## Description
At publish we would allow to check domains we want to publish. As of now
we publish all project domains.
But already pass them from UI, so future move would be just UI changes,
without touching API
- [x] - Fix "no access to project domains using service api call"
## Steps for reproduction
1. click button
2. expect xyz
## Code Review
- [ ] hi @kof, I need you to do
- conceptual review (architecture, feature-correctness)
- detailed review (read every line)
- test it on preview
## Before requesting a review
- [ ] made a self-review
- [ ] added inline comments where things may be not obvious (the "why",
not "what")
## Before merging
- [ ] tested locally and on preview environment (preview dev login:
5de6)
- [ ] updated [test
cases](https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio-builder/blob/main/apps/builder/docs/test-cases.md)
document
- [ ] added tests
- [ ] if any new env variables are added, added them to `.env.example`
and the `builder/env-check.js` if mandatory
## Description
Closes https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio-builder/issues/1377
## Steps for reproduction
1. add Text
2. change tag prop to figcaption
## Code Review
- [ ] hi @TrySound , I need you to do
- conceptual review (architecture, feature-correctness)
- detailed review (read every line)
- test it on preview
## Before requesting a review
- [ ] made a self-review
- [ ] added inline comments where things may be not obvious (the "why",
not "what")
## Before merging
- [ ] tested locally and on preview environment (preview dev login:
5de6)
- [ ] updated [test
cases](https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio-builder/blob/main/apps/builder/docs/test-cases.md)
document
- [ ] added tests
- [ ] if any new env variables are added, added them to `.env.example`
and the `builder/env-check.js` if mandatory
Ref https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio-builder/issues/1129
Here added sdk-components-react-remix with all remix components moved
away from react-sdk.
Exposed 3 entry points
- @webstudio-is/sdk-components-react-remix
- @webstudio-is/sdk-components-react-remix/metas
- @webstudio-is/sdk-components-react-remix/props
## Description
We want to be able to specify the order in which components are shown in
the panel.
Right now the order property is not set where needed, because I am
waiting for feedback from @taylornowotny
## Steps for reproduction
1. Open add components panel
2. See components are in the right order
## Code Review
- [ ] hi @TrySound , I need you to do
- conceptual review (architecture, feature-correctness)
- [ ] hi @taylornowotny , I need you to do
- give some thought to both components that need to be first which we
set specific order to (the rest will go as is)
- recheck the categories, I feel like our split into categories is not
intentional
## Before requesting a review
- [ ] made a self-review
- [ ] added inline comments where things may be not obvious (the "why",
not "what")
## Before merging
- [ ] tested locally and on preview environment (preview dev login:
5de6)
- [ ] updated [test
cases](https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio-builder/blob/main/apps/builder/docs/test-cases.md)
document
- [ ] added tests
- [ ] if any new env variables are added, added them to `.env.example`
and the `builder/env-check.js` if mandatory
## Description
The idea is to deploy by `buildId` instead of `projectId`.
Every build now can have `deployment` metadata params (currently
`domains` only, but in the future can be any additional metadata, like
vars etc)
Publish is simplified (-2 workers), the same trpc as for other saas api
is used to publish, see `cms.publish`
(also local development is simplified as edge-api at saas works on local
dev perfectly)
isDev and isProd are not needed anymore. Any published build has
`deployment` metadata, and various builds can be active now on different
domains.
Build clone now seriously faster as no parse/serialize steps involved at
all.
Partial index `CREATE UNIQUE INDEX "Build_dev_index" ON "Build"
("projectId") WHERE "deployment" IS NULL;` created so we could be sure
that no more than 1 dev build exists.
createBuild and cloneBuild are now splitted, and seriously simplified
## Steps for reproduction
1. click button
2. expect xyz
## Code Review
- [ ] hi @kof, I need you to do
- conceptual review (architecture, feature-correctness)
- detailed review (read every line)
- test it on preview
## Before requesting a review
- [ ] made a self-review
- [ ] added inline comments where things may be not obvious (the "why",
not "what")
## Before merging
- [ ] tested locally and on preview environment (preview dev login:
5de6)
- [ ] updated [test
cases](https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio-builder/blob/main/apps/builder/docs/test-cases.md)
document
- [ ] added tests
- [ ] if any new env variables are added, added them to `.env.example`
and the `builder/env-check.js` if mandatory
Ref https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio-builder/issues/1545
All complex use cases already switched to get meta from arguments and
from atom.
