mirror of
https://github.com/cozystack/cozystack.git
synced 2026-10-30 16:47:20 +09:00
Timur Tukaev
ec2203a934
Four independent reviews of the first draft of this reporting found that it overstated remediation, understated how much of the backlog was never applicable, and contained a disclosure leak the stated rule had not anticipated. What lands here is the corrected version. The reconciliation is the substantive artifact. It audits every finding the CVE-scanning pipeline has tracked against what the project actually shipped, because the pipeline has no write-back from this repository and so has never marked anything fixed. Findings: remediation did happen and is invisible to the tracker, concentrated in one wave in June 2026 rather than the steady stream an earlier draft claimed; 57% of the backlog was never applicable or cannot be assessed, the largest block being packages that contain no executable vulnerable code, chiefly kernel headers, since a container never provides a running kernel; reachable exposure in a stock install is an estimated 2-5% of the tracker; four component bumps are available upstream and not yet taken; and the pipeline itself has seven defects, including deduplication by CVE identifier alone and a broken attribution step that left 16% of findings unattributable. The monthly reports are cut back to per-month facts. Remediation is no longer attributed to individual months: crossing a severity-banded count of still-open findings with one month's component bumps, which anyone can enumerate from the commit log, narrows the search for unpatched exposure more than a bare count does. An earlier draft did exactly that while refusing to publish bare counts on disclosure grounds. The triage-latency figure is also gone, because 494 of 495 decisions were recorded in a single bulk pass and a per-finding latency cannot be recovered from a closing timestamp. Two process-tracking issues that the pipeline's severity filter should have excluded are no longer counted as findings, so the total is 825 rather than 827. The disclosure rule is revised in two directions, both more open: findings with no upstream fix will be named with mitigation guidance, since there is nothing to wait for and a mitigation is then the only available control; and the generator's guard now covers every advisory namespace rather than CVE alone, refuses to emit any file if any file would leak, and takes released evidence rather than a stale tracker label as its source of truth. SECURITY.md, the self-assessment and the GTR are brought into line: all three previously described this reporting as unpublishable, and the GTR refused on principle the counts the reports print. Assisted-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com> Signed-off-by: Timur Tukaev <timur.tukaev@aenix.io>