Commit Graph
7437 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
Aleksei Sviridkin bdca165f4c feat(gateway): report a GatewayClass that does not serve TLSRoute
A GatewayClass lists the features it serves in status.supportedFeatures,
and TLS passthrough is TLSRoute. On a class that leaves it out the
passthrough listeners are accepted and serve nothing, so the
TenantGateway now reads Ready=False/GatewayClassUnsupported naming the
class instead of Ready. A class that lists no features at all is not
judged: implementations predating the field leave it empty.

The class writes that list after it is accepted and may change it when
its controller is upgraded, so a GatewayClass event requeues the
TenantGateways on it.

Assisted-by: LLM
Signed-off-by: Aleksei Sviridkin <f@lex.la>
2026-10-09 17:53:25 +03:00
Aleksei Sviridkin d624049a3a feat(gateway): allow tlsPassthroughListeners under dns01 and existingSecret
The refusal existed because Cilium 1.19.5 served every Gateway port
from one Envoy listener matched by SNI alone, so the "*.<apex>"
terminate listener of the wildcard modes and a passthrough listener
under the apex could reach each other's backend. The shipped Cilium
1.20.2 gives each port its own Envoy listener when SNI overlaps across
ports, and Gateway API treats listeners on different ports as
compatible, so the pair is served as declared. edge still refuses the
field: it renders no TLS listener for an entry to bind to.

Assisted-by: LLM
Signed-off-by: Aleksei Sviridkin <f@lex.la>
2026-10-09 17:53:25 +03:00
Aleksei Sviridkin e1319b5a6c docs(cilium): say the SNAT backport is dropped by hand
The patch header cited a commit of cilium/cilium#49232, an open PR
whose branch is force-pushed, so the commit is reachable from no ref.
Cite the PR alone.

It also read as if the build would flag the patch once upstream
carries the fix. It does not: a fix that lands in another place leaves
this patch applying cleanly as a second early return, so the drop is a
manual step.

Assisted-by: LLM
Signed-off-by: Aleksei Sviridkin <f@lex.la>
2026-10-09 17:53:16 +03:00
Aleksei Sviridkin e816522366 chore(renovate): leave the cilium-operator image pins to make update
The operator rebuild compiles one Cilium release with the Go toolchain
upstream's builder image pins at that tag, and make update re-pins the
builder line from there, along with the operator-generic base, its
digest and the source archive checksum. A Renovate bump of that line, by
tag or by digest, would build the release with a toolchain upstream
never shipped it with, and the next make update would revert it without
notice.

Assisted-by: LLM
Signed-off-by: Aleksei Sviridkin <f@lex.la>
2026-10-09 17:53:15 +03:00
Aleksei Sviridkin 1bfa64f83a fix(cilium): keep per-type xDS while the 1.20 upgrade rolls
The 1.20 chart renders envoy-xds-mode "ads" and an adsConfig bootstrap
for cilium-envoy unless xdsMode or upgradeCompatibility says otherwise.
A 1.19 agent never registers the aggregated discovery service, and a
1.20 agent in ADS mode registers nothing else. The agent and envoy
DaemonSets roll independently, so on every node where their versions
differ envoy gets no configuration until both pods are replaced, and
Gateway traffic stops on all nodes at once during the upgrade.

Pin xdsMode to split, the per-type xDS both versions serve and the
agent's own default when the key is absent. Moving to ADS is a separate
step once every node runs 1.20.

Assisted-by: LLM
Signed-off-by: Aleksei Sviridkin <f@lex.la>
2026-10-09 17:53:14 +03:00
Aleksei Sviridkin 5b92ca3fc8 fix(cilium): serve HTTPS and passthrough on one port from one listener
When a Gateway needs per-port Envoy listeners, the operator emits one
listener per HTTPS port and, with two or more passthrough ports, one per
passthrough port, all named listener-<port>. A port carrying both gets
two listeners with one name, and the agent skips the whole
CiliumEnvoyConfig, so every listener of the Gateway stops serving while
its status stays green. With one passthrough port the port is instead
mapped to two listeners in the CEC services. A tenant Gateway with
HTTPS and passthrough on 443 plus a passthrough listener on a native
port reaches the first case.

The patch puts the passthrough filter chains of such a port on its
HTTPS listener and leaves the port out of the passthrough listeners and
service mappings.

Assisted-by: LLM
Signed-off-by: Aleksei Sviridkin <f@lex.la>
2026-10-09 17:53:14 +03:00
Aleksei Sviridkin cebf9f1e1e feat(cilium): accept wildcard HTTPS beside specific TLS passthrough
Cilium 1.19.6 and later mark an HTTPS-terminate listener and a TLS
passthrough listener on the same port Conflicted whenever their
hostnames intersect, and 1.20 drops both from Envoy. That rejects
*.<apex> HTTPS next to api.<apex> passthrough on 443, which a tenant
Gateway with one address needs. Envoy selects the most specific
server_names match before the transport protocol, so the pair maps every
SNI to exactly one filter chain.

The operator is rebuilt from the upstream tag with a patch that accepts
the pair when the passthrough hostname is strictly narrower than the
HTTPS one, and keeps every other overlap conflicted. The asymmetry is
needed because passthrough chains take their server_names from the
attached TLSRoutes: under a passthrough wildcard a route may claim the
HTTPS listener's exact name, and two chains with one match make Envoy
refuse the whole listener.

The binary replaces the one in the upstream operator-generic image, and
the builder runs the patched packages' tests, so a tag bump that breaks
the patch fails the build. make update re-pins both upstream images by
the digests the vendored chart carries, the builder by upstream's own Go
toolchain, and the source archive by its checksum. The image ref sits
under operator.image.override: committed as the upstream operator the
rebuild starts from, so a tree rendered without a build still pulls an
image that exists, and stamped by make image.

Assisted-by: LLM
Signed-off-by: Aleksei Sviridkin <f@lex.la>
2026-10-09 17:53:14 +03:00
Aleksei Sviridkin 8c8f2522ee fix(cilium): keep the host mark on host traffic to a local pod
Since v1.20.0 the bpf_host SNAT conflict check fires for any packet
carrying the host mark on every device bpf_host runs on, and the SNAT
path replaces that mark with SNAT_DONE. With kube-ovn chaining a host
connection to a pod on the same node leaves through ovn0, so the pod's
to-container program sees SNAT_DONE and classifies the source as world
instead of host. The implicit localhost allow then stops matching:
kubelet probes fail under any default-deny ingress policy that does not
admit world, and a world deny drops the API server calling a webhook on
its own node.

Carry a verbatim backport of cilium/cilium#49232, which skips the
conflict check when the destination is a local endpoint: such traffic
never leaves the node and cannot collide with pod egress SNAT. Keeping
the hunks identical to upstream lets the patch be dropped as soon as a
shipped cilium release contains the fix. Without chaining, host traffic
to a local pod does not pass to-netdev and nothing changes.

Assisted-by: LLM
Signed-off-by: Aleksei Sviridkin <f@lex.la>
2026-10-09 02:04:40 +03:00
Aleksei Sviridkin b64e12b0cf docs(cilium): re-anchor comments the v1.20.2 bump made stale
The admission-webhook deny policies in ingress-nginx and kubeovn-webhook
cite Cilium source and the vendored values by line number. The bump
moved endpointLockdownOnMapOverflow and the policy-map ordering block in
pkg/endpoint/bpf.go, so the cited lines pointed elsewhere. Name the key
and the function instead, which survive the next bump, and move the
getEndpointSelector citation to v1.20.2, where the cited lines are
unchanged.

The kubeProxyReplacement pin explained the service translation in terms
of v1.19.5. With Gateway API on, v1.20.2 keeps socket LB in the host
namespace, so pod-namespace connections are translated per packet in
bpf_lxc before egress policy runs, which is what the pin relies on. The
same holds for the e2e image mirror, whose egress-policy comment in
hack/e2e-talos-image-cache.yaml described socket LB.

Assisted-by: LLM
Signed-off-by: Aleksei Sviridkin <f@lex.la>
2026-10-09 02:04:40 +03:00
Aleksei Sviridkin e60461dc56 docs(cilium): stop tying the endpoint-leak race note to one release
The note said the restore-window race had no released fix as of
v1.19.5, which reads as current on every later pin whether or not
anything changed upstream.

Assisted-by: LLM
Signed-off-by: Aleksei Sviridkin <f@lex.la>
2026-10-09 02:04:39 +03:00
Aleksei Sviridkin 0f31e7a148 fix(cilium): bump vendored chart to v1.20.2
v1.19.5 rejects platform HTTPRoutes on a shared tenant Gateway with
NotAllowedByListeners (cilium#42159). The 1.19 line that fixes it also
marks a same-port HTTPS-terminate and TLS-passthrough pair
ProtocolConflict while still programming both, which leaves the
TenantGateway Ready=False on a layout that serves. 1.20 drops such a
pair from Envoy outright, so the listener layout is fixed against 1.20
rather than against a 1.19 status quirk, and the bump goes straight
there.

The update target now follows the 1.20 line. v1.20 moved the ARP case of
do_netdev under ENABLE_IPV4, which broke the anchor of the IPv6
passthrough patch; the patch's ETH_P_IPV6 case now sits right before
`default:`, outside the ENABLE_IPV4 block. The other two cases apply
unchanged.

Assisted-by: LLM
Signed-off-by: Aleksei Sviridkin <f@lex.la>
2026-10-09 02:04:39 +03:00
Aleksei Sviridkin 3dc0d046b3 fix(postgres): cap the default shared_buffers at a quarter of the memory limit (#4724)
## What this PR does

The chart renders no `shared_buffers`, and CloudNativePG does not set
one either (its default parameters in `pkg/postgres/configuration.go` at
v1.30.0, the operator version this repo ships, have no such key).
PostgreSQL therefore starts with its built-in 128MB whatever the
container gets. A full buffer pool is the whole memory limit on
`t1.nano` and half of it on `t1.micro`, which is the chart's default
preset. The pool is shared memory that the kernel cannot reclaim without
swap. A small or idle database never fills it, but a dump, index scans
over a large table or a replica catching up after a failover can, and
then the instance is OOMKilled.

Observed on a cluster running Cozystack 1.4.3, whose chart renders the
same parameters, with a three-instance `t1.nano` database. A
`pg_dumpall` run through `kubectl exec` inside the primary's container
got that container OOMKilled. The dump client ran in the same container
and shared its limit, so that first kill is weak evidence on its own.
After the failover the old primaries could not rejoin. Their `pg_rewind`
against the new 128Mi primary kept failing with `could not fetch file
list: SSL SYSCALL error: EOF detected` until that primary's memory limit
was raised to 512Mi, and then both rewinds completed.

Below a 512Mi memory limit the chart defaults `shared_buffers` to a
quarter of the limit with a 16MB floor, capped at the rendered memory
request rounded down to whole MiB. CloudNativePG rejects a Cluster when
`shared_buffers` exceeds that request, which can happen with memory
overcommit. That is 32MB on `t1.nano` and 64MB on `t1.micro`. From 512Mi
up a quarter is at least 128MB, so nothing is rendered and those
clusters keep the PostgreSQL default exactly as before. An explicit
`shared_buffers` in `postgresql.parameters` still wins at any size. The
limit is read through `cozy-lib.resources.defaultingSanitize`, the
helper that fills `spec.resources`, which is also how
`packages/apps/mariadb/templates/_tuning.tpl` sizes the InnoDB buffer
pool. Presets and partial `resources` overrides therefore resolve
exactly as they do for the container.

A quarter is the starting point the PostgreSQL documentation gives for a
dedicated server with 1GB or more, and it advises a smaller share below
1GB, so this is a ceiling for small instances rather than tuning. Larger
presets are left alone on purpose. Deriving a bigger pool for them is a
tuning change that would restart every PostgreSQL instance on upgrade,
and it does not belong in a fix.

### Upgrade impact

`shared_buffers` needs a restart. On upgrade every cluster whose memory
limit is below 512Mi and that does not set `shared_buffers` gets the new
value, and that includes every cluster created with the default preset.
The chart leaves `primaryUpdateStrategy` and `primaryUpdateMethod` at
their CloudNativePG defaults, `unsupervised` and `restart`, so the
operator restarts the replicas first and then the primary in place, and
writes pause for the length of one PostgreSQL restart. A single-instance
cluster is unavailable for that time. Clusters from 512Mi up render the
same manifest as before and are not touched.

### Validation

- `helm unittest` passes all 166 tests in 21 suites. The new suite
covers the default preset, `t1.nano`, a `resources` override that sets
only cpu, a 500Mi limit just under the threshold, the 16MB floor,
`t1.small` and `t1.large` rendering no key, an explicit value on a small
and on a large preset, and the other default parameters. Seven
additional cases cover memory overcommit, rounding down a fractional MiB
request, a request below the 16MB floor, explicit values and the
unchanged 512Mi threshold. Four cases fail against the previous PR
template.
- Breaking the threshold comparison, the 16MB floor or the divisor, or
dropping the new block, turns at least one case of the suite red each
time.
- `helm template` of the whole chart renders `t1.small` exactly as the
base does, and the default preset differs only by `shared_buffers:
"64MB"`.
- `make generate` with cozyvalues-gen v1.7.0, the version CI pins,
leaves `README.md`, `values.schema.json`, the Go types and the
ApplicationDefinition unchanged, because `values.yaml` only gains a
comment.
- The new default was not exercised on a live cluster.

### Screenshots

Not a UI change.

### Downstream repositories

Walked the trigger map in `docs/agents/contributing.md` against the
diff. It touches one chart template, a comment in `values.yaml` and a
new test file. No package is added, renamed or removed, no field in
`values.schema.json` is added, removed or renamed, and no default in
`values.yaml` changes, so the Terraform provider has nothing to restate
and the generated README is identical. Neither the website nor the
provider mentions `shared_buffers`. No entry matches.

- [x] No downstream repository is affected by this change
- [ ] [cozystack/website](https://github.com/cozystack/website) -
follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/terraform-provider-cozystack](https://github.com/cozystack/terraform-provider-cozystack)
- follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/ansible-cozystack](https://github.com/cozystack/ansible-cozystack)
- follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/ccp](https://github.com/cozystack/ccp) - follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/talm](https://github.com/cozystack/talm) - follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/cozyhr](https://github.com/cozystack/cozyhr) -
follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/cozy-proxy](https://github.com/cozystack/cozy-proxy) -
follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/cozystack-telemetry-server](https://github.com/cozystack/cozystack-telemetry-server)
- follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/external-apps-example](https://github.com/cozystack/external-apps-example)
- follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/examples](https://github.com/cozystack/examples) -
follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/community](https://github.com/cozystack/community) -
follow-up:

### Release note

```release-note
fix(postgres): default shared_buffers to a quarter of the memory limit with a 16MB floor, capped at the memory request, when the limit is below 512Mi and shared_buffers is not set. PostgreSQL's built-in 128MB was the whole memory limit on t1.nano and half of it on t1.micro, the default preset, so a dump, index scans over a large table or a replica resync could fill the buffer pool and get the instance OOMKilled. Affected clusters restart their instances once on upgrade, the primary last, with a short pause in writes. Clusters from 512Mi up and clusters that set shared_buffers explicitly are unchanged.
```


<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->

## Summary by CodeRabbit

* **New Features**
* PostgreSQL now automatically adjusts its default memory allocation for
deployments with memory limits below 512 MiB, while retaining
PostgreSQL’s default for larger limits. Explicitly configured values
continue to take precedence.
* **Documentation**
* Clarified how the automatic memory allocation works, including its
minimum and memory-request cap.

