<!-- Thank you for making a contribution! Here are some tips for you: - Use Conventional Commits for the PR title: `type(scope): description` - Types: feat, fix, docs, style, refactor, perf, test, build, ci, chore - Scopes are not an exhaustive list — pick the most specific scope for the change and extend the list when a genuinely new area appears. Examples: - System components: dashboard, platform, operator, cilium, kube-ovn, linstor, fluxcd, cluster-api - Managed apps: postgres, mariadb, redis, kafka, clickhouse, virtual-machine, kubernetes - Development and maintenance: api, hack, tests, ci, docs, maintenance - Breaking changes: append `!` after type/scope (`feat(api)!: ...`) or add a `BREAKING CHANGE:` footer - If it's a work in progress, consider creating this PR as a draft. - Don't hesistate to ask for opinion and review in the community chats, even if it's still a draft. - Add the label `kind/backport` if it's a bugfix that needs to be backported to a previous version. --> ## What this PR does Fixes #4128. `messaging-topology-operator` 1.14.2 caches **every Secret in the cluster** — its `ClusterRole` grants `secrets: list, watch` cluster-wide with no namespace or label restriction — and the vendored manifest limits it to `500Mi`. On a cluster that has grown enough Secrets it OOMKills and never recovers, because the initial `LIST` alone no longer fits. While it is down, no topology CR reconciles for any tenant. Measured on the affected cluster: 8 211 Secrets across 291 namespaces, 293 MB of Secret payload (87 % of it Helm release history), against 21 topology CRs and 1 `RabbitmqCluster`. Working set sat flat at 331–335 Mi for 30+ hours, crossed 500Mi, then crashlooped 154 times. The operator was caching 8 211 Secrets in order to read 2. Upstream fixed exactly this, and it is not a bigger limit — their default is still `512Mi`: - `329aa9e4e` (2026-06-30, released in v1.20.0) gates the Secret informer on `rabbitmq.com/topology-operator: "true"`, to bound "memory usage on large clusters". - `0850c3ae8` (2026-07-22, released in v1.20.1) bypasses the cache for `Service` reads. v1.20.2 is the current patch release carrying both; v1.19.x and earlier carry neither. This PR refreshes the vendored manifest to v1.20.2 through the package's existing `make update` pipeline (fetch, drop the `Namespace` object, rewrite `rabbitmq-system` → `cozy-rabbitmq-operator`). **The bump alone would break every install**, which is why the app chart moves with it. The app chart's credentials Secret is referenced by `User.spec.importCredentialsSecret`, and from 1.20 the admission webhook rejects a user-provided Secret without the label: ``` secret %q must have label rabbitmq.com/topology-operator=true to be used by the Topology Operator ``` Verified against the 1.20.2 source, two things deliberately do **not** change: - The `RabbitmqCluster` `default-user` Secret needs no label — `rabbitmqclient/cluster_reference.go` reads it through `apiReader.Get`, uncached. - The `Status.Binding` contract is unchanged since 1.14.2, so the vendored `cluster-operator` 2.9.0 stays compatible and is left alone to keep this PR focused. The v1.20.2 manifest is self-contained: it ships its own `Issuer` and both `Certificate` objects (webhook + metrics), and adds probes, a `securityContext` that satisfies `restricted` PodSecurity, a defaulting `MutatingWebhookConfiguration` and secure metrics. Same 13 CRDs, none added or removed. ### Tests - `packages/apps/rabbitmq/tests/user_credentials_test.yaml` renders two users and asserts that each `User` imports its own `<release>-<user>-credentials` Secret and that every credentials Secret carries `rabbitmq.com/topology-operator: "true"`. Deleting the label line from the template fails it. - The rabbitmq e2e suite now creates its cluster with one user and asserts `User/rabbitmq-test-app` reaches `Ready`, so the webhook and the User reconcile run against the real 1.20.2 operator. Its `catch` gains a describe of that `User` and the topology operator's logs. ### Upgrade path Existing installs carry unlabeled credentials Secrets until each tenant's `rabbitmq-*` HelmRelease re-renders. No migration is added: in 1.20.2 the User controller watches Secrets and maps an import Secret back to its Users through the `.spec.importCredentialsSecret.name` field index (`secretToUserRequests`), so relabelling the Secret requeues the User immediately rather than on the next interval, and nothing is removed from the broker in between. The import path no longer writes `<user>-user-credentials`, and nothing in this repo reads the ones 1.14.2 left behind. ### Verification - `make generate` in both touched packages — no diff beyond the intentional changes - `helm unittest packages/apps/rabbitmq` — 103/103, and the new suite fails with the label removed ### Screenshots No UI changes. ### Downstream repositories <!-- Cozystack is upstream for repositories that are NOT kept in sync with it automatically, and nothing in CI compares the two sides, so a change here can break them silently. Which change forces what, and which file to touch, is the trigger map in docs/agents/contributing.md under "Downstream Repositories". Walk it before you tick anything. IF YOU ARE AN AI AGENT OR AN LLM, THIS IS PART OF THE TASK, NOT A FORM TO FILL IN: 1. Walk the trigger map against the actual diff of this PR, file by file. Do not decide from the PR title or from your memory of what you changed. 2. For every repository you tick, open the follow-up PR there and link it on the same line. A ticked box with no link claims work that does not exist, which is worse than an empty box. Search that repository for an open PR or issue covering it first, and link that instead of filing a duplicate. 