Here migrated the last cases and dropped legacy meta register in
react-sdk package. Now we ready to split components into separate
packages.
Cleanup after refactoring. Now we can get rid of Asset.location because
asset location is defined by environment. And remove fields moved to
File table.
Enable unicorn eslint rule to enforce `node:fs` like specifiers for node
modules.
Previously `node:` prefix helped to find server code bundled in browser.
Here added two component restrictions to meta.
requiredAncestors prevent inserting components outside of required ones
here restricted ListItem to always be inside of List.
invalidAncestors prevent inserting components inside of invalid ones
here prevented nested buttons
Ref https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio-builder/issues/1664
Here added Build.version which is updated on every patch. The client
should provide latest received version to compare with stored in db.
When version mismatched user is suggested to reload.
Ref https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio-builder/issues/1129
Here refactored registered components away from global state in
react-sdk package in favour of components map.
The map can be easily computed in runtime or generated for worker.
Default and custom (remix) components registering is unified now and
both libraries can be split into separate packages.
Temporary added "@webstudio/react-sdk/components" entry point to get a
record of components.
Here refactored horizontal shift in tree to search available placement
by selector. This enables us to add restricting ancestors with
requiredAncestorss and invalidAncestors options in meta (in the next
PR).
The idea of this refactoring to do similar search for both left and
right directions based on item selectors which means from deepest to
root. So before searching I compute deepest expanded selector when all
items at the bottom.
## Description
Services we need like `image-transform.wstd.io`, `local.wstd.io`
can intersect with user-created domains. _in some cases that will cause
disastrous results_
Do not allow to create domains we already use, and reserve `wstd-sys-`
and `wstd_sys_` for future services we can create
## Steps for reproduction
1. click button
2. expect xyz
## Code Review
- [ ] hi @kof, I need you to do
- conceptual review (architecture, feature-correctness)
- detailed review (read every line)
- test it on preview
## Before requesting a review
- [ ] made a self-review
- [ ] added inline comments where things may be not obvious (the "why",
not "what")
## Before merging
- [ ] tested locally and on preview environment (preview dev login:
5de6)
- [ ] updated [test
cases](https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio-builder/blob/main/apps/builder/docs/test-cases.md)
document
- [ ] added tests
- [ ] if any new env variables are added, added them to `.env.example`
and the `builder/env-check.js` if mandatory
Ref https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio-builder/issues/1569
Here we change template in meta to include current component instead of
implicitly creating it.
This way we can provide insert composition of components instead of
single one for example input+label. Or even wrap current component like
label>input.
Another usecase is ability to set local styles and props for current
component.
Note: review with hidden whitespaces
## Description
How it looks. (Not everything aligned or have features like in design)
https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio-builder/assets/5077042/349c7fae-afd8-478d-9eba-701b002f0fd4
Most API methods return `{ success: true } | {success: false, error:
string}` because in the future they need to be moved into server
workflows, and do not exist or return anything.
## Steps for reproduction
Run locally, at localhost I've created a fake domain creation API, to be
able to test UI.
## Code Review
- [ ] hi @kof, I need you to do
- conceptual review (architecture, feature-correctness)
- detailed review (read every line)
- test it on preview
## Before requesting a review
- [ ] made a self-review
- [ ] added inline comments where things may be not obvious (the "why",
not "what")
## Before merging
- [ ] tested locally and on preview environment (preview dev login:
5de6)
- [ ] updated [test
cases](https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio-builder/blob/main/apps/builder/docs/test-cases.md)
document
- [ ] added tests
- [ ] if any new env variables are added, added them to `.env.example`
and the `builder/env-check.js` if mandatory
## Description
npm update
## Steps for reproduction
1. click button
2. expect xyz
## Code Review
- [ ] hi @kof, I need you to do
- conceptual review (architecture, feature-correctness)
- detailed review (read every line)
- test it on preview
## Before requesting a review
- [ ] made a self-review
- [ ] added inline comments where things may be not obvious (the "why",
not "what")
## Before merging
- [ ] tested locally and on preview environment (preview dev login:
5de6)
- [ ] updated [test
cases](https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio-builder/blob/main/apps/builder/docs/test-cases.md)
document
- [ ] added tests
- [ ] if any new env variables are added, added them to `.env.example`
and the `builder/env-check.js` if mandatory
## Description
Forwarding all headers caused errors in some cases.