<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
2026-10-09 00:10:40 +03:00
Aleksei Sviridkin e7bd3f4c58 fix(mongodb): set the s3 bucket and prefix on the bootstrap restore (#4779)
## What this PR does

helm fails on every install or upgrade of a mongodb release with
`bootstrap.enabled: true`. the chart renders a
`PerconaServerMongoDBRestore` without `spec.backupSource.s3.bucket`, the
operator crd marks that field required, and the api server rejects the
object.

```text
PerconaServerMongoDBRestore.psmdb.percona.com "<release>-restore" is invalid: [spec.backupSource.s3.bucket: Required value, <nil>: Invalid value: "null": some validation rules were not checked because the object was invalid]
```

the bucket is not the only gap. for a `backupSource` restore the
operator builds the pbm storage from `backupSource.s3` alone. the only
location data it takes from `backupSource.destination` is the backup
name, its last path segment. that is `getBackup` and `getStorage` in
`pkg/controller/perconaservermongodbrestore` at v1.22.0, the operator
version this repo ships. so a restore with a bucket and no prefix would
pass validation and then look for the backup at the bucket root.

the fix adds two helpers in `templates/_backup.tpl` that take the bucket
and the prefix from `backup.destinationPath`, with the same expressions
the backup storage already used. `mongodb.yaml` and `restore.yaml` both
call them, so the restore reads from where the backups are written. both
places quote the values now. a numeric bucket or prefix like
`s3://2024/10` used to render as ints that the crd rejects and now stays
a string. the backup storage still leaves out an empty prefix, so for
every other `destinationPath` running releases keep the same object. the
restore always sets the prefix, an empty one as `""`. a
`destinationPath` that names no bucket, like `s3://`, now fails at
render time instead of reaching the operator with an empty bucket.

the bug goes back to when the chart was added. both crd versions the
repo has shipped, 1.21.1 and 1.22.0, require the bucket, so no chart
version could ever create this restore. release-1.6 has the same
template and gets a backport.

tested with helm-unittest 1.1.2, the version ci pins.

- `helm unittest` passes 151 of 151 tests in 11 suites. before this
change it was 143 in 10.
- six new cases in `tests/restore_test.yaml` cover the bucket and prefix
with and without a trailing slash, a bucket root, a numeric bucket and
prefix, the render-time failure, and the check staying off when
bootstrap is disabled.
- the new `tests/restore-storage_test.yaml` renders the cluster and the
restore together and checks that bucket, prefix, endpoint, credentials
secret, `insecureSkipTLSVerify` and `forcePathStyle` match on both
sides, and that a numeric bucket and prefix stay strings on both.
- against the old templates 7 of the 8 new cases fail. the eighth only
pins that the new check stays inside the bootstrap block, so it passes
either way.
- `helm template` of the `PerconaServerMongoDB` for 8 `destinationPath`
forms. 5 render the same storage as before. for the two bucket root
forms the only difference is that a `prefix: null` the api server prunes
anyway is no longer rendered. `s3://2024/10` goes from ints the crd
rejects to strings.
- the rendered restore was checked offline against the crd in
`packages/system/mongodb-operator` with the apiextensions validation
code the api server runs. before the fix all 8 forms fail with
`spec.backupSource.s3.bucket: Required value`. after it 7 pass and
`s3://` stops at render time.
- `make generate` with cozyvalues-gen v1.7.0, the version ci pins,
leaves every generated file unchanged.
- no restore was run against a live cluster.

on upgrade, releases with `bootstrap.enabled: false` render the same
manifests as before. a release that still has `bootstrap.enabled: true`
creates its restore on the first reconcile after the upgrade, and the
operator starts restoring into the cluster as it is at that moment. the
release note says so.

three related things are out of scope here. the restore runs in the
pbm-agent sidecar, which the operator only adds when
`spec.backup.enabled` is true, so a bootstrap with `backup.enabled:
false` still cannot complete. the credential mismatch in #3832 is not
addressed, a bootstrap restore goes through the same pbm logical restore
that issue describes. and a restored release backs up to the same
`backup.destinationPath` it restored from, since the chart has one field
for both, so with backups on it writes into the prefix of the source.

### Screenshots

not a ui change.

### Downstream repositories

walked the trigger map in `docs/agents/contributing.md` against the
diff. it touches two templates, one new helper file and two test files
in `packages/apps/mongodb`. no package is added or renamed,
`values.yaml`, `values.schema.json` and `README.md` are unchanged, and
nothing under `hack/` moves. the website page for mongodb is generated
from the readme and has no bootstrap walkthrough to update. no entry
matches.

- [x] No downstream repository is affected by this change
- [ ] [cozystack/website](https://github.com/cozystack/website) -
follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/terraform-provider-cozystack](https://github.com/cozystack/terraform-provider-cozystack)
- follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/ansible-cozystack](https://github.com/cozystack/ansible-cozystack)
- follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/ccp](https://github.com/cozystack/ccp) - follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/talm](https://github.com/cozystack/talm) - follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/cozyhr](https://github.com/cozystack/cozyhr) -
follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/cozy-proxy](https://github.com/cozystack/cozy-proxy) -
follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/cozystack-telemetry-server](https://github.com/cozystack/cozystack-telemetry-server)
- follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/external-apps-example](https://github.com/cozystack/external-apps-example)
- follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/examples](https://github.com/cozystack/examples) -
follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/community](https://github.com/cozystack/community) -
follow-up:

### Release note

```release-note
fix(mongodb): a mongodb app created with bootstrap.enabled now gets a valid PerconaServerMongoDBRestore. the restore carries the s3 bucket and prefix of backup.destinationPath, the same location the backup storage writes to, so the api server accepts it and the operator looks for the backup in the right place. before this the api server rejected the restore because the bucket was missing, and the release failed.

on upgrade, an app that still has bootstrap.enabled set to true, for example after an earlier restore attempt that failed on the missing bucket, creates its restore on the first reconcile, and the operator restores the backup into the cluster as it is at that moment. set bootstrap.enabled to false before the upgrade on every mongodb app that should not be restored.
```


<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->

## Summary by CodeRabbit

* **New Features**
* MongoDB bootstrap restores now use the bucket and prefix from the
configured S3 backup destination, keeping restore storage settings
aligned with backup settings.
* **Bug Fixes**
* Bootstrap now reports an error when the S3 destination does not
specify a bucket.
* Numeric-looking bucket and prefix values are preserved as strings in
backup and restore settings.

<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
2026-10-08 23:54:44 +03:00
Yan Bondarenko 4b606036bb fix(mongodb): set the s3 bucket and prefix on the bootstrap restore
With bootstrap.enabled the chart rendered a PerconaServerMongoDBRestore
without backupSource.s3.bucket. The operator CRD requires that field, so
the API server rejected the restore and the HelmRelease failed. The prefix
was missing too, and it matters just as much. For a backupSource restore
the operator builds the PBM storage from backupSource.s3 alone and takes
only the backup name from backupSource.destination, so a restore without
the prefix would look for the backup at the bucket root.

The restore now takes the bucket and prefix from the same helpers that
fill the backup storage, so it reads from where the backups are written.
Both places quote the two values, so a numeric bucket or prefix stays a
string instead of making the resource invalid. The backup storage still
leaves out an empty prefix, so running releases keep the same object. A
destinationPath that names no bucket fails at render time instead of
reaching the operator with an empty bucket.

Assisted-by: LLM
Signed-off-by: Yan Bondarenko <202671653+yankawai@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-10-08 22:39:14 +03:00
Yan Bondarenko 9c0085c358 fix(postgres): cap shared_buffers at the memory request
CloudNativePG rejects clusters whose shared_buffers exceeds the memory
request. Memory overcommit can put that request below both a quarter of
the limit and the 16MB floor.

Assisted-by: LLM
Signed-off-by: Yan Bondarenko <202671653+yankawai@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-10-08 22:39:05 +03:00
Yan Bondarenko 6dbd76ae50 fix(postgres): cap the default shared_buffers at a quarter of the memory limit
The chart renders no shared_buffers, so PostgreSQL starts with its 128MB
default whatever the container gets. A full pool is the whole memory
limit on t1.nano and half of it on t1.micro, the default preset. The
pool is shared memory that the kernel cannot reclaim without swap, so
when a dump, index scans over a large table or a replica catching up
after a failover fill it, the instance is OOMKilled.

Instances below a 512Mi memory limit now default to a quarter of the
limit, at least 16MB. From 512Mi up a quarter is at least 128MB, so
those instances render exactly as before. shared_buffers needs a
restart, so on upgrade CloudNativePG restarts every instance below
512Mi that does not set it explicitly.

Assisted-by: LLM
Signed-off-by: Yan Bondarenko <202671653+yankawai@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-10-08 22:39:05 +03:00
Aleksei Sviridkin 87a64071a7 fix(cilium)!: take cilium's own addresses from a block kube-ovn does not hand out (#4778)
## What this PR does

fixes #3740.

on the kube-ovn variants cilium allocates no pod ips, but the agent
still takes its router ip (`cilium_host`, `CiliumInternalIP`) and the
gateway api ingress ip from its own allocation cidr. with `ipam.mode:
kubernetes` that's `Node.spec.podCIDR`, a /24 out of the same /16
kube-ovn hands pods from, so sooner or later kube-ovn gives a pod an
address cilium already holds. we hit it on three clusters, details in
https://github.com/cozystack/cozystack/issues/3740#issuecomment-6022394243.

**what changes**

- the kube-ovn variants run cilium with `ipam.mode: cluster-pool`, a /29
per node out of the last /21 of `networking.podCIDR` (`10.244.248.0/21`
for the default /16). the platform derives the block from
`networking.podCIDR` and passes the same range to kube-ovn as
`--default-exclude-ips`, so a fresh install never hands it to pods.
- the block sits inside the pod cidr on purpose. envoy reaches gateway
api backends from the node's ingress ip, and kube-ovn masquerades host
originated traffic only when the source is in `ovn40subnets`. with the
`100.65.0.0/16` pool from the issue a nodeport through the gateway
answered 200 only on the backend's node and 503 `upstream connect error
... connection timeout` on the other two. with the block inside the pod
cidr it's 200 from all three. worth a look on the ci side too. the ci
sandbox sets talos `podSubnets` to `100.65.0.0/16`, so cilium's ingress
ips there already come from outside `ovn40subnets`, and the gateway e2e
checks Accepted, Programmed and the lb service but sends no request
through a listener, so it wouldn't notice. with this pr the sandbox
takes its block from the pod cidr like everyone else.
- the end of the /16 is what kube-ovn reaches last. it hands out the
lowest free address and reuses released ones only when the free range
runs dry (`pkg/ipam/subnet.go` and `pkg/ipam/ip_range_list.go` at
v1.15.26). a /21 cut into /29s covers 256 nodes.
- the slim variants and guest clusters stay on `ipam.mode: kubernetes`.
cilium is the only cni there and `Node.spec.podCIDR` is the pod range.
- `networking.podCIDR` now needs /20 or wider on the kube-ovn variants,
otherwise the render fails and says why. an install that rendered before
can stop rendering at upgrade, hence the `!`. a /21 cut into /29s also
caps these variants at 256 nodes, a fresh install included.

**existing clusters**

a post-upgrade hook in the cilium chart moves them
(`templates/ipam-migration.yaml`, `files/ipam-migration.sh`). before it
touches anything it checks that the block has a /29 for every CiliumNode
and that it lies inside kube-ovn's default subnet, and stops with both
cidrs printed otherwise. a node cleared past the pool's capacity would
lose pod networking on its next agent restart, and a block outside the
subnet puts the agents outside `ovn40subnets` again. it has to be
post-upgrade. platform migrations run as the platform's pre-upgrade
hook, while every agent still runs `ipam.mode: kubernetes` and writes
`Node.spec.podCIDR` back into a cleared CiliumNode
(`pkg/nodediscovery/nodediscovery.go` at v1.19.5), so the move can only
happen after the cilium release switched the mode. the job runs on the
host network against the agent's own api endpoint (kubeprism on talos),
because it restarts the agents.

1. adds the block and every node's current ingress ip to `excludeIps` of
the default subnet, in one json patch with a `test` op, and reads the
subnet again on conflict, since kube-ovn rewrites that list into its own
order right after a patch. the old ingress ip goes in because cilium
1.19.5 keeps a former ingress ip in the agent's ipcache as
`reserved:ingress` after the move. we saw 2 to 3 such entries per node
hours later. old router ips leave the ipcache and go back to kube-ovn.
2. stops right there if an address in the block is still allocated,
names it, and moves no agent. it first checks the subnet status it
patched against, then waits until `status.v4availableIPrange` stops
offering the block, which is kube-ovn having applied the exclusion, and
then reads the `ips.kubeovn.io` objects of the default subnet. the
status alone can't answer it, kube-ovn leaves excluded addresses out of
`v4usingIPrange` (`GetSubnetIPRangeString` in `pkg/ipam/ipam.go` at
v1.15.26), so a pod still in the block would be invisible on a retry
where the exclusion is already in place. recreate those pods and the
next upgrade retry goes through.
3. one node at a time, clears the inherited /24 from
`spec.ipam.podCIDRs` (again with a `test` op, so a concurrent writer
fails the patch instead of losing an update), waits for the operator to
allocate a /29 from the block and restarts that node's agent. a node
that isn't ready is skipped and its agent picks up the block when it
starts. nodes already moved are left alone, so a retry after a timeout
just continues. the hook runs inside the cilium upgrade, so where
restarting every agent takes longer than the upgrade timeout, 10m by
default, the release first reports a failed upgrade and the move
finishes on the retry.

running pods keep their addresses. every agent restarts twice on
upgrade, once when the config change rolls the daemonset and once from
the hook, and while it restarts host to pod traffic on that node blips
for a few seconds because the router ip moves. a pod that sits on a
router ip today is reachable again after the move, the node no longer
holds that address. a pod on a node's current ingress ip keeps it and
that node keeps seeing it as `reserved:ingress`, so recreate it. the
hook logs those pods by name.