3. When the follow-up is out of scope, or needs a decision that is not yours to make, open an issue in that repository instead, link that, and say so in the PR body. Do not push a speculative PR into another repository just to fill a line here. 4. Do not tick "No downstream repository is affected" to make the checklist go away. If you are unsure, leave every box empty and say so in the PR body, so a human decides. --> Walked the trigger map against the diff, file by file. `packages/apps/rabbitmq/templates/rabbitmq.yaml` adds one label to a rendered Secret: no package added or renamed, no `values.schema.json` field, no version enum, no `values.yaml` default, no `release.prefix`, and the Secret's *name* is unchanged, so the provider's literal-name lookups are unaffected. `packages/system/rabbitmq-operator/templates/messaging-topology-operator.yml` is a vendored upstream manifest for an already-present component: no package layout change, no `cozyrds` rename, no namespace rename, no installer or platform values key. `packages/apps/rabbitmq/tests/` and `hack/e2e-chainsaw/rabbitmq/` are test-only and appear nowhere in the map. - [x] No downstream repository is affected by this change - [ ] [cozystack/website](https://github.com/cozystack/website) - follow-up: - [ ] [cozystack/terraform-provider-cozystack](https://github.com/cozystack/terraform-provider-cozystack) - follow-up: - [ ] [cozystack/ansible-cozystack](https://github.com/cozystack/ansible-cozystack) - follow-up: - [ ] [cozystack/ccp](https://github.com/cozystack/ccp) - follow-up: - [ ] [cozystack/talm](https://github.com/cozystack/talm) - follow-up: - [ ] [cozystack/cozyhr](https://github.com/cozystack/cozyhr) - follow-up: - [ ] [cozystack/cozy-proxy](https://github.com/cozystack/cozy-proxy) - follow-up: - [ ] [cozystack/cozystack-telemetry-server](https://github.com/cozystack/cozystack-telemetry-server) - follow-up: - [ ] [cozystack/external-apps-example](https://github.com/cozystack/external-apps-example) - follow-up: - [ ] [cozystack/examples](https://github.com/cozystack/examples) - follow-up: - [ ] [cozystack/community](https://github.com/cozystack/community) - follow-up: ### Release note <!-- Write a release note: - Explain what has changed internally and for users. - Start with the same `type(scope):` prefix as in the PR title - Follow the guidelines at https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/guide/release-notes.md. --> ```release-note fix(rabbitmq): update messaging-topology-operator to 1.20.2, which bounds its Secret cache to Secrets labeled `rabbitmq.com/topology-operator=true` instead of caching every Secret in the cluster. Before this, the operator's memory grew with the cluster's total Secret count and OOMKilled against its 500Mi limit on large clusters, stopping reconciliation of all Queue, Exchange, Binding, User, Permission, Vhost and Policy resources for every tenant. The managed RabbitMQ chart now labels the credentials Secret it creates, so existing users need no action. If you manage topology resources by hand and point `connectionSecret`, `importCredentialsSecret`, `uriSecret` or `upstreamSecret` at your own Secret, add the label `rabbitmq.com/topology-operator: "true"` to it or the admission webhook will reject the resource. ``` <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> ## Summary by CodeRabbit * **New Features** * Added configuration options for resource cleanup, queue types, connection and channel limits, shovel queue arguments, and federation settings. * Added metrics support, health checks, leader-election configuration, and queue webhook capabilities. * Improved compatibility of generated credential Secrets with the RabbitMQ Topology Operator. * **Bug Fixes** * Improved validation and documentation for topology resources, including requiring an exchange for topic permissions. * Updated operator components and Kubernetes resource configuration. <!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
Cozystack
Cozystack is a free and open-source platform and framework for building clouds.
Cozystack is a CNCF Sandbox project that was originally built and sponsored by Ænix.
With Cozystack, you can transform a bunch of servers into an intelligent system with a simple REST API for spawning Kubernetes clusters, Database-as-a-Service, virtual machines, load balancers, HTTP caching services, and other services with ease.
Use Cozystack to build your own cloud or provide a cost-effective development environment.
Use-Cases
-
Using Cozystack to build a public cloud
You can use Cozystack as a backend for a public cloud -
Using Cozystack to build a private cloud
You can use Cozystack as a platform to build a private cloud powered by Infrastructure-as-Code approach -
Using Cozystack as a Kubernetes distribution
You can use Cozystack as a Kubernetes distribution for Bare Metal
Documentation
The documentation is located on the cozystack.io website.
Read the Getting Started section for a quick start.
If you encounter any difficulties, start with the troubleshooting guide and work your way through the process that we've outlined.
Versioning
Versioning adheres to the Semantic Versioning principles.
A full list of the available releases is available in the GitHub repository's Release section.
Contributions
Contributions are highly appreciated and very welcomed!
In case of bugs, please check if the issue has already been opened by checking the GitHub Issues section. If it isn't, you can open a new one. A detailed report will help us replicate it, assess it, and work on a fix.
You are welcome to take on the fix yourself. Commits are used to generate the changelog, and their author will be referenced in it.
If you have a concrete feature request, open an issue. For a cross-cutting or architectural change, open a design proposal in the community repo. For questions or early ideas, use GitHub Discussions. See CONTRIBUTING.md for the full routing.
Community
You are welcome to join us in #cozystack, on either CNCF Slack (get an invite) or Kubernetes Slack (get an invite), in our Telegram group, and at our community meetings. Add them to your Google Calendar or iCal for convenience.
Project documents
| Document | What it covers |
|---|---|
| Governance | How decisions are made and who makes them |
| Contributor Ladder | How to grow from contributor to maintainer |
| Maintainers | Who maintains the project |
| Code of Conduct | What we expect of each other |
| Security Policy | Reporting a vulnerability, and which releases get fixes |
| Adopters | Who runs Cozystack in production |
| Roadmap | Where the project is going |
License
Cozystack is licensed under Apache 2.0.
The code is provided as-is with no warranties.
Commercial Support
A list of companies providing commercial support for this project can be found on official site.
