IvanHunters
8a6fe02ee4
## What this PR does Fixes #4288, and closes the class behind it and #4276. `packages/apps/bucket/templates/hooks/cleanup-acme.yaml` passed `--request-timeout=30s` on all four of its kubectl calls. A non-zero value there makes kubectl skip its in-cluster credentials: client-go consults them only while the assembled config still equals the default, and the flag lands in that config, so every call went to kubectl's built-in default cluster and was refused. This package failed more quietly than kafka. Each call is guarded by `|| echo "WARNING: ..."` and the script sets no `-e`, so the hook exited 0 and printed `ACME cleanup complete.`, and `hook-succeeded` then deleted the Job holding those warnings. The ACME solver objects it exists to reap were left behind, with the only record removed moments after it was written. Its own suite matched the rendered command including the flag, so the broken form was pinned in place. The gate is the point of the change rather than a bonus. Two packages carried this, neither was visible in a rendered manifest, and both passed their unit suites. Nothing stops the next hook from reaching for the same flag, because it reads as ordinary defensive practice. `hack/check-hook-request-timeout.bats` fails any non-vendored template whose kubectl call carries a non-zero `--request-timeout`. The coarse part is stated in the file rather than left to be discovered: a template that names `KUBECONFIG` is skipped, because an explicit kubeconfig is not served by the in-cluster branch and the flag is harmless there. That is a per-file judgement, not per-command. It is what lets `apps/kubernetes` keep the flag on two calls that pass their own kubeconfig and stay green, and it is the first thing to tighten if a file ever mixes both styles. Checked in both directions rather than only on the clean tree: the gate passes as committed, fails if the flag is put back on any bucket call, fails if it is put back on the kafka call, and leaves the two `apps/kubernetes` files alone. It also carries a vacuity guard, because a collapsed glob would otherwise report success for having examined nothing. Bounding the work is still available where it belongs: `--timeout` for a watch, `activeDeadlineSeconds` for the Job, which this hook already had at 120s. **Depends on #4280** and is branched off it, so the gate is green here. #4280 removes the same flag from the kafka hook; merged before it, this check would be red on `main`. ### Screenshots Not a UI change. ### Downstream repositories Walked the trigger map against the diff. A hook's kubectl flags and a new `hack/*.bats` check; no values key, schema, API, default or naming contract moves, and nothing under `hack/` is moved or renamed, nor does any make target change what it does. - [x] No downstream repository is affected by this change - [ ] [cozystack/website](https://github.com/cozystack/website) - follow-up: - [ ] [cozystack/terraform-provider-cozystack](https://github.com/cozystack/terraform-provider-cozystack) - follow-up: - [ ] [cozystack/ansible-cozystack](https://github.com/cozystack/ansible-cozystack) - follow-up: - [ ] [cozystack/ccp](https://github.com/cozystack/ccp) - follow-up: - [ ] [cozystack/talm](https://github.com/cozystack/talm) - follow-up: - [ ] [cozystack/cozyhr](https://github.com/cozystack/cozyhr) - follow-up: - [ ] [cozystack/cozy-proxy](https://github.com/cozystack/cozy-proxy) - follow-up: - [ ] [cozystack/cozystack-telemetry-server](https://github.com/cozystack/cozystack-telemetry-server) - follow-up: - [ ] [cozystack/external-apps-example](https://github.com/cozystack/external-apps-example) - follow-up: - [ ] [cozystack/examples](https://github.com/cozystack/examples) - follow-up: - [ ] [cozystack/community](https://github.com/cozystack/community) - follow-up: ### Release note ```release-note fix(bucket): the ACME cleanup hook now reaches the apiserver instead of reporting success while doing nothing ``` <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> ## Summary by CodeRabbit * **Bug Fixes** * Improved ACME cleanup reliability by preventing cleanup commands from targeting an unavailable local Kubernetes endpoint. * Improved Kafka uninstall cleanup reliability by ensuring the pre-delete hook retains access to required credentials throughout execution. * Preserved existing execution time limits and warning-based failure handling for cleanup operations. * **Tests** * Added coverage to prevent regressions in Kubernetes cleanup command configuration and hook resource lifecycle behavior. <!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
Cozystack
Cozystack is a free and open-source platform and framework for building clouds.
Cozystack is a CNCF Sandbox project that was originally built and sponsored by Ænix.
With Cozystack, you can transform a bunch of servers into an intelligent system with a simple REST API for spawning Kubernetes clusters, Database-as-a-Service, virtual machines, load balancers, HTTP caching services, and other services with ease.
Use Cozystack to build your own cloud or provide a cost-effective development environment.
Use-Cases
-
Using Cozystack to build a public cloud
You can use Cozystack as a backend for a public cloud -
Using Cozystack to build a private cloud
You can use Cozystack as a platform to build a private cloud powered by Infrastructure-as-Code approach -
Using Cozystack as a Kubernetes distribution
You can use Cozystack as a Kubernetes distribution for Bare Metal
Documentation
The documentation is located on the cozystack.io website.
Read the Getting Started section for a quick start.
If you encounter any difficulties, start with the troubleshooting guide and work your way through the process that we've outlined.
Versioning
Versioning adheres to the Semantic Versioning principles.
A full list of the available releases is available in the GitHub repository's Release section.
Contributions
Contributions are highly appreciated and very welcomed!
In case of bugs, please check if the issue has already been opened by checking the GitHub Issues section. If it isn't, you can open a new one. A detailed report will help us replicate it, assess it, and work on a fix.
You are welcome to take on the fix yourself. Commits are used to generate the changelog, and their author will be referenced in it.
If you have a concrete feature request, open an issue. For a cross-cutting or architectural change, open a design proposal in the community repo. For questions or early ideas, use GitHub Discussions. See CONTRIBUTING.md for the full routing.
Community
You are welcome to join us in #cozystack, on either CNCF Slack (get an invite) or Kubernetes Slack (get an invite), in our Telegram group, and at our community meetings. Add them to your Google Calendar or iCal for convenience.
Project documents
| Document | What it covers |
|---|---|
| Governance | How decisions are made and who makes them |
| Contributor Ladder | How to grow from contributor to maintainer |
| Maintainers | Who maintains the project |
| Code of Conduct | What we expect of each other |
| Security Policy | Reporting a vulnerability, and which releases get fixes |
| Adopters | Who runs Cozystack in production |
| Roadmap | Where the project is going |
License
Cozystack is licensed under Apache 2.0.
The code is provided as-is with no warranties.
Commercial Support
A list of companies providing commercial support for this project can be found on official site.