### Validation

- `helm unittest` passes cilium 23/23, platform 246/246 and kube-ovn
22/22. the new suites pin the rendered `cilium-config` keys per variant,
the hook shape, env and rbac, and the platform wiring for the talos and
generic branches, a custom pod cidr, host bits in the network address,
the refusals for a too small or non ipv4 cidr, and the slim variant.
- on a trial merge with main at cbc9d0c4e, where #3849 runs
`hack/*.bats` under real bats 1.14 with `set -u`, the 27 bats tests pass
after the second commit loads `test_helper`, the strict setup audit is
clean, and helm unittest passes cilium 23/23, platform 263/263 and
kube-ovn 22/22.
- `hack/cilium-ipam-migration.bats` passes 27/27 and runs the real
script against a fake kubectl that models the operator, the agent
daemonset and kube-ovn publishing the subnet status. thirteen mutations
turn it red each (exclusion after the move, no ingress exclusion, no
retry, no status check, an ingress ip inside the block listed on its
own, no `test` op, no wait for kube-ovn, no ip object check, no subnet
filter on the ip objects, no capacity check, a block outside the subnet
let through, overlap turned into containment, no log of ingress ip
holders). the containment one is pinned by a usage range that crosses
the start of the block, `10.244.247.250-10.244.248.3`.
- live on a 3 node talos test cluster with cozystack v1.6.4, cilium
1.19.5 and kube-ovn v1.15.26
- moved from `kubernetes` to the block, exclusion first and then the
node moves this script does. 3 nodes in about 40 seconds, every agent
took its router and ingress ip from its /29, no pod changed its address.
- gateway api through a nodeport 9/9 answered 200 and through the
loadbalancer ip 6/6, against 3/9 with `100.65.0.0/16`.
- the final hook job on the moved cluster is a no-op in 2 seconds,
including the ip object read with the job's own rbac. the same ip object
pipeline over that cluster's real objects finds 77 in a populated /24
and none in the block.
- the exact `test` plus `replace` patch on `ovn-default` goes through,
kube-ovn re-sorts the list right after, and the same patch against the
old list is rejected. that's the conflict path the retry covers.
- shellcheck is clean and `hack/check-commit-trailers.sh` passes.
- not run here. the upgrade move from an older release in ci, e2e only
covers the fresh install.

### Screenshots

not a ui change.

### Downstream repositories

walked the trigger map against the diff.
`packages/core/platform/values.yaml` only gains a comment, but
`networking.podCIDR` gets a new constraint on the kube-ovn variants,
which the hand written key table on the website should say. the ansible
role sets `networking.podCIDR` to `10.42.0.0/16`, which yields
`10.42.248.0/21` and needs nothing there. the talm preset keeps
`podSubnets: 10.244.0.0/16`, which no longer matters on these variants
because cilium stops reading `Node.spec.podCIDR` there. the terraform
provider doesn't model platform values.

- [ ] No downstream repository is affected by this change
- [x] [cozystack/website](https://github.com/cozystack/website) -
follow-up: https://github.com/cozystack/website/pull/739
- [ ]
[cozystack/terraform-provider-cozystack](https://github.com/cozystack/terraform-provider-cozystack)
- follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/ansible-cozystack](https://github.com/cozystack/ansible-cozystack)
- follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/ccp](https://github.com/cozystack/ccp) - follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/talm](https://github.com/cozystack/talm) - follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/cozyhr](https://github.com/cozystack/cozyhr) -
follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/cozy-proxy](https://github.com/cozystack/cozy-proxy) -
follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/cozystack-telemetry-server](https://github.com/cozystack/cozystack-telemetry-server)
- follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/external-apps-example](https://github.com/cozystack/external-apps-example)
- follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/examples](https://github.com/cozystack/examples) -
follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/community](https://github.com/cozystack/community) -
follow-up:

### Release note

```release-note
fix(cilium)!: on the kube-ovn variants cilium now takes its router and gateway api ingress ips from the last /21 of networking.podCIDR, which kube-ovn no longer hands out, so pods stop landing on addresses cilium holds. existing clusters move on upgrade through a post-upgrade hook, and each cilium agent restarts twice, once for the config change and once in the hook. networking.podCIDR needs /20 or wider on these variants, and a /21 of /29s caps them at 256 nodes.
```


<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit

* **New Features**
* Kube-OVN-enabled variants now reserve the final `/21` of the pod CIDR
for Cilium router and Gateway API Ingress addresses, excluding it from
Kube-OVN pod allocation. Pod CIDRs must be IPv4 with a prefix of `/20`
or shorter.
* Added a post-upgrade migration that moves existing Cilium IP
allocations into the cluster pool and updates affected node networking.
* **Documentation**
* Documented the pod CIDR requirements and node capacity limit for
Kube-OVN variants.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
2026-10-08 21:41:23 +03:00
Aleksei Sviridkin 76c030d89f fix(dashboard): drop the resource map ConfigMaps once the map is unreadable (#4789)
## What this PR does

Follow-up to #4612.

The ConfigMaps tab takes its names from the application's resource map.
React Query keeps the last successful list when a refetch fails, so when
the resource map became forbidden or went away after a successful read,
`useApplicationConfigMaps` went on parsing the old copy. The tab stayed
with the old names, every listed ConfigMap showed an access error, and a
malformed map kept its old error. A map that is unreadable from the
start already hid the tab.

Now a 403 or 404 on the resource map drops the names and the error
whether or not an earlier read succeeded, so the tab goes away in both
cases. Any other error is still shown on the tab, as before.

The new tests are a page test with stale resource map data next to a
403, and hook tests that read the map and then refetch it with 403 and
with 404, plus a malformed map followed by a 403. All four fail on main
and pass here. `pnpm typecheck`, `pnpm test` (451 tests in 62 files) and
`pnpm lint` pass.

### Screenshots

No visual change. Once the resource map is unreadable, the page looks
the same as for an application whose map was never readable, with no
ConfigMaps tab. The tab itself is shown in #4612.

### Downstream repositories

Walked the trigger map against the diff. It touches only the console
hook that reads the resource map and its tests. No chart, values,
schema, CRD or `hack/` file changes, and the console is vendored in this
repository.

- [x] No downstream repository is affected by this change
- [ ] [cozystack/website](https://github.com/cozystack/website) -
follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/terraform-provider-cozystack](https://github.com/cozystack/terraform-provider-cozystack)
- follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/ansible-cozystack](https://github.com/cozystack/ansible-cozystack)
- follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/ccp](https://github.com/cozystack/ccp) - follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/talm](https://github.com/cozystack/talm) - follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/cozyhr](https://github.com/cozystack/cozyhr) -
follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/cozy-proxy](https://github.com/cozystack/cozy-proxy) -
follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/cozystack-telemetry-server](https://github.com/cozystack/cozystack-telemetry-server)
- follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/external-apps-example](https://github.com/cozystack/external-apps-example)
- follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/examples](https://github.com/cozystack/examples) -
follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/community](https://github.com/cozystack/community) -
follow-up:

### Release note

```release-note
fix(dashboard): the ConfigMaps tab now goes away when the application's resource map stops being readable, instead of keeping the names from the last successful read
```


<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->

## Summary by CodeRabbit

* **Bug Fixes**
* ConfigMaps are no longer displayed when access to the resource map is
forbidden or the resource map is missing.
* The ConfigMaps tab is excluded when the resource map cannot be
accessed.

<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
2026-10-08 16:49:58 +03:00
Aleksei Sviridkin 603a4fc401 test(monitoring): stop the alert severity guard from missing rule sources (#4812)
## What this PR does

follow-up to #3799, which added `hack/alert-severity-contract.bats`.

the guard had two blind spots. it found rule files by an exact `kind:
PrometheusRule` or `kind: VMRule` line, so a quoted kind or one followed
by a comment took the whole file out of the check. and a rule group
whose rules all come from template actions, for example an `include` of
a helper, is empty once those actions are stripped, so it passed with
nothing checked.

discovery now also matches a quoted kind and a kind followed by a
comment. a rule document without groups, or a group with no alert or
recording rule left after stripping, now fails the run and names the
file and the group, the same way a file that cannot be parsed already
does. a group of recording rules alone still passes.

on the current tree nothing changes. the wider discovery finds the same
43 files, no group comes out empty, and the guard stays green. three new
cases cover a quoted kind and a commented kind with a bad severity, a
group filled only by an `include`, and a group of recording rules.
against the old guard the first two fail and the third passes. dropping
the recording clause from the new check turns the recording case red,
and the tree check with it, since the tree has recording-only groups.
the suite passes under bats 1.14 with `set -u`, and the strict setup
audit stays clean.

### Screenshots

not a ui change.

### Downstream repositories

walked the trigger map against the diff. it touches only
`hack/alert-severity-contract.bats`, a unit test that no other
repository restates. no entry matches.

- [x] No downstream repository is affected by this change
- [ ] [cozystack/website](https://github.com/cozystack/website) -
follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/terraform-provider-cozystack](https://github.com/cozystack/terraform-provider-cozystack)
- follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/ansible-cozystack](https://github.com/cozystack/ansible-cozystack)
- follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/ccp](https://github.com/cozystack/ccp) - follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/talm](https://github.com/cozystack/talm) - follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/cozyhr](https://github.com/cozystack/cozyhr) -
follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/cozy-proxy](https://github.com/cozystack/cozy-proxy) -
follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/cozystack-telemetry-server](https://github.com/cozystack/cozystack-telemetry-server)
- follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/external-apps-example](https://github.com/cozystack/external-apps-example)
- follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/examples](https://github.com/cozystack/examples) -
follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/community](https://github.com/cozystack/community) -
follow-up:

### Release note

```release-note
test(monitoring): the alert severity check now also catches rule files with a quoted or commented kind, and fails on a rule group it cannot see into instead of passing it unchecked
```


<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->

## Summary by CodeRabbit

* **Bug Fixes**
* Alert-rule source discovery now recognizes quoted rule kinds and kinds
followed by YAML comments.
* The alert severity contract now reports and rejects documents with no
groups and groups with no alert or recording rules after template
actions are removed.
  * Recording-rule-only groups continue to pass the contract.

<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
2026-10-08 14:14:02 +03:00
Aleksei Sviridkin f203a47afe fix(backups): hold a Postgres backup until the plugin rollout is over (#4674)
<!-- Thank you for making a contribution! Here are some tips for you:
- Use Conventional Commits for the PR title: `type(scope): description`
- Types: feat, fix, docs, style, refactor, perf, test, build, ci, chore
- Scopes are not an exhaustive list — pick the most specific scope for
the change and extend the list when a genuinely new area appears.
Examples:
- System components: dashboard, platform, operator, cilium, kube-ovn,
linstor, fluxcd, cluster-api
- Managed apps: postgres, mariadb, redis, kafka, clickhouse,
virtual-machine, kubernetes
- Development and maintenance: api, hack, tests, ci, docs, maintenance
- Breaking changes: append `!` after type/scope (`feat(api)!: ...`) or
add a `BREAKING CHANGE:` footer
- If it's a work in progress, consider creating this PR as a draft.
- Don't hesistate to ask for opinion and review in the community chats,
even if it's still a draft.
- Add the label `kind/backport` if it's a bugfix that needs to be
backported to a previous version.
-->

## What this PR does

The first BackupJob on a Postgres app whose `cnpg.io/Cluster` has never
carried the barman-cloud plugin — a fresh platform-flow app, or one an
in-place restore re-rendered — attaches the plugin and creates the
`cnpg.io/Backup` in the same reconcile. Attaching the plugin changes the
instance pod spec, so CNPG rolls every instance (`Pod rollout required:
volumes: element plugins has been added`). The Backup then lands on an
instance without the plugin sidecar (`requested plugin is not available:
barman-cloud.cloudnative-pg.io`) or on one CNPG restarts under it
(`instance manager was restarted during backup`). CNPG does not retry a
failed Backup, so the BackupJob stays Running in
`CNPGBackupTransientFailure` until `cnpgDefaultBackupDeadline` and
fails. The first backup of each such Postgres is always lost; this was
observed on a v1.6.3 cluster and reproduced against `main`.

The driver now holds the Backup back until that rollout is over. Before
attaching the plugin to a Cluster that has none, it records
`PluginRolledOut=False` on the BackupJob, with `Ready=False` reason
`WaitingForPluginRollout` for the user, and requeues; the next pass
attaches the plugin. The Backup is created once CNPG reports the Cluster
in its healthy phase and every instance pod (`cnpg.io/cluster`,
`cnpg.io/podRole=instance`) was created after the condition and is
Ready; the condition then turns True and `Ready` is cleared, as before.
Recording the condition first means a lost status write leaves the
plugin unattached for the next pass instead of a Cluster that looks
ready while it rolls. A Cluster that already runs the plugin is not
rolled by the driver and its Backup is created on the first pass, as
today. The wait is bounded by the existing `cnpgDefaultBackupDeadline`,
after which the BackupJob fails with the phase or pod CNPG is stuck on.

Why this signal, checked against the CNPG 1.29 source and the 1.30
Cluster CRD vendored here: the Cluster status has no
`observedGeneration` and its `Ready` condition is derived from
`status.phase`, so right after the attach the phase still reads healthy
from before until CNPG reconciles the new spec. `status.pluginStatus`
does not help either, since CNPG also lists plugins referenced only from
`externalClusters` there, which is exactly the state of a Cluster a
restore re-rendered. A pod spec change is never applied in place (only a
pending Postgres restart is), so the instances are recreated and pods
newer than the attach are the ones running the sidecar. This reads pod
metadata and CNPG's documented labels only, not the plugin's container
or volume names, and needs no RBAC change: the controller already lists
and watches pods.

Tests: `TestReconcileCNPG_WaitsForPluginRolloutBeforeBackup` drives a
Cluster without the plugin through the attach, a stale healthy phase
over the old pod, a rolling phase over the recreated pod, and the
healthy phase, and asserts no Backup exists until the last step.
`TestReconcileCNPG_AttachedPluginDoesNotDelayBackup` covers a Cluster
that already runs the plugin, and
`TestReconcileCNPG_PluginRolloutWaitIsBounded` the deadline. With the
gate disabled, the first and third fail; with only the phase checked and
not the pods, the first fails at the attach pass.

### Screenshots

<!-- REQUIRED for UI changes: attach screenshots or screen recordings
demonstrating
the visual impact of your changes. PRs with UI changes without
screenshots will not be merged. -->

Not applicable: no UI change.

### Downstream repositories

<!--
Cozystack is upstream for repositories that are NOT kept in sync with it
automatically, and nothing in CI compares the two sides, so a change
here can break them silently.

Which change forces what, and which file to touch, is the trigger map in
docs/agents/contributing.md under "Downstream Repositories". Walk it
before you tick anything.

IF YOU ARE AN AI AGENT OR AN LLM, THIS IS PART OF THE TASK, NOT A FORM
TO FILL IN:

1. Walk the trigger map against the actual diff of this PR, file by
file. Do not decide from the PR title or from your memory of what you
changed.
2. For every repository you tick, open the follow-up PR there and link
it on the same line. A ticked box with no link claims work that does not
exist, which is worse than an empty box. Search that repository for an
open PR or issue covering it first, and link that instead of filing a
duplicate.
3. When the follow-up is out of scope, or needs a decision that is not
yours to make, open an issue in that repository instead, link that, and
say so in the PR body. Do not push a speculative PR into another
repository just to fill a line here.
4. Do not tick "No downstream repository is affected" to make the
checklist go away. If you are unsure, leave every box empty and say so
in the PR body, so a human decides.
-->

The diff touches only `internal/backupcontroller` Go code: no package,
values, chart, CRD, `hack/` tooling, telemetry metric or contributor
convention. Walked against the trigger map, it reaches none of the
repositories below, and the website documents no workaround for the lost
first backup that this would make obsolete.

