
docs/oidc-tenant.md          -> kubernetes/oidc-authentication
docs/oidc-grafana.md         -> operations/services/monitoring/oidc-authentication
docs/gpu-vgpu.md             -> virtualization/vgpu
                              + operations/troubleshooting/gpu-operator-host-driver
docs/vm-external-vlan.md     -> networking/vm-external-vlan
docs/hubble-observability.md -> networking/hubble
```

`docs/vm-external-vlan.md` needed splitting, not moving. Its "Staging
the reference CNI plugins" section is a contract,
`hack/cni-plugins-staging-contract.bats` greps six literal sentences out
of it and asserts them against the multus Dockerfile, the daemonset
manifest and the platform values. That half is package documentation so
it moves verbatim into a new `packages/system/multus/README.md` and the
suite reads it there, the operator guide goes to the website. The bats
messages name the README now, so a future failure points at the file
that has to change.

References repointed in the `@param` blocks, template comments and test
comments that named the guides. The generated files come from `make
generate` with cozyvalues-gen v1.7.0, the version pinned in
`.github/workflows/pre-commit.yml`. Where a reference points at text
that exists only on `next/` of the website (the aggregated API servers
section of the tenant OIDC guide), the comment names the page and the
section instead of a `v1.6` URL, which would not contain it.

Two changelog links in `docs/changelogs/v1.6.0.md` repointed as well.
The wording is untouched, only the location of the documents it names
has changed.

One bit of process framing dropped on the way past, per #3777:
`bundles/system.yaml` said GrafanaAdmin promotion was "out of scope for
Phase 1" when it is simply not implemented.

Tests: 10 cni-plugins contract, 47 install-wait, 346 kubernetes chart,
22 multus chart, 301 monitoring chart, rd-presets-check.

### Downstream repositories

- [x] [cozystack/website](https://github.com/cozystack/website) -
follow-up: cozystack/website#648 (the four guides),
cozystack/website#754 (edits made to the originals in `docs/` after the
import), cozystack/website#647 (grafana guide made reachable in v1.6),
cozystack/website#596 (tenant kubectl guide, rebased)

Walked the rest of the trigger map against the diff. No provider
follow-up: the kubernetes `values.schema.json` diff is two `description`
strings and the monitoring one is one, with no field added, removed or
renamed, no enum, no default, and no `kind`, `plural` or
`release.prefix` change. `packages/core/platform/values.yaml` changed in
a comment only and no key, so the hand written platform-package table on
the site is unaffected.

Please merge after cozystack/website#754 and cozystack/website#647. The
`@param` URLs only resolve once those pages deploy, and
cozystack/website#754 carries the edits made to the guides since the
import, which deleting them here would lose.

### Release note

```release-note
docs: operator guides for tenant Kubernetes OIDC, Grafana OIDC, NVIDIA vGPU, VM external VLAN and Hubble now live on cozystack.io instead of the docs/ directory of this repository, and in-repo references point there. The CNI plugin staging contract that shared the VLAN guide moved to packages/system/multus/README.md.
```


<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->

## Summary by CodeRabbit

* **Documentation**
* Updated configuration and test references to link to the published
Cozystack documentation.
* Added Multus guidance covering staged CNI plugins, configuration,
troubleshooting, and rollout behavior.
* Removed outdated local guides for GPU/vGPU, Hubble observability, OIDC
authentication, and external VM VLANs.
* Clarified that server-level Grafana administrator promotion is not
currently supported.

<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
2026-10-21 12:36:29 +05:00