## Steps for reproduction
1. click button
2. expect xyz
## Code Review
- [ ] hi @kof, I need you to do
- conceptual review (architecture, feature-correctness)
- detailed review (read every line)
- test it on preview
## Before requesting a review
- [ ] made a self-review
- [ ] added inline comments where things may be not obvious (the "why",
not "what")
## Before merging
- [ ] tested locally and on preview environment (preview dev login:
5de6)
- [ ] updated [test
cases](https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio-builder/blob/main/apps/builder/docs/test-cases.md)
document
- [ ] added tests
- [ ] if any new env variables are added, added them to `.env.example`
and the `builder/env-check.js` if mandatory
## Description
Aligning with the design
## Code Review
- [ ] hi @kof, I need you to do
- conceptual review (architecture, feature-correctness)
- detailed review (read every line)
- test it on preview
## Before requesting a review
- [ ] made a self-review
- [ ] added inline comments where things may be not obvious (the "why",
not "what")
## Before merging
- [ ] tested locally and on preview environment (preview dev login:
5de6)
- [ ] updated [test
cases](https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio-builder/blob/main/apps/builder/docs/test-cases.md)
document
- [ ] added tests
- [ ] if any new env variables are added, added them to `.env.example`
and the `builder/env-check.js` if mandatory
Ref https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio-builder/issues/1667
- renamed code to code text
- renamed html to html embed
- added new icon for code text
## Code Review
- [ ] hi @kof, I need you to do
- conceptual review (architecture, feature-correctness)
- detailed review (read every line)
- test it on preview
## Before requesting a review
- [ ] made a self-review
- [ ] added inline comments where things may be not obvious (the "why",
not "what")
## Before merging
- [ ] tested locally and on preview environment (preview dev login:
5de6)
- [ ] updated [test
cases](https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio-builder/blob/main/apps/builder/docs/test-cases.md)
document
- [ ] added tests
- [ ] if any new env variables are added, added them to `.env.example`
and the `builder/env-check.js` if mandatory
---------
Co-authored-by: Oleg Isonen <oleg008@gmail.com>
Ref https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio-builder/issues/1667
- renamed code to code text
- renamed html to html embed
- added new icon for code text
## Code Review
- [ ] hi @kof, I need you to do
- conceptual review (architecture, feature-correctness)
- detailed review (read every line)
- test it on preview
## Before requesting a review
- [ ] made a self-review
- [ ] added inline comments where things may be not obvious (the "why",
not "what")
## Before merging
- [ ] tested locally and on preview environment (preview dev login:
5de6)
- [ ] updated [test
cases](https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio-builder/blob/main/apps/builder/docs/test-cases.md)
document
- [ ] added tests
- [ ] if any new env variables are added, added them to `.env.example`
and the `builder/env-check.js` if mandatory
---------
Co-authored-by: Oleg Isonen <oleg008@gmail.com>
We need to forward existing request with headers.
Secure by restricting origin.
## Code Review
- [ ] hi @istarkov, I need you to do
- conceptual review (architecture, feature-correctness)
- detailed review (read every line)
- test it on preview
## Before requesting a review
- [ ] made a self-review
- [ ] added inline comments where things may be not obvious (the "why",
not "what")
## Before merging
- [ ] tested locally and on preview environment (preview dev login:
5de6)
- [ ] updated [test
cases](https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio-builder/blob/main/apps/builder/docs/test-cases.md)
document
- [ ] added tests
- [ ] if any new env variables are added, added them to `.env.example`
and the `builder/env-check.js` if mandatory
---------
Co-authored-by: istarkov <istarkov@gmail.com>
## Description
This PR moves the parse-css-value utility that was before part of the
builder app to the css-data package.