- [x] No downstream repository is affected by this change
- [ ] [cozystack/website](https://github.com/cozystack/website) -
follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/terraform-provider-cozystack](https://github.com/cozystack/terraform-provider-cozystack)
- follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/ansible-cozystack](https://github.com/cozystack/ansible-cozystack)
- follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/ccp](https://github.com/cozystack/ccp) - follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/talm](https://github.com/cozystack/talm) - follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/cozyhr](https://github.com/cozystack/cozyhr) -
follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/cozy-proxy](https://github.com/cozystack/cozy-proxy) -
follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/cozystack-telemetry-server](https://github.com/cozystack/cozystack-telemetry-server)
- follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/external-apps-example](https://github.com/cozystack/external-apps-example)
- follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/examples](https://github.com/cozystack/examples) -
follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/community](https://github.com/cozystack/community) -
follow-up:

### Release note

<!--  Write a release note:
- Explain what has changed internally and for users.
- Start with the same `type(scope):` prefix as in the PR title
- Follow the guidelines at
https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/guide/release-notes.md.
-->

```release-note
fix(backups): the CNPG backup driver no longer loses the first backup of a Postgres app whose Cluster had no barman-cloud plugin yet (a new platform-flow app, or one restored in place). It now waits for CNPG to finish rolling the instances onto the plugin before creating the cnpg.io Backup, and reports the wait on the BackupJob as Ready=False with reason WaitingForPluginRollout.
```


<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit

* **Reliability**
* Backups wait for the backup plugin rollout to complete and cluster
instances to become healthy before starting.
* If rollout does not finish before the backup deadline, the backup job
fails instead of waiting indefinitely.
* Backups can start without waiting for a new rollout when the plugin is
already attached.
* **Backup Configuration**
* When no server name is configured, backups use the cluster name and
application UID, giving recreated applications distinct archive
prefixes.
* Existing server names are preserved when the plugin is already
attached.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
2026-10-08 13:11:46 +03:00
Aleksei Sviridkin d7f3f0d392 fix(hack): keep root monitoring redirects off in the E2E install (#4811)
## What this PR does

This fixes the E2E install on pull requests that select only a few
suites. Today those runs fail before any suite starts:
`cozystack-basics` fails with `namespaces "cozy-monitoring" not found`,
and every package waiting on basics never installs.

The reduced install from #4022 disables every package the selected
suites don't need. For narrow selections like `vminstance` or the
Kubernetes suites, that list includes metrics-server, monitoring-agents
and monitoring, which are the only packages that create
`cozy-monitoring`. Basics still renders three ExternalName redirects
into that namespace, because `monitoring.rootEnabled` stays at its
default of true. Wide selections keep at least one of those packages, so
they pass.

The E2E install already sets `Tenant/root spec.monitoring` to false, and
`rootEnabled` is meant to match it. The harness now sets `rootEnabled:
false`, so basics no longer writes into a namespace the install may not
create. No suite uses these redirects. With root monitoring off they
pointed at nothing even on full runs.

The same failure can happen in a real cluster when a user disables those
three packages. That needs a product change and is tracked in #4810.

### Screenshots

### Downstream repositories

- [x] No downstream repository is affected by this change
- [ ] [cozystack/website](https://github.com/cozystack/website) -
follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/terraform-provider-cozystack](https://github.com/cozystack/terraform-provider-cozystack)
- follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/ansible-cozystack](https://github.com/cozystack/ansible-cozystack)
- follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/ccp](https://github.com/cozystack/ccp) - follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/talm](https://github.com/cozystack/talm) - follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/cozyhr](https://github.com/cozystack/cozyhr) -
follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/cozy-proxy](https://github.com/cozystack/cozy-proxy) -
follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/cozystack-telemetry-server](https://github.com/cozystack/cozystack-telemetry-server)
- follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/external-apps-example](https://github.com/cozystack/external-apps-example)
- follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/examples](https://github.com/cozystack/examples) -
follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/community](https://github.com/cozystack/community) -
follow-up:

### Release note

```release-note
fix(hack): the E2E install keeps root monitoring redirects off, so runs that select only a few suites no longer fail on a missing cozy-monitoring namespace.
```


<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->

## Summary by CodeRabbit

* **Bug Fixes**
* Root monitoring stays disabled in generated platform package settings
when `cozy-monitoring` is omitted, preventing monitoring Services from
being rendered in narrowly selected test suites.
* **Documentation**
* Clarified how the root monitoring setting relates to the
installation’s `Tenant/root` configuration and which setting to change
to enable it.

<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
2026-10-07 23:21:56 +03:00
Yan Bondarenko dc814f3ae5 test(monitoring): stop the alert severity guard from missing rule sources
The guard found rule files by an exact `kind: PrometheusRule` or
`kind: VMRule` line, so a quoted kind or one followed by a comment took the
file out of the check. A rule group whose rules all come from template
actions is empty once those are stripped, so it passed with nothing
checked. Discovery now accepts those spellings, and a rule document without
groups, or a group without a visible alert or recording rule, fails the run
the way a file that cannot be parsed does.

Assisted-by: LLM
Signed-off-by: Yan Bondarenko <202671653+yankawai@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-10-07 20:23:46 +03:00
Yan Bondarenko f944eeff6e test(hack): load the strict-mode helper in cilium-ipam-migration.bats
bats-strict-setup.bats requires every unit file to load test_helper so
its tests run under set -u, and fails the whole bats lane on main
because this file does not.

Assisted-by: LLM
Signed-off-by: Yan Bondarenko <202671653+yankawai@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-10-07 20:11:22 +03:00
Aleksei Sviridkin 84daaf0c70 fix(hack): keep root monitoring redirects off in the E2E install
The E2E install sets Tenant/root spec.monitoring to false, but left the
platform monitoring.rootEnabled at its default of true, so
cozystack-basics rendered its vlinsert/vminsert ExternalName Services
into cozy-monitoring regardless.

That namespace is created only by metrics-server, monitoring-agents and
monitoring. A narrow suite selection disables all three, so basics
fails with `namespaces "cozy-monitoring" not found` and every package
waiting on it never installs. Wide selections passed only because they
keep at least one of those packages.

Setting rootEnabled to match the root tenant removes the dependency and
is what the value's contract asks for anyway.

Assisted-by: LLM
Signed-off-by: Aleksei Sviridkin <f@lex.la>
2026-10-07 19:37:25 +03:00
Aleksei Sviridkin cbc9d0c4ed test(hack): load the strict-mode helper in fork-new-images.bats (#4805)
## What this PR does

The bats unit lane is red on main, and so is the "Unit & controller
tests" check on pull requests built on it. `hack/bats-strict-setup.bats`
requires each unit file to load `test_helper`, which turns `set -u` back
on for its tests. `hack/fork-new-images.bats` is the only unit file
without that line, so the audit fails with `strict-mode setup missing or
overridden`. This PR adds the line. All six tests in that file pass
under `set -u`.

### Screenshots

Not a UI change.

### Downstream repositories

- [x] No downstream repository is affected by this change
- [ ] [cozystack/website](https://github.com/cozystack/website) -
follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/terraform-provider-cozystack](https://github.com/cozystack/terraform-provider-cozystack)
- follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/ansible-cozystack](https://github.com/cozystack/ansible-cozystack)
- follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/ccp](https://github.com/cozystack/ccp) - follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/talm](https://github.com/cozystack/talm) - follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/cozyhr](https://github.com/cozystack/cozyhr) -
follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/cozy-proxy](https://github.com/cozystack/cozy-proxy) -
follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/cozystack-telemetry-server](https://github.com/cozystack/cozystack-telemetry-server)
- follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/external-apps-example](https://github.com/cozystack/external-apps-example)
- follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/examples](https://github.com/cozystack/examples) -
follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/community](https://github.com/cozystack/community) -
follow-up:

### Release note

```release-note
test(hack): fork-new-images.bats loads the strict-mode helper, so the strict-mode audit in the bats unit lane passes again.
```


<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->

## Summary by CodeRabbit

* **Tests**
* Updated the fork-image tests to load their shared test setup before
running, ensuring the tests have the required support in place.

<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
2026-10-07 18:51:13 +03:00
Aleksei Sviridkin 0a2bb5ef98 fix(cert-manager): enable the Gateway API solver in the host cert-manager (#4039)
## What this PR does

With the platform Gateway enabled, the ClusterIssuers in
`cert-manager-issuers` and the per-tenant Issuers rendered for
`TenantGateway` carry an `http01.gatewayHTTPRoute` solver, but the
controller refuses it: the vendored chart never turns Gateway API
support on, so every HTTP-01 challenge behind the Gateway fails with
`gateway api is not enabled` and no certificate is issued.

This passes a `ControllerConfiguration` with `enableGatewayAPI: true` to
the host cert-manager through the component values of its platform
Package. The host ships the Gateway API CRDs on every variant and orders
cert-manager after them, so the flag is safe there.

It is deliberately not a default of the `system/cert-manager` chart. The
same chart is installed into tenant Kubernetes clusters, where the CRDs
are an opt-in addon, and cert-manager v1.20 exits at startup when
Gateway API support is on and the CRDs are missing. The tenant
HelmRelease in `packages/apps/kubernetes` already passes the same
`ControllerConfiguration` when its `gatewayAPI` addon is enabled, so
both clusters now opt in from the layer that knows whether the CRDs are
there, and the chart itself stays neutral.

The new tests pin both halves: the host Package carries the flag and the
preconditions that make it safe, and the chart wires `config` through to
the controller while shipping none by default.

Closes #3725

### Screenshots

Not applicable, no UI changes.

### Downstream repositories

- [x] No downstream repository is affected by this change
- [ ] [cozystack/website](https://github.com/cozystack/website) -
follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/terraform-provider-cozystack](https://github.com/cozystack/terraform-provider-cozystack)
- follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/ansible-cozystack](https://github.com/cozystack/ansible-cozystack)
- follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/ccp](https://github.com/cozystack/ccp) - follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/talm](https://github.com/cozystack/talm) - follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/cozyhr](https://github.com/cozystack/cozyhr) -
follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/cozy-proxy](https://github.com/cozystack/cozy-proxy) -
follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/cozystack-telemetry-server](https://github.com/cozystack/cozystack-telemetry-server)
- follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/external-apps-example](https://github.com/cozystack/external-apps-example)
- follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/examples](https://github.com/cozystack/examples) -
follow-up:

### Release note

```release-note
fix(cert-manager): enable the Gateway API solver in the host cert-manager, so ACME HTTP-01 challenges succeed when the platform Gateway is enabled
```


<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit

- **New Features**
- Supported system bundles can now use cert-manager’s Gateway API
HTTPRoute solver to issue certificates.
- Hosted deployments include the required Gateway API custom resource
definitions, installed before cert-manager.
- Gateway API solver support remains opt-in in environments that do not
provide the required definitions, avoiding unintended changes to
certificate management there.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
2026-10-07 17:47:41 +03:00
Aleksei Sviridkin 0ea11b4ef0 test(hack): load the strict-mode helper in fork-new-images.bats
bats-strict-setup.bats requires every unit file to load test_helper so
its tests run under set -u, and fails the whole bats lane on main
because this file does not.

Assisted-by: LLM
Signed-off-by: Aleksei Sviridkin <f@lex.la>
2026-10-07 16:14:34 +03:00
Timofei Larkin 9b0e25b1a0 fix(etcd-operator): gate VMServiceScrape on VictoriaMetrics operator CRD (#3960)
## What this PR does

`packages/system/etcd-operator/templates/metrics.yaml` rendered a
`VMServiceScrape` (`operator.victoriametrics.com/v1beta1`)
unconditionally, so the `cozy-etcd-operator/etcd-operator` HelmRelease
fails to install on any cluster that does not have the VictoriaMetrics
operator CRDs, with `no matches for kind "VMServiceScrape" in version
"operator.victoriametrics.com/v1beta1"`. That made the VictoriaMetrics
operator a hard dependency of etcd-operator, which it should not be.

This wraps only the `VMServiceScrape` document in a
`.Capabilities.APIVersions.Has "operator.victoriametrics.com/v1beta1"`
gate, following the precedent already established in
`packages/system/linstor/templates/podscrape.yaml`. The
`etcd-operator-metrics` Service keeps rendering unconditionally, so any
scraper — a `VMServiceScrape` when the CRD is present, or something else
entirely — can still target the `metrics` port.

Note: this is a Cozystack-packaging-only issue. The upstream
etcd-operator repo's own chart is unaffected — it already gates its
scrape object.

Added `packages/system/etcd-operator/tests/metrics_test.yaml` (`helm
unittest`) pinning the new behavior: the Service always renders, and the
`VMServiceScrape` renders only when the capability is injected.

Kept this minimal — a pure capabilities gate with no new values key,
matching linstor's style, rather than adding a values toggle.

Follow-up (out of scope for this PR):
`packages/extra/etcd/templates/podscrape.yaml` (a `VMPodScrape`) is
unconditional the same way and would hit the same install failure on a
cluster without the VictoriaMetrics operator.
`packages/system/monitoring-agents` also ships several unconditional
`VMServiceScrape`/`VMPodScrape` objects, though that package may already
assume the VictoriaMetrics operator is present as part of the monitoring
stack it belongs to.

### Screenshots

Not applicable — no UI change.

### Downstream repositories

- [x] No downstream repository is affected by this change

### Release note

```release-note
fix(etcd-operator): stop requiring the VictoriaMetrics operator to install etcd-operator; the VMServiceScrape now only renders when the operator's CRD is present
```


<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->

## Summary by CodeRabbit

* **Bug Fixes**
* Metrics collection now works without the VictoriaMetrics operator API,
while scrape configuration is rendered when that API is available.

<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
2026-10-07 16:54:10 +04:00
Aleksei Sviridkin 6192d5814b feat(local-storage): add opt-in OpenEBS LocalPV hostpath package (#3266)
## What this PR does

Adds `packages/system/local-storage`, an optional package that vendors
OpenEBS Dynamic LocalPV (chart 4.5.1) and registers it as the
`cozystack.local-storage` PackageSource. A cluster without the DRBD and
ZFS kernel modules can't run LINSTOR, so it has no dynamic PV
provisioning, hostpath volumes cover that. They also fit deliberately
node-local workloads.

