Files
cozystack/hack
Aleksei Sviridkin 959e90c9ab test(e2e): time the guest console capture and baseline it on a green run
A tenant worker's guest console is stamped in seconds since that guest's
own kernel started, so a log ending mid-boot says how far the guest got
and nothing about when. Whether it ends there because the guest started
late or because the guest stopped printing decides which failure is being
looked at, and neither instant was recorded: the read's own instant was
nowhere in the file, surviving only as the artifact's mtime, which is
metadata rather than content and so says nothing to anyone reading the
log; and the guest's start only inside a describe dump that a capture
with no silent console never triggers. Across three collected runs every
capture exited zero and every log began at the first kernel line, so the
reads were complete at both ends and the logs end where the guests
stopped -- and which of the two happened could not be read off any of
them.

Each console log now carries the instant its own read started and
returned, and CAPTURE-TIMELINE.txt beside it carries each Pod's phase,
its start time and the start of its compute and console containers, from
one bounded read taken once for the whole selector. Those subtract to how
long a guest had been alive when it was read, which is what the log's
last kernel stamp is then compared against. The console container is
asked for in both status lists, since KubeVirt runs it as an init
container and reading only one of them would report a container that
started fine as one that never ran. A read that failed, a read cut off
part way and a read that answered with nothing are recorded as
themselves rather than left as a missing file, and the note names the
error log only when there is one.

The same capture also runs on the passing path, before the tenant is torn
down and the Pod holding the stream goes with it. Every console this tree
has collected came from a failure, so what a healthy boot looks like has
never been measured, while "slower than usual" is the claim the failure
keeps resting on. That caller asks for the pool's minimum rather than its
maximum, since two workers booting is the same measurement as ten, and it
warns in the job log rather than failing a suite that has already proved
everything it exists to prove. Both paths write the same directory, so
the capture also records which of them produced it.

That capture costs real wall clock at the tail of an operation with a
fixed ceiling, which is a way for a run that passed to be killed while
collecting a debugging aid. So it is declined out loud when the ceiling
no longer has room for it, against a reserve derived from its own cost
and held in step with the timeout both suites give the operation.

Assisted-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
Signed-off-by: Aleksei Sviridkin <3811295@gmail.com>
2026-08-15 23:33:33 +03:00
..
2026-02-17 22:54:12 +01:00