In this package we are adding an initial `parse-css` utility that will take
CSS and convert to a format that we can work on within Webstudio. For
now it is relatively simple and it supports only CSS classes parsing.
## Description
1. What is this PR about (link the issue and add a short description)
## Steps for reproduction
1. click button
2. expect xyz
## Code Review
- [ ] hi @kof, I need you to do
- conceptual review (architecture, feature-correctness)
- detailed review (read every line)
- test it on preview
## Before requesting a review
- [ ] made a self-review
- [ ] added inline comments where things may be not obvious (the "why",
not "what")
## Before merging
- [ ] tested locally and on preview environment (preview dev login:
5de6)
- [ ] updated [test
cases](https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio-builder/blob/main/apps/builder/docs/test-cases.md)
document
- [ ] added tests
- [ ] if any new env variables are added, added them to `.env.example`
and the `builder/env-check.js` if mandatory
Ref https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio-builder/issues/1658
Updated following components in design system
- css value list item
- icon button
- label
- nested icon label
- section title
- toggle button
Updated following UI in builder
- toggle control
- flex grid
- space UI
- collapsible section
- property name
## Description
Fixes a bug:
1. Enter a `px` value into any CSS value input
2. Reload page to make sure everything re-mounts
3. Go to the same input and change unit to `rem`
4. Scrub
5. Unit flips back to `px`
Closes https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio/discussions/31
Closes https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio-builder/issues/1639
And https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio/discussions/29
## Description
We are changing default behavior to not user selectable and allowing it
where it's practical, like copying project name as a deletion
confirmation
## Code Review
- [ ] hi @rpominov , I need you to do
- conceptual review (architecture, feature-correctness)
- detailed review (read every line)
- test it on preview
## Before requesting a review
- [ ] made a self-review
- [ ] added inline comments where things may be not obvious (the "why",
not "what")
## Before merging
- [ ] tested locally and on preview environment (preview dev login:
5de6)
- [ ] updated [test
cases](https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio-builder/blob/main/apps/builder/docs/test-cases.md)
document
- [ ] added tests
- [ ] if any new env variables are added, added them to `.env.example`
and the `builder/env-check.js` if mandatory
## Description
Closes#1646
## Steps for reproduction
1. click button
2. expect xyz
## Code Review
- [ ] hi @kof, I need you to do
- conceptual review (architecture, feature-correctness)
- detailed review (read every line)
- test it on preview
## Before requesting a review
- [ ] made a self-review
- [ ] added inline comments where things may be not obvious (the "why",
not "what")
## Before merging
- [ ] tested locally and on preview environment (preview dev login:
5de6)
- [ ] updated [test
cases](https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio-builder/blob/main/apps/builder/docs/test-cases.md)
document
- [ ] added tests
- [ ] if any new env variables are added, added them to `.env.example`
and the `builder/env-check.js` if mandatory
## Description
closes#1645
## Steps for reproduction
1. click button
2. expect xyz
## Code Review
- [ ] hi @kof, I need you to do
- conceptual review (architecture, feature-correctness)
- detailed review (read every line)
- test it on preview
## Before requesting a review
- [ ] made a self-review
- [ ] added inline comments where things may be not obvious (the "why",
not "what")
## Before merging
- [ ] tested locally and on preview environment (preview dev login:
5de6)
- [ ] updated [test
cases](https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio-builder/blob/main/apps/builder/docs/test-cases.md)
document
- [ ] added tests
- [ ] if any new env variables are added, added them to `.env.example`
and the `builder/env-check.js` if mandatory
Ref https://github.com/webstudio-is/webstudio-builder/issues/193
To make undo of assets deletion work we need to stop deleting files from
storage to restore assets without loosing actual file.
Here added File.isDeleted and file.updatedAt fields to mark as deleted.
This way we can run scheduler to actually delete files which are marked
for some time already. And undo of asset deletion now works.
Ivan Starkov