- StorageClass is `cozystack-local-hostpath`, `WaitForFirstConsumer`,
`Delete` reclaim. It is not the default and doesn't take any existing
class name.
- Opt-in: a system bundle can list the package in
`bundles.enabledPackages`, no built-in variant enables it. Alone it
installs with `cozypkg add cozystack.local-storage`.
- Vendored RBAC is cut down by `patches/rbac.diff` (reapplied by `make
update`) to what volume reconciliation calls. Helper Pods, leader
election Leases and analytics state stay in the install namespace,
helpers are still privileged because they work on host directories.
- Images stay on docker.io, pinned by index digest with `make
update-image-pins`, nothing is rebuilt or mirrored.
- `local-storage` scope is mapped to `area/storage` in
`pr-labeler.yaml`, without it the title lands in `area/uncategorized` on
every run.

Tested with helm-unittest (StorageClass, PackageSource registration) and
`tests/rbac_test.py` (effective permissions across the bindings). Not
tried on a live cluster yet. Nothing installs the package by default,
the container cluster e2e lane that will use it is a follow-up
([#3238](https://github.com/cozystack/cozystack/issues/3238)).

### Screenshots

Not a UI change.

### Downstream repositories

- [ ] No downstream repository is affected by this change
- [x] [cozystack/website](https://github.com/cozystack/website) -
follow-up: https://github.com/cozystack/website/issues/726
- [ ]
[cozystack/terraform-provider-cozystack](https://github.com/cozystack/terraform-provider-cozystack)
- follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/ansible-cozystack](https://github.com/cozystack/ansible-cozystack)
- follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/ccp](https://github.com/cozystack/ccp) - follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/talm](https://github.com/cozystack/talm) - follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/cozyhr](https://github.com/cozystack/cozyhr) -
follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/cozy-proxy](https://github.com/cozystack/cozy-proxy) -
follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/cozystack-telemetry-server](https://github.com/cozystack/cozystack-telemetry-server)
- follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/external-apps-example](https://github.com/cozystack/external-apps-example)
- follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/examples](https://github.com/cozystack/examples) -
follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/community](https://github.com/cozystack/community) -
follow-up:

Website follow-up is an issue, the docs there describe a package that
isn't merged yet. The diff adds a platform component and touches no
platform values, ApplicationDefinition, tooling or `hack/` path, so
nothing else in the trigger map matches.

### Release note

```release-note
feat(local-storage): add opt-in cozystack.local-storage package that installs OpenEBS LocalPV hostpath and provides the cozystack-local-hostpath StorageClass, it is not enabled by any built-in variant and is not the default StorageClass.
```


<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit

* **New Features**
* Added optional OpenEBS LocalPV Hostpath storage for provisioning
persistent volumes on node-local storage.
* Added a configurable `cozy-local-hostpath` StorageClass, disabled by
default as the cluster’s default class.
* Added controls for storage class creation, reclaim policy, hostpath
quotas, and node deployment.

* **Documentation**
* Added guidance on installation, configuration, storage behavior, and
uninstall considerations.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
2026-10-07 14:59:03 +03:00
Aleksei Sviridkin 387760b94e test(tests): run unit suites with Bats and retain POSIX coverage (#3849)
## What this PR does

This runs the unit suite with Bats and keeps a separate `dash` pass for
tests that source production shell helpers. Unit files are discovered
from the filesystem, and each loads the audited helper that restores
`set -u` in test bodies without changing subprocess shell options.

CI pins Bats 1.14.0, keeps JUnit reports, and runs Bats for docs-only
changes too. Code changes also run Helm, Go, controller and POSIX
compatibility tests.

Per-file Make targets and the `--keep-going` sub-make are removed
because one `bats -j` run goes through all files anyway, so a red file
doesn't stop the others, and `hack/bats-unit-keep-going.bats` checks
this with real bats. `-k` stays in the workflow because without it a red
Bats file keeps `test-controllers` from starting.

Local tests require bats-core 1.5 or newer. GNU parallel is optional,
and the complete local hook runs with `pre-commit run bats-unit-tests
--hook-stage manual --all-files`. Live-cluster suites keep their
existing runner.

### Validation

`make unit-tests test-controllers -j4 -k --output-sync=target
BATS_JOBS=4 BATS_POSIX_SHELL=dash` passed, including every discovered
Bats file and the POSIX pass. Mutation checks reject omitted files,
disabled or exported nounset, missing CI steps and missing or excessive
POSIX coverage.

### Downstream repositories

The developer guide update is tracked separately in
[cozystack/website](https://github.com/cozystack/website/issues/717).
CCP has no caller of the changed targets.

- [ ] No downstream repository is affected by this change
- [ ] [cozystack/website](https://github.com/cozystack/website) -
documentation follow-up:
[issue](https://github.com/cozystack/website/issues/717)
- [ ]
[cozystack/terraform-provider-cozystack](https://github.com/cozystack/terraform-provider-cozystack)
- follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/ansible-cozystack](https://github.com/cozystack/ansible-cozystack)
- follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/ccp](https://github.com/cozystack/ccp) - follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/talm](https://github.com/cozystack/talm) - follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/cozyhr](https://github.com/cozystack/cozyhr) -
follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/cozy-proxy](https://github.com/cozystack/cozy-proxy) -
follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/cozystack-telemetry-server](https://github.com/cozystack/cozystack-telemetry-server)
- follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/external-apps-example](https://github.com/cozystack/external-apps-example)
- follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/examples](https://github.com/cozystack/examples) -
follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/community](https://github.com/cozystack/community) -
follow-up:

### Release note

```release-note
NONE
```


<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit

* **Testing & Reliability**
* Bats unit tests run as a dedicated suite, with optional parallel
execution and JUnit reports.
* Pull request checks run Bats tests for documentation-only changes, and
unit and controller tests for code changes.
* POSIX-shell compatibility tests are included in the standard unit-test
run and continue after individual failures.
  * Test reports are uploaded even when checks fail.
* Added a manual local test hook for running Bats and POSIX
compatibility tests.
  * Shared strict setup is applied across Bats unit tests.
* **Documentation**
* Updated testing guidance with current commands, runner compatibility,
and CI coverage.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
2026-10-07 14:35:51 +03:00
Aleksei Sviridkin f568fc28bc fix(api): repair an empty required field instead of failing the release (#3956)
## What this PR does

Application spec goes to flux as HelmRelease `.spec.values` as is, and
helm value coalescing deletes null key together with chart default under
it, before values are validated against `values.schema.json`. So a field
that was written but left empty:

```yaml
apiVersion: apps.cozystack.io/v1alpha1
kind: Kubernetes
spec:
  talos:
    registryMirrors:
```

fails whole release with `at '/talos': missing property
'registryMirrors'`, naming property that spec does contain, and
application never installs. Writing `registryMirrors: {}` works, and
nothing in the error points at difference between the two.

Such null is now removed on write path (`Create` and `Update` in
cozystack-api), so chart default applies to it, and client gets a
warning naming every field that was dropped. Writing schema default into
the spec instead would pin current value into stored HelmRelease and
freeze application on it, so a later bump of that default in the chart
would never reach it.

Only fields that schema marks required are repaired. For those null cant
be load-bearing, because today it fails render entirely. Where schema
allows field to be absent, null keeps meaning it has now (chart default
suppressed, key never reaches template), and that one is worth keeping:
167 optional fields in catalogue carry non-trivial default, placeholder
credentials and example s3 buckets among them, so resolving user null to
those is worse than leaving key out. Free-form subtrees, null map
entries under user chosen key (node group, registry host) and array
elements are left as written too, there null may be the payload.

Not covered by this PR: `talos:` with whole section left empty. Root
schema of kubernetes app has no required fields at all, so it still dies
at render with `nil pointer evaluating interface {}.version`. That one
is loud and visible in HelmRelease status, and it belongs to templates.

Tests are on the real shipped schema from
`packages/system/kubernetes-rd/cozyrds/kubernetes.yaml`, and cover both
sides of the boundary: required field repaired, optional field left
alone.

### Related

Same class as #3705, where `tls:` written empty deletes the chart
default and panics the render in four charts. This PR covers the half
where schema marks the field required, so validation fails instead of a
nil deref. Template half of #3705 (guard the map, not the value) is not
here, and that one also covers `talos:` with whole section left empty.

#3046 was the same failure through the typed CR, closed by dropping
`required` from one field in #3121, and #3949 was a second attempt of
the same per field approach. That loop is what this PR is meant to end.

### Downstream repositories

Walked the trigger map against the diff. Go code in api layer only, no
package touched, no values.yaml, no schema field, no default, no version
enum, no `kind` or `plural`, README unchanged. terraform-provider models
spec fields itself and none of them changed here.

- [x] No downstream repository is affected by this change

### Release note

```release-note
fix(api): a field written with no value in an application spec (`registryMirrors:` with nothing under it) no longer fails the whole HelmRelease when the schema marks that field required. It is treated as unset, so the chart default applies to it.
```


<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit

* **Bug Fixes**
* Required application fields set to `null` now use their chart defaults
during creation and updates.
* Admission validation checks the normalized specification, helping
prevent validation and stored values from diverging.
  * Invalid specifications return a bad-request response.
  * Creation and update responses warn when null fields are repaired.
* Optional fields, free-form data, user-defined map entries, and array
positions retain their existing `null` values.
  * Processing no longer modifies the incoming application object.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
2026-10-07 14:35:36 +03:00
Aleksei Sviridkin 76b9e55102 fix(cert-manager): enable the Gateway API solver in the controller
With the platform Gateway enabled, the ClusterIssuers in
cert-manager-issuers and the per-tenant Issuers rendered for
TenantGateway carry an http01.gatewayHTTPRoute solver, but the
controller only honours that solver when Gateway API support is
switched on, and the vendored chart leaves it off. Every HTTP-01
challenge behind the Gateway then fails with "gateway api is not
enabled" and no ACME certificate is issued.

Pass a ControllerConfiguration with enableGatewayAPI to the host
cert-manager through the component values of its platform Package.
The host always ships the Gateway API CRDs and orders cert-manager
after them, so the flag is safe on every variant.

It is not a default of the system/cert-manager chart: the same chart
is installed into tenant clusters, where the CRDs are an opt-in addon
and a controller started with Gateway API support and no CRDs exits
at startup. The tenant side keeps opting in on its own.

Signed-off-by: Aleksei Sviridkin <f@lex.la>
Assisted-by: LLM
2026-10-07 14:14:35 +03:00
Mattia Eleuteri 54ab863c0e fix(backups): hold a Postgres backup until the plugin rollout is over
A Cluster that has never carried the barman-cloud plugin gets it from
the first BackupJob: a fresh platform-flow app, or one an in-place
restore re-rendered. Attaching it changes the instance pod spec, so
CNPG rolls every instance. The cnpg.io/Backup the same reconcile
created then runs on an instance without the plugin sidecar ("requested
plugin is not available") or on one CNPG restarts under it ("instance
manager was restarted during backup"). CNPG never retries it, so the
BackupJob sat in CNPGBackupTransientFailure until the backup deadline
and failed: the first backup of every such Postgres was lost.

The driver now records a PluginRolledOut=False condition before it
attaches the plugin, and creates no Backup until CNPG reports the
Cluster healthy and every instance pod was created after that
condition and is Ready. Recording it first means a lost status write
leaves the plugin unattached for the next pass, rather than a Cluster
that looks ready while it rolls. A Cluster that already runs the plugin
is not rolled by the driver and is not held back.

The phase alone cannot tell the rollout is over. Cluster status has no
observedGeneration and its Ready condition is derived from the phase,
so until CNPG reconciles the new spec the phase still reads healthy
from before the attach. status.pluginStatus is no better: CNPG also
lists plugins referenced only from externalClusters there, which is
exactly the state of a Cluster a restore re-rendered. A pod spec change
is never applied in place, so the instances are recreated, and pods
newer than the attach are the ones running the sidecar. That reads only
pod metadata and CNPG's documented labels, not the plugin's container
names. The wait stays bounded by the existing backup deadline.

Signed-off-by: Mattia Eleuteri <mattia@hidora.io>
Assisted-by: LLM
2026-10-07 11:15:43 +02:00
Myasnikov Daniil 34b1533a1a ci(labeler): map the local-storage scope to area/storage
The labeler falls back to area/uncategorized for a scope it does not
know, and re-applies the fallback on every run, so a manually fixed
label does not stay. The local-storage package is a storage component,
and its PR title scope should land on area/storage.

Assisted-by: LLM
Signed-off-by: Myasnikov Daniil <myasnikovdaniil2001@gmail.com>
2026-10-07 11:30:46 +03:00
Myasnikov Daniil d61fed46cc feat(local-storage): add opt-in OpenEBS LocalPV hostpath package
LINSTOR needs the DRBD and ZFS kernel modules, so a cluster without
them has no dynamic PV provisioning. OpenEBS LocalPV hostpath needs no
kernel modules and also serves deliberately node-local workloads.

The package is opt-in so it cannot change an existing cluster. Its
class is named cozystack-local-hostpath so it cannot collide with an
existing class name, and it is not the default so PVCs that omit
storageClassName keep their current binding. The vendored RBAC is
patched down to what volume reconciliation calls; helper Pods, Leases
and analytics state stay in the install namespace.

Images stay on docker.io, pinned by index digest.

Assisted-by: LLM
Signed-off-by: Myasnikov Daniil <myasnikovdaniil2001@gmail.com>
2026-10-07 11:30:45 +03:00
Aleksei Sviridkin 6addef4d3c fix(kubevirt): route the export proxy to the Service KubeVirt creates (#4637)
## What this PR does

The VM export routes point at a Service that does not exist, and the
tenant network policy would block the Ingress even if it did.

KubeVirt creates the export proxy Service under the name
`virt-exportproxy` (`VirtExportProxyName` in
`pkg/virt-operator/resource/generate/components`, v1.9.0). The Ingress
and the TLSRoute that publish `vm-exportproxy.<host>` name a
`vm-exportproxy` Service, and nothing creates one. The backend was
`virt-exportproxy` when the Ingress was added in 0ddaff938. Then
3780925a6 renamed the hostname to `vm-exportproxy` and the backend along
with it. The hostname stays, only the backend goes back.

Renaming the backend is not enough for the Ingress, because it is served
by the ingress controller in tenant-root and tenant egress is
default-deny. Each allowed destination has its own `allow-to-*` policy.
The CDI upload proxy has `allow-to-cdi-upload-proxy`, the export proxy
had nothing. The new `allow-to-vm-exportproxy` policy renders for the
same tenants and the same source pods as the CDI one. Its destination is
narrower: only the `kubevirt.io=virt-exportproxy` pods in
`cozy-kubevirt`, on TCP 8443, the container port virt-operator gives
them.

The unit tests pin the backend name for the Ingress and the TLSRoute,
and the placement, selector and port of the new policy.

I checked this on a test cluster with KubeVirt v1.9.0 and ingress-nginx.
Without the fix the controller logs `Error obtaining Endpoints for
Service "cozy-kubevirt/vm-exportproxy"`. With the backend renamed and
the tenant allowed egress to virt-exportproxy, a passthrough request to
`vm-exportproxy.<host>` reaches the export proxy, and it answers with
its own serving certificate.

