Aleksei Sviridkin
e126158404
<!-- Thank you for making a contribution! Here are some tips for you: - Use Conventional Commits for the PR title: `type(scope): description` - Types: feat, fix, docs, style, refactor, perf, test, build, ci, chore - Scopes are not an exhaustive list — pick the most specific scope for the change and extend the list when a genuinely new area appears. Examples: - System components: dashboard, platform, operator, cilium, kube-ovn, linstor, fluxcd, cluster-api - Managed apps: postgres, mariadb, redis, kafka, clickhouse, virtual-machine, kubernetes - Development and maintenance: api, hack, tests, ci, docs, maintenance - Breaking changes: append `!` after type/scope (`feat(api)!: ...`) or add a `BREAKING CHANGE:` footer - If it's a work in progress, consider creating this PR as a draft. - Don't hesistate to ask for opinion and review in the community chats, even if it's still a draft. - Add the label `kind/backport` if it's a bugfix that needs to be backported to a previous version. --> ## What this PR does The `checks` job in `.github/workflows/pull-requests.yaml` runs `make unit-tests test-controllers -j4 --output-sync=target` as a single step. `unit-tests` and `test-controllers` are independent goals on that command line, and without `-k` GNU Make stops handing out new work the instant any earlier-processed goal's prerequisite fails — a goal that had not yet been scheduled never starts. So whenever a BATS file inside `unit-tests` fails before `test-controllers` gets a job slot, the entire Go controller suite (`go test ./internal/...`) silently never runs, and the PR page shows only the unit-test failure with no signal at all about the controllers. This adds `-k` so already-schedulable goals keep running after an earlier one fails; the job still exits non-zero and still fails whenever anything failed, `-k` only stops make from abandoning independent work. This addresses the second half of https://github.com/cozystack/cozystack/issues/3776. The first half of that report — whether the job's comment overclaims that it gates the merge, since `Unit & controller tests` is not currently in `main`'s required status checks — needs a maintainer's call between two mutually exclusive fixes (weaken the comment, or add the job to branch protection), and is deliberately left untouched here; the issue itself frames the two as independent and separately useful. Note: `hack/unit-test-parallelism.bats`, which pins the literal invocation string in a test, was updated to match. ### Screenshots N/A — CI workflow and test-script change only, no UI. ### Downstream repositories <!-- Cozystack is upstream for repositories that are NOT kept in sync with it automatically, and nothing in CI compares the two sides, so a change here can break them silently. Which change forces what, and which file to touch, is the trigger map in docs/agents/contributing.md under "Downstream Repositories". Walk it before you tick anything. IF YOU ARE AN AI AGENT OR AN LLM, THIS IS PART OF THE TASK, NOT A FORM TO FILL IN: 1. Walk the trigger map against the actual diff of this PR, file by file. Do not decide from the PR title or from your memory of what you changed. 2. For every repository you tick, open the follow-up PR there and link it on the same line. A ticked box with no link claims work that does not exist, which is worse than an empty box. Search that repository for an open PR or issue covering it first, and link that instead of filing a duplicate. 3. When the follow-up is out of scope, or needs a decision that is not yours to make, open an issue in that repository instead, link that, and say so in the PR body. Do not push a speculative PR into another repository just to fill a line here. 4. Do not tick "No downstream repository is affected" to make the checklist go away. If you are unsure, leave every box empty and say so in the PR body, so a human decides. --> - [x] No downstream repository is affected by this change - [ ] [cozystack/website](https://github.com/cozystack/website) - follow-up: - [ ] [cozystack/terraform-provider-cozystack](https://github.com/cozystack/terraform-provider-cozystack) - follow-up: - [ ] [cozystack/ansible-cozystack](https://github.com/cozystack/ansible-cozystack) - follow-up: - [ ] [cozystack/ccp](https://github.com/cozystack/ccp) - follow-up: - [ ] [cozystack/talm](https://github.com/cozystack/talm) - follow-up: - [ ] [cozystack/cozyhr](https://github.com/cozystack/cozyhr) - follow-up: - [ ] [cozystack/cozy-proxy](https://github.com/cozystack/cozy-proxy) - follow-up: - [ ] [cozystack/cozystack-telemetry-server](https://github.com/cozystack/cozystack-telemetry-server) - follow-up: - [ ] [cozystack/external-apps-example](https://github.com/cozystack/external-apps-example) - follow-up: - [ ] [cozystack/examples](https://github.com/cozystack/examples) - follow-up: - [ ] [cozystack/community](https://github.com/cozystack/community) - follow-up: I walked the trigger map: this PR only touches CI scheduling flags inside this repo's own `.github/workflows/pull-requests.yaml` and a `hack/*.bats` meta-test that asserts against that same file. Nothing in the trigger map names either file, and the