### Downstream repositories

- [x] No downstream repository is affected by this change
- [ ] [cozystack/website](https://github.com/cozystack/website) -
follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/terraform-provider-cozystack](https://github.com/cozystack/terraform-provider-cozystack)
- follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/ansible-cozystack](https://github.com/cozystack/ansible-cozystack)
- follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/ccp](https://github.com/cozystack/ccp) - follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/talm](https://github.com/cozystack/talm) - follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/cozyhr](https://github.com/cozystack/cozyhr) -
follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/cozy-proxy](https://github.com/cozystack/cozy-proxy) -
follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/cozystack-telemetry-server](https://github.com/cozystack/cozystack-telemetry-server)
- follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/external-apps-example](https://github.com/cozystack/external-apps-example)
- follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/examples](https://github.com/cozystack/examples) -
follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/community](https://github.com/cozystack/community) -
follow-up:

### Release note

```release-note
fix(kubevirt): requests to vm-exportproxy.<host> now reach the KubeVirt export proxy: the Ingress and TLSRoute route to the virt-exportproxy Service KubeVirt creates, and tenants are allowed egress to the export proxy.
```


<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->

## Summary by CodeRabbit

* **New Features**
* Tenant workloads can now connect to the KubeVirt export proxy over TCP
port 8443.
* **Bug Fixes**
* Updated export-proxy Ingress and TLSRoute routing to use the
`virt-exportproxy` backend, keeping export-proxy traffic directed to the
correct service.

<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
2026-10-07 11:19:32 +03:00
Aleksei Sviridkin 8c1a78dc9b feat(operator): default system namespace memory via LimitRange (#3494)
## What this PR does

System components now get a default container memory limit, so their pod
cgroups carry a `memory.max` and drop out of the Talos userspace OOM
handler's victim set. `cozystack-operator` maintains a LimitRange named
`cozystack-system-defaults` in every system namespace it reconciles.

The Talos handler (v1.12+) scores cgroups with `memory_max.hasValue() ?
0.0 : {Besteffort: 1.0, Burstable: 0.5, ...}[class] * memory_current`
and drops everything that scores zero. Only a memory limit sets
`memory.max`, so only a limit takes a pod out of the candidate set. A
request just moves a pod from BestEffort to Burstable, which under the
default `strictCgroupClassOrdering: true` still means killed second.
`PriorityClass` does nothing here, because the handler reads cgroupfs
and never talks to the apiserver. Victim selection is also unrelated to
the trigger, so a tenant workload thrashing against its own limit can
drive node memory pressure while a system component with no limit is
what gets killed.

An audit of a running cluster found around 70 workloads across ~30
packages with at least one container missing a memory limit. Per-chart
resources would not cover that set, and would not keep covering it as
packages are added. So the LimitRange is written by
`reconcileNamespaces`, which already creates these namespaces and
already tells system from tenant. It also covers init containers, which
#3495 can't reach: one of them without a limit leaves the pod cgroup
without `memory.max`, whatever the main containers declare.

Tenant namespaces are skipped. Where the tenant chart's own
`tenant-range-limits` exists (only when the operator configured
`resourceQuotas`), a second LimitRange next to it would leave the result
to the order LimitRanger iterates them. Where it doesn't exist, a tenant
namespace is not the place for the platform to impose a default.

### Why the default is 32Gi

The handler grants immunity for `memory.max` existing at all, whatever
its value. So the ceiling doesn't need to be fitted, and 32Gi is high
enough that nothing plausibly reaches it. A ceiling low enough to bind
would turn a rare pressure-driven kill into a deterministic one for any
component whose real usage nobody measured. This repo already has one
such case, recorded in the `vertical-pod-autoscaler` values, where a
110Mi limit OOM-killed the updater and failed HelmReleases with it.
Scheduling is unaffected, since pods are scheduled against requests and
the paired default request is 32Mi. An operator who wants the ceiling to
bind can lower it, per component in that component's chart or fleet-wide
with the knob, once real usage is measured.

### When the default is withheld

A default below a container's own request makes that pod impossible to
admit, so the operator checks before it applies. It scans Deployments,
StatefulSets, DaemonSets, CronJobs, Jobs and Pods in the namespace, init
containers included, for a container that requests more than the
configured limit and declares no limit of its own. If it finds one, it
withdraws the managed LimitRange and records a hold in the
`operator.cozystack.io/system-memory-state` annotation on the Namespace.

The hold does not clear by itself when the blocker disappears, because
an empty scan looks the same as a pod between deletion and recreation.
Lowering a previously applied limit also creates a hold, even with no
visible blocker, because LimitRanger writes the defaulted limit onto
admitted pods and the scan can no longer tell which containers declare
one. A cluster administrator releases the hold by copying the
`<hold>:<target>` token from the state into the
`operator.cozystack.io/system-memory-ack` annotation. The token is used
once and only for that hold and target. If a blocker is still visible,
the token is rejected and the hold stays. Package reconciles are
scheduled at least every five minutes, so an acknowledgement takes
effect on a quiet cluster too. The reason and the token also appear in
the operator log under `withholding the default container memory limit`.

### Namespace another LimitRange already governs

If a system namespace already has a LimitRange that says anything about
memory, at the Container or the Pod scope, the operator writes nothing
there and withdraws what it wrote before. A second default leaves the
effective value to iteration order. A foreign `max` below this default,
a `min` above the default request or a `maxLimitRequestRatio` rejects
pods outright, which takes out a whole namespace. At the Pod scope the
collision can't be decided in advance, because it depends on how many
containers a future pod has. A LimitRange that bounds only cpu or
storage coexists normally. A same-named LimitRange without the
operator's managed-by label is treated as foreign and left alone.

This matters most in `kube-system`, which is in scope because
`cozystack-scheduler` installs there, and where a distribution's or an
administrator's own LimitRange is likeliest to sit.

### Disabling

Setting `cozystackOperator.systemNamespaceMemoryLimit` to `0` disables
the feature. On the next reconcile the operator removes every LimitRange
it owns cluster-wide, found by the managed-by label. While the feature
is on, it also removes its LimitRange from namespaces no active Package
targets any more. The safety state on the Namespace stays in both cases.

### Docs

`docs/operations/system-memory-limits.md` landed in #3496 ahead of this
code, so main describes a `4Gi` default and installer values that do
nothing yet. The page is corrected to the 32Gi default and now describes
withholding, the acknowledgement, and the foreign LimitRange rule.

### Not in this PR

linstor policy. #3824 extends the controller's existing exemption from
limits to the satellite, and a linstor limit here would contradict it,
so linstor stays with that PR.

The scan reads six workload kinds through `APIReader`, uncached, on
every reconcile of every system namespace. That cost is tracked in
#3977, since the system namespace set isn't known when the cache is
built and the right fix depends on a reconcile-rate measurement nobody
has taken.

### Verification

`go vet` and `go test` pass for `cmd/cozystack-operator` and
`internal/operator`, and `helm unittest` passes on the installer chart
for the knobs unset, set, and the limit at `0`. The reconciler tests
cover withholding on an oversized request, the hold surviving the
blocker's removal, the hold on a lowered limit, acknowledgement and
token rejection, every memory field of a foreign LimitRange at both
scopes, ownership by label, the disabled sweep, and a deleting Package
not creating policy.

The withhold design has not been run on a live cluster yet. An earlier
design of this PR was, and that run does not carry over.

### Screenshots

Not a UI change.

### Downstream repositories

I walked the trigger map against the diff.
`packages/core/installer/values.yaml` gains two keys, but the
`ansible-cozystack` trigger is for a required key or a rename of one the
role passes, and these are new, optional and default to `""`, so the
role is unaffected. Nothing else in the map is reached by the Go
changes, the operator template or the page.

- [x] No downstream repository is affected by this change
- [ ] [cozystack/website](https://github.com/cozystack/website) -
follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/terraform-provider-cozystack](https://github.com/cozystack/terraform-provider-cozystack)
- follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/ansible-cozystack](https://github.com/cozystack/ansible-cozystack)
- follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/ccp](https://github.com/cozystack/ccp) - follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/talm](https://github.com/cozystack/talm) - follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/cozyhr](https://github.com/cozystack/cozyhr) -
follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/cozy-proxy](https://github.com/cozystack/cozy-proxy) -
follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/cozystack-telemetry-server](https://github.com/cozystack/cozystack-telemetry-server)
- follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/external-apps-example](https://github.com/cozystack/external-apps-example)
- follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/examples](https://github.com/cozystack/examples) -
follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/community](https://github.com/cozystack/community) -
follow-up:

### Release note

```release-note
feat(operator): system namespaces now get a default container memory limit through a LimitRange maintained by cozystack-operator, which keeps system components out of the Talos userspace OOM handler's victim set. Tune it with cozystackOperator.systemNamespaceMemoryLimit (default 32Gi) and cozystackOperator.systemNamespaceMemoryRequest (default 32Mi); set the limit to 0 to disable it. The default is far above any real working set on purpose, because the handler grants immunity for a memory.max existing at all, not for its value. A namespace with a container that requests more than the limit and declares no limit of its own gets no default, and stays without one until a cluster administrator acknowledges the hold recorded on the Namespace (see docs/operations/system-memory-limits.md); lowering a previously applied limit needs the same acknowledgement. A namespace where another LimitRange already sets anything about memory is left alone. A container that declares its own memory limit is never changed.
```
2026-10-07 11:19:26 +03:00
Aleksei Sviridkin 84e8fcd477 fix(dashboard): re-authenticate on 401 instead of failing silently (#3115)
## What this PR does

When the dashboard session expires, the console now sends the user back
to sign-in instead of sitting on a stale page. This re-applies
cozystack/cozystack-ui#34 by @IvanHunters onto the in-tree console,
since the UI was vendored into the monorepo (#2963) and the standalone
repo is being archived. It is part of the cozystack-ui retirement
tracked in #3097.

When the `kc-access` cookie expires, k8s API calls return 401.
`K8sClient` now treats a 401 as an auth boundary and makes one top-level
navigation to `/oauth2/sign_in?rd=<current-url>`. That path is the
sign-in entry both gatekeeper modes serve. With OIDC enabled,
oauth2-proxy goes straight to the provider (`--skip-provider-button`)
and returns the user to `rd`. Without OIDC, token-proxy renders its
token form there, but it does not honour `rd` yet, so the user lands on
`/` after sign-in.

The handler can be replaced through `K8sClientConfig.onUnauthorized` and
does nothing outside the browser. A latch keeps concurrent 401s from
redirecting more than once, and any 2xx from either fetch site re-arms
it, so a handler that re-authenticates in place still sees the next
expiry.

Related: #2788.

### Verification

`client.unauthorized.test.ts` covers the hook on the request and watch
paths, the latch across concurrent 401s, the re-arm after a success, and
the default handler's target and relative `rd`. `pnpm typecheck` and the
console test suite pass.

Original PR: cozystack/cozystack-ui#34, credited via `Co-authored-by`.

### Screenshots

Not a UI change.

### Downstream repositories

- [x] No downstream repository is affected by this change
- [ ] [cozystack/website](https://github.com/cozystack/website) -
follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/terraform-provider-cozystack](https://github.com/cozystack/terraform-provider-cozystack)
- follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/ansible-cozystack](https://github.com/cozystack/ansible-cozystack)
- follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/ccp](https://github.com/cozystack/ccp) - follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/talm](https://github.com/cozystack/talm) - follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/cozyhr](https://github.com/cozystack/cozyhr) -
follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/cozy-proxy](https://github.com/cozystack/cozy-proxy) -
follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/cozystack-telemetry-server](https://github.com/cozystack/cozystack-telemetry-server)
- follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/external-apps-example](https://github.com/cozystack/external-apps-example)
- follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/examples](https://github.com/cozystack/examples) -
follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/community](https://github.com/cozystack/community) -
follow-up:

### Release note

```release-note
fix(dashboard): on a 401 (expired session) the console now sends the user to sign in again instead of silently showing a stale page. With OIDC enabled the user returns to the page they were on; without OIDC they land on the start page after entering a token.
```
2026-10-07 11:14:37 +03:00
Aleksei Sviridkin 3e078b79a9 ci(e2e): refuse a new fork image before the build starts (#4767)
## What this PR does

A fork PR that adds a first-party image cannot pass the fork e2e lane,
and today it finds that out only after the whole build. `e2e-fork.yaml`
pushes the fork's image archives only under names the base tree already
exports, so a new image is refused at the push with `image '<name>' is
not in the base-tree allowlist`. Nothing the contributor does on the PR
changes that.

This PR keeps the push allowlist as strict as it is and moves the
failure to the start of the run. On fork PRs, `plan` in
`pull-requests.yaml` now runs `hack/fork-new-images.sh`. The script
derives the image names of the PR tree and of its base parent with the
same `make -n` derivation the push step uses. If the PR tree exports a
name the base does not, it fails before any build, names the images and
says what has to happen: a maintainer lands the image on the base branch
first, or the change runs from a branch in this repository.

The check runs from the fork's own tree, so a fork can remove it. That
is fine, because it only saves an honest contributor a wasted build. The
push allowlist in `e2e-fork.yaml` is still the boundary. That workflow
cannot call the script, since it runs from the default branch over an
untrusted checkout. So `hack/fork-new-images.bats` pins the two
derivations to each other, and also covers the script's behaviour and
the fork-only gating of the step.

I replayed the script against the merge commit of #4291 and its base
parent. It fails with `cluster-api-provider-kubevirt`, the same name the
push step refused there. The workflow_run lane itself cannot be
exercised locally.

This does not lift the limitation itself: a fork still cannot get a
green run for a new image. Part of #4329.

### Screenshots

Not a UI change.

### Downstream repositories

- [x] No downstream repository is affected by this change
- [ ] [cozystack/website](https://github.com/cozystack/website) -
follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/terraform-provider-cozystack](https://github.com/cozystack/terraform-provider-cozystack)
- follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/ansible-cozystack](https://github.com/cozystack/ansible-cozystack)
- follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/ccp](https://github.com/cozystack/ccp) - follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/talm](https://github.com/cozystack/talm) - follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/cozyhr](https://github.com/cozystack/cozyhr) -
follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/cozy-proxy](https://github.com/cozystack/cozy-proxy) -
follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/cozystack-telemetry-server](https://github.com/cozystack/cozystack-telemetry-server)
- follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/external-apps-example](https://github.com/cozystack/external-apps-example)
- follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/examples](https://github.com/cozystack/examples) -
follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/community](https://github.com/cozystack/community) -
follow-up:

### Release note

```release-note
ci(e2e): a fork PR that adds a new first-party image now fails in the plan job, naming the image, instead of after the whole build at the image push.
```


<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->

## Summary by CodeRabbit

* **New Features**
* Fork pull requests that add image names not present in the base branch
are now rejected during planning, with the new names reported before
builds begin.
* **Documentation**
* Updated guidance describes the early check and clarifies how it
relates to the image allowlist used during publishing.
* **Tests**
* Added coverage for new, unchanged, reduced, and empty image sets,
along with checks that the pull request workflow applies the check only
to fork submissions.

<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
2026-10-07 11:14:23 +03:00
Myasnikov Daniil cc942fed68 test(tests): run unit suites with Bats and retain POSIX coverage
The shell translator rewrites test bodies and loses Bats reporting.
The unit lane needs complete TAP results and JUnit reports without
changing how live-cluster suites run.

Sourced production helpers still need a dash pass, and unit test bodies
need nounset without exporting shell options into subprocesses.

Assisted-by: LLM
Signed-off-by: Myasnikov Daniil <myasnikovdaniil2001@gmail.com>
2026-10-07 11:04:00 +03:00
Yan Bondarenko 8ce3f853af fix(dashboard): drop the resource map ConfigMaps once the map is unreadable
React Query keeps the last successful list when a refetch fails. After the
resource map became forbidden or went away, the hook went on parsing that
old copy, so the ConfigMaps tab stayed with stale names, and a malformed
map kept its old error, instead of the tab going away as it does when the
map is unreadable from the start.

Assisted-by: LLM
Signed-off-by: Yan Bondarenko <202671653+yankawai@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-10-07 11:00:18 +03:00
IvanHunters 3cce629535 feat(redis,postgres): certify the per-engine external hostname (#4627)
<!-- Thank you for making a contribution! Here are some tips for you:
- Use Conventional Commits for the PR title: `type(scope): description`
- Types: feat, fix, docs, style, refactor, perf, test, build, ci, chore
- Scopes are not an exhaustive list — pick the most specific scope for
the change and extend the list when a genuinely new area appears.
Examples:
- System components: dashboard, platform, operator, cilium, kube-ovn,
linstor, fluxcd, cluster-api
- Managed apps: postgres, mariadb, redis, kafka, clickhouse,
virtual-machine, kubernetes
- Development and maintenance: api, hack, tests, ci, docs, maintenance
- Breaking changes: append `!` after type/scope (`feat(api)!: ...`) or
add a `BREAKING CHANGE:` footer
- If it's a work in progress, consider creating this PR as a draft.
- Don't hesistate to ask for opinion and review in the community chats,
even if it's still a draft.
- Add the label `kind/backport` if it's a bugfix that needs to be
backported to a previous version.
-->

## What this PR does

Redis and postgres server certificates now carry the per-engine external
name `<release>.<engine>.<apex>` (for example
`redis-foo.redis.example.org`) next to the flat `<release>.<apex>` they
already had. Both names appear under the same condition as before: TLS
on and `external: true`, with a tenant apex present.

A TLS-passthrough listener on the tenant Gateway forwards the handshake
untouched, so the certificate the client checks is the engine's own. The
design in #2815 routes databases by SNI under `*.redis.<apex>` and
`*.postgres.<apex>`, and without the per-engine name in the SAN list a
verifying client would fail the hostname check. Issuing both names now
means a later move between the two hostname schemes reissues no
certificate and keeps clients on the same trust anchor. This is the
certificate step of #2815. Nothing renders a route yet.

The SAN list changes, so an existing external TLS release gets its
server certificate reissued once on upgrade, from the same CA. For redis
the operator then rolls the Redis and Sentinel pods one at a time, the
same way it handles a renewal.

The READMEs say who can reach the new name through a passthrough
listener. For postgres that is only clients using direct TLS negotiation
(server 17+, `sslnegotiation=direct`), because by default a plaintext
SSLRequest comes before the handshake. `redis-cli` needs `--sni`.

MongoDB is not in this PR. PSMDB issues the certificate itself and its
CRD has no field for extra SANs, so adding the mongos name means the
chart taking over the certificate. That needs its own change.

Covered by helm-unittest: the name is present with TLS and external on,
and absent with external off, with TLS off, and in a tenant with no
apex.

### Screenshots

<!-- REQUIRED for UI changes: attach screenshots or screen recordings
demonstrating
the visual impact of your changes. PRs with UI changes without
screenshots will not be merged. -->

### Downstream repositories

<!--
Cozystack is upstream for repositories that are NOT kept in sync with it
automatically, and nothing in CI compares the two sides, so a change
here can break them silently.

Which change forces what, and which file to touch, is the trigger map in
docs/agents/contributing.md under "Downstream Repositories". Walk it
before you tick anything.

IF YOU ARE AN AI AGENT OR AN LLM, THIS IS PART OF THE TASK, NOT A FORM
TO FILL IN:

1. Walk the trigger map against the actual diff of this PR, file by
file. Do not decide from the PR title or from your memory of what you
changed.
2. For every repository you tick, open the follow-up PR there and link
it on the same line. A ticked box with no link claims work that does not
exist, which is worse than an empty box. Search that repository for an
open PR or issue covering it first, and link that instead of filing a
duplicate.
3. When the follow-up is out of scope, or needs a decision that is not
yours to make, open an issue in that repository instead, link that, and
say so in the PR body. Do not push a speculative PR into another
repository just to fill a line here.
4. Do not tick "No downstream repository is affected" to make the
checklist go away. If you are unsure, leave every box empty and say so
in the PR body, so a human decides.
-->

- [x] No downstream repository is affected by this change
- [ ] [cozystack/website](https://github.com/cozystack/website) -
follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/terraform-provider-cozystack](https://github.com/cozystack/terraform-provider-cozystack)
- follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/ansible-cozystack](https://github.com/cozystack/ansible-cozystack)
- follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/ccp](https://github.com/cozystack/ccp) - follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/talm](https://github.com/cozystack/talm) - follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/cozyhr](https://github.com/cozystack/cozyhr) -
follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/cozy-proxy](https://github.com/cozystack/cozy-proxy) -
follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/cozystack-telemetry-server](https://github.com/cozystack/cozystack-telemetry-server)
- follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/external-apps-example](https://github.com/cozystack/external-apps-example)
- follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/examples](https://github.com/cozystack/examples) -
follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/community](https://github.com/cozystack/community) -
follow-up:

### Release note

<!--  Write a release note:
- Explain what has changed internally and for users.
- Start with the same `type(scope):` prefix as in the PR title
- Follow the guidelines at
https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/guide/release-notes.md.
-->

```release-note
feat(redis,postgres): server certificates of external redis and postgres releases also carry the `<release>.<engine>.<apex>` name that the tenant Gateway's TLS-passthrough listeners are designed to route by. Existing external TLS releases get their server certificate reissued once on upgrade, from the same CA.
```


<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit

* **New Features**
* PostgreSQL TLS certificates now cover both the tenant hostname and the
per-engine `postgres` hostname for external connections.
* Redis TLS certificates now also cover the per-engine `redis` hostname
when external services are enabled.

* **Documentation**
* Clarified connection requirements for per-engine hostnames: PostgreSQL
routing requires direct TLS negotiation, PostgreSQL 17 or later, and a
compatible client; Redis clients must specify SNI.
* Clarified that the hostnames may need to be mapped manually to the
LoadBalancer address.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
2026-10-07 10:56:34 +03:00
Aleksei Sviridkin b1c84e9c06 feat(platform, tests): select E2E packages and declare controller dependencies (#4022)
## What this PR does

E2E installs the whole platform on a fresh cluster for every PR,
whatever the PR touches, so install time and flake surface go to
packages the selected suites never use. This PR makes the E2E install
take only what the selected suites need.

`hack/select-install.sh --disabled <suites>` generates
`bundles.disabledPackages` for fresh E2E installs using an ordinary
platform variant. It keeps suite owners, runtime requirements and the
install baseline, then follows their forward `PackageSource`
dependencies.

The baseline follows the unconditional waits in
`hack/e2e-install-cozystack.bats` and stays seeded directly even where
the graph reaches the same packages. It also keeps platform services
that no suite owns but the rest of the platform uses: `multus`,
`cozystack-scheduler`, `linstor-scheduler`, `flux-plunger`, `cozy-proxy`
and `ouroboros` (the Kubernetes suites assert its hairpin NAT). Backup
suites also keep `backupstrategy-controller` and its dependencies, and
the gateway suite keeps `kubeovn-webhook`.

The E2E job now selects the suites before it installs, and passes the
complement to the platform Package as `disabledPackages`. The `full-e2e`
label and an empty selection keep the full install, and the nightly and
tag lanes pass no list.

The platform sources also change: `mongodb-application` now depends on
`mongodb-operator`, and `seaweedfs-application` on
`objectstorage-controller`. These dependencies apply to regular platform
installs and upgrades too.

The new `mongodb-operator` edge also reaches reverse test selection: a
change under `packages/system/mongodb-operator` now selects the
`mongodb` suite instead of falling back to the full suite. Backup APIs
and the gateway webhook remain suite-specific install requirements, so
they add no edges.

The disable list governs fresh installs because existing Packages carry
`helm.sh/resource-policy: keep`. Optional packages still need
`bundles.enabledPackages`. Packages that no suite owns and the baseline
does not keep stay uninstalled on purpose, also when test selection
answers with every suite (monitoring exporters like `goldpinger` and
`kubeovn-plunger`, apps without a suite, provider-specific operators).
Nothing in the run looks at them, so installing them only adds a
readiness wait, and a change to such a package gets no install check
from this gate.

### Measured

One run per variant on a 32 vCPU / 128 GB VM, container lane, the CI
artifacts of this PR, `postgres` suite selected, 55 packages disabled:

- HelmReleases 111 to 77, pods 219 to 197
- pod requests 14.8 CPU / 37.7 GiB to 13.5 CPU / 35.7 GiB
- host memory peak during install 33.4 GB to 30.2 GB
- `install-cozystack` 26m33s in both runs
- `postgres` suite 25m50s to 25m17s, passes on the reduced install

Install time did not change. The removed packages are mostly operators
and apps without instances, and what the install waits on (SeaweedFS,
LINSTOR, CDI, the Cluster API providers, Keycloak) stays in the
baseline. With one run each, differences of a minute or two are noise.

The selection, the install closure and the workflow wiring are covered
by bats tests (`hack/select-install_test.bats`,
`hack/select-e2e_test.bats`, `hack/platform-packages_test.bats`) and by
a helm-unittest suite in the platform chart.

### Screenshots

Not a UI change.

### Downstream repositories

The new dependencies ship in the platform chart. No coordinated changes
are needed in downstream repositories.

- [x] No downstream repository is affected by this change
- [ ] [cozystack/website](https://github.com/cozystack/website) -
follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/terraform-provider-cozystack](https://github.com/cozystack/terraform-provider-cozystack)
- follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/ansible-cozystack](https://github.com/cozystack/ansible-cozystack)
- follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/ccp](https://github.com/cozystack/ccp) - follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/talm](https://github.com/cozystack/talm) - follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/cozyhr](https://github.com/cozystack/cozyhr) -
follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/cozy-proxy](https://github.com/cozystack/cozy-proxy) -
follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/cozystack-telemetry-server](https://github.com/cozystack/cozystack-telemetry-server)
- follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/external-apps-example](https://github.com/cozystack/external-apps-example)
- follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/examples](https://github.com/cozystack/examples) -
follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/community](https://github.com/cozystack/community) -
follow-up:

### Release note

```release-note
feat(platform, tests): E2E installs only the packages the selected suites need. MongoDB now depends on its operator, and SeaweedFS on the object storage controller.
```
2026-10-07 09:36:24 +03:00
Aleksei Sviridkin 798094e725 feat(release): add backport-audit, a pre-release backport triage tool (#3527)
## What this PR does

This adds `cmd/backport-audit`, a maintainer tool that checks, before a
release or an rc is cut, whether everything labelled for backport
actually landed on the release branch. It prints the URLs of the PRs
that did not and exits non-zero, so the cut can gate on it.
`docs/release.md` and `docs/agents/releasing.md` now send the patch-cut
check through it.

The docs it replaces inventoried backports with `gh pr list --search
"is:merged label:kind/backport"`. That lists every PR ever labelled, not
what reached the branch. Answering the real question by hand means
reading the branch history per PR, and that is how backports go missing
quietly.

```console
$ go build ./cmd/backport-audit
$ ./backport-audit release-1.4

=== release-1.4 === 30 candidate PRs: MISSING=5 dropped=4 backported=21

  MISSING -- labelled for this line, no trace of it here (5):
    https://github.com/cozystack/cozystack/pull/2704
      #2704 fix(info): use root-host for Keycloak OIDC issuer URL in tenant kubeconfig
      label=kind/backport author=myasnikovdaniil merged=2026-05-26 -- no backport PR, nothing on branch
```

A `kind/backport` label does not name a branch. `backport.yaml` resolves
the target when the PR merges, so the same label means `release-1.5` on
a PR merged in June and `release-1.6` on one merged in August. The audit
reproduces that rule instead of trusting the label text. The rule
changed once, on 2026-08-03, when 53a7fc4dc made cutting an rc freeze
the line and 6ff5b98d5 pointed the bot at the branch list. Before that
date a line exists from its first stable release, after it from the
moment its `release-X.Y` branch is pushed. The audit estimates that
moment from the earliest `vX.Y.0-rc.N` tagged commit. This is an
estimate, because the commit timestamp is not the branch-push timestamp.
The README has the full reasoning.

Landing is checked per commit, because a commit is what a backport
loses: the bot's conflict drafts stop at the first commit that does not
apply. Every non-empty commit of the original needs its own evidence on
the branch. That is reachability, an `-x` reference, or a commit with
its subject among the branch commits that are not on main. Some but not
all is PARTIAL. A multi-commit original with a merged backport PR and no
commit evidence is UNVERIFIED. Both fail the gate. A maintainer can
confirm a squashed backport with a comment on the merged backport PR
that is exactly `backport-audit: complete`.

Two more sections start from the backport PRs on the branch instead of
from labels. DUPLICATE lists an original with more than one live
backport PR and fails the gate. UNLABELLED lists backports of originals
that are not labelled for this line. It is informational and does not
change the exit code.

Exit code 2 means the audit could not give an answer. That happens when
a `gh` listing reaches its cap, since `gh` truncates silently, or when a
git read that a verdict depends on fails. The label listings are checked
against the lower of `--limit` and 1000, because GitHub search never
returns more than 1000 results.

### Verification

`cmd/backport-audit/main_test.go` covers candidate selection, line
resolution and the evidence rules. `make unit-tests` runs it through a
new `test-backport-audit` target, since `./cmd/...` is not part of
`go-unit-tests`. `hack/release-freeze-contract.bats` pins the audit's
label set equal to the one `backport.yaml` acts on, in both directions.

### Limits

A MISSING verdict is a prompt to check, not proof of absence. A hand
backport that was squashed, reworded and never linked to its original is
invisible to every evidence layer. A label added after merge is read
against the line that was current at merge time, while the bot targets
the line current when the label is added. Such a backport shows as
MISSING on the old line and under UNLABELLED on the new one. The audit
reports that something is missing, never why. `docs/release.md` now
notes that before #3155 the bot left only a "Backport failed" comment on
a conflicting cherry-pick, which is the first thing to check behind a
MISSING.

`make generate` does not apply. This is a standalone `main` package with
no API types, no CRDs and no package `values.yaml`.