change has no effect on any package, API, chart, or contract another repository consumes. ### Validation Reproduced the exact scheduling gap in an isolated Makefile mirroring this repo's real dependency shape (a `unit-tests`-like goal depending on several independent prerequisites, one of which fails immediately, plus a sibling goal with no dependency on it), under the same GNU Make 4.4.1 `-j4 --output-sync=target` invocation used here. Without `-k` the sibling goal never ran, across 5 repeated trials; with `-k` added it ran to completion every time across 3 repeated trials, and the overall exit code stayed non-zero either way. `bats hack/unit-test-parallelism.bats` passes locally against the real files. I also ran `make unit-tests test-controllers -j4 -k --output-sync=target` against this repo directly: local disk space (a limit of my sandbox, unrelated to this change) made `go test ./internal/...` fail to compile with "no space left on device", so I could not confirm a clean end-to-end pass of `test-controllers` itself in this environment — but the run still exercised the fix: after that build failure, unrelated `hack/*.bats` prerequisites kept being scheduled and ran to completion instead of the whole invocation aborting, which is exactly the behavior `-k` adds over the prior command line. I could not run this repo's actual CI runners to confirm disk is not similarly constrained there; nothing in the workflow or runner spec suggests it would be. ### Release note <!-- Write a release note: - Explain what has changed internally and for users. - Start with the same `type(scope):` prefix as in the PR title - Follow the guidelines at https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/guide/release-notes.md. --> ```release-note fix(ci): the `Unit & controller tests` PR check no longer silently skips the Go controller test suite when a Helm-unittest or BATS unit test fails first; both suites now always run and report. ``` --- Part of #3776 <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> ## Summary by CodeRabbit * **Tests** * Updated automated test execution so unit and controller test suites continue running when one test target fails, while the job still reports failures. * Updated workflow validation to reflect the revised test command. <!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
Cozystack
Cozystack is a free and open-source platform and framework for building clouds.
Cozystack is a CNCF Sandbox project that was originally built and sponsored by Ænix.
With Cozystack, you can transform a bunch of servers into an intelligent system with a simple REST API for spawning Kubernetes clusters, Database-as-a-Service, virtual machines, load balancers, HTTP caching services, and other services with ease.
Use Cozystack to build your own cloud or provide a cost-effective development environment.
Use-Cases
-
Using Cozystack to build a public cloud
You can use Cozystack as a backend for a public cloud -
Using Cozystack to build a private cloud
You can use Cozystack as a platform to build a private cloud powered by Infrastructure-as-Code approach -
Using Cozystack as a Kubernetes distribution
You can use Cozystack as a Kubernetes distribution for Bare Metal
Documentation
The documentation is located on the cozystack.io website.
Read the Getting Started section for a quick start.
If you encounter any difficulties, start with the troubleshooting guide and work your way through the process that we've outlined.
Versioning
Versioning adheres to the Semantic Versioning principles.
A full list of the available releases is available in the GitHub repository's Release section.
Contributions
Contributions are highly appreciated and very welcomed!
In case of bugs, please check if the issue has already been opened by checking the GitHub Issues section. If it isn't, you can open a new one. A detailed report will help us replicate it, assess it, and work on a fix.
You are welcome to take on the fix yourself. Commits are used to generate the changelog, and their author will be referenced in it.
If you have a concrete feature request, open an issue. For a cross-cutting or architectural change, open a design proposal in the community repo. For questions or early ideas, use GitHub Discussions. See CONTRIBUTING.md for the full routing.
Community
You are welcome to join us in #cozystack, on either CNCF Slack (get an invite) or Kubernetes Slack (get an invite), in our Telegram group, and at our community meetings. Add them to your Google Calendar or iCal for convenience.
Project documents
| Document | What it covers |
|---|---|
| Governance | How decisions are made and who makes them |
| Contributor Ladder | How to grow from contributor to maintainer |
| Maintainers | Who maintains the project |
| Code of Conduct | What we expect of each other |
| Security Policy | Reporting a vulnerability, and which releases get fixes |
| Adopters | Who runs Cozystack in production |
| Roadmap | Where the project is going |
License
Cozystack is licensed under Apache 2.0.
The code is provided as-is with no warranties.
Commercial Support
A list of companies providing commercial support for this project can be found on official site.