### Screenshots

Not a UI change. Sample CLI output is above.

### Downstream repositories

I walked the trigger map in `docs/agents/contributing.md` against the
diff file by file. The diff adds
`cmd/backport-audit/{main.go,main_test.go,README.md}` and changes
`Makefile`, `hack/release-freeze-contract.bats`, `docs/release.md`,
`docs/agents/releasing.md` and one `.gitignore` line for the root
binary.

Nothing in it reaches a downstream repository. No package under
`packages/apps/` or `packages/extra/` is added, renamed or removed, and
no `values.schema.json`, `values.yaml` default or version enum changes,
so the website generator lists and the terraform provider schemas are
untouched. No `ApplicationDefinition` semantics, `release.prefix`,
output Secret or Service name, namespace, platform variant or bundle
changes. The paths that reach ccp and external-apps-example
(`hack/package.mk`, `hack/common-envs.mk`, `hack/update-crd.sh`) are not
touched. The Makefile change adds a `test-backport-audit` target to
`unit-tests` and changes no existing target. No node prerequisite
changes, so talm and the ansible playbooks need nothing. The website
"developer tooling" trigger covers tools contributors use on packages.
This is maintainer release tooling, and its process doc lives in this
repository only.

- [x] No downstream repository is affected by this change
- [ ] [cozystack/website](https://github.com/cozystack/website) -
follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/terraform-provider-cozystack](https://github.com/cozystack/terraform-provider-cozystack)
- follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/ansible-cozystack](https://github.com/cozystack/ansible-cozystack)
- follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/ccp](https://github.com/cozystack/ccp) - follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/talm](https://github.com/cozystack/talm) - follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/cozyhr](https://github.com/cozystack/cozyhr) -
follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/cozy-proxy](https://github.com/cozystack/cozy-proxy) -
follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/cozystack-telemetry-server](https://github.com/cozystack/cozystack-telemetry-server)
- follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/external-apps-example](https://github.com/cozystack/external-apps-example)
- follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/examples](https://github.com/cozystack/examples) -
follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/community](https://github.com/cozystack/community) -
follow-up:

### Release note

```release-note
feat(release): add `backport-audit`, a maintainer tool that reports which `kind/backport` / `kind/backport-previous` PRs have not landed on a release branch (missing outright, partially backported, waiting on an open backport PR, or deliberately dropped) and exits non-zero while anything is outstanding, so a patch cut can gate on it
```
2026-10-07 08:59:38 +03:00
Aleksei Sviridkin 5486d4ffcf fix(networking): harden webhook policy assumptions (#4058)
## What this PR does

This is follow-up for
[#3997](https://github.com/cozystack/cozystack/pull/3997). It reads
ingress-nginx admission port from effective subchart values and refuses
empty value, and fixes `kubeProxyReplacement=false` status because
cozystack has no supported Service translator in that state. Gateway
test now requires one real ClusterIP and keeps same ready Pod UID, IP
and port for whole probe, so stale EndpointSlice, replaced Pod or wrong
Service can't report deny. Policy selectors and two-ended deny from
[#3997](https://github.com/cozystack/cozystack/pull/3997) stay
unchanged, and this does not claim root cause for
[#3983](https://github.com/cozystack/cozystack/issues/3983).

### Screenshots

Not applicable.

### Downstream repositories

- [x] No downstream repository is affected by this change
- [ ] [cozystack/website](https://github.com/cozystack/website) -
follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/terraform-provider-cozystack](https://github.com/cozystack/terraform-provider-cozystack)
- follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/ansible-cozystack](https://github.com/cozystack/ansible-cozystack)
- follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/ccp](https://github.com/cozystack/ccp) - follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/talm](https://github.com/cozystack/talm) - follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/cozyhr](https://github.com/cozystack/cozyhr) -
follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/cozy-proxy](https://github.com/cozystack/cozy-proxy) -
follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/cozystack-telemetry-server](https://github.com/cozystack/cozystack-telemetry-server)
- follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/external-apps-example](https://github.com/cozystack/external-apps-example)
- follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/examples](https://github.com/cozystack/examples) -
follow-up:

### Release note

```release-note
fix(networking): use effective ingress admission port, report unsupported Cilium service routing correctly, and reject stale backend evidence in gateway tests
```


<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit

- **Bug Fixes**
- Admission webhook connectivity checks now validate the configured
Service and its exact backend endpoint throughout probing, improving
failure detection.
- Admission webhook policies now fail closed when the webhook port is
not explicitly configured.

- **Documentation**
- Clarified that supported service routing requires
`kubeProxyReplacement: true`.
- Updated guidance to explain that disabling this setting or webhook
policies does not provide a supported fallback.

- **Tests**
- Added coverage for missing webhook port configuration and strengthened
networking stability checks.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
2026-10-07 08:37:53 +03:00
IvanHunters ac4ab1c4a6 chore: drop private cluster and host names from the tree (#4461)
<!-- Thank you for making a contribution! Here are some tips for you:
- Use Conventional Commits for the PR title: `type(scope): description`
- Types: feat, fix, docs, style, refactor, perf, test, build, ci, chore
- Scopes are not an exhaustive list — pick the most specific scope for
the change and extend the list when a genuinely new area appears.
Examples:
- System components: dashboard, platform, operator, cilium, kube-ovn,
linstor, fluxcd, cluster-api
- Managed apps: postgres, mariadb, redis, kafka, clickhouse,
virtual-machine, kubernetes
- Development and maintenance: api, hack, tests, ci, docs, maintenance
- Breaking changes: append `!` after type/scope (`feat(api)!: ...`) or
add a `BREAKING CHANGE:` footer
- If it's a work in progress, consider creating this PR as a draft.
- Don't hesistate to ask for opinion and review in the community chats,
even if it's still a draft.
- Add the label `kind/backport` if it's a bugfix that needs to be
backported to a previous version.
-->

## What this PR does

I remove internal cluster names, a real hostname with its IP addresses,
internal mirror hostnames and an internal product name from comments, an
example file, test fixtures and a dead commented-out config block. Where
a stand-in is needed I use neutral test-cluster wording, RFC 2606
domains or RFC 5737 documentation addresses. I also replace two real
Keycloak usernames and a reviewer's name in code comments with
placeholders, or drop them. Rendered output does not change. The test
fixture hostnames change on the input and the expected side together,
and the unit tests of every touched package still pass.

### Screenshots

<!-- REQUIRED for UI changes: attach screenshots or screen recordings
demonstrating
the visual impact of your changes. PRs with UI changes without
screenshots will not be merged. -->

### Downstream repositories

<!--
Cozystack is upstream for repositories that are NOT kept in sync with it
automatically, and nothing in CI compares the two sides, so a change
here can break them silently.

Which change forces what, and which file to touch, is the trigger map in
docs/agents/contributing.md under "Downstream Repositories". Walk it
before you tick anything.

IF YOU ARE AN AI AGENT OR AN LLM, THIS IS PART OF THE TASK, NOT A FORM
TO FILL IN:

1. Walk the trigger map against the actual diff of this PR, file by
file. Do not decide from the PR title or from your memory of what you
changed.
2. For every repository you tick, open the follow-up PR there and link
it on the same line. A ticked box with no link claims work that does not
exist, which is worse than an empty box. Search that repository for an
open PR or issue covering it first, and link that instead of filing a
duplicate.
3. When the follow-up is out of scope, or needs a decision that is not
yours to make, open an issue in that repository instead, link that, and
say so in the PR body. Do not push a speculative PR into another
repository just to fill a line here.
4. Do not tick "No downstream repository is affected" to make the
checklist go away. If you are unsure, leave every box empty and say so
in the PR body, so a human decides.
-->

- [x] No downstream repository is affected by this change
- [ ] [cozystack/website](https://github.com/cozystack/website) -
follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/terraform-provider-cozystack](https://github.com/cozystack/terraform-provider-cozystack)
- follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/ansible-cozystack](https://github.com/cozystack/ansible-cozystack)
- follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/ccp](https://github.com/cozystack/ccp) - follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/talm](https://github.com/cozystack/talm) - follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/cozyhr](https://github.com/cozystack/cozyhr) -
follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/cozy-proxy](https://github.com/cozystack/cozy-proxy) -
follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/cozystack-telemetry-server](https://github.com/cozystack/cozystack-telemetry-server)
- follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/external-apps-example](https://github.com/cozystack/external-apps-example)
- follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/examples](https://github.com/cozystack/examples) -
follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/community](https://github.com/cozystack/community) -
follow-up:

### Release note

<!--  Write a release note:
- Explain what has changed internally and for users.
- Start with the same `type(scope):` prefix as in the PR title
- Follow the guidelines at
https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/guide/release-notes.md.
-->

```release-note
NONE
```


<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit

* **Documentation**
* Updated backup, OIDC, autoscaling, and platform references to describe
test environments without naming specific development clusters.
* Replaced development-specific endpoints in the platform example with
`example.org` and documentation-only IP addresses.
  * Updated OIDC username examples.
* **Tests**
  * Updated fixture hostnames and expected URLs to use `example.org`.
* **Chores**
* Removed commented-out registry mirror entries; the active mirror
configuration is unchanged.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
2026-10-07 08:05:19 +03:00
Aleksei Sviridkin bc9a594e47 test(clickhouse): add backup API render assertions (#4011)
## What this PR does

This adds unit tests for how the ClickHouse chart wires up the backup
API that the default backup strategy calls. The Pod of the
`cozy-default-altinity` strategy reaches the clickhouse-backup sidecar
on the named port `ch-backup-api`. It authenticates with the credentials
from the `<release>-backup-api-auth` Secret.

The new suite is
`packages/apps/clickhouse/tests/backup_api_contract_test.yaml`. It
checks that:

- the sidecar exposes `ch-backup-api` on 7171/TCP;
- `API_USERNAME` and `API_PASSWORD` come from the `username` and
`password` keys of `<release>-backup-api-auth`;
- that Secret renders with `username: backup` and a non-empty password;
- no auth Secret renders when backups are disabled.

All of this is rendered by the chart, so the unit tests catch a
regression on every pull request. The e2e assertions on the same wiring
run only when test-impact analysis selects the ClickHouse suite. They
stay as they are in `hack/e2e-chainsaw/clickhouse`, because they check
the operator-created Pod and the admitted Secret, and rendering can't do
that.

### Screenshots

Not a UI change.

### Downstream repositories

- [x] No downstream repository is affected by this change
- [ ] [cozystack/website](https://github.com/cozystack/website) -
follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/terraform-provider-cozystack](https://github.com/cozystack/terraform-provider-cozystack)
- follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/ansible-cozystack](https://github.com/cozystack/ansible-cozystack)
- follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/ccp](https://github.com/cozystack/ccp) - follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/talm](https://github.com/cozystack/talm) - follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/cozyhr](https://github.com/cozystack/cozyhr) -
follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/cozy-proxy](https://github.com/cozystack/cozy-proxy) -
follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/cozystack-telemetry-server](https://github.com/cozystack/cozystack-telemetry-server)
- follow-up:
- [ ]
[cozystack/external-apps-example](https://github.com/cozystack/external-apps-example)
- follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/examples](https://github.com/cozystack/examples) -
follow-up:
- [ ] [cozystack/community](https://github.com/cozystack/community) -
follow-up:

### Release note

```release-note
NONE
```
2026-10-07 06:58:44 +03:00
Aleksei Sviridkin a1416655f4 fix(tenant): allow tenant egress to the KubeVirt export proxy
The vm-exportproxy Ingress is served by the ingress controller in
tenant-root, and tenant egress is default-deny. Nothing allowed traffic
to virt-exportproxy in cozy-kubevirt, so the Ingress stayed unreachable
even with the right backend Service. The new policy renders wherever
allow-to-cdi-upload-proxy does, but narrows the destination to the
export proxy pods and their container port.

Assisted-by: LLM
Signed-off-by: Aleksei Sviridkin <f@lex.la>
2026-10-07 06:23:28 +03:00
Aleksei Sviridkin c069a191fc fix(monitoring-agents): give kube-state-metrics a sized memory limit (#3846)
`kube-state-metrics` ran BestEffort with no resources at all: the
subchart ships `resources: {}` and our wrapper never set any. So it put
no `memory.max` on its pod cgroup, and the Talos userspace OOM handler
only ever selects cgroups that lack one, which left it permanently in
the victim set. Any tenant workload driving node memory pressure could
evict the source of every kube-state metric we alert on. Background is
in `docs/operations/system-memory-limits.md`.

## The numbers are measured

On a three node cluster with 322 pods and roughly 25.6k series, which is
the smallest we run: 14 day peak working set 307Mi, peak RSS 280Mi, mean
176Mi.

So the request sits above the mean at 192Mi rather than at the peak, and
the limit carries wide headroom at 2Gi. The headroom is deliberate: this
component's memory scales with the number of objects in the cluster, and
the `--metric-labels-allowlist=pods=[*],deployments=[*]` already in this
file widens every pod and deployment series further, so a cluster larger
than the one measured lands well above what was seen here. `2Gi` is 6.7x
that peak, which read as linear in object count is roughly 2100 pods and
170k series, so the limit stays a ceiling rather than a bound well past
the largest cluster this sizing was drawn from.

No CPU limit, following the node DaemonSet sizing in `c9ba7a3cc`, which
set one zero times across nineteen files. CPU is irrelevant to the OOM
ranking, and a ceiling that binds on a scraper turns into scrape
timeouts rather than backpressure.

## This supersedes #2632

#2632 proposes 256Mi, which is below the 307Mi peak measured on the
smallest cluster we have, so it would convert an eviction risk into a
reliable OOM kill. It also adds a `cpu: 200m` limit, which is the half
that buys nothing. The diagnosis there was right and it sat since May;
the numbers are what needed replacing.

## Checks


`packages/system/monitoring-agents/tests/kube_state_metrics_resources_test.yaml`
pins the limit, both requests, and the absence of a CPU limit. Mutation
checked: dropping the limit to 256Mi turns it red. The chart's suites
are 3 files and 6 tests, all green.

### Release note

```release-note
fix(monitoring-agents): kube-state-metrics now carries a memory request and limit sized from a measured peak, so it is no longer a permanent candidate for the node OOM handler
```


<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit

* **New Features**
* Configured kube-state-metrics with requests of 50m CPU and 192Mi
memory, plus a 2Gi memory limit. No CPU limit is configured, allowing
CPU usage to scale as needed. These settings help ensure the service has
the memory and CPU resources it needs while keeping memory use bounded.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
2026-10-07 06:19:17 +03:00
Myasnikov Daniil 9927c299d4 fix(operator): keep deleting packages out of memory policy creation
A foreground-deleting Package can survive long enough to reconcile
after cleanup retires its default. It must not reinstate that policy
or consume an acknowledgement while its components are being removed.
An active Package sharing the namespace can still manage the default.

Assisted-By: LLM
Signed-off-by: Myasnikov Daniil <myasnikovdaniil2001@gmail.com>
2026-10-07 06:06:52 +03:00